Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The chicano movement of the 1960s in the us
The chicano movement of the 1960s in the us
Chicano and black movements
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The chicano movement of the 1960s in the us
The Revolt of the Cockroach people is a well written book by Oscar Zeta Acosta. He tells the story of Buffalo Zeta Brown as if his own father was telling his life. Brown who was a Chicano lawyer goes into details on what happen when he moved into Los Angeles back in 1968 who’s only attention was for him to write an article for the New York Times and a book. After three months there he meets Gilbert a formal officer of the Chicano Militants. With time and obstacles such as the Chicanos movement in the barrio of Tooner Flats in east Los Angeles he not only became the groups lawyer but he eventually started helping in the marches and protest. In other words, he became one of them. While he was there he was part of the march at the Garfield high school and the …show more content…
disruptions of masses on Christmas eve. He decided he would provide free defense to those who did not have the funds. That is why He was also evolved in the Robert Fernandez, and most importantly the Tooner Flats Seven case. Eventually brown was involved in the revenge part, that consisted \in the bombing of the Safeway store and the court house. In the other hand during his time of fighting for Chicanos, he managed the right to question Judges. Furthermore, I believe this book only provides truthful stories that made me learn of what was happening during the Chicano movement, was the Robert Fernandez case, catholic church discrimination, and the School Walkouts. 12 Although I knew Chicanos were treated bad and there was no true justice towards them, I happen to learn a story of a young man whose injustice death was never published in any way but they still talk about the black dahlia. I learned that it was believed that a young teenage boy named Robert Fernandez was murdered by someone in side the cells. In other words, he was Chicano pensioner. Despite all the facts that were pointed out () during the trial it was said that his death was a suicide. Furthermore, according to Mr. de Silva a former prisoner whose cell was next to Fernandez cell stated that “We talked for a while. Then I fell asleep. I woke up a little later…I heard some noise…It was the police. They were taking Fernandez out of the cell… I didn’t see nothing” (117). In other words, brown had no support since the only witness would not come out with the truth because it was clear he feared the police. Brown anger was brought down to the fact that despite Fernandez body showed that the bruises were clearly not enough to prove that it was the police in that prison who killed him. I believe this case was nothing but interesting since it brings up the issue that black people were not the only ones getting picked by police and the death would have no justice. Chicano lives matter. 12 Something I did not know was the fact that the churches would discriminate. I thought that out of all the places churches would be the place where there would not be any trouble but acceptance because isn’t that what god is all about. That is why I was surprised upon Brown’s arrive to los Angeles, he stated that “we turn and start walking up the cement steps. But at the top, the fifteen-foot doors of glass are shut in our faces. And when we try them they are locked. Left out, ounce again; tricked into thinking we are welcome” (13). In other words, the quote states that the Chicanos were prohibited of entering the church, it implicates the discrimination by treating them as if they all belong outside. What seemed to anger brown was the fact that they made the Chicanos believe that the reason they were not allowed inside was because of the lack of room. What surprised me even more was the fact that the church wouldn’t even allow the people outside to listen the mass. Furthermore, I learned that the St. Bail’s catholic church was not so nice to the poor crowd and it was a crowd that was mostly made up Chicanos. 10 Most importantly I learned that the school walkout was more serious than I thought.
It made me realize that those where kids who were around my age were fighting for their own kind, for students like me. The Chicano students began to notice the inequities when it came to education. They wanted a change in education such as they wanted better materials, teachers, administrators that would reflect Chicanos. Also a society where where speaking Spanish was allowed. Furthermore, that is why the walkouts were organized, it was meant to get the administration’s attention along with the district. According to Brown’s observations “the teachers try to stop it. They stand at the gate and try to shoo them back in. but the Chicanos are too many. The front of the school is a madhouse of excited Cockroaches” (39). The quotes show nothing but an image of the students fight for what they believe in, a change they seem to be waiting and will make it happen with excitement. In other words, the Chicanos problem were not only fought by grownup but by students who saw the injustice stuff that was clearly going on around them. Despite my believes I obtained a better understanding of the walkouts based on how he described
it.11 Furthermore, what I learned from the book was nothing but the Robert Fernandez case, the catholic church discrimination against Chicanos, and the School Walkouts. The book basically explains the Chicano problem that we discussed in class such as the walkouts and just having such knowledge on that subject is something I will totally remember. Regarding the rest of the book it basically states the injustice many chicanos were put which was a subject we have been taking about in class, that is why I believe most of it will stay with me. I denifily recommend this book to anyone because this book opens many awareness and makes other question history. History was not tough or mention once in their life especially for those Chicanos who didn’t grow up East Los Angeles. In other words, there are Chicanos who don’t know their history since they were never exposed to it. I believe college students should read it just because I believe high school students would only even touch the book endless the book is given to an honors or AP class. High school students tend not to read and I know that because I witnessed I was honestly one of the five students who would actually read a whole book. In other words, any college student should read the book no matter what they look like or where they come from. As along as they are in college because they actually care about their grades, their education. I believe that who ever gets the chance to read the book especially a woman should not get offended on how he talks about a female. I also believe that people should look out for the unexpected history they never knew about. It might make them confused, made, or sad for the injustice Chicanos went through and they aren’t really given any notice for their accomplishments. 12
I enjoyed that the book challenged some of the biggest problems in our legal system, or even society as a whole. There is still a lot of racism going on, and this book was not afraid to exploit that. I enjoy those kinds of readings. They are the things that will eventually spark a change and shed some light on the problems that are happening right now.
Nathanael West’s The Day of the Locust tells the story of people who have come to California in search
The most meaningful part of the book for me, was the sit-ins, a form of protest in which demonstrators occupy a place, refusing to leave until their demands are met. The reason the sit-ins were so meaningful is that it really brought attention to how Americans were segregating the African Americas. Just as if you do nothing when a bully, whites, is picking on you, blacks, they will continue picking on you until you fight back. The sit-ins were a nonviolent way to show that they no longer will or have to take the abuse.
The things that Mrs. Hawkins says to Mrs. Paley are things that really stuck out to me. I think that if Mrs. Paley had thought more about what Mrs. Hawkins said to her in the beginning of the book she would have made a few of her discoveries about teaching African American students earlier. I feel that this statement made a huge impact on the way that I think about teaching. I never thought about the positives of the differences before. I grew up in a mainly white area. We had a few black students in our school, but most of them where bused in from the city and didn't live in the area. I always wondered why they wouldn't just stay and go to schools that were closer to where they live. Mrs. Hawkins brings up a good point that integrating brings in positive, interesting and natural differences. I think that if I had gone to a school with only white children I wouldn't have been shown these differences in such a good light.
The case of brown v. board of education was one of the biggest turning points for African Americans to becoming accepted into white society at the time. Brown vs. Board of education to this day remains one of, if not the most important cases that African Americans have brought to the surface for the better of the United States. Brown v. Board of Education was not simply about children and education (Silent Covenants pg 11); it was about being equal in a society that claims African Americans were treated equal, when in fact they were definitely not. This case was the starting point for many Americans to realize that separate but equal did not work. The separate but equal label did not make sense either, the circumstances were clearly not separate but equal. Brown v. Board of Education brought this out, this case was the reason that blacks and whites no longer have separate restrooms and water fountains, this was the case that truly destroyed the saying separate but equal, Brown vs. Board of education truly made everyone equal.
I don’t think Alma’s decision to return to Mexico was a great one. She should have stayed and applied for another Visa, went and applied for assistance, and talked to an individual who could talk and help her with her current situation. I think the different voices throughout the story affect the main story because all of them have had some kind of negative experience. It poses many questions because you wonder how all Mexicans feel when they come to the United States, what makes them leave their families and come to the United States, do many of them return? I think reading The Book of the Unknown Americans, helps open up one’s eyes and realize that these individuals have faced so many problems coming to the United States that they shouldn’t face more here by being discriminated.
The movie “Walkout” is about the school system in East Los Angeles in the late 1960’s. During this time Mexican Americans were treated unfairly and were seen as second class citizens. The story goes through the different aspects that Mexican American/ Chicano students had to put up with within their own schools. They wanted and deserved equal education, but were constantly shut down by the city. This movie contains the four characteristics of Mexican American Art, which is what gives this movies such a strong and meaningful message.
Sophocles’s Antigone and Julia Alvarez’s In the Time of the Butterflies are based upon a common theme: rebellion. While reading both pieces in class, the notion of to what extent a rebellion is justified surfaced frequently; however, reading both texts was insufficient in finding a conclusion to this topic, so I read through various poems to aid my deduction. After my extensive research, I came to the conclusion that rebellion can be justified by a rebel’s genuine belief in their cause. The process of justification is based upon one’s personal qualification of what is considered just; therefore, a single belief in the righteousness of any revolt justifies a rebellion.
William H. McNeill makes a monumental contribution to the knowledge of humanity in his book Plagues and Peoples. He looks at the history of the world from an ecological point of view. From this viewpoint the history of human civilization is greatly impacted by changing patterns of epidemic infection. Plagues and Peoples suggests that "the time scale of world history...should [be] viewed [through] the "domestication" of epidemic disease that occurred between 1300 and 1700" (page 232). "Domestication" is perceived "as a fundamental breakthrough, directly resulting from the two great transportation revolutions of that age - one by land, initiated by the Mongols, and one by sea, initiated by Europeans" (page 232). This book illustrates how man's environment and its resident diseases have controlled human migration, as well as societal successes and failures. McNeill discusses the political, demographical, and psychological effects of disease on the human race. He informs his audience that epidemics are still a viable threat to society, and warns of potential future consequences.
When you look at someone, you see a person, but sometimes, you forget that that person has a story. I learned that when I watched the film, I Learn America. When I first watched the movie, I saw students that have come to America. They have come to an international school in New York to learn English. As the film goes on, you see that each of the students that they focus on have struggles that they have/had to overcome to come or stay in America. Before, I did not realize how much they had to go through in order to come to the United States. As educators, we have to get to know our students. We have to understand their lives and their backgrounds and create a good teacher-student relationship and help students build a “home away from home”.
...ink it shows that the education system in America is biased and cuts out important Mexican American History. I can understand why Mexican Americans boycotted schools in the 1960s.
Mary Mebane used her own experience on the bus to show how segregation affected her life. Mary Mebane points out, white people “could sit anywhere they choose, even in the colored section. Only the black passengers had to obey segregation laws.” When Mebane was young, she saw a conflict on the bus. The driver asked a black person who sat in the ‘no-man’s-land’ to move back to colored section to give the seat for the white person who was standing on the bus because the bus was full. Segregation on the bus represented how white people unequally treat black people. When black people refused this driver to move, the driver try to send them to police. Black people were living in the shadow of racism and segregation at that time. However, that situation still affects school system and community now. Mebane asserts, “It was a world without option.” Black people have lower economic and social status because they are restricted to a small box because of segregation. “In Six Decades After Brown Ruling, in US Schools Still Segregated”, Dexter Mullins claims that in some schools like Valley West Elementary School in Houston, about 90% of people are not white people. These kinds of schools do not have enough funds to support adequate school resource to these students, and these students have lower opportunities to contact with cultural diversity. Both reasons negatively impact on the
The author is using personal experience to convey a problem to his or her audience. The audience of this piece is quite broad. First and foremost, Mexican-Americans just like the author. People who can relate to what the author has to say, maybe someone who has experienced something similar. The author also seems to be seeking out an audience of white Americans who find themselves unaware of the problem at our borders. The author even offers up a warning to white America when she notes, “White people traveling with brown people, however, can expect to be stopped on suspicion they work with the sanctuary movement”(125). The purpose of this writing is to pull out a problem that is hidden within or society, and let people see it for what it is and isn’t.
Parker attempts to persuade the reader by highlighting the flaws in the pro-immigration supporters and their demonstrations. In paragraph 3, she states, “There is something not convincing about illegal immigrants demonstrating to claim they have inalienable rights to come here, be here, work here, become citizens here-and make all these claims in Spanish”. She adds in paragraph 7, “The civil-rights movement was about enforcing the law, not breaking it. The Civil War amendments to the Constitution were not getting the job done in what has been a long struggle in this country to treat blacks as human beings. If Americans were kidnapping Mexicans and selling them into slavery here, I might see the equivalence. But these are free people, who chose to come here and chose to do so illegally.” With these statements, Parker attempts to appeal to the sensibilities of the reader to persuade them into her way of thin...
As a reader, my mind was most affected, not by the struggle of the civil rights movement, but by the determination of the editors to assist in putting an end to segregation in the United States. This changed my mind about some of what I was taught about the civil rights movement and how big of an impact it had on not just African Americans, but everyone as a whole.