Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the novel Stranger by Albert Camus
A critique on the stranger by albert camus
A report on the topic camus the outsider by Albert Camus
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on the novel Stranger by Albert Camus
Society constrained to a specific social standard reproaches individuals who do not conform to such ethics. Albert Camus’s The Stranger exemplifies Meursault as a passive nonconformist who refuses to meld into society’s norm and thus condemned for failing to meet society’s social expectations. Through the use of irony and hyperbole, Camus reveals how the outcast, Meursault, Is put to death because of his nonconformist beliefs. Meursault’s nonconformist character consistently doesn’t see the need to express his emotions. The absurdist beliefs of Camus are reflected through Meursault’s passive approach to life. Camus uses a first person perspective which would normally allow the reader to see inside the narrators head. However in this case …show more content…
we see how inverted Meursault is by his lack of emotion. During Meursault’s first encounter with Raymond, Raymond is telling Meursault about his problem with his “mistress”. The horrific account full of unlawful actions has no effect on Meursault, “… he wanted to know what I thought about this story. I told him that I hadn’t thought about it but it was very interesting.” Later, Meursault and Marie are listening outside Raymond’s door as he beats his “mistress”. Meursault’s response to the event is nonchalant, “Marie said it was terrible and I didn’t say anything…Marie and I finished getting lunch ready. But she wasn’t hungry, I ate nearly all of it. She left at one and I slept for a bit.” He goes through the events of the day detached, stating each occurrence but never delving deeper into a statement. “Mother died today. Or maybe yesterday, I don’t know.” Even when referring to his mother’s death, he goes into more detail about his uncertainty of the date than he does about the effect the news has on him. Also during his mother’s funeral, “[He] hadn’t cried once and [he’d] left straight after the funeral without paying [his] respects at her grave”. This reveals that Meursault doesn’t necessarily not feel emotions, he just sees it as unnecessary to express them, which comes from the absurdist’s idea that everything is meaningless.
However society does expect definite emotions to be connected to specific events. Emotions such as a physical representation of grief at his mother’s funeral, and a passionate desire for one’s significant other. His relationship with Marie further represents Meursault’s refusal to conform to society’s demands to express emotion. He thinks nothing of having an affair with her right after his mother’s funeral. When they are together he is solely focused on her body and physical elements as, “[he] helped her onto a buoy…as [he] did so, [he] brushed against her breasts” and, “she had her leg pressed against mine, and I was fondling her breasts.” He “really fancied her because she was wearing a pretty red and white striped dress and leather sandals. You could see the shape of her firm breasts and her suntanned face was like a flower.” All of his observations of Marie are physical, noticing her outer beauty not her inner characteristics or personality. Despite society’s expectation that people be loved for who they are not what they look like, Meursault’s attraction to Marie is purely physical which is proved when she visits him in jail and he, “wanted to squeeze
her shoulders through her dress.” When Marie brings up marriage, Meursault doesn’t hesitate to say he would marry her “if she wanted to” . In regards to if he loves her, “that it didn’t mean anything but the [he] probably didn’t.” Society views love and marriage as a bond and mutual affection between two people. Meursault fails to appropriately represent this tradition by refusing to express emotion or care about Marie’s feelings. Meursault’s passive attitude to life, nonchalant response to Raymond’s vile actions, and his detached relationship with Marie exemplify how he refuses to express emotion thus failing to conform to society’s expectations. This idea is further developed by Meursault’s simple acceptance of every circumstance despite its discomforts or consequences. “At that time, I often thought that if I had had to live in the trunk of a dead tree, with nothing to do but look up at the sky flowing overhead, little by little I would have gotten used to it.” While in jail, Meursault comprehends that because he believes that everything is meaningless, he can adapt to any situation he is in. Even with the threat of death in his near future, he simply accepts it without argument. “The judge told me in a peculiar way that I would be decapitated in a public square in the name of the French people…But the judge asked me if I had anything to add. I thought it over. I said, “No.” He then justifies his passive lack of objection by saying, “Everybody knows that life isn’t worth living. And when it came down to it, I wasn’t unaware of the fact that it doesn’t matter very much whether you die… given that you’ve got to die, it obviously doesn’t matter exactly how or when…Therefore, I had to accept the rejection of my appeal.” When Marie wants to marry him, Meursault simply complies, “ She just wanted to know if I would have accepted the same proposal from another woman, with whom I was involved in the same way. I said, "Sure." Then she said she wondered if she loved me… I didn’t say anything, because I didn’t have anything to add, so she took my arm with a smile and said she wanted to marry me.” His lack of contemplation over the serious commitment of marriage, exemplifies Meursault’s acceptance of any situation, despite its costly bindings. Meursault’s response of indifference when Raymond asks him to write a letter to entice his “mistress” to come back to him so he can harm her is loathsome. “… He’d thought I might draft it for him. When I didn’t say anything, he asked me if I’d mind doing it right away and I said no…I wrote the letter. I did it rather haphazardly, but I did my best to please Raymond because I had no reason not to please him.” Society’s standard morals would expect one to be appalled at another’s suggestion to write such a letter. However Meursault passively refuses to conform to society’s standard by aloofly accepting every circumstance he encounters.
In Part I, Meursault is spending the night next to his mother's coffin at a sort of pre-funeral vigil. With him are several old people who were friends of his mother at the home in which she had been living at the time of her death. Meursault has the strange feeling that he can see all of their faces really clearly, that he can observe every detail of their clothing and that they will be indelibly impr...
In The Stranger, Albert Camus describes the life of the protagonist, Meursault, through life changing events. The passage chosen illustrates Meursault’s view during his time in prison for killing the Arab. In prison, one can see the shifts in Meursault’s character and the acceptance of this new lifestyle. Camus manipulates diction to indicate the changes in Meursault caused by time thinking of memories in prison and realization of his pointless life. Because Camus published this book at the beginning of World War II, people at this time period also questions life and death similar to how Meursault does.
In Albert Camus’s The Stranger, Meursault, the protagonist, could be seen as immoral if he were judged on the basis of his actions alone. However, through Camus’s use of a first person narrative, we begin to understand Meursault as not an immoral man, but simply an indifferent one. Meursault is a symbol of the universe, and so in understanding him we understand that the universe is also not evil, but instead a place of gentle indifference.
Albert Camus’ The Stranger offers one man’s incite into the justice of society. Monsieur Meursault, the main protagonist in the novel, believes that morals and the concept of right and wrong possess no importance. This idea influences him to act distinctively in situations that require emotion and just decision, including feeling sadness over his mother’s death, the abuse of a woman, and his killing of an innocent man. In these situations Meursault apathetically devoids himself of all emotion and abstains from dealing with the reality in front of him. When confronted by the court over his murder, he reiterates his habitual motto on life that nothing matters anyways, so why care? His uncaring response inflames the people working within the
Albert Camus is a skillful writer noted for showing aspects of culture and society through the depiction of his characters. In The Stranger, Camus illustrates the existentialism culture and how that comes into play in the life of the protagonist Meursault. The Stranger, as suggested by the title, is a novel revolving around the protagonist, Meursault, who is a stranger to the French-Algerian society as he challenges its values. Camus vividly portrays Meursault’s journey through the use of imagery, irony, and symbolism. In The Stranger, Albert Camus uses the minor character, Raymond Sintes, to illustrate the contrasting nature of Meursault and how his friendship with Raymond leads to his downfall.
...able option. Camus’s main character, Meursault, embodies this third option; by accepting his circumstances and being indifferent to them, Meursault is able to break free of all possible causes of anxiety and find happiness. Furthermore, Meursault’s rejection of religion as belief, his acceptance of the “benign indifference of the universe”, and his acceptance of his circumstances all leading to happiness personifies Camus’s take on Absurdism, the philosophy that Camus is trying to depict in The Stranger (76). By using foil characters to contrast Meursault in actions or personality, Camus creates several polarizing situations, making Meursault the extreme epitome of Absurdism in every contrasting relationship and thus, shining light on his ideology in the process.
Albert Camus is a widely renowned author and existentialist philosopher from the 1950s. He believed in a concept called “The Absurd” which he described as the notion that our universe is completely irrational, yet people continue to try and give order and meaning to it. For most normal human beings, this is an extremely difficult concept to accept, including the main character from the novel “The Stranger”, Meursault. Meursault does not express and ignores his emotions, even though it is evident in the book that he does experience them. However, once Meursault falls into a blind rage with the chaplain, the universe begins to make more sense to him. In order to come to an acceptance of the indifference of the universe, one must have an emotional breakthrough, which Camus shows through differences in sentence structure and elemental imagery between parts one and two.
Meursault is very much like someone autistic. Autism is a developmental disorder which affects a person’s communication skills, social restrictions and behavior. Like people with autism, Meursault doesn’t know when to show emotions nor think they are important. You can see this pattern in Meursault when he is informed about his mother’s passing. It does not seem to affect him at all and shows this by saying “Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don’t know” (Camus 3).
Choice and Individual Freedom in The Stranger Camus's The Stranger is a grim profession that choice and individual freedom are integral components of human nature, and the commitment and responsibility that accompany these elements are ultimately the deciding factors of the morality of one's existence. Meursault is placed in an indifferent world, a world that embraces absurdity and persecutes reason; such is the nature of existentialist belief, that rationalization and logic are ultimately the essence of humanity, and that societal premonitions and an irrelevant status quo serve only to perpetuate a false sense of truth. Meursault's virtue, as well as his undoing, lies in his unique tendency to choose, and thereby exist, without computing objective standards or universal sentiment. His stoic, de facto existentialism is a catalyst for endless conflict between his rationalization- and logic-based existence and that of others, which focuses on an objective subscription to "the norm" ; such is evident in heated discussions with the magistrate and prison minister, who are seen as paragons of invalid logic and the quixotic, quasi-passionate pursuit of hackneyed conformity. No windmills are slain1 in this simulated existence; absurdity of a different ilk dominates the popular mentality, one which would alienate a man based on his perceived indifference towards the mundane, and try, convict, and execute a man based on his lack of purported empathy towards the irrelevant.
Meursault’s apathy towards his mother’s death, his girlfriend, Marie Cardona, and the Arabic man symbolize a cruel French colonist. The first sentence of “ The stranger”, “Mother died today. Or, maybe, yesterday; I can’t be sure”(4), appalls reader by showing Meursault’s unconcern about his mother’s death date. At the funeral, Meursault behaves indifferently which contrasts with the old Perez, “who put on and put off his hat again and again”(11). Conversation between Meursault and his girlfriend also shows Meursault aloofness. “Marie came that evening and asked me if I’d marry her. I said I didn’t mind; if she was keen on it, we’d get married. Then she asked me again if I loved her. I replied, much as before, that her question meant nothing or next to nothing- bu...
“But from the moment he knows, his tragedy begins.” Meursault is not unlike Sisyphus. In the novel, The Stranger, by Albert Camus, we watch this character change from a carefree man who loves being alive and free to a man who is imprisoned for a meaningless murder he commits but who eventually finds happiness in his fate.
In The Stranger, Camus portrays women as unnecessary beings created purely to serve materialistically and satisfy males through the lack of a deep, meaningful, relationship between Meursault and females. Throughout the text, the main character, Meursault, creates closer, more meaningful relationships with other minor characters in the story. However, in his interactions with females in this book, Meursault’s thoughts and actions center on himself and his physical desires, observations, and feelings, rather than devoting his attention to the actual female. Living in Algiers in the 1960s, Meursault originates from a post-modernist time of the decline in emotion. Meursault simply defies the social expectations and societal ‘rules’, as post-modernists viewed the world. Rather than living as one gear in the ‘machine’ of society, Meursault defies this unwritten law in the lackluster relationships between he and other females, as well as his seemingly blissful eye to society itself. In The Stranger, males, not females, truly bring out the side of Meursault that has the capacity for compassion and a general, mutual feeling relationship. For example, Marie and Meursault’s relationship only demonstrate Meursault’s lack of an emotional appetite for her. Also, with the death of Maman, Meursault remains virtually unchanged in his thoughts and desires.
In Albert Camus’ novel, The Stranger, the protagonist Meursault is a character who has definite values and opinions concerning the society in which he lives. His self-inflicted alienation from society and all its habits and customs is clear throughout the book. The novel itself is an exercise in absurdity that challenges the reader to face the nagging questions concerning the meaning of human existence. Meursault is an existentialist character who views his life in an unemotional and noncommittal manner, which enhances his obvious opinion that in the end life is utterly meaningless.
Meursault was always indifferent. Meursault accepted death. Why? Meursault saw the purpose of life meaningless. That is “Absurdity”! Absurdity, how does that word sound? Pretty bad, eh? Absurdity when used like “that’s absurd!” gives the feeling of negative judgment and a sense of finality. The idea of the Absurd seems to attach itself with meaningless, pointless and other such words that express a destination but without the means to get there and vice versa means but no destination. So from there I inferred that Camus does not believe in God nor any high law or universal law that are associated with a divinity, which is a path in life (either the means or the destination). So what is Absurd? The Absurd is living, a quest to find the meaning of anything within a reality with no purpose. Reality has no purpose because there is no high law, a universal law nor a God. Therefore this reality must be randomness. I believe that Camus wants us to see this and begin questioning our existence. So he wants he wants us to see the Absurdity and to cope with the Absurdity.
Meursault is distant from set plans, ambitions, desires, love, and emotions in general. He has a difficult time with emotions such as regret and compassion. The reader sees the nature of his personality in the first few lines of the novel: "Maman died today. Or yesterday maybe, I don't know." When he hears of the death of his mother through a telegram, he is unattached, and can be considered uncaring.