Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of English American Literature
History of English American Literature
History of English American Literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History of English American Literature
The Scarlet Letter Freely Adapted as a Movie
The gods and goddesses of Greek mythology had temples erected in their names. They were worshipped and most times adored. The people brought offerings to these gods in the form of food, drink, and gold. Today’s gods and goddesses don’t sit high on Mount Olympus. They sit high on or behind the movie screen. We visit their temples in record numbers and bring food, drink, and the mighty dollar. But what do they offer us in return? Voyeurism, titillation, narcissism÷all in a rebirth of classical American literature, which through their filters becomes sappy love stories with politically correct happy endings. In this way, their gifts are made more palatable for an audience they feel is not quite ready for films dealing with bitter social controversy, such as sin, hypocrisy, spiritual crisis, and guilt.
Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter is one of the classics that is experiencing this renaissance. Director Roland Joffe has enlisted the aid of writers Michael Mann and Christopher Crowe to produce a body of work also entitled The Scarlet Letter. The effort to introduce the American audience to this classical piece of literature was undertaken, as the film’s star Demi Moore asserts, because "not many people have read the book" (qtd. in Mr. Showbiz, par. 4). However, in doing so, Joffe has taken away the essence of Hawthorne. "It [is] sorrowful to think how many days and weeks and months and years of toil [have] been wasted on these musty papers [of Hawthorne’s] never more to be glanced at by human eyes. But, then, what reams of other manuscripts - filled [·] with the thought of inventive brains and the rich effusion of deep hearts - [have] gone equally to oblivion" (Hawthorne 46; The Custom House).
In film, the viewer sees a story from the director’s perspective. When experiencing a novel, the reader is drawn into the authorâs story and relates to the characters and events created by the author. He is allowed to bring forth his own imagination to recreate the characters and events by visualizing what the writer describes. He chooses the voice of each character, pictures how the character looks, and brings his own personal experiences forth to enhance the written word. He has an opportunity to be one-on-one with the author, hear his words, and experience for myself the charactersâ emotions.
In The Scarlet Letter, author Nathaniel Hawthorne efficiently conveys his purpose to the audience through the use of numerous rhetorical devices in his novel. Two such rhetorical strategies Hawthorne establishes to convey his purpose of informing the audience of valuable life lessons in The Scarlet Letter are characterization and the theme of duality.
Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter. Enriched Classic ed. New York City: Simon & Schuster, 2004. Print.
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
Griswold, Rufus Wilmot. "The Scarlet Letter." The Library of Literary Criticism of English and American Authors. Ed. Charles Wells Moulton. Gloucester, Massachusetts: Peter Smith Publishing, 1989. 341-371.
Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter is one of the most respected and admired novels of all time. Often criticized for lacking substance and using more elaborate camera work, freely adapted films usually do not follow the original plot line. Following this cliché, Roland Joffe’s version of The Scarlet Letter received an overwhelmingly negative reception. Unrealistic plots and actions are added to the films for added drama; for example, Hester is about to be killed up on the scaffold, when Algonquin members arrive and rescue her.
These included the British interference with American shipping, a naval blockade. This was brought about because Great Britain did not want the United States to provide the French, whom they were at war with, with food and supplies. The British kidnapped American sailors and forced them to work on British ships. This harsh treatment towards the Americans was another reason why the war was caused. Also, many American settlers believed that the British pushed Native Americans to fight settlers. A major causation of the war was that Congressmen leaders demanded war against Britain, they wanted British aid to Native Americans stopped, and they wanted the British out of
Gerber, John C. "Form and Content in The Scarlet Letter." The Scarlet Letter: A Norton Critical Edition. Eds. Seymour Gross, Sculley Bradley, Richmond Croom Beatty, and E. Hudson Long. New York: W.W. Norton and Co., 1988.
America took on one of the greatest army two times for one thing, independence. The War of 1812 was pointless. Many leaders and conflicts came out of this war for many different reasons. When the war ended the war was neither won or lost by either side. Land went back and forth, but in the end no land was either won or gained.
I cannot imagine what was going on in the mid of President James Madison the Commander in Chief of the United states during the war of 1812. Some of you may refer to the war of 1812 as the American and British war; some refer to as being the second American war of independence. I will explain to you the significance of the Peace Treaty Ghent. The positive results of the Peace Treaty, and how it
Introduction With the ongoing battles between England and France in the early 19th century, the newly formed United States found itself thrust in the middle of this struggle. In the early part of the century Napoleon was on a mission to once again establish a mighty French empire of early years. But with the build up of the royal British Navy the English were trying fiercely to hold Napoleon in check. The United States was determined to stay neutral and continue its trading with both nations. However several mandates passed by both France and England made this very difficult. With England’s naval blockade and the repeated search and seizure of American trade vessels, the United States, led by an aggressive group of leaders in congress known as the Young War Hawks, took a very aggressive approach to Britain and its royal navy. However, the War Hawks and President Madison also had plans of expansion in mind, to extend its boarders to the North Pole, home to royal colonies of the now hated Great Britain. With this plan and the negative feeling toward Britain, the war was just around the corner. And in June of 1812, a full-fledged war was upon them. The war, which lasted approximately two years, was a very bloody and costly battle to both the United States and Britain. Systematic Analysis To begin to look at this war we must take a look at the system the world was in at the time. The world was dominated by a bi-polar system, with France and England being the two poles.
At the time Canada was still a British colony, so the British also had the Canadians as allies. President Madison came to the realization that to get free trade, his Navy, and independence back from the clutches of the British Empire was to go to war with them. The United States senate voted on the issue and it passed by a vote of 19-13. The War of 1812 lasted about 3 years, it began in June of 1812 and didn’t end until February of 1815. In October of 1812 the U.S. made a crucial error trying to establish a foothold in Canada. The U.S. suffered serious navigational problems and could not get their forces across the Niagara River. These errors lead to an attack by the British and ultimately a surrender of U.S. troops. With this victory the British Empire controlled the eastern Canada line throughout the war. The next big battle was in September of 1813 at Lake Erie. The United States navy finally had their luck turn around when they outnumbered the British royal navy. They defeated them and took control over the lake, which helped them win back Detroit and also defeat the Indians at the battle of the Tharnes, it was a huge victory for the U.S. navy. The British retailed in many ways during this war, one of them was the
Why would the War of 1812 be known as the forgotten war? I am led to believe that the war of 1812 was considered the “Forgotten War” because it wasn’t the easiest of wars fought against the British. This war showed much significance. It had marked an end to the British invading western territory. On the other hand, it was a struggle for the Americans.
American involvement in Vietnam was largely in response to Cold War polices and Strategies. Kennedy took a much more laid back approach to Vietnam than Eisenhower did. He only wanted to support the South and not give them direct military aid by getting involved. Kennedy believed that the nations themselves should bear the burden of fighting the war and America would merely give them supplies and political support. However, the administration’s attempt to help the South largely failed because neither the South Vietnamese nor the Americans knew how to deal with guerrilla warfare. Another issue was that Diem’s support quickly declining to the point where it was just about his own family. He never trusted any popular government official in office, and would quickly replace them. Kennedy kept urging Diem to change his ways before all support for the South diminished (Kaiser). Between 1960 and 1968 Vietnam evolved into an American war and the tactics greatly affected the American soldiers.
Overall, by the end of the War of 1812, both sides had accomplished exactly nothing except destroying little bits and pieces of the enemy. Neither side had settled any of the issues they were originally fighting over, nor had either side technically "won" according to the Treaty of Ghent (1814). The United States did gain some things indirectly from the war though, like another degree of respect from foreign nations and the identification of more war heroes. The war also proved that the Americans were able to survive completely separated from European Affairs. None of these results though were the desired ones from the war. If the Americans would have been able to put aside their regional selfishness and differences, perhaps the War of 1812 would have accomplished more for the United States than it really did
Nevertheless reuniting two opposite things is difficult , it was even harder to reunite a communist and a tribal types of governments. And so in the years after the reunification , things were not going very well as the south wanted to keep it’s communist identity and ideology and the north wanted to keep it’s long going tribal system. From there started some fundamentalist movements each wanting what in the past was theirs. Two years were more than enough to distinguish betwe...