Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of the reformation
The effects of reformation
Influence of the reformation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Influence of the reformation
The Reformation began long before its official start date in 1517, while its consequences are still in effect today. Ideas of reformation began in the middle of the 14th century. By the 16th century the Catholic church sought reform from within itself because between the 14th and 16th centuries the church was faced with a significant decline in authority. Reformers, such as John Wycliffe, Erasmus, and Martin Luther, played significant roles as the source of the Reformation, however; there are other provoking source - indulgences along with the art and literature of the time- and the components combined created unfortunate consequences and positive solutions to the declining authority of the Church. Through the accusations and lessons taught …show more content…
by John Wycliffe, Erasmus, and Martin Luther we can see the initial motivation of the Protestant Reformation was a disagreement in how we should live out the bible. John Wycliffe was the first person to question the church therefore, he was the initial spark of the Reformation. John Wycliffe question the church on various topics and views. Wycliffe wrote De Conversatione Ecclesiasticorum, where he addressed the church’s excommunication of a “true man” (document 1). Within the same piece of literature Wycliffe also called attention to the reason religious leaders persecuted the common honest man. According to Wycliffe the Church would pay people to be false witnesses and create fake notaries against accused “true man.” Furthermore, Wycliffe disagreed with the church's view that believing in Jesus was not enough. Wycliffe added to the leave and said that people also had to believe that the Pope was head of the Church. In questioning the church Wycliffe was ridiculed and labeled as heretical by the Pope at this time, Pope Gregory XI. In addition to Wycliffe’s accusations and teachings, Erasmus thought the church was corrupt and wrong. Erasmus believed that in deeds of love one would be saved and be welcomed into heaven. Erasmus was strongly against the selling of indulgences. Erasmus used Christ’s hypothetical disapproval of the religious leaders because they focused on trivial human traditions with great confidence and they boast about their greed and gluttony (Document 4). Finally, Martin Luther was the last pre-reformation reformer and the first reformar a part of the reformation. In 1517 he wrote the 95 theses and posted them on to a church door. Luther did not want to feel guilty any longer for that actions of the church. The 95 Theses focused on small problems with in the church but, when the problems were put together, they presented large corruption within the church. Many of the theses revolved around the validity of indulgences . The importance of the 95 Theses came from the fact that is was a, “small initial step that stirred up an international controversy and thereby set in motion the dramatic events that followed” (document 7). Wycliffe, Erasmus, and Luther's contribution to the cause of the Reformation were not the sole causes; art, literature, and indulgences portrayed significant views and opinions from the church and society.
In Livre des Persecutions des Crestens, Paris there is a wood carving that depicts Satan's influence on reformers of the Catholic Church ( document 5). The carving represents society's view on both reformers and the church's response to the reformers. Society was all of the community of people with the same customs laws and organization and they were not in favor of change. We also discover society’s discontentment with the church in Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales (Document 3). The Canterbury Tales, written in 1388, describe the pardoner using negative connotation and possessing bad morals. We are told that the partner puts on a show for the assembly at mass in order to encourage them to pay indulgences: “To win some silver, as he right well could;/ The loude and the merrier he would sing” (Document 3). Chaucer’s views and description of the pardoner was true because he was a part of the general population meaning he was a common man. The significance of him being a common man means that the other common had similar view points to his. He used real life to create his social satire of a book. The indulgences in the church were viewed in many different ways. Before the Reformation the sale of indulgences granted partial salvation and remission of sins in purgatory …show more content…
(document 6). Therefore that causes of the church differed in what they were but, most of the causes supported the same ideas of the corruption in the church. The church, before the Reformation, was a major political authority throughout the world, nevertheless began to decline as the Protestant Reformation approached. Through the Reformation secular lifestyles became more prominent and the idea of identifying people with their state was more popular than identifying with their religion. Before the Protestant Reformation Pope Gregory XI threatened Wycliffe with prison time to assert the authority of the church in the state.. Pope Gregory XI demanded that Oxford take action to prevent the spread of Wycliffe's ideas with threats to take away, “all the favors, indulgences, and privileges granted to you and your University” (document 2). In addition to the authority of Pope Gregory XI’s authority, Popes Clement VI and Sixtus IV created a standard definition supporting an indulgence and what indulgences did and didn’t do which established their authority because they were setting a universal understanding for the catholic church as a whole. Therefore, church leaders, before the Reformation, had great authority in both the state and church, but that took a change after the reformation. The authority of the church began to rapidly decline as reformers became more and more popular, therefore; the church suffered consequences from the Reformation.
An example of the declining power is in Pope Leo X and Luther’s disagreements. The church lost authority because, instead of being feared for their threats, they were being ignored and was shown that they were being ignored by Luther. Pope Leo X critiqued the theses that Luther wrote claiming that they were, “ errors.” More specifically Pope Leo X stated in his proclamation to Luther that the church needed to take action against Luther because he was aiming to destroy the church (document 8). However, the decline of Pope Leo X’s authority was discovered in Luther’s response. Luther responded to Pope Leo X’s demands by throwing them into a fire filled with Catholic and anti-Luther's writings (document 9). One last effect of Luther during the reformation was anti-semitism people. Luther’s rage for Jewish people was transferred into his writing of Concerning the Jews and Their Lies (document
10). The Protestant Reformation had various causes and effects throughout history. The effects of the reformation negatively impacted the Catholic church’s authority and the opinion of Jewish people. A document that would have been helpful in the construction of this argument would have expressed the positive side of the counter reformation and the catholic church’s reconstruction. However, the Catholic Church gained a its authority in later years after the counter reformation in Spain, France, Portugal, Ireland, and in southern and eastern Europe.
Geoffrey Chaucer's "The Pardoner's Tale," a relatively straightforward satirical and anti-capitalist view of the church, contrasts motifs of sin with the salvational properties of religion to draw out the complex self-loathing of the emasculated Pardoner. In particular, Chaucer concentrates on the Pardoner's references to the evils of alcohol, gambling, blasphemy, and money, which aim not only to condemn his listeners and unbuckle their purses, but to elicit their wrath and expose his eunuchism.
“The Pardoner’s Prologue” is an introduction given by the Pardoner to his fellow pilgrims, and his prologue is one of the greatest moments of satire used by Chaucer in all of “The Canterbury Tales”. The Pardoner is a man that preaches to groups, and he pardons them of their sins, after given a tithe. He tells the group how he will reach about others greed to get the greatest tithe, then use that money for himself. “Pardoner is someone who emphasizes seemingly hypocritical excesses in his own character.” (Boenig) He is the one that shows of his hypocrisy, no other character is ...
The Pardoner surrenders his own spiritual or religious virtue for helping to cure the sins and misdeeds of others, yet he does not see it like that; the Pardoner cares more for the money and treasure he is given for his false preaching and sermons. Chaucer’s sharpest and overarching critique of the Church in “The Pardoner’s Prologue” seems to be that religion has become a business, and that the virtues and ideals of the Church will be condemned if necessary or profitable. The Pardoner, the narrator of the tale, tells his fellow pilgrims how he has made a business of the Church: “Of avarice and of swich cursednesse Is al my prechyng, for to make hem free To yeven hir pens, and namely unto me. For myn entente is nat but for to wynne, And nothyng for correccioun of synne.” (400-404.) This is one of the many times in “The Pardoner’s Prologue” where the Pardoner admits that he is only preaching to make the commonfolk generous and give money to him, and that he cares nothing at all for the correction of sin. Because of the power he wields on behalf of the Church, the Pardoner thinks himself immune to punishment and all negative consequences. This is probably true; Church officials in Chaucer’s time held such great positions of power that they were able to do whatever they so wanted, while claiming
Just as modern day preachers, medieval preachers would used tales both historical (from the bible) or personal incidents to teach a moral lesson. In Chaucer`s Canterbury Tales however he doesn`t let his narrator (Bailey) pass judgement on the characters , he lets them (characters) be self critical. At times having their own character contradict with the moral values they are peddling, as in the Pardoner`s Tale. The Pardoner`s Tale is about a traveling salesman, selling (Absolution). Chaucer also uses specific words to help us discern who his characters are as individuals. As we analyze some of the text of the Pardoner`s tale let is keep in mind the influence of the Vatican and the Church on the people of Britain. With that the Pardoner as the
The portrayal of the Pardoner in the Canterbury Tales gives Chaucer a chance to satirize religious men in their deceitful, lying ways. The Pardoner is a liar. He persuades people to purchase certificates of forgiveness by preaching his moral stories. Chaucer creates the Pardoner to be a very greedy and deceitful preacher when he writes, "'And thus I preach against the very vice/ I make my living out of--avarice,'" (Chaucer 24-25). The Pardoner is telling his crowd that he preaches certain stories to make a living rooted in greed. He is so obssesed with greed, and want for money, the Pardoner will blatantly lie every day of his life. Chaucer is satirizing religious men in the story to make fun of them, and try to improve their behavior in the
Chaucer first begins his sly jab at the Church’s motives through the description of the Pardoner’s physical appearance and attitude in his “Canterbury Tales.” Chaucer uses the Pardoner as a representation of the Church as a whole, and by describing the Pardoner and his defects, is able to show what he thinks of the Roman Catholic Church. All people present in the “Canterbury Tales” must tell a tale as a part of story-telling contest, and the pilgrim Chaucer, the character in the story Chaucer uses to portray himself, writes down the tales as they are told, as well as the story teller. The description of the Pardoner hints at the relationship and similarity between the Pardoner and the Church as a whole, as well as marks the beginning of the irony to be observed throughout the “Pardoner’s Prologue and Tale.” The narrator describes the Pardoner as an extremely over confident, arrogant, and unattractive man, noting that his hair is “as yellow as wex,” lying thin and fl...
The pardoner, in Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Pardoner’s Tale, is a devious character. He is a man with a great knowledge of the Catholic Church and a great love of God. However, despite the fact that he is someone whom is looked at with respect at the time, the pardoner is nothing more than an imposter who makes his living by fooling people into thinking he forgives their sins, and in exchange for pardons, he takes their money. His sermon-like stories and false relics fool the people of the towns he visits and make him seem as a plausible man, which is exactly what the pardoner wants. In fact, the pardoner is an avaricious and deceitful character whose driving force in life is his motto, “Radix malorum est cupiditas,” which is Latin for “greed is the root of evil.” The pardoner’s entire practice is based upon his motto and is motivated entirely by greed.
In the 21st century, the roman catholic church is a well followed religion with about 1.2 billion followers, the pope is a very famous and well known face around the world. The publicity of the pope comes from the billion followers of Roman Catholicism but, there was a time when the pope of the Roman Catholic church was viewed negatively as a result of permeating lies and encouraging acts of deceit. There was a time where the church was mostly about establishing ways to obtain money in an unfitting manner. As a result, this gave the church even more power and authority. Money is power, so the more money given to the church the more power the church would acquire. This money was given in purchases of indulgences which were pardons given by the priests to people who committed sins. While, Most people did not know or understand the wrongdoings done by Pope Gregory XI. There were few people who did know the wrongdoings by the
In the story, “The Pardoner’s Tales”, Geoffrey Chaucer wrote the character the Pardoner in descriptive way. He describe the Pardoner’s corruption teaching and the way the Pardoner act in the tale. The religious that the Pardoner teaching is corrupted and very selfish, greediness, and gluttony. This thing are all opposite to what the real church religious is teaching. In the story, he tricks the people to buy his fake relics and other things by using the church’s believe. The Pardoner act and his teaching are all corrupted because of the church. It shows the side of greediness, gluttony and selfishness which highly reflect into himself and his believe.
A MANIPULATIVE AND RUTHLESS PARDONER, A RELIGIOUS FIGURE WHO SOLD pardons to those who sinned, was included in Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales. Bereft of morals, the nefarious pardoner sells fake relics to poor country priests and intentionally make monkeys of them and their congregation. Consciously admitting his sins, the pardoner dissembles his true nature by telling a tale that decries the sins of greed, which is quite ironic.
The Canterbury Tales is a literary masterpiece in which the brilliant author Geoffrey Chaucer sought out to accomplish various goals. Chaucer wrote his tales during the late 1300’s. This puts him right at the beginning of the decline of the Middle Ages. Historically, we know that a middle class was just starting to take shape at this time, due to the emerging commerce industry. Chaucer was able to see the importance and future success of the middle class, and wrote his work with them in mind. Knowing that the middle class was not interested in lofty philosophical literature, Chaucer wrote his work as an extremely comical and entertaining piece that would be more interesting to his audience. Also, Chaucer tried to reach the middle class by writing The Canterbury Tales in English, the language of the middle class rather than French, the language of the educated upper class. The most impressive aspect of Chaucer’s writing is how he incorporated into his piece some of his own controversial views of society, but yet kept it very entertaining and light on the surface level. One of the most prevalent of these ideas was his view that certain aspects of the church had become corrupt. This idea sharply contrasted previous Middle Age thought, which excepted the church’s absolute power and goodness unquestionably. He used corrupt church officials in his tales to illustrate to his audience that certain aspects of the church needed to be reformed. The most intriguing of these characters was the Pardoner. Chaucer’s satirical account of the Pardoner is written in a very matter-of-fact manner that made it even more unsettling with his audience. Chaucer uses his straightforwardness regarding the hypocrisy of the Pardoner, suggestive physiognomy of the character, and an interesting scene at the conclusion of the Pardoner’s Tale to inculcate his views of the church to his audience. The way that Chaucer used these literary devices to subtly make his views known to an audience while hooking them with entertainment, shows that Chaucer was truly a literary genius.
In the story, Chaucer acts as a journalist to write down these grotesque and obscene stories he uses to bash these ideas. He doesn’t attack the church as a whole, just the selling of indulgences and paying to look at relics. He comes up with the story, “The Pardoner's Tale,” and starts off with a prologue to introduce themselves. The Pardoner basically says I love women and money, a horrible thing for being a pardoner. In “The Pardoner's Prologue,” on lines 19-20 the pardoner says, “Is all my sermons, for it frees the pelf. Out to come the pence, and specially for myself.” Meaning, he love to take people’s money for himself. This outcome of the Pardoner has a negative impact towards making the church look like robbers. He continues on lines 24-25 in the prologues stating, “Once dead what matter how their souls fare? The can go blackberrying, for all I care!” The Pardoner uses his stories to empty people’s pelfs because of his cupidity or greed for money. The line in simple terms say after they die I don’t care where they go to Hell blackberry picking for all he cares. This is the first iconoclastic idea Chaucer will bash
The Roman Catholic Church is known as the pinnacle of the unified Christendom throughout the 5th to the 15th century. However, during the 16th century, the unified Christendom came apart which caused the Reformation movement. The essential cause of the Reformation movement, the confessional conflicts, and dismantling of the unified Christendom is clerical corruption within the Roman Catholic Church. The priests claim to power and governmental support is the reason clerical corruption came about. Reformers such as Martin Luther and Henrich von Kettenbach, and many others did not like the clerical rule. The Reformers speak against indulgences, simony, and their control of the word. All these factors are responsible for the Reformation movement.
Geoffrey Chaucer's masterpiece "The Canterbury Tales" depicts characters from every stratum of feudal society and exposes the contradictions of the character's social roles. As a Church representative, the Pardoner, for instance, is to be a scammer of gullible believers. His tale is an ironic narrative that speaks about human morality. The Pardoner's tale is of three men finding fortune to have a better life and defeat death, but end up killing each other. Though the use of irony in "The Pardoner's Tale" satirizes both the corruption of the Catholic Church and individual human greed and materialism as evidenced by the characters in the tale and the Pardoner himself. The prologue or the introduction of the Pardoner's tale reveals his true character. The Pardoner uses his ties as a Church to manipulate people into giving him ill- gotten funds. He tells false tales and displays false artifacts just to fuel his "avarice." The Pardoner makes a lucrative living preaching "mockeries" in his "sermon, for it frees the pelf" and his purpose is to "win" and not to redeem people of "sin." The Pardoner himself is an embodiment of irony and contradiction by not only his practice of corruption but his tale being a moving parable that would strike shame within a person. The main characteristic of his personality and his tale is summed in his biblical statement in Latin, "Radix malorum est cupiditas," translated as "the love of money is the root of all evil." His irony derives from his wealthy-beggar status, corruption of the Church, and his tale denouncing all of his practices.
“After coming into contact with a religious man I always feel I must wash my hands” Friedrich Nietzsche once stated. In the frame tale Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer, the Pardoner, is a man among many pilgrims on a religious journey from London to Canterbury, in order to visit the Shrine of Saint Thomas Becket. A Pardoner is a person who offers indulgences, for people who repented of the sin they had committed, Although one might believe that the Pardoner is on the trip for religious reasons, as he sells indulgences, he is actually going on the pilgrimage for personal reasons, and this is for money. The prologue presents the Pardoner as corrupt and greedy qualities which make him one of the most amoral of the pilgrims.