Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical dilemma in software engineering
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical dilemma in software engineering
The Therac-25 Software Disaster
The Therac-25 is a computerized medical radiation therapy machine for cancer patients. During the time span of June 1985 to January 1987, it was the source of six fatal or near fatal overdoses. These incidents were a result of a combination of factors that can be viewed as unethical actions made through the ranks of hierarchy, from the manufactures to the FDA.
The Therac-25 is a medical dual-mode linear accelerator that is used to target the less sensitive cancer cells of patients. The Therac-25 was not the first generation of this product. The previous versions, Therac-6 and Therac-20, were very similar, however the Therac-25 used more advanced technology. Compared to the Therac-20, the Therac-25 is more compact, versatile, and easier to use. All these added features are consequences of its dependence on software, instead of hardware. In this paper, I will evaluate the problematic actions that lead to the poor design of the product (“Death and Denial”).
The leading factor contributing to the poor design can be found in the programming of the software. The first mistake made was that a single programmer was responsible for the software in all three different versions of the Therac. Because the single programmer was negligent of his or hers responsibilities, many issues arose within the software. Examples of the programmer’s unethical behavior include him not informing his supervisor of the possible dangers of having no safely catches outside of the software. The programmer also used unprotected memory, improper initialization, and did not test the software properly. Since a single programmer designed all three generations of the product, the new iterations reused the same software. (“System Safet...
... middle of paper ...
... placed on one individual; however, the actions of all involved failed to properly address the right problems.
References
Leveson, Nancy G., Turner Clark S. “An Investigation of the Therac-25 Accidents.” Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science. National Academy of Engineering. 16 Feb. 2006. 15 April 2014. http://www.onlineethics.org/Resources/Cases/therac25.aspx
Leveson, Nancy G. “Medical Devices: the Therac-25.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 19 April 2014. http://sunnyday.mit.edu/papers/therac.pdf
Porrello, Anne Marie. “Death and Denial: The Failure of the THERAC-25, A Medical Linear Accelerator.” 22 April 2014. California Polytechnic State University. http://users.csc.calpoly.edu/~jdalbey/SWE/Papers/THERAC25.html
“System Safety.” 22 April 2014. Computing Cases.org. http://www.computingcases.org/case_materials/therac/analysis/Safety.html
Stirling Bridge demonstrated strong moral principles when deciding how to best approach consumer injuries related to the Braveheart power tools line. STIRLING BRIDGE took the public interest to heart and exercised the utilitarian approach to serve the greatest good for the greatest number. Stirling Bridge exhausted substantial financial and labor resources to focus more on the well-bei...
...being held accountable, the city officials themselves were also held accountable because of improper safety regulations. Showing that the city itself should be at fault for not enforcing safety regulations for such things as fire escapes, that were not in working order. These unprecedented circumstances just lay down the blueprint for what is now the correct way to set regulations for industrial factory conditions.
This tragic accident was preventable by not only the flight crew, but maintenance and air traffic control personnel as well. On December 29, 1972, ninety-nine of the one hundred and seventy-six people onboard lost their lives needlessly. As is the case with most accidents, this one was certainly preventable. This accident is unique because of the different people that could have prevented it from happening. The NTSB determined that “the probable cause of this accident was the failure of the flightcrew.” This is true; the flight crew did fail, however, others share the responsibility for this accident. Equally responsible where maintenance personnel, an Air Traffic Controllers, the system, and a twenty cent light bulb. What continues is a discussion on, what happened, why it happened, what to do about it and what was done about it.
At this day in age we are constantly trying to improve the field of medicine in any way that we possibly can. We cherish every birthday and continually try to prolong life. Not only through every field of medicine, especially in terms of cancer. The American Cancer Society is “the official sponsor of birthdays” and is making leaps and bounds in the types of care that cancer patients receive. One of these many breakthroughs is the practice of Stereotactic (Body) Radiotherapy or S(B)RT. SBRT and other radiation therapies have the ability to greatly improve the way that we treat the issue of cancer and the variation of treatment options; however, they have raised the concerns of long term effects from radiation and cost-effectiveness. As research has begun to show, radiation therapies are having great success in curing cancer.
The most common type of radiation therapy that is used involves exposure of patients to external radiations. In this method, a beam containing high-energy X-rays is directed to a specific region of the body to irradiate the main tumors. However, the problem with this technique is that the ability to hit normal tissues of adjacent organs (Noda et al., 2009). Different from this, targeted radionuclide therapy functions like chemotherapy. A radionuclide labeled molecule is administered either orally or intravenously such that it delivers radiations that are sufficiently toxic to the site of the disease to kill the target cells (Bolus & Brady, 2011). However, the main difference with chemotherapy is that the drugs or toxins only...
Martin, M.W. and Schinzinger, R. (2005) Ethics in Engineering. 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
Popp, W., Rasslan, O., Unahalekhaka, A., Brenner, P., Fischnaller, E., Fathy, M., . . . Gillespie, E. (2010). What is the use? An international look at reuse of single-use medical devices. International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 213(4), 302-307.
"Radioisotopes in medicine." World of Physics. Gale, 2007. Science in Context. Web. 19 May 2014.
Over the past decade, scientists have made significant advancements in the treatment of certain diseases. Unfortunately, just like any new product, the cost of developing these new technologies and treatments is extremely high. Plus, unlike other technology, heath technolo...
In the end we can conclude that radiation therapy has it’s benefits and it’s drawbacks. We can see the drawbacks of radiation therapy don’t outweigh
The radiotherapy is not a very new technology history reveals that the German physicist Wilhelm Roentgen discovered radiation therapy after the discovery of x-rays in 1895. The World’s first Radiation Oncologist (therapist) was Emil Grubbe a medical student who irradiated a cancer patient in (Dartmouth, February 1896). The radiation ...
In this case a large engineering consulting firm was contracted by the government to perform civil engineering work for the installation of equipment that would be later used to train firefighters. Prior to the actual work being commenced on site, Donald J. Giffels, president of the consulting firm soon realized through careful observation that there was a significant amount of ambiguity in how critical safety systems were to be designed. In this situation, what are the ethical issues that the consulting firm faces in accepting such a contract from the government. What is the optimal strategy in responding to what Donald J. .Giffels identified as an unacceptable lapse in safety. These two important questions are discussed in further detail with a conclusion of noteworthy facts surrounding this case following.
Poel, Ibo Van De, and Lambèr M. M. Royakkers. Ethics, Technology, and Engineering: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. Print.
The initial ethical guideline presented in the IEEE Code of Ethics states “to accept responsibility in making decisions consistent with the safety, health and welfare of the public, and to disclose promptly factors that might endanger the public or the environment”. In regards to health, safety and well-being of the public and environment, many would consider this to be the most important rule presented. Professions in electrical and electronic engineering operate in designing electrical syst...
9. Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (2010). Introduction to engineering ethics (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.