The Strengths And Limitations Of The Progressive Movement

823 Words2 Pages

Lauren Henry Course: US History Since 1877 Semester 2015 The writings of Richard Hofstadler are some of the about “The Age of Reform” is very clear how the United States was in a crossroads of destroying itself. The following material will cover some of the most questioned items to Hofstradler’s argument. These items are as followed; why did the middle class become the epicenter of the Progressive Movement? What was the motivation for the mainly white middle class Protestant individuals to involve themselves as reformers? What were the strengths and limitations of the movements? Who exactly were the Progressives? The Progressives mainly consisted of the middle-class society, trying to defend the United States from capitalism, by standing …show more content…

Ultimately, the Progressives did get an order of government to build warehouse to store their crops until sold, which would be considered the Warehouse Act. For all of their successes, Progressives often found their legislation compromised by the diluting influence of elites like Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Henry Stimson. Such prominent figures positioned themselves as champions of the cause, but were willing to make compromises in order to satisfy key constituents and remain in power. Progressivism championed noble aims, but was often co-opted by businessmen seeking to enact symbolic or less radical reforms, and was hampered by the diverse and sometimes contradictory motives and identities of its own activists Progressive’s strength were small, but effective. They were able to involve the public health system to be involved with the public. These changes to modern medicine kept the death rate to drop dramatically in the early 20th century. Multiple Acts were passed to help investors such as the Interstate Commerce Act and Sherman Antitrust Act. Progressives pushed to enable the citizenry to rule, this helped make a push for Primary elections in 16

Open Document