Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History and Systems of Psychology
Is psychology a science
What is psychology about
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History and Systems of Psychology
Psychology can be defined as the study behind human behavior, how individuals perceive the world around them, and how they react to these perceptions. Psychology considers itself a science. However, there are many who disagree with this notion. Often called a fictitious science or even a cult, psychologists have frequently had to defend their scientific community. Despite being a comparably new science, skepticism of whether or not psychology is an actual science has existed even before its establishment as an independent discipline. In fact, Immanuel Kant, a highly recognized 18th century philosopher, denied the validity of such a science. He contended that the study of the human mind could not become a proper natural science because events of the mind are not quantifiable (i.e. weighed or measured). Therefore, its data cannot be described mathematically, nor can it be truly manipulated experimentally. With arguments similar to those of Kant, many modern critics of psychology offer a lack of tangibility and quantifiability as indicative of its failure to be a true science.
Wilhelm Wundt, a 19th Century German physician and physiologist, is credited with establishing psychology as a separate science as well as being the “founding father” of experimental psychology. Since then, the science of psychology has continued to develop and mature. Over time, psychology has increased the extent to which scientific standards are met by its procedures for collecting data in both laboratory and non-laboratory research thanks to advancement in techniques and technology. Psychology, being a study of human behavior, has obvious links to other natural sciences such as biology, chemistry, and physics. All of these sciences are completely inte...
... middle of paper ...
...? It has become clear that this type of thinking is the driving force behind the argument against psychology as a legitimate science. If it is not physical, how do we observe, test and explore these features in others? The fact that these elements are not physically visible produces unique challenges for the study of psychology in terms of testing theories and analyzing its findings. However, these non-physical elements manifest themselves into the visible phenomenon of human behavior. Through our observations and interactions with others as well as our own introspection, we are aware that these features exist and that they differ in every human. Psychology has and continues to explore the variations in behavior and is constantly developing theories that attempt to explain and predict them, making it not only a valid science but an extremely important one as well.
The World of Psychology. (2002). A Pearson Education Company. Boston, MA: Samuel Wood & Ellen Green Wood p. 593
As Fodor states in his 1997 papers conclusion one must not only attack the generalizations but also the evidence, predictions and then the generalizations don’t actually yield true results. As he simply states, “You have to actually do the science,” (Fodor, 1997. p.162). Once you do this you can clearly see that mental states can be multiply realized in so far that results are logically confirmed. Through examples and explicating why Kim’s conclusion is a fallacy I have shown that Fodor’s conclusion that psychology is a science is valid.
The birth of psychology was in December of 1879, at Germanys University of Leipzig (Myers, 2014, p.2). In 1960, Wilhelm Wundt and Edward Titchener defines psychology as “the science of mental health” (Myers, 2014, p.4). However, two provocative American psychologists, John Watson and B.F Skinner, redefined psychology in 1920. They redefined psychology as “the scientific study of observable behavior” (Myers, 2014, p.4). The problem arose when psychologists realized people could not observe feeling or thought so they needed to come up with a new definition for psychology. We define psychology today as “the science of behavior and mental processes” (Myers, 2014, p.4). Psychology includes many subfields such as human development, social behavior,
Psychology can be broadly defined as the scientific and systematic study of people’s behavior and mental processes.
Schacter, D. L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Psychology. (2nd ed., p. 600). New York: Worth Pub.
The development of psychology like all other sciences started with great minds debating unknown topics and searching for unknown answers. Early philosophers and psychologists such as Sir Francis Bacon and Charles Darwin took a scientific approach to psychology by introducing the ideas of measurement and biology into the way an indi...
...en out of favor with many modern psychologist maybe because of the way people’s mentality change over the course of the years. I also believe that the unfortunate truth is that old philosophies are meant to be substituted by new and better ideas. Last but not least that what makes this subject of psychology so intriguing for me; the fact that there so many theories conflicting with each other yet, some way and some how, no idea is ether wrong nor incorrect; each idea has a compelling argument witch makes it unique.
The study of psychology began as a theoretical subject a branch of ancient philosophy, and later as a part of biological sciences and physiology. However, over the years, it has grown into a rigorous science and a separate discipline, with its own sets of guidance and experimental techniques. This paper aims to study the various stages that the science of psychology passed through to reach its contemporary status, and their effects on its development. It begins with an overview of the historical and philosophical basis of psychology, discusses the development of the various schools of thought, and highlights their effects on contemporary personal and professional decision-making.
Davis, S. F., & Palladino, J. J. (2003). Psychology. (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Rieber, R. W. (2001). Wilhelm Wundt in history: the making of a scientific psychology. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
There have been debates regarding whether social psychology should be dealt as a natural science or not. The ideology of natural science is very important as it affects the way the social psychologist deals with the situations. For example, if there are specific scientific objectives then the study can be laboratory based and use experimental procedures in order to gain knowledge. Psychologists who use this positivistic method are classified as experimental social psychologists. On the other hand, critical-social psychologists have competed with the experimental-social psychologists. The strength of the critical-social psychologists is that they’ve used a range of different methods in research, and have...
In terms of a traditional science, one key point is empiricism: a reliance on observations of behaviours instead of our logical reasoning, to further aid explanations of why humans act in certain ways (Valentine, 1992:5). In this way Psychology could be considered a science as psychologists are constantly monitoring behaviours some may perceive as common sense, for example Milgram’s study into obedience (1974). However, for an outcome of any observation to be correct, we must have faith in how it was measured. Two further questions arise from this in relation to Psychology as a scientific measure: whether Psychology doe’s mis-measure, and secondly whether, as some propose, Psychology is ordinari...
Weiner, I. Healy, A. Freedheim, D. Proctor,R.W., Schinka,J.A. (2003) Handbook of Psychology: Experimental psychology,18, pp 500
Psychology started, and had a long history, as a topic within the fields of philosophy and physiology. It then became an independent field of its own through the work of the German Wilhelm Wundt, the founder of experimental psychology and structuralism. Wundt stressed the use of scientific methods in psychology, particularly through the use of introspection. In 1875, a room was set-aside for Wundt for demonstrations in what we now call sensation and perception. This is the same year that William James set up a similar lab at Harvard. Wilhelm Wundt and William James are usually thought of as the fathers of psychology, as well as the founders of psychology?s first two great ?schools? Structuralism and Functionalism. Psychologist Edward B Titchner said; ?to study the brain and the unconscious we should break it into its structural elements, after that we can construct it into a whole and understand what it does.? (psicafe.com)
The profession of psychology has been around since the time of the Greeks, but did not develop into its own discipline until around the late 1800s. A German physiologist named Wilhelm Wundt began using scientific research methods in order to investigate reaction times. He also was the first person to make the association between physiology and human thought and behavior. In 1879, he opened the first psychology lab at the University of Leipzig. This event has been said to be the official beginning of psychology as a separate scientific discipline (Landrum). Over the years, many influential people have helped the profession of psychology experience a dynamic evolution into various subfields