Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of human rights within the eu constitution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Role of General Principles in E.U. Law as Opaque and Uncertain
Since the founding European Community Treaties of the 1950’s there has
been a noticeable evolution in regards to the lack of provisions
concerning the protection of human rights in the conduct of the
Community affairs. Primarily this evolution was the work of The Court
of Justice, who stated that “the ‘general principles of EC law’
include protection for fundamental rights which are part of the common
constitutional traditions of Member States.”[1] Article 249 of the EC
treaty lays out the sources from which the Community may govern, with
greatest emphasis being placed on regulations and directives. However,
there are ‘softer’ forms of law, which have been adopted due to their
natural and logical evolution in practice. The ‘general principles’,
inspired by the common traditions and constitutional rules shared by
the Member States, fall into this category, and are thus used more as
aids to legal interpretation rather than definitions of the law
itself.
These general principles of EU law include; 1) Legal certainty and
legitimate expectations, (the knowledge of citizens of the likely
legal consequences of their actions); 2) Proportionality, (originally
a German based principle that the ECJ has adopted, which says that “it
must be ascertained whether the means which it employs are suitable
for the purpose of achieving the desired objective and whether they go
beyond what is necessary to achieve it.”[2]); 3) Equality/
non-discrimination, (“comparable situations must not be treated
differently and different situations must not be treated in the same
way unless such tr...
... middle of paper ...
...l Status of the Charter: Vital Question or
Non-Issue?’ (2001) 8 MJ 81
[19] Law Text, Cases and Materials (Third Edition) – Paul Craig and
Grainne De Burca
[20] Law Text, Cases and Materials (Third Edition) – Paul Craig and
Grainne De Burca
[21] Case T-54/99, max.mobil Telekommunikation Services GmbH v.
Commission, ruling of 31 Jan. 2002 paras. 48, 57
[22] Law Text, Cases and Materials (Third Edition) – Paul Craig and
Grainne De Burca
[23] Law Text, Cases and Materials (Third Edition) – Paul Craig and
Grainne De Burca
[24] Case C-13/94 [1996] ECR I-2143
[25] Case C-50/99, Deutsche Telekom v. Shroder [2000] ECR I-743
[26] Law Text, Cases and Materials (Third Edition) – Paul Craig and
Grainne De Burca
[27] Law Text, Cases and Materials (Third Edition) – Paul Craig and
Grainne De Burca
"Schenck v. United States. Baer v. Same.." LII. Cornell University Law school, n.d. Web. 6 Jan. 2014. .
The Human Rights Act of 1998 was co-founded upon the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950. Developed following the ending of the Second World War, European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) was constructed to further the idealistic principles and endeavours of equality among all human beings, as well as a devout declaration of preventing the reoccurrence of the holocaust and massacres which have occurred as a casus belli . ECHR comprises civil privileges and liberties fundamental to all human beings irrespective of race, gender, age, sexual orientation exclusive of discrimination. The UK government have promptly endorsed the ECHR, recognising the need of ...
Simmonds C., ‘Paramountcy and the ECHR: a conflict resolved? [2012] Cambridge Law Journal Vol. 71 Issue 3, 498-201
The principle of Supremacy of EU Law was established by the European Court of Justice in a series of cases. This principle authorizes EU Law to take precedence over
R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd and others [1999] All ER (D) 1173.
Prof. Jeffrey A. Brauch, The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the rule of law, Vol.11, Columbia Journal of European Law (2004-2005)
To answer this question I will firstly explain how EU law became incorporated within the member states I will then explain the various types of EU legislation's in circulation. This is important to define as the various types of methods will involve different enforcement procedures. Finally I will explain how EU law is enforced and the ways EU law will effect the member state and individual businesses. I will summarise my findings at the end of the essay, this will give details of all the key ideas I have ut across.
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights, as amended) (ECHR), Art 5(1)(e)
4.13 [6] pp. 149, 151-52 [7] 26 November 1987; Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Transcript No 1200 of 1987 [8] (2000) Ch 162 CA [9] (1993) 69 P & CR 170 [10] [1982] QB 84, 104-105 [11][1980] 1 WLR 1306 [12] [1976] Ch 179, 189, 198 [13] p. 224 [14] [1998] 1 FLR 806 [15] [1975] 3 All ER 768 [16] (2001) 48 EGCS 129 [17] (1996) 2 WLR 1498 [18] (1996) 72 P & CR 196, CA [19] 2nd ed (1993), p 324
According to Article 38 of the 1946 Statute of the International Court of Justice, the Court shall apply “international custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law” in its decisions (Kritsiotis 123). In other words, the International Court of Justice cites customs as a formal source of law. According to Roberto Unger, author of Law in a Modern Society, customary international law is best defined as “any recurring mode of interaction among individuals and groups, together with the more or less explicit acknowledgement of these groups and individuals that such patterns of interaction produce reciprocal expectations of conduct that out to be satisfied (Shaw 72-73). In other words, customary international laws are primarily concerned with how and why sates behave in a particular manner. Customs derive from the behavior of states (state practice) and the subconscious belief that a behavior is inherently legal (opinio juris). Evidence of state behavior is documented in the decisions of domestic courts, international courts, and international organizations. Unlike treaty law, customary laws are binding on all states. Additionally, if a treaty derives from a custom it is also binding on all states. Some of the international court cases that have been instrumental in the development of customary international law include the Nicaragua v. United States case, the Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries case, the Scotia case, the Asylum case, the Paquete Habana case, and the Lotus case.
"50 Years of EU Gender Equalitylaw." EUROPA. N.p., 25 Oct. 2007. Web. 09 Mar. 2014.
The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights is a document which brings together all of the Fundamental Human Rights together in one, single document. Before the inception of EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the member states of the European Union had many conflicting opinions on what exactly a human right entailed, therefore the need for a single, codified document outlaying the basic Fundamental Human Rights was great. The Charter was issued in 2000 and at this time, according to Jesse Norman, The Parliamentary Undersecretary of State for Industry and Energy, ‘The charter was then described as a ‘solemn proclamation’ and was designed to strengthen the EU’S political legitimacy, containing rights and freedoms as well as strengthening the rights of
It is for each member state to lay down the criteria for acquisition of Nationality, which is the only way to access EU citizenship, therefore, I believe, the contradiction between that competence of the Member State and the actions of the CJEU in matters of EU citizenship is a very important and interesting topic of research.
On December 10th 1948, the General Assembly adopted a Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This declaration, although not legally binding, created “a common standard of achievement for all people and all nations.to promote respect for those rights and freedoms” (Goodhart, 379). However, many cultures assert that the human rights policies outlined in the declaration undermine cultural beliefs and practices. This assertion makes the search for universal human rights very difficult to achieve. I would like to focus on articles 3, 14 and 25 to address how these articles could be modified to incorporate cultural differences, without completely undermining the search for human rights practices.
In any kind of legal relations, subject always play an important role, and it is one of the signals to determine the relation that pertaining the adjustment of any legislation system. International law is a legislation system that is a set of thousands of documents from various sources. The research about the subjects is necessary since it helps to find out the source of law, which relation pertains the adjustment of law. The subjects of international law include sovereign states and analogous entities, intergovernmental organizations, the individuals, and multinational corporations.