Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of humor
Role of humor
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of humor
The tableaux assignment was overall, a great experience for me to meet new people and get to know more about the different forms of drama! Firstly, our group’s biggest challenge in creating our tableaux was using the resources that we had. I say this because our story was “Jack and the Beanstalk,” a story which needs a lot of props to be able to be understood. The props that were needed were: a small sack and a big bag (or alternatively: some yellow scraps – to symbolize riches and gold). It would be hard to understand the play without these two significant props unless the audience were given the title as to which the story is known by all and would be easily understood. To overcome this challenge we decided to use people instead of props. …show more content…
Firstly, I didn’t like my group’s transitions because everyone was all over the place. Many people didn’t know where to go and had to be directed in between scenes (during transition time). I believe this definitely had a negative impact on the audience because the transitions weren’t smooth which might have thrown off the audience. Secondly, my group could have held their freeze with more focus. I base my criticism off of the last scene when the music started playing; most of the actors (Jack and the giant) on stage started to laugh and didn’t hold their freeze. This is another factor that might not have been appealing to the audience who was trying to understand what was going on. The sudden outburst of emotions definitely put the audience out of the mood that the tableaux was meant to be in. It further, destroyed the tension in the moment (not necessarily tension but many other emotions) as many of the emotions running through the actors were overpowered by the laughter, which added a comical sense to the whole performance. Moreover, if I were (able) to direct my group, I would definitely have called “everyone” to the rehearsal instead of letting them wander off to other groups and not pay attention which would have resolved the problem with the transitions. Next, I would have practiced the last scene multiple times until my group stopped laughing and got over the comedy. This would have prevented the problem with the focus and the emotions at the
The production had many elements which for the most part formed a coalition to further the plot. The characters, the three part scenery and costumes represented well the period of time these people were going through. As far as the performers entering and exiting the stage, it could have been more organized. There were a few times when the performers exited at the wrong times or it seemed so due to the echo of the music. At certain moments the music was slightly loud and drowned the performers. Many of the songs dragged on, so the pacing could have been more effectively executed. Though the music was off at times, the director's decision to have most of the songs performed center sage was a wise one. Also the implementation of actual white characters that were competent in their roles came as a great surprise to the audience and heightened the realism.
When it came to the dialogue of the production and the understanding of it the performers again did an excellent job. Their gestures and vocal elements all aided in the production’s success and were all fittingly used by the characters. For example, when Lala was talking on the phone with Peachy she casually twirled the phone cord in her hand, leaned against the banister and childishly flirted with Peachy.
character, hyperbole, a dramatic setting, imagery and a huge tragedy in order to display the
In conclusion I think that the stage directions and dramatic irony are significant to the play, and without them there would be no need for a lot of the events that happen in the play.
The dynamics were played out excellently by the use of unity of time, place, and action. The climate was heated and so too were the members of the jury as the story progressed. The characters grew to understand each other and the audience learns more and more about the individuals. Perhaps, the motive for that said characters verdict or backstory on the matter. A few characters were highly stereotypical and the actors did a worthy job in portrayed them as accurately as possible. For such a short production, it was an extremely elaborate one. The absence of an intermission also played an important role in keeping the audience submerged in the action. The use of the thrust stage made the acting and situation feel more real. The message was powerful and received well by the audience.
can see his importance in the title of the play; he is named in the
...transition between each stage was flawless. I enjoyed that screens were used to create the background for each scene allowing for the smooth transitions. The screens gave the appearance of being three-dimensional making the scenes seem much more real. I also enjoyed the lighting being used as spotlights during some of the scenes and being used as a transition between scenes, or day and evening.
In conclusion, the acting in the production was very good. I was held captivated by the accents and shocked by the language and dialect because I knew that this really happens and has happened. I felt like I could actually change what was happening on stage. For Instance, when the rumble is happening and Bernardo and Riff bring out the switchblades, I gasped. Silently to myself, I said "DON'T DO THIS. THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A CLEAN FAIR FIGHT. YOU GUYS ARE MORE SIMILAR THAN YOU ARE DIFFERENT, JUST BEING FRIENDS." The same occurrence happened when Anita is assaulted by the Jets when attempting to find Tony to save him. I understood her feelings and wanted the Jets to get in trouble for their actions. I became invested in what happened to the
The most successful aspect of the performance for me were the scene changes. I found that the rotation of the blackboard, center stage, where the actors were able to stoop beneath it in order to enter and exit the stage, was an effective touch to this non naturalistic performance. When this was first used, at the end of the first scene, when the characters Ruth and Al left the stage, I thought it didn't quite fit as at the beginning the style was leaning towards realism. But as the play progressed and the acting style became more and more non naturalistic, and this rotation of the black board technique was used more frequently it fitted in really well and became really effective.
...ne else in the play the power of language to alter reality, and the issues of conscious or unconscious deceit.
funny parts of the play by creating confusion within characters and lowering the intensity of the
Although people in the play don’t know that they are talking about something important the readers do. they are talking about who is to blame for various events. on example of this is Hamlets death. This could be Claudius and Laertes fault for poisoning the blade that killed him, they would be the water that came to the man because they are an effect of the problem, or it could be Hamlets fault for killing Polonius starting a chain reaction that made Laertes want revenge on Hamlet he would be the man that came to the water because he started the problem. Another example of appearance vs. reality is how Gertrude cares about
I believe that the actors fully embraced the characters and did not hold back. Since the actors did hold themselves back, the humor stood out. A problem actors may face when performing comedy is the fear of embarrassment. When having to perform an over-the-top action, such as when Prince Dauntless threw a temper tantrum, many actors will hold themselves back due to the fear of looking ridiculous. The problem with that is that when actors do not go full out, they actually look
The show was natural because all the cast understands their roles well. They have a great voice. All the songs sound great. Monica, Nathan, and Kimberly voices were just unbelievable. It makes the audience sink into the play more and more. The show flows well and the director has done a great job. She gives the actors/actresses to use their own way to portray the characters other than just telling them what do to. Something that can do better is the dancing. In the play, the dance was off because there are so many dancers it understandable that they don’t have the same pace. It would be great that they dance at the same pace. For example, during the ball, there is one couple who dance faster than the rest but at the end they still catch up with each other. It was nice when actors and crew move the set in the dark. Some crew wears black so they are see less visible. It is a great idea when the directors did that. Something that the play did well was the set, the dresses, the jokes, songs and many other
There wasn’t any particular scene on stage that made me doubt the integrative work of the director since all the staging work such as lighting, design, costumes and performance were well coordinated and blended for a very good production. The lights were well positioned with well fitted costumes and a very ideal scene to match. There wasn’t much change of scenes in the play except for some movement of tables and chairs. There was an entrance and exit for the performers which made their movements uninterrupted. There was a loud sound of a bell when school was over while the lights were dimmed whenever there was a change of scene. The pace of the production was very smooth since one scene followed the other without delay and most likely because most of the performers wore the same costume; especially all eight students wore the same costume for the entire