Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of brain in loving
Conscious and unconscious mind essay
Conscious and unconscious mind essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the Introduction to “The Social Animal”, David Brooks offers a synthesis of new research which challenges our understanding of, as he says “how the conscious and unconscious minds interact.” Specifically, Brooks argues that the processes. As the author, he puts it, “Rob actually shiver[s] as he escort[s] Julia back unconscious and conscious mind interact through how the control is divided up. The unconscious mind controls body movement while the conscious mind controls thinking to her car. His heart [is] palpitating and his breathing [is] fast. […] Vague sensations [sweep] over him, which he [doesn’t] understand […] because their sensations had not cohered into any conscious message” (Brooks 15-17). We can see from this example that Rob …show more content…
is not consciously aware of how his body is reacting; his unconscious mind is controlling his reactions. The phrases “he doesn't understand” and the “sensations had not cohered,” help emphasize Brooks’ point of Rob not being aware of his body and the reactions it is having towards Julia. Specifically notice the connotation around the words “understand” and “cohered;” the way Brooks uses these words brings a connotation of confusion creating a sense that Rob is slightly confused about the sensations occurring and has absolutely no conscious control over his body’s reactions. Rob isn’t consciously thinking about how to make his body respond, his body is responding without the effort of the conscious mind. Rob maybe is consciously thinking that Julia is really pretty, but he is not consciously thinking that he is really attracted to her.
As the conscious and unconscious mind interact and control specific reactions that Rob is experiencing, This doesn’t mean the Rob is completely unaware that he is walking to the car or talking to Julia or that he is shivering. He is fully aware of those aspects but only has limited control over them consciously. He can’t stop shivering by thinking to himself “stop shivering” because this is being controlled by the unconscious mind. Although some people believe the feeling of affection is completely controlled by the conscious mind, Brooks argues that while some actions such as walking and talking are being controlled by the conscious mind, but at the same time some other actions, associated with being attracted to someone such as shivering, are being controlled by the unconscious mind. In sum, then, his view is that the conscious and unconscious mind interact by controlling different reactions. The unconscious mind is controlling the physical body reactions to being attracted while the conscious mind is controlling the thoughts going through one’s mind about the person one is attracted …show more content…
to. I agree with Brooks’ argument, however without going through my own dating relationship first, I would have been really surprised.
In my own view, the conscious mind controls thought processes while the unconscious mind controls the body functions of breathing, heart pumping, and digesting food, so to extend this thought to romantic situations would also be fitting and be a logic assumption. For instance, before I started dating, I looked at my parents, and I was confused at how they could always think and act according to the desires of one another. I was confused how my mom could be grading papers but acknowledge whenever my dad would walk into the room. I thought she must be making mistakes in her grading or going really slowly, but in fact she was not. Before my own dating experience, if I had read this book, I would have been really surprised at learning how my mom was able to do all of that. Learning about how her mind would be able to interact to make my mom look she was really good at multi-tasking. I now realize that her conscious mind was focused on the grading of papers, but her unconscious mind was focused on something completely different, my dad. Just like my mom, after I started dating, I realized that I too was able to “multi-task.” I was able to be focused on my homework and still be able to waive or wink when I saw him approaching me in the library. In addition, I never thought about if I wanted to hold hands with my boyfriend, it just happened. As we would
walk down the hallway of my high school, it would be an automatic response to him standing next to me. I unknowingly would shift my textbooks to be in the other arm, and my hand would drop down to touch his and then hold it as we walked together. As you can see, this is all controlled by my unconscious mind. I was unaware of what I was doing and why. While I was dating, more and more things occurred similar to this. It didn’t seem strange or awkward as I would adjust to sit closer to him or hold his hand. However, before my dating experience, I thought that dating would be difficult because I would constantly be thinking about how to act and react. Just toying with the idea about how I would have to hold my books and hold someone’s hand seemed weird and uncomfortable. When I started dating, it was very surprising and a great relief to realize that there was some actions that I didn’t have to consciously think about all the time. I am glad that the unconscious mind controlled more than just my heart rate, and breathing patterns. I’m glad it included reactions my body had to being attracted to this man I was dating. Some might object, of course, on the grounds that in order to maintain relationships a lot of conscious effort needs to be put forth from both people involved. Yet I would argue that while some conscious effort does have to be put forth to maintain a relationship, the unconscious mind does a lot to impress, react, or get reactions that one is not even aware of. Overall, then, I believe that I am in agreement with Brooks’ viewpoint of how the unconscious and conscious mind interacts. I believe that my conscious mind is controlling the thoughts of my mind while my unconscious mind is controlling the reactions of my body.
Sian Beilock is the author of this novel, the information written by her would be considered credible due to the fact that she is a leading expert on brain science in the psychology department at the University of Chicago. This book was also published in the year 2015 which assures readers that the information it contains is up to date and accurate. The novel is easy to understand and the author uses examples of scientific discoveries to help make the arguments more relatable. Beilock goes into depth about how love, is something more than just an emotion, it derives from the body’s anticipation. “Volunteers reported feeling
Chapter 4 discusses the several states of consciousness: the nature of consciousness, sleep and dreams, psychoactive drugs, hypnosis, and meditation. Consciousness is a crucial part of human experience, it represents that private inner mind where we think, feel, plan, wish, pray, omagine, and quietly relive experiences. William James described the mind as a stream of consciousness, a continuous flow of changing sensations, images thoughts, and feelings. Consciousness has two major parts: awareness and arousal. Awareness includes the awareness of the self and thoughts about one's experiences. Arousal is the physiological state of being engaged with the environment. Theory of mind refers to individuals understanding that they and others think,
Eagleman talks about unconscious learning, and explores how much of what we do daily is learned and directed by the unconscious mind. The first example is changing lanes: when we’re driving, we do it without thinking. However, when asked to describe how they change lanes, many people are flummoxed. Changing lanes is so automatic that when the conscious mind tries to take control, it confuses our brains and our gears become out of sync. The second example is chicken sexers: people who can sort chick hatching even though male and female chicks look exactly alike. The third example is plane spotters: people who could distinguish between enemy and ally planes thousands of feet in the air. In both cases, the people just knew! They couldn’t explain how they knew. Rather, after trial and error, their unconscious picked up on the slight cues that allowed to them tell the difference. The conscious mind, on the other hand, was unaware of this
The scientific definition of love is "having stimulation that one desires" (5). Recent research by two British neurologists concludes that love is linked to certain brain activities. By conducting tests using a magnetic resonance imager, the scientists measured brain activity in 17 people while they were viewing a picture of their loved one, and while they were viewing a photo of a friend of the same sex as their lover. When the individuals see the picture of the person they love, clear activity occurs in four regions of the brain that were not active when the image of the friend was present. The media insula, which is responsible for instinctual feelings, and the anterior cingulate, which acts in response to euphoria-inducing drugs, such as cocaine, are the two areas of the cortex stimulated by pictures of a lover. The striatum, that is activated when we are rewarded and the prefrontal cortex also increase their activity when shown the same picture.
Are minds physical things, or are they nonmaterial? If your beliefs and desires are caused by physical events outside of yourself, how can it be true that you act the way you do of your own free will? Are people genuinely moved by the welfare of others, or is all behavior, in reality, selfish? (Sober 203). These are questions relevant to philosophy of the mind and discussed through a variety of arguments. Two of the most important arguments with this discussion are Cartesian dualism and logical behaviorism, both of which argue the philosophy of the mind in two completely different ways. Robert Lane, a professor at the University of West Georgia, define the two as follows: Cartesian dualism is the theory that the mind and body are two totally different things, capable of existing separately, and logical behaviorism is the theory that our talk about beliefs, desires, and pains is not talk about ghostly or physical inner episodes, but instead about actual and potential patterns of behavior. Understanding of the two arguments is essential to interpret the decision making process; although dualism and behaviorism are prominent arguments for the philosophy of the mind, both have their strengths and weaknesses.
The mind-body problem has astounded philosophers since the beginning of time, but many researchers actively searching for solutions to the problem are nearing their final conclusion. Many have based their theories on the mind being a nonphysical thing that simply interacts with the body, known as interactionism, and many others have used physicalism as their brand of choice, where theories claim the mind and body are both physical entities and interact with one another. Even though both theories have received high remarks from top-notch philosophers and scientists, physicalism is my preference due to modern technological advances which exhibit neurological processes occurring in the brain, the physical interaction that must occur between humans’
The unconscious mind can be explained in various ways and can take on various attributes. Carl Jung the author of “The Archetype and the Collective Unconscious,” defines unconsciousness as the first reactions and interactions a person endeavors. Several Physicists believe that the unconscious mind acts separately from our voluntary thinking. Scientist believes that understanding the unconscious mind is key to determining what type of archetype a person may have or develop. Experiments such as, reaction to stimuli, have lead cognitive psychiatrist to determine the strength of the unaware and involuntary mind. In addition, many social physicists have also believed that the unconscious mind is unaware of it actions and that the unconscious part of our brain can sometimes be focused on several signs that our conscious self can’t see.
An attempt to understand and grasp what the mind truly is has paved the way for new fields in research. First of all, the mind is elucidated as “the element of a person that enables them to be aware of the world and their experiences, to think, and to feel; the faculty of consciousness and thought.” Based on that information it can be assumed that the mind is like our window to the physical world, but it is crucial to note that certain aspects of our personality define it. Additionally, our perceptual experiences are deemed to be influenced by a stimulus that arrives at our sensory organs and have the power to cause changes in our mental states. But, how is it “possible for conscious experiences to arise out of a lump of gray matter endowed with nothing but electrochemical properties (wiki)?” This is precisely where psychologists come into play since they focus on understanding people, the mind, and human behavior. Psychologists perform countless experiments and research studies in order to elucidate on how we act, feel, and think, and additionally treat mental illness...
Renner, T., Feldman, R., Majors, M., Morrissey, J., & Mae, L. (2011). States of Consciousness. Psychsmart (pp. 99-107). New York: McGraw-Hill.
In the text, The Eureka Phenomenon, by Isaac Asimov disuses the uses for unconscious thinking and how they have helped and shaped many revolutionary ideas throughout history. To get the reader to understand his thought process Aismov gives many examples such as an example of himself. He was a writer and when he would "write himself in a hole" he would participate in things that would take his mind off the task at hand. . . such as watching a movie. As he watched a movie that didn't take much thought the answer would reveal itself every time. Asimov explains it as how humans breathe and that when you are holding your breath the body is in full awareness and organs start to tense up, but when you let out all of the air the body goes back to breathing
How romantic this all seems, the young girl falling into the arms of the fast becoming man. Two people stumbling along unbeknownst of their fate, finding their soul mates in a blissful utopia. This is true love. However, the actual truth behind the romance of love is not romantic at all. The biochemical reactions don't know his charming personality, his blue eyes, her shining smile, her sweet laugh. The whole of the person means nothing to the biochemistry, which knows one thing and one thing only, and that is that it must reproduce. It must pass on its traits to perpetuate its species. But how can it convince the heart to reproduce? The brain's combination and release of just the right chemicals cause that feeling that people so romantically call love.
“Consciousness is defined as everything of which we are aware at any given time - our thoughts, feelings, sensations, and perceptions of the external environment. Physiological researchers have returned to the study of consciousness, in examining physiological rhythms, sleep, and altered states of consciousness (changes in awareness produced by sleep, meditation, hypnosis, and drugs)” (Wood, 2011, 169). There are five levels of consciousness; Conscious (sensing, perceiving, and choosing), Preconscious (memories that we can access), Unconscious ( memories that we can not access), Non-conscious ( bodily functions without sensation), and Subconscious ( “inner child,” self image formed in early childhood).
In terms of the unconscious and conscious, Freud situates these conceptions in a topographic model of the mind. He divided it into two systems called the unconscious and the preconscious. Their knowledge in the unconscious system is repressed and unavailable to consciousness without overcoming resistances (e.g., defense mechanisms). Thereby, the repression does not allow unconscious knowledge to be completely aware; rather, it is construed by means of concealing and compromise, but only interpretable through its derivatives dream and parapraxes that overcome resistance by means of disguise and compromise. Within the preconscious system, the contents could be accessible, although only a small portion at any given moment. Unconscious thought is characterized by primary process thinking that lacks negation or logical connections and favors the over-inclusions and 'just-as' relationships evident in condensed dream images and displacements. Freud asserted that primary process of thinking was phylogenetically, and continues to be ontogenetically, prior to secondary process or logical thought, acquired later in childhood and familiar to us in our waking life (1900, 1915a).
...f your thinking" (Temes 11). The unconscious mind, which controls all of the automatic processes in your body involuntarily, allows any idea to stick in your brain. With the conscious mind absent, the brain does not judge any new incoming ideas, so the mind will agree and believe them with no doubt. In this comfortable, subconscious-free state, "your guard is down; Ideas you might ordinarily object to are easily transmitted into your mind. You will not reject new information that you might ordinarily be wary of" (Temes 12). As a result, one can easily overcome phobias the mind usually rejected or feared, and also take into consideration new characteristics or habits. With your brain mentally managing almost every aspect of your actions and character, this control of the mind allows for an effective alternative or medical technique to help aid in several situations.
The unconscious is the largest part of the mind. All the things that are not easily available t...