Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection of critical thinking
Use of critical thinking in reflection
Reflection of critical thinking
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflection of critical thinking
In the novel, “Freakonomics,” by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, many topics and their hidden sides are brought up that not many people think twice about. This book has no one theme. Instead, it is about “stripping a layer or two from the surface of modern life and seeing what is happening underneath.”(Levitt and Dubner, 2005, pg. 11) They are not looking at the surface of common occurrences or issues, but passed what most people see. They explain the hidden side to everything. This ranges from topics about choosing your child’s name to how guns affect the crime rate.
Initially, this book did not strike me as an “interesting read.” I correlated the title to the Economics class I was forced to take in High School, which ultimately eradicated any fascination I had with the topic. However, after reading the book I found that Levitt’s and Dubner’s take on society and their hidden motivations were much more interesting than I originally thought. After finishing the book, I realized how a lot of what they discussed was relevant to my life. The relevance helped get me engaged with the book.
As explained in the previous paragraphs, there are multiple themes displayed in the book. The first theme was their study of how incentives are the root behind people’s motivations. How they were able to compare sumo wrestlers and school teachers was eye-opening. Levitt and Dubner have taken two things I would have never thought had any similarities, and made a comparison. Incentives play into daily life more than we realize. Sumo wrestlers use incentives to get ahead in their careers, while school teachers are guilty of the same exact thing. Levitt and Dubner bring these, as well as many other issues to light.
Another comparison they made was...
... middle of paper ...
...s specific material to friends and relatives. I feel it will encourage them to make sure they are in a good place emotionally and financially before they decide to have a child, since these are the qualities that affect how well children do in school. This material could also help parents who are worried they don’t do enough to help their child do better in school.
This novel can easily be compared to the topics I’ve learned about in class. Topics covered in the classroom are the importance of thinking critically about things in day-to-day life. Levitt’s and Dubner’s book is an excellent example of the things that can be produced from thinking critically about the world around us. Being a critical thinker aids people in making intelligent and educated decisions.
Works Cited
Levitt, S. D. Dubner, S. J. (2005) Freakonomics. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers
The article, “Critical Thinking? You Need Knowledge” by Diane Ravitch, discusses how in the past people have been deprived from the thinking process and abstract thinking skills. Students need to be given more retainable knowledge by their teachers to improve their critical thinking skills. (Ravitch).
On the front cover of Freakonomics, the subheading reads, “A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything,” which is the purpose of the book. The economist Steven Levitt and the author Stephen Dubner wrote this book using several rhetorical devices to achieve that purpose. A few of those devices, style, ethos, pathos, and logos, were prominent within the book and helped to convey the message and purpose well.
In Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting by in America, the author, Barbara Ehrenreich, takes on an experiment where she leaves her job as a highly acclaimed writer and decides to become part of the working class in order to better understand them and their continuous strains and worries. Throughout the novel, the author cleverly utilizes statistical data, her own personal experiences and the previously untold experiences of others to bring to light the harsh reality facing many Americans who, despite their daily hard work and effort, are shockingly close to poverty.
Other than how this book personally encouraged me and discouraged me, it was eye opening to see such a coincidence of birthdates among all-star hockey players and how Bill Gates just happened to be born in the wake of computer technology. It is also very shocking to see the racial demographics behind plane crashes and the relationship between math, rice, and Asian people. I am glad that I was able to read this book because despite the limits it places on success, it provides a better understanding of the possible reasons why some people become outliers while other remain average.
Their main focus is to engage and teach the ordinary person versatile concepts of economics in an inoffensive way. In doing so, they account for all manner of people who might be reading it, including drug dealers. That way, a drug dealer could read facts about their line of work and digest data concerning it, without feeling offended or attacked by the words the authors chose. Levitt and Dubner make their book an all inclusive reading because anyone can read it from any walk of life and not be offended in doing so.
Both authors believe that thinking critically before doing the work will make people successful. Graff states, “…… how to make an argument, weigh different kinds of evidence, move between particulars and generalizations, summarize the views of others, and enter a conversation about ideas” (383). Author tries to proclaim that to be a critical thinker, we should be able to get all the information and need to analyze it very carefully. We should be able to figure out what is right and what is wrong. Doing nothing will not make us critical thinkers, but thinking deeply and figuring out options will make us critical thinkers. In addition to, Gldwell also supports Graff that in order to be a critical thinker, we must be able to find the best promising way to solve the perilous situations. Graff mentions, “But if you think there are still lunch counters out there that need integrating it ought to give you pause” (327). The author tried to suggest that we have to think about every aspect and should try to figure out the best possible solution to a problem. From the text, Gladwell gives an example of four college students who started protesting because they were not allowed to sit at the lunch counter. This can be used as an example of critical thinking, because the four students denied to leave, and decided to start a protest and later on many peoples supported them. If they couldn’t think critically, they wouldn’t have come with the plan or perhaps, they could have just left the lunch counter. Both authors Gladwell and Graff believe we have to analyze things carefully to be a critical
Shirley Jacksons short story The lottery and Kurt Vonnegut’s short story, Harrison Bergeron are both dystopian texts. They demonstrate a way of life that violates our sense or rightfulness but are found acceptable and ordinary to the characters. A dystopian world is often propagandized as being a utopia and has a futuristic totalitarian or authoritarian government that exerts complete control over the public which results in the loss of individuality and freedom. Even though both texts have entirely dissimilar concepts the reader can still recognise the depraved and immoral lives the characters believe are essential to their way of life. The societies portrayed in both texts are illusions of utopian worlds, even though the reader views the characters lifestyle to be revolting, dehumanized and sickening. The authors also caution the readers of the extreme dangers associated with the blind acceptance of their lifestyle just because of tradition and society’s acceptance.
Colombo introduces his section on critical thinking by asking a question “Why do instructors mean when they tell to think critically?” (2). His point is that we should no just focus on the surface meaning. He uses the example of the cover of our Rereading America textbook. He says that the average student from the United States may just believe that the book only applies to the United States. When a student from anny other country in the Western Hemisphere might complain that the title reflects a discriminatory view of what it maens to be an American. Since America contains all the countries of North, South, and Central America. He goes on to explain that most think they want us to ask questions rather than just relay the text back through memorization. That kind of thinking is nearly useless in the real world. What job is there that all you do is relay data back? There are almost none of these
The first time I read “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, I thought it would be about someone in a desperate situation who wins a large amount of money. However, after reading the story I was shocked and disgusted like millions of other readers because of what the “lottery” was all about. After my shock wore off I thought about why the author had chosen to be so cynical. It occurred to me that she needed to shock people into changing for the better. She believed that the biggest problem in her society were the people who would live their lives without thinking about changing themselves for the better. She stresses the importance of questioning the validity of everything as opposed to conforming blindly to the majority.
Rereading America: Cultural Contexts for Critical Thinking and Writing written by; Gary Colombo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle, Eighth Edition, published April, 2007 by Bedford/St. Martin’s, is a textbook about writing and critical thinking. In the first chapter of Rereading America: Cultural Contexts for Critical Thinking and Writing, “Thinking Critically, Challenging Cultural Myths”, the Authors begin by setting a relatable scene of what it’s like for a college student. How a new found independence can be overwhelming, especially with regards to critical thinking, showing that what we have learned, needs to be re-evaluated and that an open mind in essential. "What Is Critical Thinking" In this section of the chapter the editors explain what it means to be a critical thinker. They explain that critical thinking is not just studying dates and facts, but rather taking those facts and examining them. The editors then proceed by explaining how having an open mind, and taking others' perspectives into account when formulating our own opinions on what the author is trying to say to us is important. A critical thinker takes all aspects into account and reflects on personal experience as well. The editors also point out that different cultural experiences bring different opinions. They suggest that we need to become active learners, continuously questioning the meaning behind everything, testing not only the theories of others but also our own experiences and analyzing the text rather than going for the obvious. They show that thinking outside the box is the epitome of critical thinking. Basically, we need to step outside our comfort zones and what we have always been taught. The editors also suggest that we need to re-evaluate our per...
Economics in reverse is the best way of describing the unconventional method preferred by economist, Steven D. Levitt. While most economists measure social situations and present the data as numbers and graphs Levitt takes anomalies within the data to reveal truths obscured. It’s Levitt’s sociological take on economics that has set him apart from his peers with his heavy focus on incentives, choices, and the consequences they have. Freakonomics mirrors Levitt’s method since it’s a collection of stories he has uncovered or read, and the core economic principles are hidden within each story throughout the book, sometimes even in plain sight like how there are exactly as many chapters as there are core economic principles.
School teachers, sumo wrestlers, and life are tied together by one aspect, incentives. Incentives are the driving reason behind doing things, much like motivation. Incentives drive people to get what they want/need, even more so when others want/need the same, which sometimes involving finding loopholes. The author starts with the daycare example. For just a $3 fine, parents could not have the guilt of picking up their child late. The (negative) incentive was not high enough, considering more parents were late than when there was no fine. Levitt goes through three types of incentives: economic, moral, and social. For example, people don't freely commit crimes, because there are economic (negative) incentives, like going to jail, fines, or not
Have you ever been obsessed with money? In the story Seize the Day by Saul Bellow money basically runs everything. The main character, Tommy Wilhelm, invests his money with a friend of his father and loses everything. This story falls into the critical perspective of Economic Determinist and Marxism. The critical perspective of Economic Determinist and Marxist evaluates literature from the perspective of economic and social class inequality and oppression. This essay will explore how the story Seize the Day by Saul Bellow shows this critical perspective of Economic Determinist and Marxist.
The author’s statement regarding how creative and critical thinking can affect our lives is a very powerful one and it should be. Creative and critical thinking can have a very powerful impact on our lives. People that use these two aspects of thinking are more likely to achieve long and short term goals and make better life decisions, such as the type of career to pursue. They live by a moral code that is well thought out and created to fit the person that they are. They are also more likely to think for themselves and have beliefs that have been closely examined. These are just a few of the examples of what thinking creatively and critically can help a person achieve, but it is clear that they can help a person live a more enriched life and
There are many benefits to teachings having a good relationship with the student’s family, guardian, or parents. Teachers should begin the school year with building positive relationships with the student’s families. In the book it mentions that there is ongoing research that indicates the benefits of family involvement in children’s education. Some of these benefits mentioned were children earning higher grades, tend to have better attendance, have higher rates of homework completion, and are more motivated and have positive attitudes towards school. Through the reading it also emphasizes on the increase in family involvement in children’s education will result in a decrease in students participating in substance abuse and violence. Students