Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of leadership to a society
How leadership changes society
Importance of leadership to a society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The author of the article means many differing ideas from the following sentence: "When leaders attempt to navigate the slippery slope of fairness, they will find themselves arbiter of public opinion and hostage to the politically correct." With this sentence, the author means that when leaders, like presidents, mayors, or teachers become fair with their system, they will have ultimate authority and many will favor them. He introduced this idea by saying, “From a leadership perspective, it’s a leader’s obligation to do the right thing, regardless of whether or not it’s perceived as the fair thing.” Throughout the article, the author brings up the idea that when leaders, like President Obama, start suggesting that life needs to be fair, followers
of those leaders start to believe that concept, and then start to take these words as a lifestyle. Conversely, the main purpose of the article is “life isn't fair”, so this idea contradicts but adds to the article at the same time. However, the author follows the statement by introducing a list of “Rules for Life” by Bill Gates, which does not contradict the main idea, but instead, adds to it. So, when the author introduced this sentence and then followed it by the words from Bill Gates, he developed a central idea of the article that what higher figures say about the fairness of life, or the unfairness of life, makes an impact on lives
In “Don’t Lower the Bar,” he compares the educational standards difference with an athletic gap: “The best analogy I can give you is based in the fact that some coaches and athletic directions have noted a steep decline in the number of white kids going out for basketball. They feel as if they cannot compete with their black classmates. What if we addressed that by lowering the rim for white kids? What if we allowed them four points for each made basket?” (Pitts). The example of basketball makes the idea of the standards gap easier to fathom for readers who might not completely understand the issue. The analogy also puts into perspective the way minority students may feel when different expectations are set for them. Comparisons between one idea and another are also made in “Torture Might Work.” Pitts postulates that “...if you wanted to stop that carnage, it would be simple. Just make drunk driving a capital crime with instant punishment...We could execute the miscreants within a day...It would work...But we won’t make drunk driving a capital crime for one simple reason. It would be wrong” (“Torture Might Work”). By correlating one controversial topic with a seperate one, the author captures the reader’s attention and gets him or her thinking. When such a hot topic as drunk driving is introduced, any reader, regardless of whether or not he agrees with Pitts, is more inclined to hear out the argument. In addition, the writer uses an analogy in “We’re OK With Mass Murder”: ‘When the killer is not a Muslim, though, we treat the killing like rain, a natural vexation we lament but also accept because, what are you going to do? But this is not rain, just a different kind of murder” (Pitts). In this comparison, the author is using a simple concept -- rain -- to exemplify a much more complex and disputatious idea -- mass murder. This analogy makes the main argument much more perceptible for any audience. As an effect,
Society has developed throughout history into a seemingly equal, segregated commonwealth. In general, humanity may seem to have broken the nineteenth century class structure, nonetheless, there are situations today that still have deep roots in discrimination and apartheid. Advancement in both extremes can result in catastrophe, therefore, it is inevitable that a balance must be reached. In the short stories “Totem” by Thomas King, and “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut, the theme of overdeveloped social beliefs has proven to be the most significant. In both stories, the author is trying to say that society is either too equal, such as in “Harrison Bergeron” or too contrasting, such as in “Totem.”
1. What is the tone of this article? The tone of this article is kinda snotty but truthful in all ways.
... discriminatory practices were directed against blacks as a group. ...Preferential treatment programs are meant to offset the disadvantages imposed by racism so that Blacks are not forced to bear the principal costs of that error. ...To condemn policies meant to correct for racial barriers as themselves erecting barriers is to ignore the difference between action and reaction, cause and effect, aggression and self-defense...”. He concludes by stating that “Affirmative action is directed toward empowering those groups that have been adversely affected by past and present exclusionary practices. Initiatives to abolish preferential treatment would inflict a grave injustice on African Americans, for they signal a reluctance to acknowledge that the plight of African Americans is the result of institutional practices that require institutional responses. (Pg.218) [10/12]
Innocent members of the community such as Scout Finch prove that there are other mindsets to be taken. “ ‘I think there's just one kind of folks. Folks’ ” (Lee 304). Martin Luther King and his wife Coretta both stood up very publicly and deliberately for their convictions, but even ordinary heroes such as Rosa Parks can spark social revolution. “ ‘I was just plain tired, and my feet hurt.’ ” So she sat there, refusing to get up” (King 3). Social justice is not elusive to everyone, but in cases like the one portrayed in “American Tragedy” differentiation between race and class still affect the minds of prominent members of civilization. In the end, true civic equality is not obtainable for everyone because of age-old practices that encourage racial segregation, communal fear to adjust comfortable habits, and because it would be necessary for all people to take part in such an undertaking, which is neither realistic nor justifiable. Hope for such a day when differentiation and prejudice are no longer prominent in society’s issues is shown in small acts of defiance everyday, by exhibiting respect for all when it is not offered. “She would quickly subordinate her own desires to those of the family or the community, because she knew cooperation was the only way to survive” (Houston
For example, “when one black individual dares to violate the restrictions, he or she was used as an example to reiterate to the entire race that the group would continually be held responsible for the actions of the individual. Thus an accusation of rape could lead not only to the accused black man being lynched and burned, but to the burning of black homes and the whipping or lynching of other black individuals as well” (Collins 921). Similarly talking about racial discrimination, in the United States, if somebody commits violent activity, it is judged, viewed and treated differently depending upon that person’s race and gender, For example, Collins mentions “the case of Mumia Abu-Jamal, an African-American journalist, who was accused of murdering a white police officer, received a death penalty and many false evidence, coerced eye-witness and inadequate legal counsel were presented against him to arrest him” (Collins 922). Since he is a black race person, he is punished although he is innocent.
The theme statement of Harrison Bergeron is that egalitarianism is inefficient, and will eventually be resisted by society. Competition is what drives society forward, and if everyone is equal, we are not developing as one. Many of the people in the story are unable to complete their basic tasks or jobs. “It wasn’t clear what the bulletin was about, since the announcer, like all announcers, had a serious speech impediment.” this is unreasonable as it is the announcer’s job to broadcast the news, and when he is unable to do so, he has lost his purpose (61). Equality is everyone receiving the same, while justice is everyone receiving what they require. “She must have been extraordinarily beautiful, because the mask she wore was hideous.” This is an example of the corrupti...
“We simply cannot say we live in a country that offers equal justice to all Americans when racial disparities plague the system by which our society imposes the ultimate punishment,” stated Senator Russ Feingold.
Disparate treatment is a form of discrimination that is forbidden by laws in which all employers must comply, including fire and emergency services. Disparate treatment in the workplace is applicable to many functions of the workplace including, discipline, promotions, hiring, firing, benefits, layoffs, and testing (Varone, 2012). The claim of disparate treatment arises when a person or group, “is treated differently because of a prohibited classification” (Varone, 2012, p. 439). In the 2010 case, Lewis v. City of Chicago, six plaintiffs accused the city of disparate treatment following testing for open positions within the Chicago Fire Department (Lewis v. City of Chicago, 2010). The case is based on the argument that the Chicago Fire Department firefighter candidate testing, which was conducted in 1995, followed an unfair process of grouping eligible candidates, therefore discriminating against candidates of African-American decent. The case was heard by the Seventh District Court of Appeals and ultimately appeared before the United States Supreme Court, where Justice Scalia delivered the final verdict in favor of the plaintiffs.
Throughout history, leaders, such as Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Susan B. Anthony, have helped to bring equitable balance to mankind. Individuals who represent opposing views mold and change the course of history; without such risk takers, life may never progress for the good of humanity. Works Cited Achebe, Chinua. Things Fall Apart. New York: Anchor Books, 1994.
In many cultures finding your identity is hard. It is even harder to not be labeled for what you look like in society. Currently, people have changed the way that they judge each other and are judging everyone based on the idea of their ethnicity. As I grew up, who I was as a person did not matter because everyone did not bully me based on the color of my skin. I assumed I was just like everyone else. Although when I became a teen things changed. After 9/11, my race and ethnicity mattered more and people treated me differently because I was labeled as a Muslim.
The high expulsion rate of black students even from pre kinder Garten, gives rise to various ethical questions. Are not they being discriminated against? The number of black preschoolers being expelled is disproportionately high. It gives rise to a very important issue that if the schools are discriminating against the students of color. It of course puts a question on the ethics of the preschools. The question is not just of prejudice but if racial discrimination shows up against the tiny preschoolers then it raises questions regarding ethics as well. Of course racism is not ethical and neither is race based prejudice. Black school children while they represent only 18% of the total enrolled, constitute around half of the total expelled. This data is truly shocking. Black students are also more likely to be punished and disciplined as compared to the white students.
John Rawls’ Justice as fairness attempts to both define the principles typical of justice and describe what a just society would necessary entail by the conception presented. What is described is not a perfectly good society, as justice is but one virtue among many, but a just one. Specifically, Rawls’ conception is that justice and fairness are one in the same. Using this as a starting point, Rawls focuses foremostly on the practices in a society, rather than any individual action. In this way, he expounds on what is meant by the term fairness and what value that term has in explaining justice. In this paper of three parts, I will first describe Rawls position on justice, including this position’s main principles. Secondly, I will examine
We must find ways to resist unfair treatment in society because everyone knows that there is a lot of things that are not fair in life, but I won’t sit around and don’t do anything about it. I am going to stick up for what I believe in and hopefully others will have the courage to do the same. We need to be aware of all the negatives things that are happening. No one’s life is easy, we all go through bad situations.What matters the most is how we take that bad situation and turn it into a better one.There are a lot of different things that creates unfairness in this world, but it doesn’t have to be that way. We need to get rid of unfairness because we are all human, so we shouldn’t treat another human being differently because of their race, religion, sexual orientation , color of their skin or even their physical appearance.
Promoting fairness in the classroom not only gives the teacher respect but also gives the students a sense of safeness and trust within the classroom. Creating an environment that revolves around fairness, trust and respect will be beneficial to all of the children in the class. The terms respect and trust are pretty straightforward. There doesn’t need to be a debate on what those two mean, but the same cannot be said for fairness. When one usually hears the word “fair” it is often looked at as synonymous to the term “equal” but the two are not the same, especially in a classroom setting. The term fairness on the classroom level means that the individual students are given what he or she may need in order to be successful; fairness does not