Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relationship of the Stroop effect on attention and interference
The stroop experiment analysis
The stroop effect experiment 1935
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction of the Stroop Effect The Stroop Effect, named after American Psychologist John Ridley Stroop, refers to the increased difficulty one has in processing the font color of a word when the meaning of that word refers to an incompatible color (e.g. the word “orange” typed out in the font color blue). This psychological phenomenon was first identified by Dr. Stroop in 1935, when he first noticed that most people are able to read out words fairly quickly, and that they direct their focus onto that word and not onto other attributes (ex. font color). He also found that it was much more difficult for many to read aloud the font color of a word when the word meaning does not correspond with the font color. Psychologists believe that this …show more content…
To perform this test successfully, a participant must focus their entire attention on the tested variable and avoid incorrect impulses that may likely get in the way of desired results. These impulses are a result of what some researchers refer to as an automatic word recognition process that cannot be disabled. According to this process, people can see a word and process it without much effort or conscious will. The act of processing color, however, is not automatic, creating conflict between processing word color and word meaning. These interferences/conflicts activate the areas of the brain involved in executive function (memory, organization, problem solving), such as the anterior cingulate cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. (Mary McMahon, 2003) Two main theories have been created and used to explain the results of the Stroop experiment. These theories are known as the Speed of Processing theory and the Selective Attention theory. In the Speed of Processing theory, it is thought that the brain needs to use more attention to identify a color than to identify a word, causing a delay as the brain processes the color. However, according to the Selective Attention theory, the brain needs to give more attention to the color, rather than the word, causing a discord between the reaction times of the word and the reaction times of the color. (Eric H. Chudler, …show more content…
Stroop’s original test have been conducted over the recent years, testing the same effect in different types of ways. In one particular study, it was concluded that the Stroop Effect can also affect words that can be associated with (but not necessarily representing) a certain color (e.g. fire= red, water=blue, grass=green) (Rochester Institution of Technology). A different, emotion-based test has shown that people associate colors with a feeling or mood (e.g. depression=blue, anger=red) A researcher would pair a word with a color you would not normally associate with that word (e.g. sadness=yellow, water=red) and test how fast or how accurately a person could read the color aloud, just like in a typical Stroop experiment. (Mary McMahon, 2003) The Stroop test has been used also by doctors (such as psychologists) to check if a person’s brain is functioning properly, specifically in the focus and attention area. It can be used as a medical screening tool, testing for certain mental disorders such as ADHD, dementia, and schizophrenia. For example, people with ADHD tend to be less able to focus on and filter the conflicting information (McMahon,
Two types of assessment procedures that are currently being used are the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery (LNNB), and the Halstead Russell Neuropsychological Evaluation System (HRNES-R). The LNNB is used to diagnose cognitive deficits, while the HRNES-R indicates both the presence and degree of impairment. Both procedures involve tasks that require the patient to complete a series of functions that test abilities and/or perceptions. Such tasks would include, but are not limited to, problem solving, memory, sensorimotor functioning, and psychological/emotional status.
Although correlation does not equal causation, we can conclude that similar cognitive processes, such as interference and automaticity, have influenced the results in our experiment. This can be expressed by the data and in identifying and saying aloud/reading a simple number compared to quantifying simple numbers. The cognitive load of reading familiar or smaller words is lower than that of counting, thus creating perchance a longer reaction time. In the experiment conducted in class as well as the one conducted by Stroop, the issue of divided attention may have been a great factor in interference or prolonged reaction time in the conditions. Psychological refractory period which states that the response to a second stimulus is slowed down by the first stimulus being processed; this can be a cause for the finding of increased reaction time when conflicting information is given. Attention may unconsciously be given to the less complex task, which is reading/identifying, and counting the main and more complex task may be interfered by the simpler stimulus. The expectation of having a longer reaction time when conducting the incongruent task was referenced back to the Stroop effect due to the similar implications of identifying and saying aloud the color presented in the print of the color descriptive word (Stroop,
The Web. 26 Mar. 2014. The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. Kaya, Naz. A. Epps, Helen H. "Relationship Between Color And Emotion: A Study Of College Students." College Student Journal 38.3 (2004): 396-405. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection.
In common language synesthesia is an involuntary blending of the senses by some people, which allows them to see colors when looking at numbers, for instance.
Harvey et al (2000) also used the word list learning and delayed recall, pranix drawing, modified Boston Naming test and CERAD to assess cognitive function of both their control and experimental populations. The word list learning and delayed recall is a ten item list of words that is presented to the subject during three separate trials. After each trial the subject is asked to freely recall the words from the list. After a delay, which is filled with the pranix drawing task, the participants are asked to recall the list of words once again. The dependent variable in this task is the number of words recalled over the three trials and the number of words that were recalled after the delay. The scores ranged from 0 to 20 based the...
Webster dictionary defines synaesthesia as “a subjective sensation or image of a sense other than the one being stimulated” (Wyld,1963). Synaesthesia is a condition that causes someone to have associations of usually color with certain everyday things, such as numbers or letters. There are several different types of synaesthesia that will be discussed in this paper digit-color synaesthesia, odor-color synaesthesia, and person- and music-color synaesthesia. A common effect that is discussed when talking about synaesthesia is the McCollough effect. This effect is a wonder of humans and their visual perception where colorless gratings appear to have a color.
...ce for increased activity in visual areas or the fusiform gyrus, which is connected with color perception. These results have shown that spoken words result in co-activation of color processing areas, but not visual areas connected with the perceptual process of color. Sadly, the conclusions don’t reveal which perceptual or cognitive processes might cause the difference with people with synaesthesia and the controls.
However, because this claim is based on subjective reports and has never been verified with objective measures, it was Rothen and Meier’s (2010) aim to test whether there really is a higher prevalence of grapheme-color synesthesia in artists. Their sample was a group of fine-art students. Participants were individually presented with 36 graphemes (A^Z; 0^9), one at a time, in random order. Each grapheme was accompanied, on the same screen, by a palette of 13 basic colors, the same each time but randomly arranged on each trial. Participants were required to select the ‘best’ color for each grapheme. After an initial presentation, an immediate surprise retest followed, in which the graphemes were presented again in a re-randomized order. The consistency score was calculated as the number of identical grapheme-color associations. In simpler terms, they showed a number on the screen then the participants picked which color suited the number best from a palette. They were then tested again in a different order and a consistency score was calculated to verify the participant had synesthesia. They found the proportion of synesthetes was significantly higher for the art students (seven synesthetes in the art students group, two in the control) (Rothen & Meier, 2010).
Craik and Tulving did a series of experiments on the depth of processing model. They had participants use a series of processing methods to encode words at different levels; shallow, moderate, and deep. The subjects were shown a series of words and ask questions about the words that would provide a "yes" or "no" response. At the shallow level they were asked questions about whether or not the word was written in capital letters. At the moderate level of processing, the subject was asked questions as to whether or not two words rhymed. Finally, the subjects were asked about words in sentences and whether or not they fit. This was the deep level of processing. After participants had completed the task they were then given a surprise recognition test with the words that they were just asked questions on (target words) and then words that they have never seen before (distraction words). The results of the experiment showed that people remembered the words better that were at deeper level of processing (Craik and Tulving 1975).
Macleod and Mathews (1991) induced attentional biases within a laboratory setting to determine that a ca...
A popular subject within psychology is that of selective attention, particularly visual, auditory or visual and auditory attention (Driver, 2001). There are many theories of visual and auditory attention that provide us with a greater understanding of the ways in which humans attend to different stimuli (Driver, 2001), such as Broadbent’s (1958) filter theory of attention, for example. This essay will compare and contrast theories of visual and auditory attention, as well as discussing how well these theories explain how we attend to objects. The essay will consist of three auditory attention theories of Broadbent’s filter theory, Treisman’s (1964) attenuation theory, and Deutsch and Deutsch’s (1963) late selection model of attention; and two models of visual attention known as the spotlight model, such as Treisman and Gelade’s (1980) feature integration model, and the zoom-lens model of visual attention (see Styles, 2006). Broadbent’s (1958) filter theory of attention proposes that there is a filter device between sensory identification and short-term memory.
Weiner, I. Healy, A. Freedheim, D. Proctor,R.W., Schinka,J.A. (2003) Handbook of Psychology: Experimental psychology,18, pp 500
According to Elizabeth Walling (January 8, 2011), colors can be used to influence emotions and the feelings around us. That’s why something so simple like the color of a room affects people in several ways including the way they feel. The color red may trigger passionate feelings of anger of exposed to the color in a long period of time. The color green may calms others as it reminds them of nature. In conclusion, Elizabeth Walling says that it impacts our lives whether if it's a negative or a positive result.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological review, 88(5), 375.