Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How are the characters in the tempest portrayed
Comparing and contrasting characters in the tempest
Contrasting characters in the tempest
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How are the characters in the tempest portrayed
Discovery has the power to transform individual’s lives to allow the individual to re-discover themselves and therefore give them a different perspective on their own life. This concept is demonstrated in William Shakespeare’s play ‘The Tempest’ and Julio Cortazar’s short story ‘The Night Face Up’. Shakespeare through the main protagonist, Prospero demonstrates that discoveries can cause individuals to become merciful and cooperative, even if they were out for revenge initially. In contrast Cortazar through his nameless protagonist conveys that the discovery of tragedy and danger can transform the individual into one who escapes reality to the extreme. Through both Prospero and the nameless protagonists, different transformations are illustrated …show more content…
This is presented through the emotive language of Miranda “I have suffered with those that are suffering”, through the empathy that is displayed by Miranda the violent action of Prospero on the ship that carries Antonio and the royals are demonstrated. Through this violent action Prospero demonstrates his desire to get revenge on all the people that have harmed him and his daughter. However, Prospero also commands Ariel to protect the people on board, coupled with this, the metaphor “The government I cast upon my brother and to my state grew stranger” shows that he is on the path to self-enlightenment due to his acknowledgement of his own downfall. Prospero through the order to protect the people and the use of the personal pronoun in the metaphor displays that he has identified his own role in his downfall. By accepting his role he is able to start to forgive Antonio and progress on the path to enlightenment. However, he is presented to not have reached complete self-enlightenment through his vengeful treatment of Caliban seen through the metaphor “A devil, a born devil on whose nature, nurture can never stick”. Through this metaphor, he illustrates that he …show more content…
His initial view is conveyed through the comparison between the Modern World and the Aztec world. The positive imagery of “passing under trees filled with birds” describes the free, peaceful and safe nature of the modern world through the symbolism of birds living in freedom and not locked up in a cage. This is contrasted with the metaphor of “He detached himself almost physically from the nightmare” when referring to the Aztec world shows that it is an unsafe and violent due to the world being described in negative connotations by the protagonist. However he realises that this peaceful world that he lived in was only his imagination. The realisation of his true reality occurs through the imagery of “He realised he was running in pitch darkness…the sky crisscrossed with treetops was less black than the rest” of the Aztec world. Coupled with the motif of smell in his dreams shown through “it was a curious dream because it was full of smells and he never dreamed smells” also reflects the idea that his real world is the Aztec world. The depth of description when describing his dream and the use
Prospero is a very powerful man who is out for revenge. At this point in the play, and in his life, he seems to only care about himself and his daughter. He is bitter at the loss of his Kingdome from his own family and she has been the only one who is there for him which isn’t exactly by choice. It is easy to see how hurt he is from what has been done to both him and his daughter. For the first time he is telling Miranda about the journey that led them to the island, “I pray thee, mark me /I thus neglect worldly ends, all dedicated / To closeness and the bettering of my mind” (1.2.107-110). While he is telling his daughter this story he is making sure he is being seen as innocent, saying he was just trying to better himself when this happened.
In the comedic, yet thrilling play, The Tempest, William Shakespeare uses characters such as Caliban, Alonso, and Ariel to show Prospero’s immense cruelness and pure monstrosity. Moreover, these Shakespearean characters are also used to highlight Prospero’s change in character into a kinder and more forgiving person. Prospero starts the play out as a vengeful monster, after an illuminating moment however, his persona transforms into his true identity of a compassionate man.
Prospero has long been read as one of Shakespeare’s most cherished and provocative protagonists. His timeless role in “The Tempest” has provided readers and critics with insights into many attributes of Shakespeare as a man, his works, and the political views that are personified in his play. The historical context of “The Tempest” is one that convincingly conveys the political views of the English people of his time, relating to the colonization of the New World, the expansion of British powers, and the domination of the indigenous peoples that was necessary for the British to thrive in the Americas. Of course, many people from the 1600’s would argue that domination of these natives would have been completely justified, from this view, Prospero conversely did nothing truly evil in taking rule of the Island from Caliban. However, a modern critic reading or watching a performance of “The Tempest” may find that Prospero is not very different from Antonio when standing the play and the colonial era next to each other. The reader will see through basic observation that these two men have more in common than they do in disparity, and more so that he closely resembles the attitude of European colonists settling in the New World. Prospero is simply a ruler, bent for power, and to him, the end justifies the means. The only true difference between Prospero and Antonio may be that that Prospero is not quite as willing to kill as Antonio is, and that he may not be addicted to gaining power and fratricide as Antonio may be. Prospero is capable of forgiveness, as seen in the end of the play.
In Act I of the play, Prospero finally tells Miranda the woeful story of how she and he arrived on the island. From the beginning, Prospero plays his subjects and his sympathetic audience as pawns in his game of manipulation. He explains that twelve years ago he was the Duke of Milan, but being enthralled with his studies, he left most of the governmental responsibilities to his brother Antonio. Antonio, hungry to be "Absolute Milan" himself (1:2, p.6), proceeded to betray him with the help of King Alonso of Naples. When Miranda asks why they were not killed, Prospero sighs, "Dear, they durst not,/ so dear the love my people bore me" (1:2, p.7). From the beginning, Prospero portrays himself as a distinguished scholar and beloved leader unjustly victimized by his power-hungry brother. Who would suspect such a humble man of being psychologically manipulative? Prospero succeeds in deceiving many with this credible guise.
Discoveries, driven by wonder or necessity, can be challenging and confronting, compelling people to leave their comfort zones. This can be provocative, leading to emotional and intellectual responses. This concept is explored in Shakespeare’s play ‘The Tempest”, and Peter Weirs, Film, Dead Poets Society (1989). In Shakespeare’s play, the characters portray a moralistic experience and rediscover the necessity of compassion and emotion because of abusive, intellectual power leading them to re-evaluate their relationships with other characters. Similarly, In Peter Weirs, Dead poet society, it elucidates the transformative power of introspection that cultivates emotional and intellectual response, leading to self-discovery. Both texts explore
kindness and innocence portray heart" (line 8/9) and this contrasts. to her father who is not as concerned as she is "Tell your piteous heart there's no harm done" (line 14). Prospero's power and control over Miranda is something that really stands out, "obey and be attentive" (line 38) and it is clear that she. respects him, "my dearest father" (line 1.) At first one may presume that Prospero is an evil man for causing the tempest, but I feel that He loves Miranda very much and would do anything to protect her.
In summary, Shakespeare’s The Tempest play explores the theme of opposition to the colonial-style authority of Prospero based on various characters’ covert and overt reactions to the master’s antics. For instance, Ariel opposes Prospero’s continuous detention of the former regardless of an earlier agreement to the contrary. Moreover, Caliban expresses his dissatisfaction with the forced labor that her does for Prospero. To prove his opposition to Prospero’s authority, Caliban plans the master’s death. Miranda also makes a statement that indicates her displeasure with the way Prospero executes his authority especially with regard to Ferdinand. The imprisoned Ferdinand also indicates his opposition to Prospero’s power through a disproving statement made before Miranda.
To begin showing how this process takes place in Prospero, I would like to take issue with some traditional views of the character. Many critics see Prospero as completely in control of everything that takes place on his island. He is seen as all-knowing, having a perfect plan in place, often seen as calm, as good, as the main force of reason and logic and Man’s highest qualities. I do not dispute all of this. Prospero is an amazingly talented, wise, mature man in control of himself and his environment, but he is not perfect. This is a play showing growth and education in its characters, but most of all, the growth and education of Prospero himself. At the outset, he is a man in struggle, an embittered man, a vengeful tyrannical man; not God, unless it is the cruel anthropomorphic God of the early Old Testament.
Miranda serves one main purpose for Prospero; she is a foil to reveal his manipulative nature and his grandiose plan for power. Prospero relies on Miranda’s role as an object of wonder
This book consisted of a variety of William Shakespeare’s plays. The Tempest was the main focus for the presentation. The play demonstrated a love story, some tragedy and magic consisting of many characters such as Prospero, Ariel, Miranda, Caliban, Ferdinand, Trinculo and Stephano. Prospero made a love match with his daughter Miranda and the Prince of Naples, Ferdinand, through his magical powers and the help of his spiritual servant Ariel. Prospero’s used his magical powers to create a shipwreck leading the men from Naples including the Prince stranded on a disserted island. As they embark the disserted island, Caliban who is Prospero’s
The island in the Tempest serves as a temporary kingdom for Prospero as well as a prison while he battles to escape his inner demons. Despite achieving a position of great power on the island, Prospero’s aspirations thwart his happiness. Outwardly Prospero appears to be the master of his isle as he uses his magical powers to manipulate people and his surroundings; however, internally he is a servant to the feelings of inadequacy that dictate his will and actions. Prospero is not a free man because his unfulfilled desire to reclaim the dukedom controls his actions and will.
Prospero presents himself as a victim of injustice, however his belief of justice and injustice is somewhat contradicting. He takes advantage of this authority over other people and situations he encounters while using his integrity and compassion to mask his dangerous plans and to retain love and respect. The Tempest in the end suggests that love and compassion are more effective political tools than violence, hatred or even abusive magic.
Throughout The Tempest, Shakespeare depicts Prospero as the ultimate puppet master, pulling each individual’s string towards his master plan. Along with his bossy and controlling attitude, Prospero claims “it was mine art/ that/… let thee out” (I.ii.351) to force Ariel into obedience. Hence with Prospero’s demands, Ariel sets up the encounter between Miranda and Ferdinand, causing them to fall in love, resulting in Prospero “rejoicing/ at nothing can be more” (III.ii.114-115). Considering the amount of power he possesses, Prospero wants to try to maintain the power. In order to keep the power, Shakespeare makes Prospero’s attitude demanding to explain the effects of having excessive amounts of power. Presenting Prospero as the bitter tyrant, Shakespeare expands on how power corrupts a person. Not satisfied with their current status, he addresses the issue of these people constantly craving
As a mother, Prospera is thought to be caring and loving of her daughter. This idea is generated from the manipulation of plot by the director of the film. In the movie, Prospera takes her daughter into her labyrinth to discuss their origins. While doing so, Prospera continues to stroke Miranda and comfort her. Hugging her daughter, she tells Miranda that she was the source of strength after being cast out of Milan (The Tempest). Prospera soothes her daughter by informing her that those aboard the ship have safely made it ashore. Both Prospero and Prospera are quoted stating “I have with such provision in mine art so safely ordered that there is no soul-no, not so much perdition as an hair betid to any creature in the vessel” (Shakespeare 1.2.28-32). However, the sentiments behind the lines possess different motives. The portrayal of Prospera is compassionate, especially towards her daughter. Throughout the scene, Prospera affirms, comforts, and listens to her daughter. On the other hand, Prospero dictates every aspect of his daughter’s life. Not only is he controlling, he is manipulative. In verbal gestures that appear loving, the influence over Miranda
As Prospero is so invested in his plot to seek vengeance as well as carry out the marriage between Ferdinand and Miranda, the thought of Caliban’s, his slave’s, plot to murder him has escaped his memory. He then launches into a speech about the ceremony he’s holding for Miranda and Ferdinand, but more specifically how the ceremony is as meaningless as their roles on the island. For instance, Prospero elaborates that “These our actors, As I foretold you, were all spirits and Are melted into air, into thin air; And like the baseless fabric of this vision…” (IV.i.165-168). These few lines reveal much on Prospero’s mindset regarding the events transpiring, beginning with “These our actors, As I foretold you”. By calling everyone “actors,” he is demeaning life into a mere play. But it’s not a simple play; it’s a play he is directing. Evident in “As I foretold you,” Prospero admits that he is the one narrating the play, but more so that everyone is a puppet to his play -- and he holds the strings. He continues to debase the play by calling it “baseless” and of “this vision”, and it is important to note that “this” refers to Prospero’s vision, which again demonstrates his role as a playwright and, therefore,