Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How are ancient civilizations similar and different
Ancient civilization comparison
Ancient civilization comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How are ancient civilizations similar and different
If there exists a commonality between past human civilizations and present human civilizations, it would be the spirit of progression. Humanity innovates through its constant grasp of new knowledge in order to progress as a civilization. However, humanity's thirst for progress has blinded it into an ignorance which has resulted in the regression of the natural environment. From the early Mesopotamian society to our modern day technological society, humanity has constantly advanced under a constant change. The human race constantly produces feats of human ingenuity as seen in our history. Only five thousand years ago, the first instances of an organized agricultural system were developing in the fertile lands of Mesopotamia (Gezzehei, lecture). …show more content…
It is well established in science that any theory is tainted by uncertainty. One man who is very well familiar with uncertainty is Carl Sagan who asks us "to question the conventional wisdom" (Sagan 1). All wisdom that is known was at some point derived from a human mind. It would be naive to unquestionably rely on all human wisdom knowing that each notion was at one point extracted from a flawed human being. Fortunately and unfortunately "human beings are... highly motivated to find regularities [and] natural laws," in life, meaning, humans have a tendency to search for the rules in the game of nature in order to find ways to succeed (Sagan 3). Moreover, once a human comes to discover a rule of nature, it leaves room for us to become complacent because we believe we "know" the rule completely well. For example, as previously stated Carl Linnaeus entertained the idea of classifying all living things in an encyclopedia and he created various categories in which each species would fit in such as Mammals, Birds, Amphibians, and Fishes. At the time, Linnaeus did not believe he had incorrect definitions in his encyclopedia and the stunning fact about the encyclopedia, Systema Naturae, is that nobody ever questioned its credibility. It was unchallenged until Comte de Buffon, a …show more content…
One of the most prominent of these inventions is the use of Google. Google is the web based search engine which instantly searches for web content using algorithms. In a general sense users are able to, "hop from one source to another," endlessly through a swarm of search results (Carr, 1). Some would argue that the open access of information has allowed a fast and efficient research process. Despite the lauds, Google is influencing humanity in some form. Some suspect that Google may be changing the way modern humans think, and in a negative way. Some argue that, "[Google] may be weakening our capacity for a kind of deep reading... And our ability... To make rich mental connections that form when we read deeply" (Carr 1). Immediacy and efficiency are the principles that a Western civilization following capitalistic values would undoubtedly propagate. The question remains: at what cost is this happening? Slowly, man may be losing the ability to deeply ponder the wonders of the universe, whether it is the entirety of the universe or the composition of a small grain of salt as Carl Sagan would inquire. Not to mention, intellectual discussions will become obscure if the thinking is done for us by a search engine. However, little of Google's influence on humanity is certain. What we do know is that we still do not know. Google is a multi-billion dollar company that will still exist in the foreseeable
In Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid” the reader finds all three methods of persuasion, ethos, pathos, and logos in emphasizing his point that Google is possibly making people stupid; but it is ultimately the people who cause their own mental deterioration. His persuasion is a reminder to people of the importance of falling back on the “traditional” ways of reading. He also understands that in skimming an article one has the ability to retain what is necessary. Carr himself points out that in the past he was better able to focus on what he read and retain the information. However, now he exercises the process of browsing and skimming over information, just as many individuals have come to do in this day and age.
In composing “Is Google Making Us More Stupid” Nicholas Carr wants his audience to be feared by the internet while at the same time he wants his work to seem more creditable. Nicholas Carr uses many different types of evidence to show us that we should be scared and feared as well as his credibility. Carr’s audience is people who think like him, who find themselves getting lost on the internet while reading something, someone who is educated and uses the internet to look up the answers to questions or to read an article or book.
He states how he used to spend hours reading, but his concentration started to drift after two or three pages. He backed up his theory with stories from others who say they’re experiencing the same thing. But they still await the long-term neurological and psychological experiments that will provide a definitive picture of how the internet affects cognition. After a brief history lesson, Carr starts to incorporate Google into the article. He tells us about Google’s history and their mission.
Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and Sherry Turkle’s “How Computers Change the Way We Think” both discuss the influence of technology to their own understanding and perspective. The first work by Nicholas Carr is about the impact technology has on his mind. He is skeptical about the effect it could cause in the long term of it. He gives credible facts and studies done to prove his point. While Sherry Turkle’s work gives a broad idea of the impact of technology has caused through the years. She talks about the advances in technology and how it is changing how people communicate, learn and think. In both works “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and “How Computers Change the Way We Think” the authors present
The following essay will discuss how the ideas in “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr, is expressed in the futuristic novel Feed, by M.T Anderson.
With the rise of technology and the staggering availability of information, the digital age has come about in full force, and will only grow from here. Any individual with an internet connection has a vast amount of knowledge at his fingertips. As long as one is online, he is mere clicks away from Wikipedia or Google, which allows him to find what he needs to know. Despite this, Nicholas Carr questions whether Google has a positive impact on the way people take in information. In his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Carr explores the internet’s impact on the way people read. He argues that the availability of so much information has diminished the ability to concentrate on reading, referencing stories of literary types who no longer have the capacity to sit down and read a book, as well as his own personal experiences with this issue. The internet presents tons of data at once, and it is Carr’s assumption that our brains will slowly become wired to better receive this information.
In Is Google Making Us Stupid, Nicholas Carr disputes that due to new digital tools, peoples’ ability to retain and acquire information has been negatively altered. Even though, we have information at our fingertips, we often don’t take the time to soak in all the information. Carr mentions Bruce Friedman, a blogger, who finds it extremely difficult to read a “longish article on the web” and to try to focus on the importance of the text holistically (Carr 316). This is an issue that many can relate even Carr knows that, “ the deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle (Carr 314). Additionally, media theorist Mcluhan describes the net as “chipping away [mental] capacity for concentration and contemplation” (Carr 315). In essences, Carr states that we are having less of an attention span and consequently, less patience for longer articles (Carr 314). Therefore, this affects media outlets such as magazines, newspapers, and other articles, because they must conform and shorten their texts to fit the status quo that people safely enjoy (Carr 321). In addition, the net forces people to be efficient, and so, causes people to “weaken [their] capacity for deep reading” (Carr 317). People are becoming more driven on how quick he or she has to do something rather than think why this text is important. As a consequence, Carr believes that we are starting to lose our ability to be critical readers and
Farming also became a steady source of food for the early civilization. With established dwellings, communities were able to create crude irrigation systems to support their crops in the very dry dessert like climate. Domestication of animals also became a possibility as well with the more permanent living situation the early civilization h...
“Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr and “How Computers Change the Way We Think” by Sherry Turkle are two articles that explore how technology influences our daily lives. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” discusses the effects of the internet in our society, how it is robbing us of our deep thoughts, memories and our ability to read books. Carr also talks about how the internet has become our primary source of getting information. The writer also discusses about how he’s having difficulty focusing on reading. “How Computers Change the Way We Think” is talking about how people don’t use their brains full potential capacity to solve problems. Instead, we depend on technology to do that for us.
In this fast-paced and hectic life, people have developed a desire for "Instant gratification" which essentially means that people get what they want, and they get it in an instant. Google has proven to be one of our greatest tools in accomplishing this. In Nicholas Carr's essay, "Is Google Making Us Stupid", he explains the convenience of this search engine, "Research that once required days in the stacks or periodical rooms of libraries can now be done in minutes. A few Google searches, some quick clicks on hyperlinks, and I've got the telltale fact or pithy quote I was after" (Carr 46). Research is a way for people to learn how to learn, but Google is making learning too easy. There is no challenge in trying to find and learn information. Anything you need to know is literally one click away. But is Google making us stupid, or is it making us lazy? "The more pieces of information we can 'access' and the faster we can extract their gist, the more productive we become as thinkers" (Carr 51). Everything comes fast and easy, and people seem to think this will expand the knowledge we can obtain. We now expect information to find us. We think we can type in whatever need into the Google search bar and we will be provided with links to the knowledge de desire. Google is making us lazy and this has major repercussions. Just as I was too lazy to go to the store to make my purchase or even pay with actual cash. I could not be bothered. Paying online with a card and then having the item delivered is just too convenient, but this convenience caused a breach in my own privacy, and a loss of my own
If only my local library could hold the vast quantity of information that my hand held smart phone does. Carr insinuates that Google (and the internet) is making us stupid. I say they are making us lazy. In “Is Google Making Us Stupid” by Nicholas Carr informatively states that with the advancement of technology, Google search engine, and the internet we are become more distracted—with all the different forms of flash media, the amount of hyper-links after hyper-link after hyper-links, and clickable adds-- in turn we are doing less critical reading by way of the internet as opposed to a printed book. Being able to glance over several articles in hour’s verses days looking through books; being able to jump from link to link in order to get the information you need, never looking at the same page twice has decrease out deep thinking and reading skills. Now days, all forms of reading, e.g. newspaper, magazine, etc. are small amount of reading to get the main idea of what’s going on and if you would like more information you will have to go to another page to do so. In the end, C...
The factors of irrigation, inherent topography, and useful bronze-age technical innovations paved the way for the agricultural revolution to occur in the land of Sumer and Akkad. The people of the Tigris and the Euphrates basin, the ancient Sumerians, using the fertile land and the abundant water supply of the area, developed sophisticated irrigation systems and created what was probably the first cereal agriculture. This historical factor resulted in an excess of production of cereals, dates, and other commodities. The consequence of excess is the emergence of a productive peasant agricultural system and a redistributive economy that fuels the progress of civilization.
All the way from the start of civilization through to the Early Christianity there has been a pantheon of; destruction, recognition, wars, cultural diffusion, religious breakthroughs, laws that have been established, kings and queens crowned and dethroned. The Mesopotamian Civilization it was the land between two rivers the Tigris and the Euphrates Rivers that civilization first began.
The contributions of the civilizations of Mesopotamia in the Fertile Crescent, classical China, ancient Greece, and the Roman Empire laid the foundations for living in the modern world. Breakthroughs in a multitude of fields, including art, architecture, math, science, philosophy, law, government and others are crucial to the way people live all over the world. Although these ancient civilizations may seem primitive today, they shaped the progress of the world for many centuries.
Agriculture has been around for about 11,000 years. Around 9.500 BC, the first signs of crops began to show up around the coastlines of the Mediterranean. Emmer and einkorn wheat were the first crops that started to show up in this area, with barley, peas, lentils, chick peas, and flax following shortly. For the most part, everyone was a nomad and just travelled along with where a herd went. This went on until around 7.000 BC, and then the first signs of sowing and harvesting appeared in Mesopotamia. In the first ...