The Role Of Conflict In King Philip's War

1089 Words3 Pages

King Philip's war was the most destructive conflict in American history, compared to the sizes of the populations involved. The New England colonists lost five percent of their population, while the Native Americans lost nearly forty percent of their populations. The war was the culmination of the tensions that had been building between the Native Americans and the English settlers since their first encounters during the establishment of Plymouth Plantation. The Natives were losing their traditional ways of life, and were becoming more and more dependent on English goods. They were constrained by the land deals that they had made, and were running out of land and resources. The conflict was ignited by the deaths of two prominent Natives at …show more content…

The English had the goods that the Natives desired, but after the fur trade died down due to over-hunting, all the Natives had left to trade was their land. At first, the Natives sold their land without a full understanding of how the English viewed land ownership, due to their cultural differences. But as the English began buying more land and settling it, the English definition of land ownership became very clear. Despite this, the Natives, especially Massasoit, continued to sell their lands for very low prices. For example he sold lands near the Pokanoket village of Sowams for a mere 35 pounds in 1651. The sale of most of the Native land for such low prices put a strain on the Natives, who were watching their ancestral land be torn apart. As the English population increased, they acquired and settled more lands. By 1675, the English population in New England had reached fifty thousand, and the sale of Native land increased accordingly. In the ten years between 1665 and the outbreak of war in 1675, there were sixty-seven deeds registered for the sale of Native land. In addition, the English used less ethical methods to obtain the land. Josiah Winslow, who would become governor of Plymouth in 1673, used mortgaged Native land to effectively force the Natives off their land, whether they wanted to sell it or not. The …show more content…

First, the death of Alexander, King Philip's brother, in 1662. He was forced to go to Plymouth by Josiah Winslow, to stand before the court there. After spending a night at Winslow's house, Alexander died of a mysterious illness. Many Natives, including Philip, assumed that Alexander had been poisoned by Winslow. This served to reinforce Philip's hatred of the English. Later, in 1671, he met with officials in Plymouth, and was bullied into signing a treaty that would force him to give up all of his weapons, and pay a 100 pound fine.This gave Philip no choice but to prepare for war. In 1675, however, a Native named John Sassamon tried to warn Josiah Winslow of Philip's preparations for war. After he left , he was found dead in a frozen lake, and it was suspected he was murdered. One Native said he had seen three other Natives kill Sassamon. Tobias, and advisor of Philip's, Tobias's son, and a third man. They were all convicted of murder, despite there only being one witness, and English law requiring two. They were all executed, and the travesty of justice enraged the Natives who were gathering for the now inevitable

Open Document