Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Reform movement
Luther's contribution to reformation
Effect of martin luther on church reformation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Reform movement
While Martin Luther is probably the most well-known figure from the Reformation, there were many other notable figures that went on to challenge the Catholic Church as well, such as Ulrich Zwingli, John Calvin, and even King Henry VIII. Zwingli was a Swiss preacher who shared some of the same sentiments as Luther in regards to Church authority, that “scripture was the sole basis of truth, and the power of popes and councils was illusory” (Marshall, 18). He was able to give a public defense of his ideas, and eventually won out in reforming Switzerland: by 1524, “religious images were removed from the city churches, and fasting and clerical celibacy were abolished,” and in 1525, “the Latin mass was replaced with a vernacular communion service” …show more content…
(Marshall, 18). While French preacher John Calvin’s influence began in the Swiss city of Geneva, he is perhaps most known for transforming France and beginning “French Protestantism,” followers of which became called “Huguenots.” Calvin’s teachings and beliefs, or “Calvinism,” “emphasized the sovereignty of the scriptures and divine predestination- a doctrine holding that God chooses a select few to enter Heaven, regardless of their good works or their faith” (Biography). Calvin is widely regarded as one of the most important figures of what became known as the “second surge” of the Protestant Reformation, after Luther. Ultimately, “other theological figures,” much like Zwingli and Calvin, “published their own perspectives,” and eventually, “new churches sprung up, representing principles that differed” from that of the Roman Catholic Church (Scialabba, 75). Finally, though more of a personal issue with the Church, the English King Henry VIII split with the Catholic Church when the pope refused his request of an annulment from his wife, Catherine of Aragon, in order to marry Anne Boleyn. Since Pope Clement VII would not approve the annulment, Henry VIII separated from the Church and created the Church of England, or Anglican Church, in 1534, declaring himself as its Head. Once he did this, he was able to finally marry Anne Boleyn, without the approval of the Roman Catholic Church. The Church’s “Counter-Reformation” was the “negative and essentially reactive response” to the ridicule and challenges of the Protestant Reformation (Marshall, 6).
The Catholic Church’s reform “was naturally shaped by an ongoing confrontation with Protestantism, just as Protestantism defined itself throughout its history in relation to a Catholic […] other” (Marshall, 6). The “office” of the Roman Inquisition was formed in 1542 and was a threatening vehicle to combat the growing atmosphere of Protestantism. As history will recall, the Inquisition was another result of the Church’s Counter-Reformation and is infamously known for their great searches for, and trials of, heretics. As one scholar wrote, “where censorship failed to prevent spiritual infection, the Inquisition strove to cure” (Moynahan, 440). The Roman Inquisition was founded in 1542 by Pope Paul III, and has been described as a “dreadful engine of tyranny” due to its seemingly nonexhaustive hunt for heretics (Moynahan, 440). One of the most famous figures to be tried by the Inquisition was Galileo, who was ultimately condemned to house arrest for the rest of his life. However, the Roman Inquisition is not to be confused with the Spanish Inquisition, the latter of which was older, and more brutal, than the Roman …show more content…
Inquisition. Between 1545-1563, the Church assembled in the Council of Trent meetings to try and reverse the affects of the Reformation.
The goals of the Council were many, including: the reinforcement of “Catholic doctrine, reform[ing] corruption from within the Church, identify[ing] errors in Protestant interpretation, standardize[ing] the Mass throughout the Church, and strengthen[ing] Catholic education” (Scialabba, 80). Ultimately, the decisions made during the Council of Trent sessions “were made within the context of controlling the new forces of Gutenberg’s invention” (Scialabba, 80). There’s no argument that the printing press fueled the Reformation due to its ability to spread knowledge and information on such unforeseen levels. In the 1546 session of the Council, the Vulgate, or Latin version, was established as the “official” version of the Bible, and it was declared that “no books should be printed on religious matters” without the approval of religious authorities (New Catholic
Encyclopedia). Besides the Church responding to the Reformation with the brainstorming at the Council of Trent and, as will be discussed later, their Index, there was also a growth of more spiritual, literate, and educated followers of the Catholic faith. One of the biggest examples of “militant” followers to rise out of this Counter-Reformation were the Jesuits, who were zealous missionary followers who practiced strict religious morals and unshakeable faith. Perhaps one of the most well-known Jesuits was its founder, Ignatius Loyola. Loyola supported defending Catholicism and “made ‘combating the religious heresies of Protestantism’ the mission of his Jesuit ministry” (Scialabba, 81). The Jesuits were known for their missionary services and traveling to other countries to spread their faith “beyond one’s local area, […] directed towards non-Christians, non-Catholics, and Catholic Christians as well” (Scialabba, 81). Today, the Jesuits are most known for their innumerable amount of schools, and influence, worldwide. However, it was the Church’s Index Librorum Prohibitorum that has been regarded as “one of the most successful and enduring censorial devices in history” (Bald, 182). The Index is also known as the “List of Prohibited Books,” the “List of Forbidden Books,” and the “Roman Index.” Under the order of Pope Paul IV, the first Index was compiled in 1557, and published in 1559 by the Roman Inquisition’s Sacred Congregation, which “act[ed] as the zealous guardians of the Faith,” and who “executed their office with severity” (Beacon). It should be noted that while the books included on the Index were “banned for their heretical or ideologically dangerous content,” they were actually also “only […] books that ecclesiastical authority was asked to act upon” (Beacon). Furthermore, “the list[s] had official sanction in all Catholic countries” (Beacon). Besides the various editions of the Index that would be published throughout the centuries, “Expurgatory Catalogues” were also issued, which contained “lists of literary works not entirely forbidden, but where sentences or parts were censored” (Beacon). Any Catholics who owned, or were caught reading, any of the listed books risked being excommunicated from the Church.
Social and economic stresses of The Protestant Reformation age were just among few of the things that impacted the ordinary population of Europe. The Protestant Reformation was the 16th-century religious, political, and cultural disorder that divided Catholic Europe, setting in place the structures and beliefs that would define the continent in the ordinary population. In northern and central Europe, reformers like Martin Luther, John Calvin and Henry VIII challenged papal authority and questioned the Catholic Church’s ability to define Christian practice. In 1555 The Peace of Augsburg allowed for the coexistence of Catholicism and Lutheranism in Germany; and in 1648 Treaty of Westphalia, which ended the Thirty Years’ War. The key ideas of the Reformation, a call to purify the church and a belief that the Bible, should be the sole source of spiritual authority. However, Luther and the other reformers became the first to skillfully use the power of the printing press to give their ideas a wide audience.
The Protestant Reformation was a period of time (1500-1700) where there became a change in Western Christendom. This reformation was caused by the resentment from the people because the Catholic Church abusing their powers for political and economic advances. In this time the church was selling pardons for sin and indulgences to forgive sins, decrease days spent in purgatory and save the dead from damnation. The reformation was when people became more aware with the back hand dealings with the church and men like Martin Luther and John Calvin created their own churches to what they believed was not corrupt unlike the church. Unfortunately there many consequences as far at the Roman Catholic church attempting to bring people back to the church,
Initiated by Pope Paul III to condemn and refute protestant beliefs, it would eventually lay the principles of catholicism for four centuries. They were able to condemn the reformation by approving the Index of Forbidden Books, which would punish anyone who possessed a list of books that supported Protestantism or were critical of the church in Catholic Countries. They defended their religion through scriptures and other traditions. It would eventually acknowledge and curtail the abuses in sale of indulgences, sale of church offices, give bishops more power from clergy, and establish seminaries to train priests. The Council of Trent existed to condemn protestants in order to protect their faith, but in turn would have to decrease some of their
As the Byzantine empire’s power began to lessen, ecclesiastical law flourished (Rautman). The Inquisition was entirely based around Roman Catholicism, and was commonly seen as needed in order to protect and defend the church from protestantism and sinners. It’s courts had judges called “inquisitors.” Inquisitors served lifelong terms and made decisions solely in the name of the Pope. While the only type of crime pursued and prosecuted by the Inquisition were crimes against the church, it was often accused of being a very biased institution, as all verdicts were made according to Catholic beliefs, regardless of the circumstance
Thesis statement: Martin Luther was responsible for the break-up of the Catholic Church Martin Luther was a representative during the 16th century of a desire widespread of the renewal and reform of the Catholic Church. He launched the Protestant reform a continuation of the medieval religious search. From the Middle ages, the church faced many problems such as the Babylonian Captivity and the Great Schism that hurt the prestige of the church. Most of the clergy lived in great luxury while most people were poor and they set an immoral example. The clergy had low education and many of them didn’t attend their offices.
The Reformation was full of war and inventions that many had never seen before, affecting the religious and social political systems in positive and negative ways. The first event in the Reformation was the Printing Press. The Printing Press enabled the circulation of the bible, starting the spread of Christianity and the Catholics. The Printing Press was created by Johannes Gutenberg in 1450. Before the Printing Press the bible had to be printed by hand, which meant that the copies had to be written word for word. Because they had to be written word for word only the important people had them such as Popes and other religious leaders. Therefore everyone would gather together somewhere and listen to the one man with the bible preach the word. This limited some from learning the word because of the language barrier. At the time all the bibles printed where in the Latin language. So they had a translator and copies of the bible in many other languages. Technological advantages of the 15th century enabled the spread of the word all over Europe, serving as a catalyst for reform leaders of the 16th century.
As a result of this, they came into the 20th century intellectually inferior and bankrupt. With the banished, tortured, and persecuted heretics in mind, it is possible that the Spanish Inquisition is perhaps one of the most cruel acts performed on innocent people in the name of religion. Before the Spanish Inquisition took place, several other inquisition movements appeared, but none quite as barbaric and brutal as the Spaniard’s did. Waves of opposition towards the church swept Europe in the Middle Ages. In the 12th century, it was a modern belief that a peaceful, utopian government could be obtained if all of the population of the society were “pure” and Catholic.
Joseph Pérez not only described the Spanish Inquisition by summarizing the contents of this “regime,” but also his main thesis and interpretation are based on criticizing the origins of anti-Semitism, how the Spanish Inquisition “defended the Catholic faith” against Jews, Muslims, Protestantism, and witchcraft. Also, Pérez continues his thesis and interpretations when he argued against the trials and organization of “the Holy Office”—the Inquisition. Finally, Pérez reinforced his main thesis by arguing and comparing the Spanish Inquisition with modern regimes, such as Nazi Germany and Communist regimes that used similar procedures of “torture” and “persecution” to those who opposed Nazism and Communism ideologies. Therefore, Pérez’s interpretation and explanation not only make sense, but they are well presented.
In order for an Inquisition to be issued the Holy Office, or the Pope, must grant permission (Bachrach 12). The Papacy instituted Inquisition in certain countries to counter any threat against Catholicism. An Inquisition was initially intended to prevent civil disruption, social corruption, and bloodshed (Bachrach 12). This, however, was not the case. The Church began to empower government officials called Inquisitors to essentially hunt down “unbelievers” and quietly question them about their faith
As a result of confrontations with such heresy, the Inquisition was established by a series of papal decrees between 1227 and 1235. Pope Innocent IV authorized the use of torture in 1252, and Pope Alexander IV gave the Inquisition authority over all cases of sorcery involving heresy, although local courts carried out most actual prosecution of witches. At the same time, other developments created a climate in which alle...
Proving to be the paramount of the conflict between faith and reason, the European Enlightenment of the eighteenth century challenged each of the traditional values of that age. Europeans were changing, but Europe’s institutions were not keeping pace with that change.1 Throughout that time period, the most influential and conservative institution in Europe, the Roman Catholic Church, was forced into direct confrontation with these changing ideals. The Church continued to insist that it was the only source of truth and that all who lived beyond its bounds were damned; it was painfully apparent to any reasonably educated person, however, that the majority of the world’s population were not Christians.2 In the wake of witch hunts, imperial conquest, and an intellectual revolution, the Roman Catholic Church found itself threatened by change on all fronts.3 The significant role that the Church played during the Enlightenment was ultimately challenged by the populace’s refusal to abide by religious intolerance, the power of the aristo champions of reform and print culture, the philosophers, who shared a general opposition to the Roman Catholic Church. By the end of the seventeenth century, the fanatical witch hunts of Western Europe led by the Church had begun to die away.4 Although "witches" were still tried by the clergy and clergy-controlled governments, the massive witch hunts of the Middle Ages had been abandoned in search of more reasonable and plausible explanations of the unknown.
As demonstrated by scholars such as Kagan and Dyer, Homza, and Kamen, The Spanish Inquisition was a highly organized and secretive institution used to police religious and social order. The trials of María Gonzalez and Pedro de Villegas demonstrate the dedication with which Inquisitors sought to persecute those who were outsiders in society and manipulate them into confessing their religious offenses. However, they also show that the Inquisition was not completely unmerciful- it operated with a legal process that afforded the accused an opportunity to provide evidence that would prove they were not guilty. Using these two cases, I will demonstrate these polarities and argue that the Spanish Inquisition was not as cruel as it is made out to be. Although victims were often falsely accused, they were provided the opportunity to defend themselves and community testimony was allowed to confirm their case. Although it’s methods weren't always ideal, the Inquisition was "something less than the faceless, monolithic machine that it is commonly conceived to have been."1
The Reformation was a decisive period in the history not only for the Catholic Church, but also for the entire world. The causes of this tumultuous point in history did not burst on the scene all at once, but slowly gained momentum like a boil that slowly festers through time before it finally bursts open. The Reformation of the Church was inevitable because of the abuses which the Church was suffering during this period. At the time of the Reformation, a segment of the Church had drifted away from its mission to bring Christ and salvation to the world. Throughout the Middle Ages, the Church had gradually become weaker because of abusive leadership, philosophical heresy, and a renewal of a form of the Pelagian heresy.
The Protestant Reformation of the sixteenth century is one of the most complex movements in European history since the fall of the Roman Empire. The Reformation truly ends the Middle Ages and begins a new era in the history of Western Civilization. The Reformation ended the religious unity of Europe and ushered in 150 years of religious warfare. By the time the conflicts had ended, the political and social geography in the west had fundamentally changed. The Reformation would have been revolutionary enough of itself, but it coincided in time with the opening of the Western Hemisphere to the Europeans and the development of firearms as effective field weapons. It coincided, too, with the spread of Renaissance ideals from Italy and the first stirrings of the Scientific Revolution. Taken together, these developments transformed Europe.
Huldrych Zwingli was an influential theologian and a dynamic political leader whose new Protestant religious doctrines, similar to those of Martin Luther, fueled the Swiss Reformation. (Britannica – History - 4/12/15) Against what he viewed as the decadent Roman Catholic hierarchy, Zwingli favored the return to the teachings of the Bible. While Luther strictly separated the spiritual and political realms, Zwingli emphasized that both the church and the state were subject to the law of Christ. (Britannica – History - 4/12/15) In 1525, Zurich’s great council adopted his innovations, and other Swiss towns soon followed.