Journeying across America from Philadelphia to San Francisco, Avram, a Polish rabbi, finds himself in the role of the hero in the 1979 Western parody, The Frisco Kid. As the film’s protagonist, he is tasked with leading a Jewish community over 6,000 miles away in San Francisco, continually acting in a manner consistent with irrationality due to his lack of knowledge of American cultural norms. As he travels across America, he continually finds himself in trouble with thieves, the law, and Native Americans, yet escapes each trial with unwavering persistence and a steady religious devotion. Set in the mid 1800’s, at the height of the American “Wild West” era, the film serves as a parody of the traditional Western hero, substituting an inexperienced, …show more content…
yet cagey Jewish Rabbi for the usual hardened, gun-slinging cowboy. At each point along the journey it seems Avram has no place in an outlaw’s world, yet as he overcomes each trial, it soon becomes clear that he is the only hero for the job, serving as a comic deconstruction of the traditional Western hero.
The Frisco Kid depicts the journey of an ignorant outsider in an unfamiliar world, critiquing the traditional Western hero by placing great emphasis on his religious piety, indicating success is attained through blind faith rather than pragmatic action. Avram’s success along his journey comes despite his general gullibility and cluelessness of American cultural norms. Although these traits may seem counterintuitive to achieving one’s goals along the western frontier, Avram asserts himself as an untraditional hero, proving these traits are requisites for his success. Tasked with leading a newly formed Jewish congregation in San Francisco, Avram must travel nearly 6,000 miles to find his new home. Having completed rabbinical school in Poland, he knows hardly anything about America, and aside from his ability to speak English, has no real skills to help him adapt to the new world he is thrown into. But, these are exactly the traits that allow him to accomplish his two goals of reaching San Francisco to lead his new congregation, and delivering the Torah (in a complete state) to said congregation. For …show more content…
example, after he and Tommy are chased by Native Americans on horseback, Avram notices the Torah is missing from his rucksack (1:02:17). Having just asked Tommy “What did [the Native Americans] want?” (1:04:47), Avram demonstrates a lack of understanding of the general rivalry between Native Americans and the white man, ignorant of their general perception as “dangerous” in the west during the 1850’s. The archetypal Western hero of “rugged masculinity, and superhuman abilities” (Turner, 48) would resort to violence to retrieve his lost object, relying on his gun to make “peace” with the tribe. However, Avram, instead of turning to brutality, a quality he seems rather incapable of expressing, returns to retrieve it, riding his horse back toward the Native American camp, ignorant to the potential dangers. And, even though he and Tommy are initially captured by the Native Americans, Avram eventually gets the Torah back, facilitated by his ignorance and dedication. Similarly, Avram’s entire friendship with Tommy is based on his ignorance to Tommy’s bank robbing tendencies and outlaw status. Avram, a man of morals, would likely not associate with someone like Tommy if he was aware of his occupation, and he especially would never allow himself to serve as an accomplice to a robbery as occurs in the film (50:00). But, because he develops a friendship with Tommy, he is provided with food, is able to survive the frigid cold, and has an experienced guide to lead him through the west toward San Francisco. Without this friendship, Avram would have either starved, frozen to death, or gotten lost, lacking the survival and navigational skills that Tommy provides. Again, Avram is saved by his ignorance, unable to identify Tommy as a criminal, and therefore developing a close bond, a bond which turns out to be necessary for him to make it to his final destination. The film repeatedly depicts Avram as acting in a seemingly counterintuitive manner, but, in actuality, his perceived “foolish” choices are vital to his success along the trail. In addition to his ignorance, Avram’s unflagging devotion to his religious beliefs often puts him in danger, but this stubbornness ultimately saves him.
As a devout Jew, Avram strictly abides by Jewish law, even when these practices are not convenient for him. For example, following Tommy’s bank robbery, as the two are chased by the townspeople, Avram refuses to ride his horse as it is the Sabbath, and would be unlawful for him to do so (59:45). Here, his innocence comes into play once again, as he is likely unaware of the hanging that awaits him if the mob catches up to him. But, even though he may not know the full extent of it, he knows there is danger if the crowd were to catch him, but places religious devotion over his own well being. Nowhere to be found is the classic “singing cowboy in the style of Gene Autry or Roy Rogers, portraying the “masculine image of the Western hero,” (49) the viewer only left with an inexperienced and stubborn rabbi to satisfy the role of hero. Later on, when Tommy peers of the cliff, and sees the search party nearing in the distance, he sprints back to Avram and the horses, urgent to ride on. Each man running with his horse, Tommy loudly questions “NOW?” pleading Avram to put his beliefs aside and ride on to safety. However, Avram stays strong as the camera jumps back and forth between the two men and the setting sun, representative of when Avram can ride his horse again. Once the sun is just barely visible over the crest of the mountain
ahead, the men stop, and wait for it to fully descend, before jumping on their horses and quickly speeding off. At this moment, the music changes to a more rapid, jaunty tune, signaling the danger is largely over and indicating excitement for the ride ahead. Riding off into the distance, a triumphant soundtrack playing, the scene evokes images of a classic Western, with the heroes victoriously riding off into the sunset. However, in this Western parody, Tommy mutters, “Longest damn day of my life,” the light humor working to minimize the serious trouble Avram’s inconvenient religious devotion almost got them both into, as a successful escape is observed. Such a tactic is identified by Turner in his characterization of the traditional Western parody: “The comedian can do this because comic discourse often masks serious critique as harmless frivolity.” (Turner, 3) Such again evidences the film’s critique of the Western hero through Avram’s role as a religious figure, demonstrating the near deadly outcome of not being to ride a horse, but then quickly brushing it off as if nothing ever happened with the inclusion of a simple joke as the scene’s close. The decomposition of the archetypal Western through a religious figure as hero continues when Avram is tied to a stake by the Native American’s and questioned about what he would and wouldn’t do to get the Torah back (1:06:00). Fully devoted to his assignment to bring the Torah to San Francisco, as well as to the preservation of the Torah itself, Avram offers to give up literally everything he owns to ensuring the chief returns the Torah to him. Ropes lashed around his hands and arms, firmly tied to the wooden stake, Avram is alone, surrounded by a strange culture of individuals that he has never seen before. Tommy is the only familiar person near him, yet he is also tied up and can only mouth words and attempt to signal responses with head motions. Huddled around in a large circle, the Native Americans all quietly gaze upon Avram as he is questioned, their collective piercing glare isolating him even more than he already is. Despite facing death by fire, constrained by ropes, and undergoing questioning in front of a menacing crowd of strangers, Avram keeps his cool, even as the chief approaches him, asking the most intense question yet: “If I give you back Torah, will you purify your soul by fire?” Glancing first at Tommy in hopes of assurance of the correct answer, Avram quickly looks away, as he knows the correct answer inside. The camera zooms in for a tight-shot on his face, emphasizing his slow turn of the neck to view the burning flames below him. Immediately, the camera jump cuts to the flames, accompanied by the introduction of a quick tempo song, mirroring the excitement of the scene as Avram’s demise seems imminent. He responds with a calm, and simple “yes,” before being slowly lowered into the fire pit, putting up no resistance, in contrast to the fiery opposition that one would expect from a traditional Western hero. The flames crackling at his back, the chief asks yet another question: “If I let you go, will you give me Torah?” Without hesitation, Avram exclaims a loud “No!” even as he is lowered into the fiery bed. He continues to descend until he is pulled up right at the last second, preventing his death, the ritual called off by the chief after witnessing Avram’s amazing display of faith, willing to literally go down in flames for his faith holy literature. Avram acts a foil to the “the central Western figure [who often] remained somehow stronger, smarter, and faster than regular folk,” actually saved by his stubbornness and unrelenting piety, rather than his masculinity and wit. Because of his blind religious devotion, Avram doesn’t need these extraordinary abilities of the classic cowboy, only able to survive due to his strict moral code and tenacious perseverance. Here, the film clearly deconstructs the masculine Western hero, crafting a new hero with the qualities of an average man, possessing a strong sense of faith, and creating situations in which only this comedic foil could succeed. Avram’s willingness to die before relinquishing his possession of the Torah is representative of the blind faith he practices throughout the film, playing the role of the backwards Western hero as opposed to the traditional gallant gun slinger. The Frisco Kid utilizes an eccentric, yet simple rabbi to dismantle the traditional, masculine Western hero. In each caper along his journey, Avram escapes danger due to his ignorance of social norms and his undying religious devotion, rather than his dueling skills or outdoor savvy. The film’s repetition of faith triumphing over action frames Avram as the ideal hero, successful in his journey because of his non-traditional characteristics.
Because of the outlaw hero’s definitive elements, society more so identifies with this myth. Ray said, “…the scarcity of mature heroes in American...
The author, Sherman Alexie, is extremely effective through his use of ethos and ethical appeals. By sharing his own story of a sad, poor, indian boy, simply turning into something great. He establishes his authority and character to the audiences someone the reader can trust. “A little indian boy teaches himself to read at an early age and advances quickly…If he’d been anything but an Indian boy living in the reservations, he might have been called a prodigy.” Alexie mentions these two different ideas to show that he did have struggles and also to give the audience a chance to connect with his struggles and hopefully follow the same journey in becoming something great. By displaying his complications and struggles in life with stereotypical facts, Alexie is effective as the speaker because he has lived the live of the intended primary audience he is trying to encourage which would be young Indian
Nordheimer, J. (1978, December 10). All-American Boy on Trail. New York Times [New York], p. 1.
The setting of the essay is Los Angeles in the 1800’s during the Wild West era, and the protagonist of the story is the brave Don Antonio. One example of LA’s Wild West portrayal is that LA has “soft, rolling, treeless hills and valleys, between which the Los Angeles River now takes its shilly-shallying course seaward, were forest slopes and meadows, with lakes great and small. This abundance of trees, with shining waters playing among them, added to the limitless bloom of the plains and the splendor of the snow-topped mountains, must have made the whole region indeed a paradise” (Jackson 2). In the 1800’s, LA is not the same developed city as today. LA is an undeveloped land with impressive scenery that provides Wild West imagery. One characteristic of the Wild West is the sheer commotion and imagery of this is provided on “the first breaking out of hostilities between California and the United States, Don Antonio took command of a company of Los Angeles volunteers to repel the intruders” (15). This sheer commotion is one of methods of Wild West imagery Jackson
He has endured and overcame many fears and struggles, but during this section, we truly acquire an insight of what the little boy is actually like – his thoughts, his opinions, his personality. Contrary to his surroundings, the little boy is vibrant and almost the only lively thing around. I love him! He is awfully appalled by the “bad guys” and shockingly sympathetic toward dead people. For example, when the father raided a house and found food, the little boy suggested that they should thank them because even though they’re dead or gone, without them, the little boy and father would starve. My heart goes out to him because he is enduring things little boys should never go through, even if this novel is just a fictional
Cormac McCarthy was wise in choosing the Southwest as the setting for a novel of unprecedented bloodshed. No other land would have done McCarthy’s ideas justice, given that only the Southwest harbored such wanton violence. A ...
In Sherman Alexie’s “This Is What It Means to Say Phoenix, Arizona” and “Dead Men’s Path”, the reader is given a glimpse into two different stories but share many similar characteristics of traditions. Tradition is the handing down of statements, beliefs, legends, customs, information and cultures within a group of people from generation to generation. However, these two stories will reveal that the protagonists in these stories, Michael from “Dead Men’s Path” and Victor from “This Is What It Means to Say Phoenix, Arizona,” will ignore their own traditions that they face throughout the story. In other words, the protagonists are westernized and have forgotten their own culture, which reflects the theory of the melting pot. The ignorance of ancestry and traditions brings the worst fates into the lives of the protagonists in each story.
Lyon, Peter. The wild, Wild West; for the discriminating reader. New York, Funk and Wagnalls, 1969.
Children are seen as adorable, fun loving, and hard to control. Ida Fink uses a child in “The Key Game” to be the key to this family’s life. The setting is placed during the start of World War II; Jews all around were being taken. Fink uses a boy who doesn’t look the traditional Jewish, “And their chubby, blue-eyed, three-year-old child” (Fink). As they read on the emotional connection is stronger because there is a face to go with this character. Fink draws a reader in by making connections to a family member the reader may know. A blue-eyed, chubby child is the picture child of America. A child in any story makes readers more attached especially if they have children of their own. The child is three way too young to be responsible for the safety of the father, yet has to be. Throughout the story, we see how the mother struggles with making her child play the game because no child should be responsible like
The image of the cowboy as Jennifer Moskowitz notes in her article “The Cultural Myth of the Cowboy, or, How the West was Won” is “uniquely
The story is an Eastern take on the Hollywood western with a dash of satire,
Alexie Sherman’s, “The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven” displays the complications and occasional distress in the relationship between Native-American people and the United States. Despite being aboriginal inhabitants of America, even in present day United States there is still tension between the rest of the country, specifically mainstream white America, and the Native-American population. Several issues regarding the treatment of Native-Americans are major problems presently. Throughout the narrative, several important symbols are mentioned. The title itself represents the struggles between mainstream America and Native-Americans. The theme of racism, violence, and prejudice is apparent throughout the story. Although the author
The notion Grossman sculpts in her article is part Frederick Remington, part Sea of Galilee. Indeed, “[f]undamentally, it’s an attitude, whether you ride a bronc or a computer keyboard“ (Grossman 1D). The cowboy church movement seems to cut in on a growing herd of believers in America who seem to think that the values of the church as it should be are undermined by the very urbanity, the very sophistication that has come to characterize modern life and popular culture. They seek their solace in The West, in a picture - however mythological it may be - of a simpler way of life. This is a phenomenon, after all, that exists simultaneously with ranchers who hang cell phones where their six-shooter used to be, who use multi-tools to mend fences and all-terrain vehicles to run down stray livestock.
The main character, Tom Tin, faces hardships and struggles many fourteen year olds do not have to face so early on. His father has mistakenly got himself into trouble and it is up to Tom to save his father and help make his family’s future bright again. Tom has good intentions throughout the novel, but he gets himself into trouble. He turns out to be an unlikely hero after pushing through his doubts and finally triumphing over his mistakes along his journey.
Western movies such as Rio Bravo and El Dorado illustrate America’s rugged and picturesque scenery explaining life as it was in the wide open country, at a time when few laws were in place to safeguard the public. These two films tell the story of four men who arrest and