Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hawthorne effect in the 21st century
Hrm Theories
Theory for hrm practices
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Hawthorne effect in the 21st century
In the 1920’s, the central theme was Scientific Management. The ideas of Behavioralism in management were introduced by social psychologists and sociologists. The scientific management era functioned as a logical link to the developing approach to management era.
The Hawthorne studies brought the human relations effort to the forefront and led to the theme of the social person. Over many years the behavioral approach to management grew a little bit at a time. Theorists, who advocate the behavioral approach to management, stressed that an individual in organize activity deserved to be the main attention of focus. These sociologists and psychologists felt that management’s success largely depended on the manager’s skills and abilities to work with individuals and also understand those which have a diversity of aspirations, needs, backgrounds, and perceptions. The advancement of this approach from the human relations movement to modern organizational behavior has had a great effect and influence on the theory and practice of management. The human relations movement was a concentrated effort among theorists to make sure that managers were more sensitive to their worker’s needs. This practice came into existence as a result of special circumstances that took place during the first part of the 20th century. Scientific management during the social person era was supported by three very different influences; the Hawthorne studies, the threat of unionization, and the philosophy of industrial humanism.
The Hawthorne Studies
Behavioral scientists in the 20th century started to conduct studies concerning behavior related to the job. Instead of studying methods, tools and worker techniques that the theorists used in the scientific managem...
... middle of paper ...
...berg, M. (1993). The Political Economy of the Wagner Act: Power, Symbol and Workplace Communication. Harvard Law Review, 106(7), 1381.
Follett, M. (2003). Mary Parker Follett: A Prophet Gaining Honour. Business Strategy Review, 14(1), 75-76. doi:10.1111/1467-8616.t01-1-00247
Johnsey, G. (2011). Leveraging the Hawthorne Effect: Monitoring Manager Performance While
Transitioning Assets. Journal of Investing, 20(2), 138-140.
O’Conner, E., S. (1999). The Politics of Management Thought: A Case Study of the Harvard Business School and the Human Relations School. Academy of Management Review, (24), 117–131.
Sarachek, B. (1968). Elton Mayo’s Social Psychology and Human Relations. Academy of Management Journal, 11(2), 189-197, doi:10.2307/255256
Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1985). Shedding light on the Hawthorne studies. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 6(2), 111-130.
Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. C. (2013). Organizational Behavior Science, the Real World, and You (8th ed.). Mason, Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning.
The central focus of the human relations approaches is human needs within an organization. The evolution of this theory stems from the classical approach. The classical approach centers around the machine metaphor. It highlights the importance of three key elements within an organization: specialization, standardization, and predictability (Miller, 2012: 18-19). In the classical approach, organizations emphasize structure and efficiency; communication is limited within the boundaries of hierarchy and formality. Classical organizations communicate vertically from upper management to employees, often relying on written and formal communication methods (Miller, 2012:
Robbins, S.P., & Coulter, M. (2009). Management (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Wren. (2005). The History of Management Thought (5th ed.). Danvers, MA: Wiley & Sons. (Original work published 1976)
Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A., (2004). Organizational Behavior (6th ed.). New York: McGraw- Hill/Irwin. pp. 406- 441.
Frederick Taylor and Henri Fayol are both considered classical contributors to management theory. Both were developing and expression their viewpoints at similar time period with the aim of “raising standard of management in industry” (Brodie,1967, p7) in a period were very few publications and theories on management. While both theories were developed with the same influencing factors such as war, social struggles and industrial revolution (Urwick. 1951, p7) each developed quite different management theories. Frederick Taylor is considered the Father of Scientific management and he developed scientific principles of management, focusing on the individual,...
Kolb, D. A., Osland, J. S., Rubin, I. M., & Turner, M. E. (2007). The Organizational Behavior
Ivancevich, J., Konopaske, R. & Matteson, M. (2011). Organizational Behavior and Management. NewYork, NY: McGraw Hill.
the study of time and action; b) the management on assignment; c) the theory of organization. (8)Taylor’s theory created a revolution in the subject of management because it was the first scientific method in field of management science. (1)After that, management became a truly scientific knowledge and it expanded and modified by later generations. Therefore, Taylor is “known as the father of scientific management”. (2) Taylor put forward a perspective which was “study the character, the nature and the performance of each workman” and moreover, to “train and help and teach this workman”. (3) In the following paragraphs, will exploring the relevant and irrelevant hypotaxis between Scientific Management and organizations.
Scientific Management theory arose from the need to increase productivity in the U.S.A. especially, where skilled labor was in short supply at the beginning of the twentieth century. The only way to expand productivity was to raise the efficiency of workers.
The period between the 1920 and 1930 saw the introduction of the Hawthorne Studies and brought about radical changes in organisational behaviour. The once popular belief that increasing output of an organisation was directly related to increasing workers' wages was disproved. Experiments conducted by Elton Mayo proved that there were more than economic factors that improved efficiency. During the tests, behavioural science which is also known as human relations was a key component to improve organisational output.
The importance of Human Resource management is associated with the beginning of mankind. As the knowledge of survival had begun including safety, health, hunting and gathering, tribal leaders passed on the knowledge to their youth. However more advanced HRM functions were developed as early as 1000 B.C and 2000 B.C. Since the modern management theory took over, the working environment was transformed into a more friendly and safe work place. The workers were termed as most valuable resources. While some companies took the human side of employment seriously, there were others who did not find it mandatory. Hence they faced huge labor unions and factory shut downs (Henning, 2001).
The evolution of management though the decades can be divided into two major sections. One of the sections is the classical approach. Under the classical approach efficiency and productivity became a critical concern of the managers at the turn of the 20th century. One of the approaches from the classical time period were systematic management which placed more emphasis on internal operations because managers were concerned with meeting the growth in demand brought on by the Industrial revolution. As a result managers became more concerned with physical things than towards the people therefore systematic management failed to lead to production efficiency. This became apparent to an engineer named Frederick Taylor who was the father of Scientific Management. Scientific Management was identified by four principles for which management should develop the best way to do a job, determine the optimum work pace, train people to do the job properly, and reward successful performance by using an incentive pay system. Scientifi...
It is argued whether sociological theories are relevant in the modern day contemporary workplace. In order for one to come to a conclusion for whether the statement above is true or not, one needs to consider and understand Sociology’s role in society and the workplace to help understand how it can assist and benefit human resource managers in the workplace. For one to draw a conclusion, its important one examines the various factors. These factors include; what human resource and their everyday functions are as well as sociological theories from different perspectives, then conclude whether they are relevant or not.