Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The separation of powers uk
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The separation of powers uk
The Separation and Balance of Powers in the UK Constitution
“By the latter part of the 20th century the independence of the judges
had come under increasing threat from interference by the executive.
Recent reforms have, however, served to redress this position and
ensure that a proper division of personnel and functions between these
two arms of the state is restored.
Discuss this statement in the context of the Separation/ Balance of
Powers in the UK constitution.”
French political thinker Montesquieu argued during the Enlightenment
that in a democratic state the three branches of government; the
legislative, the executive, and the judiciary should not overlap in
personnel or function. Is the British judiciary’s integrity at stake
in a constitutional monarchy which does not comply with Montesquieu’s
base definition of democracy? Transitioning without a written
constitution or clear separation of powers resulted in questionable
balance of power amongst the arms of government, and to some extent
hampered judicial independence. The United Kingdom’s historic and
homeostatic governance needed to be severely tweaked to conform to the
contemporary world. The UK’s judicial system faced challenges similar
to those European nations which have moved from despotic to democratic
governance; the processes’ abridged version most recently featured by
members of the Soviet block in the early 1990’s. The courts’ crucial
function of upholding individuals’ rights, keeping the executive in
line, and defining the meaning of laws relies on a decision making
process and judicial review wholly independent from outside forces and
considerations...
... middle of paper ...
... significant reason for the feasibility of unwritten laws and
conventions United Kingdom in maintain law and order is the “culture
of gentlemen”.
Reference
Hartley, T., Griffith, J. “Government and Law.” Second ed. Fakenham
Press. London. 1981.
Kirby, M. “Courts and Politics: Judicial Independence.” Yale Law
School. 2000. Retrieved from the World Wide Web:
http://www.hcourt.gov.au/
Sueur, A., Sunkin, M. “Public Law.” Longman. London. 1997.
Turpin, C. “British Government and the Constitution Text, Cases and
Materials.” Fifth ed. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 2005.
“Judicial Independence, Open Justice and Advance Sentence Indication.”
Crown Prosecution Service Retrieved from the World Web at:
http://www.cps.gov.uk/
======================================================================
Checks and Balances. Checks and balances is a system that is a part of out U.S. Constitution. This system was put in to place so that no part of government would have too much power. The three branches: judicial, legislative and executive are constantly granting and checking the other branches actions, this is to make sure no one person can gain an excessive amount of control in government. For example according to ," the legislative branch is in charge of making laws. The executive branch can veto the law, thus making it harder for the legislative branch to pass the law. The judicial branch may also say that the law is unconstitutional and thus make sure it is not a law.The legislative branch can also remove a president or judge that is not doing his/her job properly. The executive branch appoints judges and the legislative branch approves the choice of the executive branch. Again, the branches check and balance each other so that no one branch has too much power".
The Strengths of the U.K. Constitution Britain’s need for a codified constitution, as a unitary state, is different. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is also a political union, but based on the sovereignty of the national Parliament. The UK now has a Scottish Parliament and Northern Ireland Assembly able to pass their own domestic legislation and a National Assembly for Wales which can make secondary legislation. But all these were created by and are subordinate to the Westminster Parliament, as are all 468 county, borough, district and unitary councils. Parliamentary sovereignty also entails the right to make or unmake any law whatever.
Montesquieu, for example, through “The Spirit of the Laws” emphasized the need for separation of powers within governments, including the need for branches of government to institute checks and balances within that government. The influence of Montesquieu’s piece was an integral influence
In Donald Robinson’s, Slavery in the Structure of the American Revolution, he eloquently articulates the original purpose of separation of power in the United States of America: to protect private interests and freedom. Considering that separation of power is viewed as a means to prevent a unitary and centralized government, the issue of slavery influenced the adoption of separation of power. While equality is a quintessential reflection of America, the power of states’ rights prevents states from being consistent with American values. In this paper, I will examine the principle concept of separation of power in the context of ensuring private interests, in particular, the institution of slavery and segregation. I will argue how decentralized political power fundamentally prevents unity within a nation because of its intent to protect the private interests in the United States of America.
In the Spirit of the Laws, Montesquieu lays out the idea to separate the government into three powers: the legislative; the executive, in respective to things dependent on the laws of nations; and the executive, regarding things dependent on civil laws. Today these there powers are known as the legislative, executive, and judicial powers. The Constitution states in Article 1, “all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives,” Article 2, “the executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the term of four years, and, together with the Vice-President chosen for the same term, be elected, as follows,” and Article 3, “the judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.” These three amendments outline the separation of the powers of government and how much power each branch has and the
... idea of Parliamentary Sovereignty: The Controlling Factor of Legality in the British Constitution’ (2008) OJLS 709.
The law of England and Wales has been built up gradually over the centuries . There are several methods of developing law and usually is referred to as sources of law . Historically , judges used old anglo saxon and local custom to decide cases . In the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries , Parliament became more dominant which leads to Acts of Parliament becoming the main source of new laws . However , judicial decisions still played a significant role in interpreting the Parliamentary law and helped in filling in the gaps where there was no statu...
John Adams once remarked “..I say, that power must never be trusted without check” . And true enough, anything or any person in power must be kept in check lest there is another Fascist Dictator in the world.
The Judiciary Act of 1789 not only set up the federal court system and used the Court’s jurisdiction under the Constitution as a basis for granting it broad powers that are recognized everywhere. According to Abraham (1983), “There is no gainsaying the importance and the majesty of the most powerful of courts, not only in the United States, but the entire free world (p. 19).” The French political observer Alexis de Tocqueville noted the uniqueness of the Supreme Courts in the history of nations and jurisprudence. He stated, “The representative system of government has been adopted in several states of Europe, but I am unaware that any nation of the globe has hitherto organized judicial power in the same manner as the Americans. . . . A more imposing judicial power was never constituted by any people (qtd in Abraham, 1983, p. 27).
Sueur AL, Sunkin M and Murkens J, Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials 2e (Oxford University Press 2013)
The United Kingdom as one of the remaining monarchies of the world, which head of it, the Queen Elizabeth II, has powers that provide an essential evolution of the country. These powers, are called Royal Prerogative powers. Obviously, British people respect the Royal family and additionally the queen, nevertheless they could have their own beliefs as seen on their references. According to the Royal Prerogative (“RP”), it is definitely the most historically and continuing tradition of Britain. In some situations, circumstances tend to disappear them and replaced them by other recent means. In this essay, it will define the RP and how can preserve the separation of powers. Therefore, it should explain how these powers dying to a democratic environment.
This exercises the idea of independence within ‘different functions of government’; it is represented by the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. Separating the three prevents a dangerous occurrence where power is entirely centralized in one group.... ... middle of paper ... ... Carl F. Stychin and Linda Mulcahy, Legal Methods and Systems, (4th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2010).
It has been observed that most constitutional monarchies have a parliamentary system in which the monarch may have ceremonial duties or reserve powers according to the constitution. In the United Kingdom, the rights and duties of the head of state are established by conventions. These are non-statutory rules which are just as binding as formal constitutional rules. The monarch’s reserve powers include the power to grant pardons, bestow honours, appoint and dismiss a prime minister, refusal to dissolve parliament, and refusal or delay royal assent to legislation. Strict constitutional conventions govern the usage of reserve powers. If these powers are used in contravention of tradition, it will generally provoke a constitutional crisis.