The Seige of 1216 and Dover Castle "THE SIEGE OF 1216 BROUGHT ABOUT LITTLE REAL CHANGE TO DOVER CASTLE.
AT THE END OF THE THIRTEENTH CENTURY DOVER CASTLE REMAINED THE TYPICAL
MEDIEVAL SQUARE KEEP CASTLE THAT IT HAD BEEN IN THE TWELFTH CENTURY"
I would disagree with his statement, Dover Castle developed throughout
its history, to cope with the change in weaponry and situation of the
times it went through. After the siege of 1216 changes and
improvements were made that made an already important fortification to
one of supremacy. Castles have two main functions, to provide a
residence for an army and for military purposes. Dover castle is an
example of a castle that takes these needs to an extreme- it was a
royal castle, a castle fit for the king, and a castle with a military
importance like no other in England, it was described as the key to
England.
[IMAGE]
The pharos at Dover, evidence that the site had been occupied for
thousands of years
[IMAGE]Fortifications at Dover had existed since Roman times; the
pharos is an example of a roman structure built inside the original
Iron Age hill fort and the Anglo-Saxon church shows that the Saxons
had settled on the hill as well. The embankments constructed by
original settlers laid out the shape of the castle for years to come-
the concentric defences of the castle during the 13th century followed
the outline of these embankments. In this respect, Dover is not
typical- no other castle was built on the basis of an Iron Age hill
fort. William of Normandy built the first castle at Dover in 1066
shortly after his invasion. This was to put his own mark on the land,
Kapelle, W.E. ‘The Norman conquest of the North:The region and its transformation 1000-1135’ (Croom Helm 1979)
Richard III's Usurpation and His Downfall Richards rule was always unstable due to his unlawful usurpation to the throne and his part as far as the public was concerned in the death of the two princes. As a result right from the start he didn't have the trust or support from his country. As soon as he became King people were already plotting against him. After he was crowned he travelled the country trying to raise support by refusing the generous gifts offered to him by various cities. However unknown to him a rebellion was been planned in the South.
In this essay I will explain the battle between Germany and Britain, discuss how important winning this battle was, what Britain had that the Germans did not have, and what could have happened if Britain would have lost. It is known cleverly as “the Battle of Britain”.
Widukind was a monk at the monastery of Corvey in the mid-tenth century. His trilogy, Deeds of the Saxons, is an account of the Saxons under the rulers of Henry I and his son Otto I. This essay will evaluate Widukind’s understanding and depiction of the nature of warfare during the first two generations of the Ottonian Dynasty. In the three books of Deeds of the Saxons, Widukind made the Saxons look superior by providing a biased impression of what warfare was like under the rule of Henry I and Otto I and examining their battles solely through the lens of the Saxon people.
In the beginning of this semester, English 1302 seemed as though it would be the subject that would be the toughest for me to pass. The pace, the work load and everything in between seemed overwhelming for me. As time proceeded to pass, the course didn’t seem as overpowering. By taking the work one step at a time, it simply became another step to achieve the overall goal of this first half of the semester. I have made improvements as well as learned lessons from my mistakes made along the way.
1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.
(Battle of Britain Historical Society) As Winston Churchill stated, the Battle of Britain would become a major influence to the outcome of World War II. Whether or not Germany conquered Great Britain was going to determine if Germany could become a world power. The Battle of Britain did not just save one country from Hitler’s rule, but ultimately kept the world from Germany’s reign.
In Act 3, Scene 4 of The Tragedy of King Richard the Second by Shakespeare, the Queen finds that she is unhappy due to an unexplained intuition. While in the Duke of York’s palace, the Queen’s waiting-women try to comfort her until the gardeners interrupt the failed attempts to reach a happiness. As the Queen secretly listens into the gardener’s conversation, she hears that they are speaking about binding the apricots and plucking the weeds. However, the gardening essentially is a metaphor for the rule and management of the kingdom under King Richard II. This scene is important because it displays how Shakespeare desires to reveal the perspective of the common man and the type of rule King Richard II has over the people of England. In the metaphors of the garden, blame is placed on Richard and his advisors for England’s state and the King’s overrule by Bolingbroke.
In Henry IV Part One Hal achieves great honour, and proves himself truly ready to be King. However, he has only achieved this at the expense of others. In the play we find out how he has gone from ‘Eastcheap rogue’ to ‘battlefield warrior.’
William the Conqueror Changing the Course of English History After successfully invading England, William the Conqueror changed the
The British were better equipped to fight in the Battle of Britain than were the Germans. The RAF and the people of London were helpful because the Germans mistook them intelligence, strategy, and targets. The British people had five advantages, including the control of active radar, the enormous ammunition of the Spitfires and Hurricanes, the English fighter pilots' abilities, confusion caused the enemy, and the English people's inspiring unity in the flight.
When Harold Godwineson took the English throne he had to weigh up the two threats from both the North (Harald Hardrada) and the South (William, Duke of Normandy). Harold chose to send his troops South to defend the coast from William. At the time the wind was blowing the wrong way for William's sailing ships to cross the channel. At around this time Harald Hardrada invaded in the North and Harold Godwineson sent his troops North. Harold Godwineson wo...
There are three basic parts of any good story. Rising action, a climax, and a resolution or falling action. This structure is the base of any well developed story. William Shakespeare, as history’s best author, is an impeccable expert at developing literature masterpieces. When adapting historical events for the stage certain liabilities must be taken. For instance not every detail can be included in a three hour play. Even then, an audience requires a comedic break from the dramatic action. Though some comedic parts might be added in, Henry V is a true account of the events that occurred prior to and following the Battle of Agincourt. Shakespeare’s decisions to structure the play how he did effect the structure, meaning and effect of the
The focus of this report will be The Battle of Hastings and William the Conqueror who lead the Normans into the Battle of Hastings. It will become clear to see that the Battle of Hastings was ‘The battle that changed history’ (Simon Newman, 2013: Online).
With the need for war came the need for protection. Castles surrounded the king for his protection against enemies. In addition,...