Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How did American involvement in World War II change the nation’s economy
British culture" differs from "north american culture
World War 2 economic effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the years following World War II, many scholars argue the United States and Britain have been bonded by a ‘special relationship.’ Since 1945, this relationship has resulted in several policies, both domestic and foreign. The ‘special relationship’ includes aspects in finances, allied forces during the Cold War, similar cultures and even personal relationships between leaders.
Following World War II, Britain experienced several years of hardships. Due to the high cost of war the UK lost nearly a quarter of its national wealth. In result of this substantial reduction in funds, many British citizens lived in conditions requiring rations. Something had to be done to preserve the way of life in Britain. Conversely, the United States was in a much better situation financially. As an ally during both World Wars, a financial loan from the US seemed to be the best option for a seemingly desperate Britain in search of restoring its position as a first rank world power. (Bartlett, 1992, pp. 10-16, 24-26)
Although it was apparent the loan was the lesser of two evils, it was not without great objection from both nations. American leaders and citizens alike were quick to question why the US should promote imperialism in assisting a “junior partner in an orbit of power predominantly [beneath America]” (Bartlett, 1992, pp. 10-16, 24-26). Although the British embassy did not view this as the nation being written off, according to Bartlett, the opinion voiced by the US did nothing to win over the people of Britain. Many Ministers of Parliament, along with citizens, viewed the loan as damaging to British pride. Despite disagreements, the British Treasury eventually ruled firmly against attempting to get by without the loan. The United Kingdom ...
... middle of paper ...
... the nations share a common media as well as ancestry. Most important in the similar aspects between the nations is language. Having the same language can help explain why Britain was skeptical to join the EEC, whose official language was French. America being an English-speaking nation was much more appealing than the numerous languages of continental Europe.
Works Cited
Bartlett, C. J. 1992. 'The special relationship'. London: Longman.
Dumbrell, J. 2004. The US--UK'Special Relationship'in a world twice transformed. Cambridge review of international affairs, 17 (3), pp. 437--450.
Sanders, D. 1990. Losing an empire, finding a role. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Thomas-Symonds, N. 2012. Clement Attlee: the UK's greatest PM?. [online] Available at: http://www.totalpolitics.com/history/329047/clement-attlee-the-ukand39s-greatest-pm.thtml [Accessed: 30 Mar 2014].
To keep with the “true neutrality” the United States initially refused to aid either side with supplies or economic assistance. Once the battles became entrenched and a “war of attrition” began, the European nations continued to look toward the United States for aid. As American financial institutions and exporters sought guidance from Wilson’s administration they received a different answer: “short term loans and credits by American financial institutions to belligerents in connection with trade were acceptable” (Zieger, 11). Americans could not over look the potential economic boost that could be achieved by supplying the European nations with food, supplies and weapons orders being requested.
Crockatt, Richard. The fifty years war : the United States and the Soviet Union in world politics, 1941-1991. London; New York; Routledge, 1995.
It is somehow strange for today’s reader to find out that the situation with America’s foreign affairs hasn’t changed much. As some clever people have said, “The History book on the shelf is always repeating itself.” Even after nineteen years, Americans think of themselves as citizens of the strongest nation in the world. Even after the September the 11th. Even after Iraq. And Afghanistan.
...erall, Great Britain wanted to rule colonies to benefit themselves and only concerned for their own welfare and not that of the American people.
Great Britain’s debt level is high; rather, the compensation for her debt is the investment of a strong navy to defend herself and the American people. Conversely, “our land force is already sufficient, and as to naval affairs, we cannot be insensible, that Britain would never suffer an American man of war to be built, while the continent remained in her hands” (34). Paine understands the important role of a navy, and he warns the American public that America is vulnerable to attack and destruction because the British will never sacrifice their manpower for America’s liberty and freedom from other countries. Paine points out that America has an opportunity to “leave posterity with a settled form of government, an independent constitution of its own, the purchase at any price will be cheap” and prosper with a constitution and a military of her own to defend herself and her people in times of turmoil and crisis because “a navy when finished is worth more than it costs” (34, 36). “Commerce and protection are united,” and America’s “natural produce” of timber, iron tar, leaves the American ports to gain marginal profits for the colonial states across the Atlantic in Europe (36).
With all the horrible political things that happened between the American colonies and Britain, you would think that economically maybe something good could come out of it - but sadly, nothing did. In Document F, everything is explained. The commissioners say, "We find that the revenue arising therefrom is very small and inconsiderable,...and is not yet sufficient to defray a fourth part of the expense necessary for collecting it.
Mingst, K. A. (2011). Essentials of international relations. (5th ed., p. 78). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
New York: Oxford University Press, 2005. Shiraev, Eric B., and Vladislav M. Zubok. International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. Silver, Larry.
Throughout all of history, the British Empire has been an integral part to almost every country, whether they were invaded or aided by the British. After the American Revolution, people of other countries realized that their independence was achievable causing a rift in power. The British Empire began its decline from a once great empire and superpower to a smaller country with the need to look to foreign country allies. In the early 1900’s, many British citizens were divided with their ideals. Some believed it was time to adopt the ideal of isolationism and become self-reliant, while others believed England should rely on foreign aid. Joseph Chamberlain, a conservative politician during those times, took it upon himself to become a voice for
(1993), The Cambridge History of American Foreign Relations, Volume Four, America in the Age of Soviet Power, 1945 – 1991, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press · Froman, M.B. (1991) The Development of the Détente, Coming to Terms, London, Macmillan Academic and Professional LTD · Kent, J. and Young, J.W. (2004) International Relations Since 1945, Oxford, Oxford University Press · www.oed.com (Oxford English Dictionary online)
Mearsheimer J. J. (2010). Structural Realism. International Relations Thoeries, Discipline and Diversity (Second Edition), p.77-94
Understanding the World ‘We’ Live in’, International Affairs, Vol. 80, No. I, (2004) pp. 75-87.
Nye, Jr., Joseph S. “Hard and Soft Power in American Foreign Policy.” In Paradox of American Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. 4-17. Print.
Mingst, K. (2011). Essentials of international relations. (5th ed., p. 70-1). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company
The two languages are very similar, so much that it is very easy to understand between the two countries. The languages do not need translation due to writing in what is called standard English. Standard English is the written English format used in all three countries making it very versatile and easy to understand. There only a handful of similarities between American English and British English. There is more of a difference than there are similarities.