Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why did the metropolitan police find it hard to catch jack the ripper
Why did the metropolitan police find it hard to catch jack the ripper
Why did the metropolitan police find it hard to catch jack the ripper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Reasons Behind Police's Inability To Catch Jack The Ripper
Jack The Ripper was never caught, and his identity remains a mystery
to this day. The police were unable to catch Jack The Ripper and solve
the mystery of the Whit Chapel murders because of several reasons.
The first reason is the police themselves. In London, there were two
police forces. The Metropolitan police and the City Of London police.
The murders took place in both of the jurisdictions. The police forces
each had separate investigations going on and they did not share
evidence or information with each other. This hampered their
investigations because a vital clue being held by one police force may
have linked in with evidence being held by the other police force.
This prevented either police force from solving the mystery.
The technology at the time stopped the police from gathering
sufficient evidence from the crime scene. The police could not take
fingerprints, blood samples, DNA and could not analyse it. They were
unable to differ between human and animal blood. This meant that all
the police could do was search the crime scene for any evidence that
could be seen with the naked eye. No magnifying equipment was
available to search for tiny clues. Clues were found at the crime
scene. A bloody cloth was found at one of the victims' body, however
this was useless to the police, as they could not analyse the blood on
the cloth that could have made that catching the killer was possible.
The note written on the wall could not have been fingerprinted for
clues because this technology was not available. This was the same as
the letters that were sent to the police. ...
... middle of paper ...
... in a
terrible state. This meant that the post mortems were difficult and
the coroners were unable to get any clues from the corpses. No one
actually saw Jack The Ripper Kill. Many different descriptions were
given on the killer but no one actually saw him commit murder. This
meant that the police had no idea of where and when he killed because
he could have moved the bodies.
I believe that the most important reason why Jack The Ripper was never
caught was because of the police. Their tactics were not suitable for
catching a serial killer, as they had never experienced one before.
Also, the limited technology made it difficult for the police to
gather any evidence or clues from the crime scene.
Because of this main reason, and other reasons Jack The Ripper escaped
being caught and remains a mystery to this day.
If the killer was one of the family members there motive would have been because of their rage. It was said that Patsey was getting mad at Jonbenet for wetting the bed almost every night. She could have snapped and accidently hit her with an object she found near her. She told there gardener that anyone can get away with murder in this country right now because at the time OJ Simpson was found innocent. But there is also a motive for John Ramsey. When the police arrived at the house it was reported that he was making a phone call and saying that he is wanting to leave the area. Why would John want to leave the area if his daughter just died? After that John left for about an hour and no one knows where he went expect him. When he came back he was acting very suspicious. But it could have been an intruder as well that killed Jonbenet. The window in the basement was smashed and they found scruff marks on the wall. There was also a boot print that was found in the crime scene and it didn't match anyones shoe in the house. Eventually the police ruled out the immediate family because of the DNA. The police suspected other people too like John Mark Karr or Michael Helgoth. Karr confessed to strangling to in detail. But they ruled him out because of the DNA didn't match and she didn't die of strangulation. Helgoth also confessed to murdering her on tape. The boot print that the police found was very similar the his shoes that he was wearing. But they ruled him out because of DNA and Michael committed
...lice or lawyers used their integrity. The police skirted around the law and use evidence that the witnesses said was not correct. They had a description of the suspect that did not match Bloodsworth but, they went after him as well. They also used eyewitness testimony that could have been contaminated.
We were presented with many facts that all pointed to Mr. Washburn as the murder. In the house all of the entrances were thoroughly inspected by authorities, and they found no sign of ransacking. “[They] examined all the locking mechanisms, all the doors and windows. In [their] opinion there was no evidence of any forced entry” (P.81). When police looked for fingerprints, “They were all of the Washburn family and the maid” (P.81). There was no trace of an outside party; somebody usually in the Washburn house committed the murder. While in the living room, an officer found a drop of blood. The evidence technician was called the next night to run some tests. “He sprayed the living room carpet with luminol. It is a luminous spray, and when it comes in contact with blood it illuminates” (P.82). To both men’s surprise the whole living room was illuminating. After spraying further the men found a trail from the living room through the kitchen to the garage. In the closet the men found a wet mop, which was tested for blood and also came back positive. Somebody tried to clean his or her bloody mess, and try to save himself. The physical evidence proves the killer was somebody who was familiar to the Washburn household.
Investigating Why the Police Were Unable to Catch Jack the Ripper I believe the most important reason why Jack the Ripper was so hard to catch was because of the lack of evidence. In those days they did not have as advanced technology as we have today for instance, we have forensics where we can tell from a strand of hair who that hair belongs to. In those days they were only just learning the significance of footprints to catching a villain. Another part to this is that Jack the Ripper was so random towards who he killed the police could not find a link between the murders except that they were all prostitutes, which did not really help, although prostitute murders were not terribly uncommon. The press coverage to the case didn’t help much as they had forced the police to investigate ‘Leather Apron’ and this wasted a significant amount of the police time which, if spent properly, may have allowed them to uncover more information needed to catch the Ripper.
They had an alibi witness, a gas receipt, a ticket on the day of the murder. A police officer who would not come unless the judge subpoena him and the judge of course refused and would not pay the $650 to summon him. There were also two jailhouse snitches who lied about their testimony. The police misconduct was used in how they charged these individuals originally and how they have been accused initially with robbery, which later turned into murder. The police created the story and intimidated an eye witness who refused to testify and threatened to charge her with the murder if she refused. The attorneys told a moving tale and Ron Keine and company ended up being convicted. This case was before DNA testing but what exonerated these individuals was the actual murder confessing to the crimes. The entire case seemed like a fluke and malicious attack on these people. A guy in Carolina, confessed to all charges and had an epiphany and told the police where the weapon was located and how everything happened and how he dragged the body. He had to fight to get the police to accept his confession because the police were acting as if they already had their
Two detectives were assigned to the case: Harry Hanson and Finis Brown. [2] When they and the police arrived at the crime scene, it was already swarming with people, gawkers and reporters. The entire situation was out of hand and crowded, everyone trampling all over any hopes for good evidence. [2] One thing they did report finding was a nearby cement block with watery blood on it, tire tracks and a heel print on the ground. There was dew under the body so they knew it had been set there just after 2 a.m. when temperatures dropped to 38 degrees.
...s. This element makes a good detective fiction story because it eliminates the number of suspects and would not be literally impossible to figure out the crime.
...ed dead in the Thames River (Schachner). A jury ruled his death a suicide by drowning. Investigators of the case believe that Druitt could have been Jack the Ripper, because around the same timeframe he committed suicide; the murders stopped (Jones). John Douglas noted that serial killers do not suddenly cease their urge to kill (Anderson 69). That would logically explain why there were no more murders were committed.
The officers tampered with evidence and made a false discovery that he was the person and that is how he was convicted (Innocent Project N.D.). Many forensic methods have been implemented in research when looking for evidence, but the methods that are not scientific and have little or nothing to do with science. The result of false evidence by other means leads to false testimony by a forensic analyst. Another issue with forensic errors is that it is a challenge to find a defense expert (Giannelli, 2011).
so that this informs us that the killer may not have had a motive, but
As you can see there is no perfect crime. The littlest piece of hair or paint or anything left behind can be found. Suspects often miss these tiny peieces of evidence and while they looked over it, it is still lurking at the crim scene. It is guarenteed that a Crime Scene Investigator will find this evidence no matter how small and use it to find, prosecute, and convict a criminal.
Jack the Ripper was an infamous serial killer who killed at least five London female prostitutes in 1888. Never captured, his identity is one of English's most famous unsolved mysteries. Today, Jack the Ripper is one of the most, if not the most, famous serial killer ever. There are many theories on who Jack the Ripper is, and why he killed, but none of these theories were ever proven. Jack the Ripper is simply a lone assassin who “officially” killed four prostitutes and got away without ever being caught and convicted of his crimes.
Some cases cannot be solved without this evidence. “Physical evidence refers to any item that comes from a nonliving origin, such as fingerprints, tire marks, footprints, fibers, paint, and building materials” (“PE”). There is also another group called biological evidence. Biological evidence branches from a living thing, including bloodstains and DNA. Forensic scientists place their evidence into categories including these. “Forensic science is the use of scientific principles and methods to analyze material connected with a crime” (Funkhouser). When a crime is committed, law enforcement officers tape off the scene as quickly as possible (Funkhouser). They then search the area for evidence (Funkhouser). Forensic scientists rarely actually go to the crime scene (Funkhouser). Once all the evidence is gathered from the site, it is then cautiously transported to the crime lab to be analyzed (Funkhouser). Everything about a crime scene is taken very seriously. It is a very tedious process, which takes patience and
Many of us enjoy watching crime scene investigation shows, but in the criminal justice system forensic investigation is an essential field that requires upright observations and a prodigious interpretation. Under forensics, it is difficult to blame someone without scientific data. For that reason, Larry K. Gaines author of the textbook Criminal Justice in Action explains the importance of Blood Spatter Analysis. Specialist can learn a great deal about violent crime by examining where blood landed at the scene, the size and consistency of drops, and the pattern of blood spatter (Gaines, 2011). Consequently, an article of the Blood Spatter Analysis will be used to explain the research methodology the author uses to proceed certain investigations.
There are many steps that have to be taken when leading a criminal investigation and investigating a crime scene. Firstly, detectives have to try and figure out why and how a crime was committed. They examine a crime scene looking for information or clues such as fingerprints, weapons, and DNA. They investigate the victims’ history to define why someone would want to harm them. After they have formed a hypothesis, they try to find proof that somebody committed a crime so that they can arrest the suspects. They look at both the cause and the actual evidence of the crime and try to see if their hypothesis makes sense. The suspects then enter the criminal justice system where they are tried using the evidence collected at the crime scene.