Turn of the Screw No one can be trusted. In Henry James's The Turn of the Screw, the ambivalent nature of the novella causes suspicion of the sanity of his narrator, the Governess. The characters of the Governess, the children, and the apparitions, as villains and victims, cannot be told apart. Henry James impeccably makes use of ambiguity to create mystery and suspense through the dubiety roles of his main characters and the liability of the narrator. The obscurity of the character of the Governess as a reliable narrator and sane person creates confusion and riddle in the story. Her first nights at Bly, the Governess listens "for the possible recurrence of a sound or two, less natural and not without but within, that I fancied I heard" …show more content…
(James 153). The Governess relates this occurrence, unspecific as to whether she hears these disturbances within the house or within her own mind. This calls into question the sanity of the Governess and her ability to govern the children and points out her initial paranoia. During the second appearance of the apparition, Quint, the Governess refers to "[her] vision" (James 169). This vision can be interpreted as both a physical sight and as a hallucination. The reader questions whether the occurrences of Quint and Miss Jessel are their stalking the children or merely figures of the Governess's imagination. In the same way "the spell" cast over the Governess, around the children, can be construed as her own insanity or of the cunning charm of Flora and Miles. Ambiguity forms the unreliable character of the Governess, producing an aura of doubt and mystery. Use of ambivalence by Henry James promotes dubiety of the Governess's role as villain or victim. The Governess considers herself to be a victim, but several ambivalent statements throughout this novella suggests that she, herself, may be the enemy. Despairing, the governess declares that she "[does not] save or shield [the children]" (James 186). She may be indicating that the two apparitions have made the children's rescue hopeless. At the same time, it is also reasonable to believe that the Governess is acknowledging herself as the villain, not "sav[ing] or shield[ing] them" but causing them harm (James 186). Flora, during her illness in the latter of the plot, cries to be taken "away from her" (James 240). It cannot be certain whether she is accusing the Governess or Miss Jessel of the source of her misery. The final scene of the The Turn of the Screw is of a frantic Miles in the dining room with Quint and the Governess. Miles screeches "Peter Quint-- you devil!" (James 261). Whether he is identifying Quint or the Governess as the fiend, the reader will never know. The Governess's responsibility for the incident of this novella is a feasible but uncertain explanation. The Governess states that Miles "was too clever for a bad governess [...] to spoil" (James 193). What she does not state is the identity of the root of this injury is herself or the former governess, and phantom, Miss Jessel. These debatable factors, put into question the Governess's role as a victim or villain. The equivocal language of Henry James builds the mystery and puzzle of the true prey and predator of his novella.
The phantoms, Miss Jessel and Quint, appear to be enemies of the children and the Governess but never display iniquity toward the living, compromising their positions, in the story, as foes. Mrs. Grose recollects the relationship between Miles and Quint, prior to the death of the latter, revealing how Quint "spoil[ed] him" (James 177). With this, Henry James leaves his readers ambivalent about whether the connotation of "spoil", in this instance, is positive or negative. While the dictionary defines "spoiled" as being ruined or damage, the author may use the term in the same way a warmhearted grandparent pampers a grandchild. The evil nature of Quint and Miss Jessel remains debatable. "They harassed [the Governess]", constantly (James 213). Aside from their affect on the Governess's mental state of mind, Miss Jessel and Quint do no harm to anyone. Even this offense is tenable. As the Governess does not mention who "they" are, it is equally likely that she is referencing Flora and Miles as she is the wraiths of Jessel and Quint. With ambiguity, the two children can be viewed as either prey of the evil or as the wickedness themselves. Mrs. Grose, in consultation with the Governess, discloses "that he was definitely and admittedly bad" (James 177). What "he" she is referring to, Quint or Miles, is a mystery. The obscurity of this statement shows the immoral
character in this novella as either the children or the apparitions. When the ghosts of Miss Jessel appears in the presence of Flora and the Governess, the Governess describes her as having "such awful eyes" (James 184). The Governess, once again, does not make herself clear as to whom she is describing-- Flora or Miss Jessel. In the time of Flora's illness, Mrs. Grose converses with the Governess and admits that "she's so horrible" (James 246). Mrs.Grose can be interpreted as making this claim either against the apparition of Miss Jessel or against Flora. The obscurity of the phrasing in The Turn of the Screw blurs the boundary between the wicked and innocent characters. The innocent may appear to be the villain, while the wicked is disguised as a victim. The roles of the Governess, the children, and the apparitions, as prey and predator, become confused and puzzled, throughout the novella. Henry James impeccably makes use of ambiguity to create mystery and suspense through the dubiety roles of his main characters and the liability of the narrator. Trust no one.
The Turn of the Screw by Henry James continues to stir up an immense amount of controversy for such a short novel. Making a definite, educated decision on the actual truth considering the countless inquiries that develop while reading this story proves more difficult than winning a presidential election. That being understood, taking one particular side on any argument from a close reading of the story seems impossible, because the counter argument appears just as conceivable. Any side of the controversy remains equally disputable considerably supported by textual evidence from the novel. One issue which, like the rest, can be answered in more than one ways is why Mrs. Grose believes the Governess when she tells her about her ghost encounters. Usually one would second-guess such outlandish stories as the ones that the governess shares throughout the story, yet Mrs. Grose is very quick to believe our borderline-insane narrator. One of the explanations for such behavior could be the underlying fact that Mrs. Grose and the governess have a similar socio-economic background, therefore making them somewhat equals even if the governess does not always seem to think that way. This fact makes them susceptible to trusting and believing each other, and to believing that the ghosts are there, for the people that the ghosts are presenting used to be servants and therefore from a similar socio-economic background. To add on to that, Bruce Robbins proposes in his Marxist criticism of The Turn of the Screw that the idea of a ghost is synonymous to that of a servant, subconsciously making the two lower-class workers of Bly more vulnerable to believe that the ghosts were real; in other words, servants we...
The existence of the ghosts in The Turn of the Screw has always been in debate. Instead of directly discussing whether the ghosts are real or not, this essay will focus on the reliability of the governess, the narrator of the story. After making a close examination of her state of mind while she is at Bly, readers of The Turn of the Screw will have many more clues to ponder again and to decide to what extent the governess can be believed. While critics like Heilman argue that there are problems with the interpretation that the governess was psychopathic, textual evidence incorporated with scientific research show that the governess did go through a period of psychical disorder that caused her insomnia, out of which she created hallucinations.
As humans, we can’t help but to jump to conclusions, but the governess’s assumptions are too misguided and are taken too far without substantial proof. When she first arrives at Bly, she automatically infers that Ms. Grose, although not showing any hint of it, is relieved that the governess is there and simply “wish[es] not to show it” (7). This could be the case, or, as it would seem to any sane person, Ms. Grose could just be unmoved by the governess’s arrival. Her second assumption with Ms. Grose is when they agree on one thing and the governess assumes that “on every question [they should] be quite at one” (9). Some people can hope that a person may have similar ideas to them, but they wouldn’t expect to agree on everything all the time. People understand that we all have different views, but obviously the governess does not. Then, the governess goes on to guess that Miles got kicked out of school because “he’s an injury to others” (11). She has no specific proof that shows he was kicked out for any reason but she is quick to make the inference. She hasn’t talked to the school, the uncle, or even Miles himself to find out what happened, but instead goes along with her own imagination. She also makes many assumptions about the ghost when she hasn’t even been talking to them. She deduces the ghost of Peter Quint “was looking for Miles” but she only had a feeling to base that off of
In the governess's last attempt to consume the children for herself, she sends Ms. Grose away with the sickly Flora and keeps Miles with her at Bly. After her last vision of Quint and with Miles dilapidated in her ineludable arms, the governess frightens Miles so that he collapses and dies, by the governess's conniving will, and to her own bane. Although the governess seemed to have good intentions, her root of mind was self-serving and deceptive.
Toward the end of the novel, the governess sees Ms. Jessel and tries to point her out to Flora and Mrs. Grose. However, Mrs. Grose questions the governess by wondering “[w]here on earth does [she] see anything?” (James 70). Even though Mrs. Grose claims that she does not see any figure, it is not certain that she is telling the truth. It is obvious that she is overwhelmed in this scene because Flora is fearful of the governess’ behavior. Mrs. Grose is merely trying to be rational and appeal to Flora’s anxiety over the governess’ temperamental and persuasive attitude. Another argument that could appeal to the governess’ insanity is that she is love struck by the master, causing her to be delusional. This is exemplified through her imagining that the master “would appear…and stand before [her] and smile and approve” (James 15). Nonetheless, she is not imagining any people because in the last scene of the novel, Miles recognizes Peter Quint’s presence by implying to the governess that he is in the room. If the governess was creating the ghosts in her mind, Miles would not verbally notice Peter Quint’s presence in the room. The governess is clearly sane and does not simply imagine the
“It takes courage to grow up and become who you really are.” Clover, the main character in the story The Other Side by Jacqueline Woodson, Clover grows up, disobeys her mom, and makes a new friend. I think the theme of the story The Other Side is courageous because Annie and Clover are both kind to each other, they accept each other, and they are both brave.
Lord of the Flies is a novel written by William Golding in 1954 about a group of young British boys who have been stranded alone together on an island with no adults. During the novel the diverse group of boys struggle to create structure within a society that they constructed by themselves. Golding uses many unique literary devices including characterization, imagery, symbolism and many more. The three main characters, Ralph, Piggy, and Jack are each representative of the three main literary devices, ethos, logos, and pathos. Beyond the characterization the novel stands out because of Golding’s dramatic use of objective symbolism, throughout the novel he uses symbols like the conch, fire, and Piggy’s glasses to represent how power has evolved and to show how civilized or uncivilized the boys are acting. It is almost inarguable that the entire novel is one big allegory in itself, the way that Golding portrays the development of savagery among the boys is a clear representation of how society was changing during the time the novel was published. Golding is writing during
Much of history’s most renown literature have real-world connections hidden in them, although they may be taxing uncover. William Golding’s classic, Lord of the Flies, is no exception. In this work of art, Golding uses the three main characters, Piggy, Jack, and Ralph, to symbolize various aspects of human nature through their behaviors, actions, and responses.
The classic ghost story, the Turn of the Screw, is filled with loose-ends and ambiguity. Are the ghosts real or imagined? Is the Governess a heroine or anti-heroine? Are the children really as innocent as they seem? In the novel, Henry James rarely provides an in-depth character that the reader actually gets to know. From the young romantic governess, to the intelligent ten year old, James keeps his characters morally ambiguous in order to further the “Unsolved mystery” style.
In conclusion, it is not the ghosts, as the governess suspected, that are corrupting the children, but the governess herself, through her continually worsening hysteria that is corrupting the children. Both Peter Quint and Miss Jessel are not real ghosts that have the peculiar habit of appearing before the governess and the governess alone but they are merely the signs of the fragmenting mental state of the governess.
and tries to protect them. In the classic novel, The Turn of the Screw, the governess and the
The Turn of the Screw by Henry James has been the cause of many debates about whether or not the ghosts are real, or if this is a case of a woman with psychological disturbances causing her to fabricate the ghosts. The story is told in the first person narrative by the governess and is told only through her thoughts and perceptions, which makes it difficult to be certain that anything she says or sees is reliable. It starts out to be a simple ghost story, but as the story unfolds it becomes obvious that the governess has jumps to conclusions and makes wild assumptions without proof and that the supposed ghosts are products of her mental instability which was brought on by her love of her employer
...t want to be the only one who does. It is another feeble attempt to prove her sanity to herself and to others. However, because she “is so easily carried away”, she soon believes that the children do in fact see the ghosts by reading into their every remark and behavior. By piecing all of this together, the governess proves to herself that she is not insane. The governess in The Turn of the Screw, is a highly unreliable narrator. From the beginning of the story, her energetic imagination is displayed to the reader. With this knowledge alone, it would not be irrational to conclude that she had imagined the appearances of Peter Quint and Miss Jessel. However, these facts in addition to her unsubstantiated inferences allow the reader to intelligently label the governess as an unreliable narrator. Works Cited Poupard, Dennis. “Henry James.” Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism: Volume 24. Ed. Paula Kepos. Detroit: Gale research.; 1990. 313-315.
Henry James's Turn of the Screw was written in a time when open sexuality was looked down upon. On the surface, the story is simply about a governess taking care of two children who are haunted by two ghosts. However, the subtext of the story is about the governess focusing on the children's innocence, and the governess trying to find her own sexual identity. Priscilla L. Walton wrote a gender criticism themed essay about the Turn of the Screw, which retells certain parts of the story and touches on the significance they provide for the sexually explicit theme. Walton's essay is accurate because James purposely put an undertone of sexuality and identity confusion in the Turn of the Screw.
The next unclear situation is when the Governess learns of Miles’ expulsion. This is one of the main mysteries within this story. The question, “What does it mean? The child’s dismissed his school,” is the only question that the reader has throughout the conversation between the Governess and Mrs. Grose (165). Even though their conversation does inform the reader that the school has “absolutely decline[d]” Miles, it doesn’t clarify what exactly he has done to be expelled (165). The Governess comments, “That he’s an injury to the others” and “to corrupt” are her own opinions as to why Miles was expelled (165, 166). Nevertheless, her comment does not help the reader in any way because the remark in and of itself is unclear. Her first comment suggests that Miles might be causing physical harm to other students but her second ...