Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of the woman in literature
The role of the woman in literature
The role of the woman in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Jackson’s “The Daemon Lover,” the main protagonist feels helpless under the demands of society that she needs to find a husband. At the beginning of the short story, the woman exposes her nervous tendencyies with, “it was two minutes after ten; she was not satisfied with her clothes, her face, her apartment” (Jackson). Jackson depicts her in a anxious manner even before the time her fiance was supposed to come, she shows signs of her insecurity as a women, having a clean house, perfect and appropriate clothes, hair and makeup. It is the unfair ideals of society, that oppress women because of the expectation to uphold them. Ultimately revealing her loss of stability and the uncertainty she feels, explaining no matter what she does it will …show more content…
not take away how incomplete she feels. In spite of her uncertainty, Jackson explains,"Why don’t I go to the police..What a fool I’d look like. ..Yes, we were going to be married today, but he didn’t come…” (Jackson). Jackson describes the women being worried about not having him, she is trying to convince herself that she is not a “fool” with, "a certain clear view of life that might make a man satisfied and productive and happy" (Jackson) because of her confusion. She feels insecure about how he did not come, and how people view that in a bad way. She feels as if, looking like a fool is a bad thing, because of societal norms and how she cares how people perceive her. As a result of her uncertainty and anxiety, she falls victim to a loss of stability but she never gives up, "She came back many times, everyday for the first week ... but no matter how often or how firmly she knocked, no one ever came to the door" (Jackson). Jackson shows her perseverance of believing he is still there to represent the main protagonists vulnerability in the situation. She experiences a loss of stability when she realized something she was so certain about changed. In reality, women don't need men for comfort and stability, but she was so blindsided when he did not show, that it put her into a state of panic. The story overall puts in perspective what women feel in relationships and society everyday, feeling like they have to try so hard, for someone who may never commit in pursuit of "stability" that they offer. Jackson depicts the oppression women fall to under society of insecurity and representing the epitome of the fight women take feeling inferior to males. Thinking that the security lies within marriage and stability they offer and having to do what is expected. In Faulkner’s “Barn Burning,” Colonel Sartoris Snopes is oppressed by his father’s instability.
His father, an arson, constantly physically and mentally abuses Sartoris. Sartoris takes on a big responsibility for his father’s wrongdoings by taking the blame for his father, in regard to burning down the barns. He is forced to lie during investigations carried out by the Justice. In spite of that, Sartoris is hesitant to do the wrong action, always feeling “grief and despair” (Faulkner, 1). He lives his life walking on eggshells because of fear of not knowing the things his father was doing, and having to constantly pack and move and leave a past life behind. Sartoris's father demands his son to obey his every demand,he even expects Sartorius to lie for him in his trial, and tells him that he has to "to learn to stick to your own blood or [he] ain't going to have any blood to stick to" (Faulkner, 3). He tells Sartoris how staying by your family's side is the most important thing, even if you have to lie, acting as Sartoris’s oppressor. In effect of Sartoris’s fear of doing the wrong thing, he unexpectedly goes against his oppressor, his own father, in pursuit of doing the right thing. From his actions of telling on his father, his father is persecuted for his crimes, "knowing it was too late yet still running even after he heard the shot and, an instant later, two shots, pausing now without knowing he had ceased to run, crying "Pap! Pap!," running again before he …show more content…
knew he had begun to run" (p 11). His father left him without a sense of reassurance but making it feel like it was Satoris’s fault. His father acts as his oppressor by controlling his son, having over him, causing him to loss dignity. In Perkin Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper,” the nameless wife falls to insanity, under the constant control of her relentless husband, “John”.
The women's experiences traditional women oppression under men. She is thought of as unimportant, depicted by Gilman by not properly giving her a name. She represents a loss of identity because she is inferior to John, Gilman explains, “I sometimes fancy that in my condition if I had less opposition and more society and stimulus—but John says the very worst thing I can do is think about my condition, and I confess it always makes me feel bad. So I will let it alone and talk about the house” (Gilman). Gilman notable personifies the interference that John plays on her thoughts. He interrupts her thoughts describing her husband’s power and authority, “but John says”, exemplifying how is opinion is always right and superior to her own. He controls her head by subsiding the unhappy thoughts and projecting her thoughts to her surroundings, leading to the fascination with the wallpaper. Her sadness is not only derived from the sadness of the apparent ‘condition’ but the oppression she experiences in her relationship. His overarching restrictions that are placed on her, drive her farther into insanity, “life is very much more exciting now than it used to be” (Gilman). Gilman captures the irony, almost comical truth of her madness. She has been derived from pleasure and a normal life, that she finds joy in little things such as the
pattern on wall, describing it as “exciting”. She spends all day and night thinking about it, keeping her from reality. In effect of her lack of individuality, she has forced to succumb to total loss of control and insanity, “There are things in that paper which nobody knows but me, or ever will. Behind that outside pattern the dim shapes get clearer every day. It is always the same shape, only very numerous. And it is like a woman stooping down and creeping about behind that pattern. I don’t like it a bit. I wonder—I begin to think—I wish John would take me away from here!” (Gilman). She has began to hyperfocus on the wallpaper playing further into her fantasy life in her head, hiding the horror of her real life. She describes “the dim shapes get clearer every day”, acting as if she is getting better, but she is yet to advocate for herself due to how inferior and powerless she has already become. She acts as if she wants to free herself from the oppressing relationship but finds herself trapped. Overall, “The Yellow Wall Paper” shows the suffocating role a person can play in a relationship, traditionally giving all power to the male, and the effect it has on the lesser. This relationship, between being oppressed and feeling disempowered, is true to m
It has been stated that while doing what is right is not always easy, it is in fact doing what is right despite it being difficult that is quite the accomplishment. Justice one finds to be one of the major themes throughout “Barn Burning”. The notion of intuitive justice presents itself as a characteristic explored throughout William Faulkner’s literary masterpiece “Barn Burning” through the protagonist Colonel Sartoris Snopes, also referred to as Sarty throughout “Barn Burning”. Faulkner presents Sarty and demonstrates his sense of justice through literal actions and dramatic context.
The narrator makes comments and observations that demonstrate her will to overcome the oppression of the male dominant society. The conflict between her views and those of the society can be seen in the way she interacts physically, mentally, and emotionally with the three most prominent aspects of her life: her husband, John, the yellow wallpaper in her room, and her illness, "temporary nervous depression. " In the end, her illness becomes a method of coping with the injustices forced upon her as a woman. As the reader delves into the narrative, a progression can be seen from the normality the narrator displays early in the passage, to the insanity she demonstrates near the conclusion.
It is clear that in their marriage, her husband makes her decisions on her behalf and she is expected to simply follow blindly. Their relationship parallels the roles that men and women play in marriage when the story was written. The narrator’s feelings of powerlessness and submissive attitudes toward her husband are revealing of the negative effects of gender roles. John’s decision to treat the narrator with rest cure leads to the narrator experiencing an intense feeling of isolation, and this isolation caused her mental decline. Her descent into madness is at its peak when she grows tears the wallpaper and is convinced that “[she’s] got out at last, in spite of [John] and Jennie… and [they] can’t put her back!”
Sarty spent his entire life hiding behind the unspoken rule that blood is thicker than water. But, in the face of having to decide whether he should continue to overlook Abner’s amoral behavior, he chooses not to. Even though he tries to understand Abner’s reasoning, in his heart he cannot condone it. In a situation where Sarty-the child would be frightened to stand up against his father, Sarty-the man is not. It is unfortunate that he had to lose a father in order to regain his sense of morality, but in light of the situation he was in, it can be agreed, that he is better off.
Throughout the story, the reader is called to trust the narrator although it is clear she is going crazy, for she is the only telling the story. Gilman is able to develop the theme through this character’s point of view by showing that the narrator has no choice in the world in which she lives-- she must obey the men in her life above all else. If Gilman chose any other perspective, the story would not have been able to portray the woman’s oppression as well, because the reader would not have been able to see into her mind as it slipped away well into insanity.
As a result, women were stuck at home, usually alone, until their husbands got home. In the story, Jane is at home staring at the wallpaper in her room. The wallpaper’s color is described by Jane as being “repellent, almost revolting” (3) and the pattern is “torturing” and “like a bad dream” (10). The description of the wallpaper represents Jane’s and all women’s thoughts about the ideologies and rules upheld by men prior to the First World War. It is made evident that this wallpaper represents the screen made up of men’s ideologies at the time caging in women. Jane is subconsciously repelled by this screen and represents her discovering continuously figuring out what she wants. Metaphorically, Jane is trapped in that room by a culture established by men. Furthermore, Jane compares the wallpaper’s pattern to bars putting further emphasis on her feelings of being trapped and helpless. Later in the narrative, she catches Jennie staring at the wallpaper’s pattern and then decides to study the pattern and determine what it means herself. Her study of the pattern is representative of her trying to analyze the situation in which she’s in. By studying the pattern, she progressively discovers herself, especially when she sees the woman behind the
Even though her husband treats her with what seem at first as love, it becomes clear she is nothing more to him than a piece of property. Every time he talks to her, he asks her to get better for his sake and the children's, and only after mentions hers interests. He doesn't think that she has any normal human feelings or worries and attributes her behavior to minor nervous depression. He doesn't see her true suffering since he believes "there is no reason to suffer" (574). He could never understand that a woman can be unsatisfied with the role imposed on her by society. Even though the heroine recognizes that her condition is caused by something other than John's theory, she is too scared to voice her opinion.
Sarty has moved twelve times in his ten years of age and although the story does not state clearly, that this is not the first time his father has set fire to a barn, but shows that the chances are, that he probably has done this in the past which has affected Sarty in how he feels about his father. Sarty’s other family members include the mother, aunt, an older brother, and two twin sisters who are minor contributing factors in this story. The family knows the father is responsible for the burning of the barns and they even unwillingly help him at his requests. This story describes the family somewhat concerned for the father, but they never challenge his decision to burn the barns even though it is wrong.
The story begins when she and her husband have just moved into a colonial mansion to relieve her chronic nervousness. An ailment her husband has conveniently diagnosed. The husband is a physician and in the beginning of her writing she has nothing but good things to say about him, which is very obedient of her. She speaks of her husband as if he is a father figure and nothing like an equal, which is so important in a relationship. She writes, "He is very careful and loving, and hardly lets me stir without special direction." It is in this manner that she first delicately speaks of his total control over her without meaning to and how she has no choices whatsoever. This control is perhaps so imbedded in our main character that it is even seen in her secret writing; "John says the very worst thing I can do is to think about my condition...so I will let it alone and talk about the house." Her husband suggests enormous amounts of bed rest and no human interaction at all. He chooses a "prison-like" room for them to reside in that he anticipates will calm our main character even more into a comma like life but instead awakens her and slowly but surely opens her eyes to a woman tearing the walls down to freedom.
She analyzes the significant languages, images, and symbols used in the text. After Barbara analyzed the short story, it basically pinpoints that Gilman’s was trying to make a feminist statement. Suess also goes into details about the representation of patriarchy in society and she tied it to text. The article showed that a form of patriarchy is introduced in the story, and that Gilman used John to represent a patriarchy and society. Barbara stated that in the story, John is a clear representation law, order, and reality. The article revealed that John 's suppression of Jane 's efforts to gain control of her own life through her choice of medicine and the opportunity to write reflects the more general oppression of Jane, as a woman and as a mentally ill person. I believe this article would be beneficial for my research paper because it goes into details about the story and talks about specific symbols used in the text that point towards my theory of how Gilman is making a feminist statement in the
Societal control of the accepted terms by which a woman can operate and live in lends itself to the ultimate subjugation of women, especially in regards to her self-expression and dissent. Gilman does an extraordinary job of effectively communicating and transforming this apparent truth into an eerie tale of one woman’s gradual spiral towards the depths of madness. This descent, however, is marked with the undertones of opportunity. On one hand, the narrator has lost all hope. On the other, she has found freedom in losing all hope. This subversion of the patriarchal paradigm is tactfully juxtaposed against a backdrop of the trappings of insanity.
To begin with, the narrator husband name is John, who shows male dominance early in the story as he picked the house they stayed in and the room he kept his wife in, even though his wife felt uneasy about the house. He is also her doctor and orders her to do nothing but rest; thinking she is just fine. John is the antagonist because he is trying to control her without letting her input in and endangers her psychological state. It is written in a formal style, while using feign words.
Gilman shows through this theme that when one is forced to stay mentally inactive can only lead to mental self-destruction. The narrator is forced into a room and told to be passive, she is not allowed to have visitors, or write, or do much at all besides sleep. Her husband believes that a resting cure will rid her of her “slight hysterical tendency” (Gilman 478). Without the means to express herself or exercise her mind in anyway the narrator begins to delve deeper and deeper into her fantasies. The narrator begins to keep a secret journal, about which she states “And I know John would think it absurd. But I must say what I feel and think in some way - it is such a relief” (Gilman 483)! John tells his wife that she must control her imagination, lest it run away with her. In this way John has asserted full and complete dominance over his wife. The narrator, though an equal adult to her husband, is reduced to an infancy. In this state the narrator begins her slow descent into hysteria, for in her effort to understand herself she fully and completely loses herself.
The son, Colonel Sartoris, known as Sarty, had to deal with constant rejection from his father, Abner. The story starts with Sarty feeling the anxiety of whether he should tell the judge the truth or lie for his farther. He is in an emotional dilemma on what to do. Sarty knew if he told the truth, that his father might have to go to jail. As Sarty was called by the judge to come forward, he said to himself, "He aims for me to lie, he thought, again with that frantic grief and despair. And I will have to do it." In despair, "Enemy! Enemy! he thought; for a moment he could not even see, could not see the judges face was Murphy 2 friendly nor discern that his voice was troubled" (398)
Gilman used John to portray a state of oppression. Janice Haney-Peritz stated that according to the feminist methodology, “the traditional roles of women are constricted to patriarchal order, in which masculine ways of thinking are privileged” ( Haney-Peritz 113). This theory gives the opportunity to be able to identify the misrepresentations of women’s role in society and helps one to look for social misconceptions that treat masculine behaviour as a norm and feminine viewpoint as a deviation. Regarding to the “Yellow Wallpaper”, John confines the narrator to a room, which taunts her. John banned her from performing any tasks, which included her writing. Consequently, this attitude explains two obvious roles: The narrator’s husband, who obviously represents “law, order, and authority” (Suess 79), and the narrator who is bound to play the role of a good wife. Throughout the text, one can see that Gilman uses the narrator to illustrate the perception of how women were treated, and their roles in society. Melissa Wright stated that “Feminism illustrated the status of men and women in society, and the main goal is to use these awarenesses, and knowledge gained to improve women’s lives, and their role in society (Wright 826). During the time period in which the story was written, men were the ones that ruled, and the women obeyed. “So I take