Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Two waves of globalization
Industrial revolution and european imperialism
How did the industrial revolution change globalization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Two waves of globalization
The main idea of this article is that there were two major waves of globalization, both of which were “superficially similar, but fundamentally different.” The first wave occurred during 1870-1914 and the second from 1960 to present. The superficial similarities between the two include the aggregate trade-to-GDP ratio and capital flow-to-GDP ratios in addition to the importance of reductions in technical and policy barriers to international trade. The fundamental differences, on the other hand, are the impact reductions had on trade and the economic beliefs and initial conditions of the two periods.
The first wave of globalization was driven by the Industrial Revolution. It transformed the British economy by improving transportation, creating new industries and production methods, and communication became faster and more reliable. Before this first wave, the world was homogenous, equally poor. However, a wide income divergence eventually formed and groups that were initially not too far apart became distanced. Although capital mobility during this period was high, the high cost of transferring knowledge favored long-term capital investments. This period experienced both trade liberalization and modern protectionism. Beginning in 1815, British liberalism rose and the country embraced free trade, liberalizing wheat imports. These free trade policies eventually spread rapidly to other economies throughout 1846-1860 through a system of bilateral treaties; by 1860, multilateral free trade was established in Europe. However, protectionist measures returned in 1879, designed to promote development rather than achieve a trade surplus. Economies followed the gold standard, for it was adjustable and a unilaterally chosen exchange rate, wit...
... middle of paper ...
...th a few minor exceptions. Even so, differences between the two periods still exist and cannot go unmentioned. Trade in ideas were more important in the second wave, with a greater focus on short-term exchanges, manufacturing, services, and outsourcing. The initial conditions of both periods were very different and the international economic system as we know it today is entirely different from what it was before. For example, there are far greater demands placed on policymakers and nations are now more interdependent than ever before. Whereas during the first wave policymakers believed that national success depended on protectionist measures such as international competition and blocking access to certain markets, globalization today dismisses such notions. Thus, it is evident that present globalization builds upon the past, but is also forging its own unique path.
Criteria: What acts have actually been made to respond to the legacies of historical globalization? How have these effects been made in trying to respond to historical globalization? What has changed since then? What has not changed?
As we have seen, the Industrial Revolution, was the beginning of modern globalization. Because of it, roads, machinery, railroads made the world smaller. Entire countries, sold their goods in a scale never seen before. Credit, via the banks, made possible international transactions and at the same time, the world became more interdependent.
The first section, called Globalization of the Economy, summarizes the United States economy from 1950s to 2000. It provides a short list of advantages and disadvantages that globalization had on the American consumers, workers,
In 1650 the British government adopted a unique policy into the international trade, a policy of mercantilism which states that a nation must export more than it imports in order to build economic strength. Specifically benefiting the British economy, England passed regulatory laws that created a trade system. This trade system illustrated that Americans provided raw goods to Britain and Britain used the raw goods to produce manufactured goods that were to be sold in European markets and then back to the colonies. The colonies were only suppliers of raw goods, so they could not compete much with Britain in manufacturing, also making it harder to trade with foreign countries. Contributing to the British Empire’s wealth was the certainty that
Mitchener, Kris, J. "Politics and trade: evidence from the age of imperialism." Voxeu.org. CEPR, 11 April 2008. Web. 30 November 2013.
of imports and exports between Great Britain and her colonies exposes the declining importance of their economic dependence they have on one another. Using four-yearly averages, Hobson shows the sharp, and very consistent, decline Great Britain suffered in exports to, and imports from her colonies between the years 1856 and 1899. Between 1856 and 1859 Great Britain was importing 46.5% of the goods received into her colonies and was in turn enjoying 57.1% of the exports out of the colonies. By the years 1896-1899 however, those numbers had dropped to 32.5% and 34.9% respectfully. Hobson’s economic argument alone discredited imperialism on the basis that it was not a successful practice for nations supporting it for economic gains. Although he had
Terborgh, Andrew. "The Post-War Rise of World Trade: Does the Bretton Woods System Deserve Credit?” Department of Economic History, London School of Economics. Sept. 2003: p. 1-73.Web. 13 Apr. 2014. .
In their article, The Imperialism of Free Trade, John Gallagher and Ronald Robinson address the relationship between free trade and European imperialism in the 19th and 20th centuries. Gallagher and Robinson refute the traditional idea of the relationship between imperialism and free trade as being one of two elements in conflict, and instead pose the alternative theory that free trade was simply a tool of European imperialism. This proposition about the nature of the relationship between free trade and imperialism is hugely important in that it addresses types of European imperialism that are frequently overlooked and uncovers the vast amount of influence that European powers exerted even without the presence of traditional formal
The globalization can be classified into three types of waves such as first wave, second wave and third wave. This globalization has a different period of time because it have different of factor that drive the changes to continues become better of globalization. First globalization happens in year 1870 until 1914. Globalization at this stage happens when decreases in tariff barriers and invented in new technologies to decrease transportation cost such as the shift from sail to steamships and railways. The first wave is ended by World War I and the increase in protectionism. Thereafter, the second wave happens in year 1945 until 1980. This type happens because decreases in transportation cost and specialization of manufacturing products in developed countries. This specialization of manufacturing products...
The development of free-market economics has, since the 18th century, resulted in the spread of a set of ideas, creeds and practices all over the developed and much of the developing world. Today, the globalisation of trade, capital, technology and innovation has accelerated competitive conditions for businesses all over the world. Globalisation may be defined as the opening of markets to the forces of neoliberalism and capitalism; it is characterised by the free movement of people, talent, skills, capital (intellectual, social and economic) across international borders. All kinds of barriers have either been swept away, diffused or made obsolete by the forces of globalisation: trade barriers, subsidies, geographical boundaries, linguistic and cultural differences. Technological advancements have pulled the world closer and, in the process, affected how labour relations and worker/employer relations operate and develop. The multinational corporation as well as the public sector alike are affected by global competition.
During the twentieth century, the world began to develop the idea of economic trade. Beginning in the 1960’s, the four Asian Tigers, Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan, demonstrated that a global economy, which was fueled by an import and export system with other countries, allowed the economy of the home country itself to flourish. Th...
An outstanding mechanism frequently used to interpret ‘Globalization’ is the ‘World Economy’. Back to the colonial age, the coinstantaneous behaviors of worldwide capitals and energy resources flowed from colonies to western countries has been regarded as the rudiment of the economic geography (Jürgen and Niles, 2005). Nowadays, the global economy was dominated by transnational corporations and banking institutions mostly located in developed countries. However, it is apparently that countries with higher level of comprehensive national strength are eager for a bigger market to dump surplus domestic produce and allocate energy resources in a global scale, thus leads to a world economic integration. This module was supported by several historical globalists (Paul Hirst, Grahame Thompson and Deepak Nayyer) ‘their position is that globalization is nothing new but more fashionable and exaggerate, a tremendous amount of internationalization of money and trade in earlier periods is hardly less than today.’ (Frans J Schuurman 2001:64).
Globalisation goes back as far as the era before the First World War. During that time globalisation’s general tendencies produced a very uneven pattern of global economic development, exposing the limits of global economic integration. For example, the integration of the African economy into the capitalist economy is part of the globalising tendencies of capitalism.
Globalization is a new concept that was introduced to the world after the fall of the communist regime. Globalization has to its identity social, economic, and political reforms, .however the globalization that we are about to discuss is the term that combines the past socio-economic and political reforms and cross with them to the world where their are no boundaries, restrictions, and immobilization what Mittelman describes as ? cross-border flows of capital, knowledge, and consumer goods ? (Mittelman 1). For the world to become a one or a single entity it has to pass through a process of economic, and technological integration. The consequence of this unification is the aim of this research, positive and negative, although the negative aspects will be the dominating part.
Globalization is the new notion that has come to rule the world since the nineties of the last century with the end of the cold war. The frontlines of the state with increased reliance on the market economy and renewed belief in the private capital and assets, a process of structural alteration encouraged by the studies and influences of the World Bank and other International organisations have started in many of countries. Also Globalisation has brought in new avenues to developing countries. Greater access to developed country markets and technology transfer hold out promise improved productivity and higher living standard.