'The Smurfette Principle' By Katha Pollitt

1492 Words3 Pages

Business is a very important part of life. It is used in every aspect of everyday life. A business is a group of people put together to produce final goods and services. Businesses fill peoples many wants and desires and they increase the money supply. Without all the businesses and corporations in American, the economy would not stand a chance at surviving. Most of the jobs in American contribute to companies. Without any jobs, the money supply would plummet. There are many different types of business and server sectors of a business. In the world today, businesses are a very important part of society and can be explained with the use of an argumentative and rhetoric analysis many essays in From Inquiry to Academic Writing: A Text and Reader. …show more content…

Pollitt has a major claim that television of which children watch is responsible for the gender bias that children have. She made a claim of value in her essay. She told a personal story of letting her daughter watch The Little Mermaid. She talked about that cartoons children watch suggest a stereotype for types of characters. Pollitt also talks about how she thinks children’s shows focus on the male but leave the female weak and vulnerable. She states, “Contemporary shows are either essentially all-male, like Garfield, or are organized on what I call the Smurfette principle: a group of male buddies will be accented by a lone female, stereotypically defined” (545). I found a supporting warrant with her essay. I see where her claim is coming from. Her argument makes sense. Pollitt provided a strong ethos appeal in her writing. She got her point across. She seemed to be writing for the greater good. I fell like she was frustrated with the TV shows performing the Smurfette principle, therefore having a pathos appeal in her essay. She did give some statistics along with some credible sources in her essay. By doing so, she included a logos appeal in her writing. Her essay contained a strong …show more content…

Her main claim is that readers should be more aware of how what going on with the book and that technology is changing how children interact with literature. I discovered that Teare had a claim of value in her essay. She gave lots of compelling evidence. She stated, “Much of the power of the Harry Potter story is in the way it seems to resist the pressures of children’s commodity culture” (551). She goes on to talk about the Harry Potter Franchise and how it can be related back to real life. Teare provided many examples from the books. She defiantly did her research. When she talked about how money is a big worry in Rowling’s world, she supported that be coming back and giving an example of that form the books. I found a supporting warrant with her essay. The more I read about her argument, the more I began to understand and agree with her. She established an ethos appeal by being orderly and convincing me with her examples. I did not find a very strong pathos appeal in her essay. She remained neutral throughout her writing. She was more informative. She did an enormous amount of research on the Harry Potter Franchise. She quoted the book several times also supplied credible sources. This is how she establishes a logos appeal. Her essay was an interesting

Open Document