Sacco and Vanzetti
Nathan Maples
Mr.Jared Davis
English III
18 October 2017
Thesis Statement: The Sacco and Vanzetti case was an unfair trial leading to the two men to be executed.
Introduction
The Murder and Robbery
Sacco and Vanzetti had solid alibis
They were charged with no evidence
The Marches and the lawyer who tried to free the men
The Marches and Protest
The Lawyer
The Conviction
The evidence from Sacco’s gun
The verdict and the execution
Conclusion
Sacco and Vanzetti Trial
The Sacco and Vanzetti case was an unfair trial leading to execution and violent protests as a result of it. In April of 1927 the Slater and Morrill Shoe company in South Braintree, Massachusetts, was robbed for $16,000. The paymaster
…show more content…
There was no one who could place them at the crime and both men had solid alibis and witnesses who testified on their behalf. After going to a garage to claim a car that was connected to the crime Sacco and Vanzetti were charged with the crime. Both men were carrying guns and neither had a criminal past. The two men were found guilty on July 14, 1921 anarchist and radicals moved into action claiming the trail was unfair and a mockery of justice (The Passion of ,1086). There was no money linking the two men to the crime There was no physical evidence to link Vanzetti to the crime. The Sacco and Vanzetti case was an unfair trial leading to the two men to be executed.
During the trial riots and protest broke out Worldwide by anti radicals mostly on Massachusetts calling for their release. Celestino
…show more content…
There was other evidence than the forensics that matched Sacco’s gun to the bullets found in the two victims. Upon their arrest protests broke out worldwide based on their innocence. The two men were executed due to an unfair trial.
Hartle, Terry. "'Sacco and Vanzetti': The Case That Never Dies." Christian Science Monitor, vol. 99, no. 239, 06 Nov. 2007, p. 15. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ulh&AN=27394776&site=ehost-live.Ivry, Benjamin.
“Sacco and Vanzetti: Murderers or Martyrs?” The Washington Times (Washington, DC), 24 Aug. 2007, www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-168067994.html?refid=easy_hf.
Lock, Joan. “Sacco and Vanzetti.” Famous Trials, Mason Crest Publishers, 2017.
Mcgirr, L. “The Passion of Sacco and Vanzetti: A Global History.” Journal of American History, vol. 93, no. 4, Jan. 2007, pp. 1085–1115., doi:10.2307/25094597.“Sacco and Vanzetti Executed.” History.com, A&E Television Networks, 2010, www.history.com/this-day-in-history/sacco-and-vanzetti-executed. “Sacco & Vanzetti.” Digital History, Digital History,
Why was the case brought? Give a detailed summary of the factors that led to the case (250 words).
Police also had fingerprints from the buick the was used in the South Braintree crime. But the fingerprints didn’t match and the police instead questioned them on their religion, political beliefs and associates, instead of the crime. The prosecutors used witnesses, but the witness accounts made no sense. Meaning it didn’t match the descriptions of the men and the stories weren’t the same and had loopholes. One witness said she saw the shooting from 60 feet away and said one of the men, which she said was Sacco, had big hands but he had small hands.
Reynolds, Larry. “Patriot and Criminals, Criminal and Patriots.” South Central Review. Vol 9, No. 1.
On August 23, 1927, Nicola Sacco and Barolomeo Vanzetti were executed in one of the most controversial legal cases in American history. Two men were shot and robbed in Braintree, MA, and two poor Italian immigrants were arrested for the crime. Although neither Sacco nor Vanzetti had criminal records, they both had pistols on them at the time, and followed a violent anarchist leader. Following their arrest, the seven-year case on the crime would drive national and international protests demanding their exoneration. There were numerous elements in the trial that influenced the guilty verdicts for the men including, but not limited to, weak evidence. The Sacco Vanzetti trial displays the social injustices and prejudice in American society during the time. It is evident that even though they are innocent, the court used Sacco and Vanzetti as scapegoats in this crime because of their beliefs and background.
This murder scene clearly demonstrates vigilante justice. Connor, Murphy, and Rocco were there to kill one man. While they were there, they found two other scumbags they thought deserved killing, a drug dealer who sold to children and a pimp who mistreated his hookers. Killing the two men was definitely vigilante justice. The brothers set out with a plan one target, Vincenzo, and included two more people they judged unworthy of living. Now they are starting to kill random evil
clergy finally decided to listen to his ideas and many of the accused were released
Randa, Laura E. “Society’s Final Solution: A History and Discussion of the Death Penalty.” (1997). Rpt.in History of the Death Penalty. Ed. Michael H. Reggio. University Press of America, Inc., 1997. 1-6 Print.
The aim of this paper is study the same primary sources that other historians have studied and see what conclusions if any can be drawn from them. The primary sources that will be used in this paper include but are not limited to online transcripts of the trial records, and other material written by the many historians of the years.
to prison for defying laws that they believed were unjust towards society. These two men
Johannes Mehserle was arrested on January 13th for the murder of Oscar Grant. Mehserle was granted bail; it was set at three million dollars (Bulwa). He testified that he thought that Oscar Grant had a weapon and was going to stock him with his stun gun but by accident he pulled out his gun. The prosecutors were trying to get him convicted of second-degree murder, by saying Mehserle was angry with Grant for resting the arres...
On August 20th, 1989 Lyle and Erik Menendez killed their parents inside their Beverly Hills home with fifteen shot gun blasts after years of alleged “sexual, psychological, and corporal abuse” (Berns 25). According to the author of “Murder as Therapy”, “The defense has done a marvelous job of assisting the brothers in playing up their victim roles” (Goldman 1). Because there was so much evidence piled up against the brothers, the defense team was forced to play to the jurors’ emotions if they wanted a chance at an acquittal. Prosecutor Pamela Bozanich was forced to concede that “Jose and Kitty obviously had terrific flaws-most people do in the course of reminding jurors that the case was about murder, not child abuse” (Adler 103). Bozanich “cast the details of abuse as cool, calculated lies” (Smolowe 48)...
...t anarchists put on trial were condemned of conspiracy to murder. Four were hanged, one killed himself, and three were pardoned later. This incident led to the end of the Knights of Labor, which was incorrectly associated with the bomb throwing. It was an all-around bad day.
The Rosenberg trial, which ended in a double execution in 1953, was one of the century's most controversial trials. It was sometimes referred to as, "the best publicized spy hunt of all times" as it came to the public eye in the time of atom-spy hysteria. Husband and wife, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, were charged with conspiracy to commit espionage. Most of the controversy surrounding this case came from mass speculation that there were influences being reinforced by behind-the-scenes pressure, mainly from the government, which was detected through much inconsistencies in testimonies and other misconduct in the court. Many shared the belief that Ethel Rosenberg expressed best as she wrote in one of her last letters before being executed, "-knowing my husband and I must be vindicated by history.
Ransdell, Hollace. “The First Sottsboro Trials.” UMKC School of Law. n.d. Web. 7 February 2012.
Centuries : Notorious Crimes, Criminals, and Criminal Trials in American History: H-R, 2016. EBSCOhost, proxygsu-afpl.galileo.usg.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgvr&AN=edsgcl.6482900301&site=eds-live&scope=site.