Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The tempest power and influence
The tempest essay introduction
The tempest essay introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Tempest is a play that is fixated with the concept and theme of imprisonment. This fixation, both literal and figurative, can be seen as the play manifests this concept in a number of various ways. Literally, the play centres on the story that Prospero and his daughter Miranda are exiled to a remote island and forced to live there in solitude. Prospero goes on to enslave Caliban, the island’s only native inhabitant, as well as freeing and ‘rescuing’ Ariel, a sprite, from imprisonment in a pine tree, to do all of his bidding. This literal theme is continued figuratively through the epilogue of the play, whereby Shakespeare suggests that throughout the play, the actors and playwrights are kept captive through expectations set by the audiences who may or may not even approve of Shakespeare’s work, whereby Prospero states that the audience must “release [him] from [his] bands.” (Shakespeare, 2011, Epilogue). Does the term ‘slavery’ then refer to the characters in the play, or rather to the audience, and how they interpret the play? This essay serves to uncover this problem of slavery within the play, as well as discussing the many instances of slavery, and how this play challenges them.
The occurrence of slavery in this play helps to provide the atmosphere for the play, as the three main protagonists in the play, namely Prospero, Ariel and Caliban, are involved in a triangular relationship between ‘slave and master’. Prospero adopts the role of ‘master’, with Ariel and Caliban acting as his slaves. This, in Caliban’s eyes, is seen as an injustice, as he believes the island to be rightfully his. This can be seen when he says: "This island's mine, by Sycorax my mother, which thou takest from me." (1.2.3)
However, this role adopted ...
... middle of paper ...
...ospero adopting the leading role of master. The topic of slavery in The Tempest is seen as a problem, as it is compared to the slavery practiced in the new world at the time, whereby the victims of European colonization are closely related to Caliban. The many parallels in comparison seem to emphasize the suffering of the victims, as the character of Caliban shows the exploitation, disinheritance and subjugation of the nation. Like Caliban, they endured enslavement by European usurpers, Prospero in the play, and too were torn between their own indigenous culture, and a culture that was forced on them and superimposed by their conquerors. It can thus be concluded that this play harps on both a literal and figurative fixation on slavery and imprisonment of the times, and simultaneously offers a critique by Shakespeare on the European colonization and their victims.
Shakespeare's play, The Tempest tells the story of a father, Prospero, who must let go of his daughter; who brings his enemies under his power only to release them; and who in turn finally relinquishes his sway over his world - including his power over nature itself. The Tempest contains elements ripe for tragedy: Prospero is a controlling figure bent on taking revenge for the wrongs done to him, and in his fury he has the potential to destroy not only his enemies, but his own humanity and his daughter's future.
In a play which usurpation is a dominant theme, Shakespeare endorses Prospero’s appropriation of the island and it’s aboriginal population. The representation of Caliban and his brother Sycorax reveals the extent to which racist and sexist ideologies function to maintain the balance of power in the hands of a small, ruling, elite. Indeed, it should be noted that The Tempest is more than a simple play. Rather, it is a complex and multi-layered literary construction. As it cannot be reduced to the single issue of race to investigate the imbalance of power in the play. Attention must be given to the way patriarchal notions of gender inform racial representations in order to understand the imbalances of power i...
The Tempest reflects Shakespeare's society through the relationship between characters, especially between Prospero and Caliban. Caliban, who was the previous king of the island, is taught how to be "civilized" by Prospero and his daughter Miranda. Then he is forced to be their servant. Caliban explains "Thou strok'st me and make much of me; wo...
In summary, Shakespeare’s The Tempest play explores the theme of opposition to the colonial-style authority of Prospero based on various characters’ covert and overt reactions to the master’s antics. For instance, Ariel opposes Prospero’s continuous detention of the former regardless of an earlier agreement to the contrary. Moreover, Caliban expresses his dissatisfaction with the forced labor that her does for Prospero. To prove his opposition to Prospero’s authority, Caliban plans the master’s death. Miranda also makes a statement that indicates her displeasure with the way Prospero executes his authority especially with regard to Ferdinand. The imprisoned Ferdinand also indicates his opposition to Prospero’s power through a disproving statement made before Miranda.
In this whimsical play, Prospero, the former Duke of Milan, after being supplanted of his dukedom by his brother, arrives on an island. He frees a spirit named Ariel from a spell and in turn makes the spirit his slave. He also enslaves a native monster named Caliban. These two slaves, Caliban and Ariel, symbolize the theme of nature versus nurture. Caliban is regarded as the representation of the wild; the side that is usually looked down upon. Although from his repulsive behavior, Caliban can be viewed as a detestable beast of nature, it can be reasonably inferred that Shakespeare’s intent was to make Caliban a sympathetic character.
One way in which The Tempest reflects Shakespeare's society is through the relationship between characters, especially between Prospero and Caliban. Caliban is the former king of the island, and Prospero and his daughter Miranda teach him how to be "civilized." Immediately thereafter, Prospero and Miranda enslave Caliban and he is forced to be their servant. Caliban explains "Thou strok'st me and make much of me...
The Shakespearean play, The Tempest, is one of the most controversial in terms of relationships in the play. The play was written in 1611 soon after the English arrived in America in 1607, launching the colonial period. This was the beginning of colonization to America, which lead to the evolution of indentured servants into slaves. Many critics have stated that the relationship between Prospero and Caliban was that of a slave and master and a representation of how the English colonized foreign lands that belonged to the indigenous Americans. Each situation could be argued and validated according to the portion of the play being analyzed. Both roles are applicable and I will provide evidence of both to prove that they are synonymous in a sense.
In her essay “Shakespeare's Tempest and the Discourse of Colonialism,” Deborah Willis argues that the play takes on a much more complex and complete identity concerning the aristocracy of colonialism, and she presents the idea that Caliban as the “other” (Willis, p.277) isn’t inherently wrong but rather misguided in readings. While her article brings up important issues concerning the reading of The Tempest, she ignores the vastness and all-consuming nature of colonialism. Her essay helped me to conclude that I perceive The Tempest as not only being solely about colonialism, but all of the issues featured in the play being tied back to colonialism, including those that Willis emphasizes aren’t as important or are ill-founded.
Since the seventeenth century many interpretations and criticisms of William Shakespeare’s The Tempest have been recorded. Yet, since the play is widely symbolical and allegorical Shakespeare’s actual intentions behind the creation of the play can never be revealed. But it is precisely this ambiguity in intention that allows for so many literary theorists, historians, and novelists to offer their insight into the structure and meaning of the play. For many years much of the critical treatment of the play has come from an educated European heritage, like the play itself. However, beginning in the nineteenth century with the re-emergence of the original text of the play and a growing global awareness in Caribbean and African nations, many attitudes were arising about the apparent cultural associations of the play’s characters and the largely heretofore unchallenged European views that had dominated popular ideology. What was once superficially taken as a play about the expansion of European culture into the Americas, was now being explored for its commentary about the inherent dominance and oppression of the natives of the Barbadian islands (the geographical setting of the play), and further as a commentary on slavery and oppression as a whole. The plays main characters, Prospero and Caliban, have come to personify the thrust of the oppressors vs. oppressed debate.
In order to understand the characters in a play, we have to be able to distinguish what exactly makes them different. In the case of The Tempest, Caliban, the sub-human slave is governed largely by his senses, making him the animal that he is portrayed to be and Prospero is governed by sound mind, making him human. Caliban responds to nature as his instinct is to follow it. Prospero, on the other hand, follows the art of justifiable rule. Even though it is easy to start assessing The Tempest in view of a colonialist gaze, I have chosen instead to concentrate on viewing Caliban as the monster he is portrayed to be, due to other characters that are not human, but are treated in a more humane fashion than Caliban. Before we meet Caliban, we meet Ariel, Prospero’s trusting spirit. Even though Ariel is not human either, he is treated kindly and lovingly by his master who calls him “my quaint Ariel.” Caliban, on the other hand, is called a “tortoise” and a “poisonous slave” by Prospero. As Caliban enters in Act 1 Scene 2, we realise his fury at both Prospero and Miranda. He is rude and insulting and Prospero replies with threats of torture. Prospero justifies his punishment of Caliban by his anger at the attempted rape of his daughter, something Caliban shows no remorse for. Miranda distinguishes herself from Caliban by calling him “a thing most brutish” and inadvertently, a thing that has only bad natures. She calls his speech “gabble,” but doesn’t stop to wonder whether it was she that didn’t understand him because she didn’t know how to speak his language. Surely Caliban communicated verbally with his mother for the twelve years before Prospero killed her? It seems that Prospero and Miranda expect Caliban to be grateful for the knowledge of their language, but Caliban has just learned “how to curse” and justifies his anger by claiming rights to the island. Even though they obviously detest each other, Prospero needs him, as he tells Miranda: “We cannot miss him: he does make our fire/Fetch in our wood, and serves in offices/That profit us…,” Caliban stays on because he is afraid of Prospero’s “art…of such power,” making Prospero the feared conqueror ad dictator. Prospero is the “right duke of Milan” and Caliban is the “savage and deformed slave.” They represent two different extremes on the social spectrum: that of the natural ruler,...
Within his portrayal of Prospero, Shakespeare skilfully displays this character as the embodiment of all characteristics that defined the true colonisers; strength, power, and of course the intense control of all relationships and land he is invested in. Although these characteristics can be seen in all Prospero’s actions and interactions it is those with his subject, Caliban, which present them most clearly.
In this essay I intend to explore the ways that William Shakespeare has presented the relationships between the main characters within his play “The Tempest”. I shall investigate Ferdinand and Miranda’s relationship, the father/daughter bond between Miranda and Prospero and Caliban’s lust after Miranda.
In Act I Scene 2, we learn about the nature of Sycorax through the speeches between Ariel, Caliban and Prospero. Caliban claims that Sycorax was the first to arrive upon the island, and thus giving her the ownership to the island (Shakespeare 1,2,331). Trained in the arts of magic like Prospero, Sycorax takes over the island through her witchcraft. Prospero describes Sycorax as an old and foul witch, whom is feared and hated by the residences of the island (Shakespeare 1,2,258). It was Sycorax whom maliciously enslaved the spirits of the island in the first place, and her actions would lead to a series of events which explains the existence of Caliban and his savage behaviours, as well as the bonds between Prospero and the local spirits. Without the existence of Sycorax, Prospero would not have had the services of Caliban nor the spirits. Thus the survival of Prospero and Miranda would’ve been jeopardized, and the events to follow would not have occurred. As well, the great tempest conjured by Ariel would not have been present, and the King and his men would’ve had a safe passage, unaware of Prospero’s presence. Without the existence of Sycorax, the play cannot exist.
The resolution of conflict in The Tempest is thus naturalised and constructed as an inevitable consequence through the use of moral and ethical concerns in the play, including the 'divine right of kings', the 'great chain of being', courtly love,
The Tempest, by Shakespeare, offers the reader a variety of themes. The one theme that stands out the most is that of colonialism. During the time of Shakespeare, many European countries such as Spain, France, and England, were expanding their borders by taking over less developed countries, referred to as colonies. During this time of exploitation, there was skepticism concerning the possible success of the colonies. While some scholars believe that the play is about the Americas, I argue that the play reflects on colonialism in general and how it is destined for failure which is shown through the character’s relationships throughout the play.