Likitha Nimmagadda Throughout history, there has been an inescapable struggle between instilling ancestral customs and following the path of progress through adaptation. Author Yukio Mishima experienced this struggle during the time he wrote the novel The Sailor Who Fell From Grace With the Sea as his political ideology leaned towards conservatism and preserving traditional Japanese beliefs such as the samurai lifestyle. Post World War II was a transitional period for Japan as it started embracing the Western mannerisms of the Allied countries. Mishima’s internal conflict between this dichotomy -- westernization and traditionality -- is represented in the novel through the character of Noboru. Noboru struggles between his immersion in traditional …show more content…
Samurai values through the chief and his association with modernized, Western values as a result of Ryuji and Fusako’s ideologies. During this period, many Japanese saw the westerners to be an intrusion into their traditional way of life.
In this way, the chief is a character who embodies the values of the traditional Japanese samurai culture. Although he isn't an outright samurai, the chief showcases the seppuku, or ritual suicide, aspect of the samurai in his murder of the kitten. In traditional culture, suicide through disembowelment is a way to escape dishonor. The chief felt that innocence is a an illusion that clouds reality; hence, in his eyes, the only honorable way to live is to see the bare fundamentals of reality. Therefore, the kitten was committing the worst form of dishonor by being blind to the real world. To aid the kitten, the chief performed his own form of seppuku by killing and disemboweling the kitten. In his words, this was necessary to “... fill the world’s great hollows” as this was the only way to “... achieve real power over existence” (57). Here, the ‘great hollows’ mentioned in the text are a symbol of innocence. In order to disillusion oneself from the hollows of innocence and achieve power over existence, it is necessary to wipe clean any lingering dishonor. The idea of death to escape dishonor is one that is very traditional because of its association with the samurai. When this is mentioned in the novel, Mishima uses grandiose diction such as “great” (57), “resplendent” (58), and “dazzling” (58) as a subtle idolization of this representation of tradition to input his personal opinion on the subject. Noboru, the character portrayal of Mishima’s opinions, decides to take part in the gang by his own volition because it allowed him “... contact with the naked universe” or, in other words, reality (149). From this, it can be inferred that Noboru also believes in the traditional samurai values embodied by the chief which spurs his participation in the gang. However, for Noboru, keeping these beliefs is not without struggle mainly due to his strong attachment with
modernity through his home life. Post-war Japan was a period of Westernization and modernization due to American influences in the restoration process. As such, many Japanese citizens, such as Fusako, were swayed by this influence as they believed it was the future of the country. Fusako is characterized as a strong-willed woman who rarely strays from her conviction that modernization is quintessential to living a successful life, personally and financially. Towards the beginning of the novel, Fusako is known to be a widow, but as the novel progresses, Fusako meets Ryuji and decides to get married for love. A marriage based on love is a very Western and modern concept because in the traditional Samurai lifestyle, marriage is for the purpose of familial alliances and procreation. Consequently, if a marriage takes place, it is reasonable to assume that there is mutual benefit for both of the families involved. However, Fusako shows her clear diversion from this mindset when she declares, “There isn’t another man in this world as strong and as gentle and as wonderful in every way as Mr. Tsukazaki” (145). The repetition and polysyndeton in this line represents the strong and constant feelings that Fusako feels for Ryuji. She loves him, which, in and of itself, is a modern idea, but the fact that she is marrying him is evidence of her complete rejection of traditional customs. Additionally, another very Western idea of the time is the idea of importing Western goods such as clothes and furniture. The materialistic items represent the extent of one’s shift to modernity. Fusako’s shift to Western ideals is close to complete, so her store, Rex, “...enjoyed a reputation ... particularly in imported men’s wear and accessories...”(25) and her house contains western furniture “...ordered from New Orleans...” (25) because of the fact that “...her mode of living was thoroughly Western...”(113). This proves that Fusako does not associate at all with Japan and its values because of her connection with Western goods. Since he was a little boy, Noboru was exposed to this modernized environment. Yet, he also has connections to the chief as that is the environment Noboru chose to associate himself with. Thus, Noboru is in a state of turmoil because he can't associate with either value: tradition or lack thereof. This is evident during the New Years party. Traditionally, the man of the house, which would be Ryuji, is supposed to start off the toast. Attempting to follow with tradition, Noboru says, “‘It seems pretty silly for Mr. Tsukazaki to drink out of the smallest (cup)’” (114). However, Noboru’s attempts are fruitless as his mother insists for Noboru to start off the toast to which he acquiesces. Noboru has a constant internal struggle between expressing his beliefs and complying with the beliefs of his mother. Mishima emphasizes Fusako’s materialistic and Western qualities to show his negative viewpoints towards the radicalists. To Mishima, the idea of rejecting one’s country when one should actually be serving their country is absolutely abhorrent, and this is represented in the novel through Noboru’s struggle between these ideals. Additionally, Mishima presents those individuals in Japan who were originally very traditional before they transitioned into modernity. In the novel, Ryuji is a representation of transitional Japan because of his shift from traditionalism to modernity as a result of his association with Fusako. Before Ryuji met Fusako, he was still very committed to his career and the sea because they represent traditional Samurai values that gave his life meaning. Noboru idolizes Ryuji as a hero because of his sacrifice of life and happiness for duty. He says, “‘That sailor is terrific! He’s like a fantastic beast that’s just come out of the sea all dripping wet’” (49). In this line, the ‘sea’ and the description of Ryuji as ‘dripping wet’ are metaphors for the fact that Ryuji emerged from sailing as a traditional man. After Ryuji and Fusako’s relationship becomes more serious, Ryuji decides to give up his profession. This is the first step in his transition to modernity in the eyes of Noboru; if Ryuji left sailing behind, he is also leaving traditional Japan behind. Noboru’s inner dialogue, “Can this man be saying things like that? This splendid hero who once shone so brightly?” (158) exemplifies Noboru’s acknowledgement of the dishonor that this transition brings. At the same time, this passage highlights Noboru’s inner struggle to keep to his traditional values because his own hero is rejecting those beliefs. In this way, how can Noboru be expected to keep to his values? Noboru is surrounded by modernity, so he can’t find peace with his own beliefs and the beliefs of those around him leaving him in a state of perpetual inner conflict. In the end, Noboru decides to reject Ryuji and his transformation, deciding, instead, to keep his own traditions regardless of the potential struggle with his family in the future. Mishima uses Noboru to express his own personal biases towards Japan’s post-war Westernization in Ryuji’s apparent loss of honor. It can be interpreted that Mishima disapproved of people who commit acts that parallel Ryuji, so he created the character of Noboru to oppose Ryuji’s change. Both Mishima and Noboru don’t fit in with the society of their time and are forced to seek comfort in the traditional values of the samurai culture. Mishima uses Noboru’s character to emphasize the inevitable discomfort of change that certain individuals must endure. Throughout society, there will always be people that oppose change. But, it is wise to remember that change can only take place if there is tradition to build upon. Word Count: 1389
A human being develops and grows throughout their life through many challenges and sometimes it takes an event in one’s life to change a person. In the novel “The Caine Mutiny” by Herman Wouk, is a novel about Willie Keith, a chubby and well educated son from an upper class family who joins the Navy. Willie goes into the Columbia University School of Journalism, which has been converted for the war effort. He is almost rejected because of his physical reasons of not being fit, but his Princeton background saves him from being rejected. As soon as he stepped in this navy life and went through a long journey with the navy crew , Willie became more independent, responsible and courageous.
Much of what is considered modern Japan has been fundamentally shaped by its involvement in various wars throughout history. In particular, the events of World War II led to radical changes in Japanese society, both politically and socially. While much focus has been placed on the broad, overarching impacts of war on Japan, it is through careful inspection of literature and art that we can understand war’s impact on the lives of everyday people. The Go Masters, the first collaborative film between China and Japan post-WWII, and “Turtleback Tombs,” a short story by Okinawan author Oshiro Tatsuhiro, both give insight to how war can fundamentally change how a place is perceived, on both an abstract and concrete level.
In Sandra Benitez’s novel, A Place Where the Sea Remembers, we get to know the lives and struggles of the residents of a small town in Mexico. Each character faces a conflict that affects the course of his or her life. The conflict I chose was the conflict that Marta was with her child and how her anger about the child made her do things she wished she could take back. It all starts with Marta and her sister. Marta is pregnant and thinks she can't take care of the kid so she wants an abortion. Then once Choyo Marta’s sister husband found out he insisted to take the kid once he is born. So then Marta decided to take care of the baby until it was born but then after time went by the husband of Choyo said that he wouldn't be able to take the kid because he was already going to have a child with Choyo. Once Marta was told this she let her anger get the best of her which then lead her to
Akira Kurosaw’s Seven Samurai is a film that encompasses various ideologies in order to allow the audience to understand the lives of Japanese people during the 1600’s. The film delves deep in social issues of the roles of the people within the society, the expectations as well as the obligations within the respected castes and elements within groups of ; suffering, working together, protecting family and working for the better good of the community.
experience, because ‘she had the face of America’s enemy and would always have such a face’[5]. However, the Japanese are not merely victims and out of a sense of superiority, they choose to maintain. their detachment from American society. Hatsue’s influential mentor Mrs Shigemura has contempt for American culture and warns Hatsue to stay away from the ‘hakujin’[6].... ... middle of paper ...
Christopher Benfey’s work The Great Wave is a narrative driven by a collection of accounts, stories and curious coincidences tying together The Gilded Age of New England in particular with interactions and connections to the Japan of old and new. In the context of The Great Wave, Benfey's own personal journey to Japan at the age of sixteen should be understood. Embarking on this voyage to learn traditional writing, language and Judo, his story can also be seen as a not only a historical continuation, but also a personal precursor to the vignettes he discovers and presents to the reader.
Mishima, Yukio. The Sailor Who Fell From Grace With The Sea. Trans. John Nathan. New York: Vintage, 1994.
In conclusion, Katsu’s tale allows one to delve deep into the day to day life of an unemployed samurai during the end of the Tokugawa era. His life can be observed to see the immense privilege the samurai status held. Not only that, he displays the values of a samurai warrior and although he does not act like an honorable samurai, he is an honorable warrior. Katsu displays the tenacity of both samurai privileges and values during the late Tokugawa shogunate. Although his life may not exemplify the ideal samurai, it does in fact allow one to observe the life of an ordinary samurai.
Throughout history artists have used art as a means to reflect the on goings of the society surrounding them. Many times, novels serve as primary sources in the future for students to reflect on past history. Students can successfully use novels as a source of understanding past events. Different sentiments and points of views within novels serve as the information one may use to reflect on these events. Natsume Soseki’s novel Kokoro successfully encapsulates much of what has been discussed in class, parallels with the events in Japan at the time the novel takes place, and serves as a social commentary to describe these events in Japan at the time of the Mejeii Restoration and beyond. Therefore, Kokoro successfully serves as a primary source students may use to enable them to understand institutions like conflicting views Whites by the Japanese, the role of women, and the population’s analysis of the Emperor.
Katsumoto, who sees his rebellion in service for the Emperor, has pledged his life to defending the dying code of the samurai; “out of loyalty to the tradition the emperor represents, he would sacrifice his life in an instant…if the emperor requested it” (Ebert). That the emperor has not requested Katsumoto to commit the ritual suicide known as seppuku tells of his split views on the modernizers and the traditionalists; perhaps reflecting The Last Samurai’s message of trying to reconcile both modernism and tradition to create a new cultural identity, one that Nathan Algren has achieved by the end of the film. While Katsumoto himself does not achieve this, dying by his own hand as samurai tradition dictates, he initiates the catalyst for Algren’s renewal of identity and purpose; he ‘recognizes in Algren something of the warrior stuff” and holds “philosophical conversations with [Algren] about the ethnics of war and warriors” (Schickel). These styles of conversations between Algren and Katsumoto, alongside with scenic views of the nature surrounding the village and temple, “breaks the convention that the Western hero is always superior to the local culture” (Ebert); Algren finds himself impressed and respectful of the cultural heritage that Katsumoto imparts with him,
Suzuki, Tomi. Narrating the Self: Fictions of Japanese Modernity. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1996.
Yukio Mishima’s novel The Sailor who fell from Grace with the Sea, represents the conflicts between pre-WW2 Japan and post-WW2 Japan, the author constructs the novel with characters whose lives are pulled into conflicting directions that portray the changing culture of Japan during that era. In the novel Fusako, the mother of Noboru and the girlfriend of Ryuji, is a woman who is caught up by conflicts, that many post-WWII Japanese women would face, which take place in her life and are direct cause of her actions throughout the novel. Fusako’s conflicts symbolize the issues faced by post-WWII Japan. Fusako is a woman with who has needs for intimacy but seeks these needs as if she was man, she has to deal with the needs of her growing boy, Noboru, who is fatherless at the moment, and also has the need to transform into a Westernized business woman as opposed to representing a traditional Japanese woman.
In every direction the sea rages and growls, tumbling its inhabitants in an ever-lasting rumble. Glory, honor, and duty are washed upon the glimmering golden shores of the Japanese empire. The sturdy land-bearers clasp hands with those thrown into the savage arms of the ocean. This junction of disparate milieus forms the basis of an interlocking relationship that ties conflicting elements and motifs to paint a coherent, lucid final picture. In The Sailor Who Fell From Grace with the Sea, Mishima incorporates the impact of contradictory settings of land and sea, combative ideologies of the Western and Eastern hemispheres, and inherent dissimilarities amongst the characters’ lifestyles in order to reinforce the discrepancy between his ideal Japan and the country he observed.
• Mishima, Yukio. The Sailor Who Fell from Grace with the Sea. Trans. John Nathan. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1965.
Yukio Mishima’s Temple of the Golden Pavilion, set in postwar Japan, gives way to a reflection of the postwar experience both the representation of military aggression and in use of symbolism of beauty, loss, and destruction. A story about Mizoguchi, a young, stuttering acolyte’s obsession with beauty lends itself to the conflagration of the Temple of the Golden Pavilion, based loosely on a true story about the Kinkaku-ji.