The acting in the play The Sparrow by Chris Mathews and Jake Minton was beyond superb. It conveyed emotions not explicitly said within the dialogue and captivates viewers as they enter the world of young Emily Book. The Sparrow is about a girl named Emily Book who, after ten years, returns to her hometown after a horrific accident took the lives of all her classmates. Carolyn Defrin ( Emily Book ) does a beautiful job portraying Emily. Her emotions are clear and concise, but powerful and heart wrenching none the less. Carolyn is able to give Emily a mysterious quality that kept me intrigued throughout the whole play. Carolyn is able to give Emily such powerful and true emotions that makes it possible for Emily to truly come alive. She was …show more content…
able to portray Emily with an element of sincerity that helped the audience to better understand the pain Emily was working through. She was able to convey the suffering and sadness that plagued Emily not only through her tone but also through her movements. Her movements were fluid and realistic, they didn’t look staged or rigid, but during some scenes, some of her actions were very over dramatized, and that took away from the realism of the play. Paige Hoffman ( Jenny McGrath ) did an outstanding job portraying her character with such emotional depth that it made Jenny one of the most interesting characters to watch. Jenny is the all American teenage girl. An honor roll student, class president and captain of the cheer squad. But Paige is able to give emotional depth to the character by giving her multiple contrasting aspects of her personality. Her movements were also very clean and true to the character. She did a great job differentiating between the multiple personalities of Jenny. Her actions were very passionate and moving, but again were somewhat over dramatic at certain points in the play. The set design in The Sparrow were very simplistic.
They were clean and straight forward, and they were able to add realism to the story without taking the focus off the actors. The set pieces were creative and innovative. I enjoyed the fact that the sets were simplistic because it kept your focus on the actors and the storyline. I, however, did not like the fact that I could see the cast carrying off the set pieces, to me that seemed very careless. I prefer that in between scenes the lights are dimmed and you can not blatantly see the sets being changed, but that is just my opinion. I find that it adds sophistication to the production that way. I enjoyed how movement was incorporated into the sets, like when Emily is walking down a street, other cast members held up a picture of a house and that was the street. It was something I have never seen done before, and I found it unique and ingenious. The incidental music was able to give the audience insight into the true intentions of characters and add to the story. It sparked curiosity and was able to portray character’s moods with ease. And when character’s experienced flashbacks, the music enhanced the quality of that scene by adding realism. Not only did the incidental music elevate the level of the performance, but it was able to add such reality to the play, that I felt as if I was truly in the world of the
characters. I overall found the House Theatre production of The Sparrow a thrilling and unique experience. the actors did a phenomenal job conveying the emotion of the character and providing the audience with a feeling of sincerity and realism. The set design was unconventional and surprising, its simplicity was beautiful and something you don’t see very often in professional theatre. Though I found the changes between sets unappealing, I overall thought the set design was exceptional. And the music added realism to they play, that otherwise could not be conveyed. The play was a beautiful work of art that everyone should see.
The book, The Truth About Sparrows by Marian Hale is about when Sadie Wynn moves to Texas because of a drought in Missouri. She is separated from her best friend Wilma but before she left Sadie made a promise that she would be Wilma’s best friend even if they were apart.
The choreography kept things interesting and the dances in a musical can make or break the performance. Overall, Cherie and Abby did an amazing job directing each person to have a place among a crowded stage. Last but not least, the costumes! This play was set in the 1890s, meaning it is very important to have correlating costumes so the audience can be aware of what time period they are in.
Ethel Waters overcame a very tough childhood to become one of the most well known African American entertainers of her time. Her story, The Eye on the Sparrow, goes into great detail about her life and how she evolved from taking care of addicts to becoming the star of her own show. Ethel was born by her mother being raped at a young age. Her father, John Waters, was a pianist who played no role in Ethel’s life. She was raised in poverty and it was rare for her to live in the same place for over a year. Ethel never fit in with the rest of the crowd; she was a big girl, about five nine when she was a teenager, and was exposed to mature things early in her life. This is what helped shape Ethel to be the strong, independent woman she is.
The Hippodrome setting played a big role in the success of the play, because the seats were close to the stage, which made the audience feel more intimate with the actors. The set was filled with everyday electronics and video games that were popular with today’s generation, and it was good way to capture the attention of the younger audience. The costumes worked for the actors because they were outfits that teens and young adults would wear, which made it easier to relate to the characters. The lighting for the production was awesome because it went well with the sound effects. For example, when Ian was doing a simulation for his new job, he set off a missile and when it exploded the lights changed from blue to red to symbolize seriousness of the situation.
It was good setting to get the attention from the audience and also a way to move around or change settings of the play. Although I love this play my small critic for this play was the players. Some others actors had understandable accents but others didn’t. For example, the brother of the servant his accent was confusing because he kept switching his accent from different country languages. This play was really nice it had a little of bit of everything drama, comedy, romance, betrayal. What like about this play it was how they used the dramatic structure the inciting incident and the climax. The inciting incident for this play of musical comedy murders of 1940 was guessing who the killer of the play was because there was tension building up not knowing who the murder was. The climax for this play would be for me finding out who was the murder and just being in shock how everything had change into a new scenario. Overall it was amazing show how it developed and how well an organized transition the play
The set of the play was built decent and looked the same. The only thing I didn't like was some of color of the stones that were painted on the walls. But, that’s just my opinion. However, I did have fun splatter painting those walls and the stairs during class. I liked how there was platforms and different ground levels, that made it more interesting. Rather than just having the stage ground there were stairs you could go up or down which set it apart. Overall, I liked the set and I thought it was built well and sturdy.
The production had many elements which for the most part formed a coalition to further the plot. The characters, the three part scenery and costumes represented well the period of time these people were going through. As far as the performers entering and exiting the stage, it could have been more organized. There were a few times when the performers exited at the wrong times or it seemed so due to the echo of the music. At certain moments the music was slightly loud and drowned the performers. Many of the songs dragged on, so the pacing could have been more effectively executed. Though the music was off at times, the director's decision to have most of the songs performed center sage was a wise one. Also the implementation of actual white characters that were competent in their roles came as a great surprise to the audience and heightened the realism.
The novel Bird by Bird by Anne Lamott is a book that was written in order to provide “Some instructions on writing and life.” Lamott published the book in 1994 in hopes to share the secrets of what it is truly like to be a writer, as both a warning and as encouragement. Bird by Bird shares with the reader the ironic truth of being a struggling writer through personal experience and humorous stories. Lamott uses memories from her past to help illustrate her points and to help the reader get to know who she is, not only as a writer, but as a person. The author focuses on the true struggles and benefits of being a writer while using metaphors and analogies to express her points, she also wraps her life stories around almost every writing tip.
The documentary, Lost Sparrow, is a very compelling production of one man’s quest to not only help his family deal with some of the trauma’s they had long been suffering from, it was also created to tell the story and hopefully shed some light on the conflicting story of the disappearance and death of his Native American adoptive brothers, Bobby and Tyler. Initially my overall takeaway from this documentary was a mixture of curiosity which quickly turned into confusion. “How did the boys (Bobby and Tyler) end up on the tracks?” and “Why were they running away in the first place?” were two questions that confused, lead me to be curious, and slightly suspicious very early in the viewing. Upon initial completion of the documentary my sole thought
Catherine, Called Birdy by Karen Cushman is a historical fiction diary because it is about an adolescent girl writing about her life from 1290 to 1291.
...transition between each stage was flawless. I enjoyed that screens were used to create the background for each scene allowing for the smooth transitions. The screens gave the appearance of being three-dimensional making the scenes seem much more real. I also enjoyed the lighting being used as spotlights during some of the scenes and being used as a transition between scenes, or day and evening.
The element that stood out the most to me was how effectively the music and the footwork corresponded. The best examples of this are seen through the dancers solos. Especially Albrecht's solo, his feet glide on the stage at the same tempo as the music. Similarly, Giselle's graceful footwork is truly amazing. I really like the similarities between the choreographed footwork and the music, it makes Giselle seem much more elegant and beautiful. This also seems to make the work look more put together and in sync because the dancers are dancing in harmony with the orchestra. The choreography by itself is amazing. The footwork is rapid and intricate, however, at the same time it is delicate and graceful. The ballerina (Giselle) made it look very easy to do the choreography, when it rea...
Since this is a review and its based on my opinion, I would have to say this was one of the worst plays I've ever seen in my life. I wasn't entertained by the play at all. The only good parts were the good-looking girls in the play. I like the main character Marisol based only on her looks. She played on ok job of acting. I realize she had a lot of lines to memorize which she had down, but she just didn't get to me. I think the costumes were ok. They had nothing special, or out of the ordinary except for the angel's wings, which were pretty nice. I didn't like the lighting or the scenery. I didn't know where the scene was supposed to be at some points.
There wasn’t any particular scene on stage that made me doubt the integrative work of the director since all the staging work such as lighting, design, costumes and performance were well coordinated and blended for a very good production. The lights were well positioned with well fitted costumes and a very ideal scene to match. There wasn’t much change of scenes in the play except for some movement of tables and chairs. There was an entrance and exit for the performers which made their movements uninterrupted. There was a loud sound of a bell when school was over while the lights were dimmed whenever there was a change of scene. The pace of the production was very smooth since one scene followed the other without delay and most likely because most of the performers wore the same costume; especially all eight students wore the same costume for the entire