Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dramatic irony in Shakespeare
The Victorian era society
The Victorian era society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dramatic irony in Shakespeare
2004 Question 2
Affluence versus poor, an age-old battle, especially during the “two worlds” time period of Victorian England. In Henry James’s The Pupil, this battle is brought to life as a poor young man, Pemberton, attempts to negotiate a salary as an in-house tutor for a very wealthy family, the Moreens. Through the use of diction and detail, James creates a specific tone that surrounds each character. Taken together, these various tones create a central tone of mockery and ridicule of the relationships amongst the characters. Additionally, James tells this story through the perspective of an omniscient narrator, that focuses mostly on the perspective of Pemberton, with a few shifts to a more neutral position. This perspective facilitates
…show more content…
a full understanding of the relationship between Pemberton and his employers as well as displaying the unhealthy relationship between Mrs. Moreen and Morgan Moreen. The use of iaxronic diction in this passage creates a tone of mockery and scorn that surrounds the Moreens and a tone of pity that surrounds Pemberton, thus depicting the Moreens as arrogant, Pemberton as timid, and establishing the Moreens’ relationship with Pemberton as one in which they feel superior.
The diction that surround Pemberton include words such as “poor” (line1), “nervously” (line 13), and “squeezing out” (line 65) create a tone of timidity that surrounds him. This tone paints a picture of Pemberton as a scared and poor young man, afraid to be assertive. The diction that surrounds Morgan Moreen, the alleged pupil of the story, include words and phrases like “only with the casual observation” and “the honor of taking his education in hand” create a tone of arrogance that surrounds the boy as well as a tone of ridicule towards the boy for acting in such ungrateful ways. The words “casual” and “honor” are clearly rooted in sarcasm and begin to illustrate the child’s deeply unsettling belief that he is above everyone else and does not need to pay respect to others. The diction that surrounds Mrs. Moreen includes words like “affable” (line 8), “save when she lowered her voice to sigh” (lines 32-33), and “expensive identity” (line 68). These phrases establish a tone of pompousness and frivolity that surrounds Mrs. Moreen, thus depicting her as a shallow and affluent woman. The diction also creates an undertone of derision that shames Mrs. Moreen for being so out of …show more content…
touch with the rest of the world, furthering her image as shallow and affluent. The combination of these three tones and three identities begins to shed a light on the relationship between the three characters. Pemberton’s timidity is a direct result of the Mrs. Moreen’s affluence as well as the child’s arrogance. The tone created through the diction that surrounds each character highlights their flaws and the relationships that it begins to display enable the other rhetorical devices present to expand on the complexities of the relationship between the three characters. The use of detail when describing the clothes and appearances of the Moreens creates a tone of ridicule and derision towards the Moreens’ way of life thus depicting them with an elevated sense of entitlement and legitimizes Pemberton discomfort in being assertive with Mrs. Moreen. Henry James writes that Mrs. Moreen “sat there drawing a pair of soiled gants de Suede through a fat, jeweled hand and, at once pressing and gliding…” (lines 9-11). This detail illustrates the extravagance of Mrs. Moreen but the inflicted tone is one of mockery. Between the soiled gloves and the fat hands, James mocks Mrs. Moreen’s affirmations of her own wealth. Through this, Henry James might be trying to take a jab at the aristocracy of the Victorian Era. However, more importantly, this illustrates some of the frustration in Mrs. Moreen and Pemberton’s relationship. Pemberton desperately needs to work for Mrs. Moreen, and he is upset that she is so concerned with her seemingly pathetic excuses for wealth and not with his salary. Henry James describes the boy as “somehow, sickly without being delicate, and that he looked intelligent…only added to the suggestion that, as with his big mouth and big ears he really couldn’t be called pretty, he might be unpleasant” (lines 48-53). Such a description creates a tone of ridicule towards the boy. The boy’s sense of entitlement is clear, as evidenced by his “big mouth” and “might be unpleasant.” This not only contributes to the understanding of his relationship with his mother and with Pemberton, but also with the interlocking dependencies between the three. In relation to his mother, Morgan Moreen is treats her with almost no respect and clearly does not value her role in his life. This is evident in the detailed description of his looks as well as the previously mentioned diction utilized to describe him. In relation to Pemberton, the detail described and the implied tone indicate that Pemberton does not like the boy, due to his blatant rudeness and general unpleasantness. The detail used in this piece highlights why the characters do not like one another but yet simultaneously need one another to continue on. This sentiment is further solidified through the point of view utilized by Henry James. Henry James uses the perspective of an omniscient narrator that shifts to focusing on Pemberton’s thoughts which depicts Pemberton as a weary teacher and illustrates a relationship between the three in which a lowly Pemberton is forced to work for an affluent and out of touch family.
The excerpt begins with a mostly neutral understanding of the scene. This facilitates a well-rounded depiction of Pemberton and the Moreens. However, in line 27 the point of view shifts to emphasize Pemberton’s emotions. The narrator says “Pemberton supposed it was precisely to approach the delicate subject of his remuneration. But it had been only to say some things about her son which it was better that a boy of eleven shouldn’t catch” (lines 27-31) The brief thoughts of Pemberton are given in a subtle way that clearly illustrates him as a charcter and build on his desperation in his relationship with Mrs. Moreen. He is so eagerly waiting for her to bring up his salary, that with each moment she doesn’t he is unable to manage. This portrays him as desperate and afraid, thus weak. Furthermore, it deepens the understanding of his dependency on Mrs. Moreen. After line 31, the point of view returns to a more holistic view of each character, only to return to Pemberton’s thoughts in line 50 to the end of the excerpt. The final paragraph begins with the line “Pemberton only wondered, while he took up his hat, what ‘all that’ was to amount to” (lines 72-73). This ending establishes him as desperate
and lacking confidence and exemplifies his dependency on the Moreens. The last line of the excerpt is Morgan Moreen saying, “in the shape of the mocking, foreign ejaculation, ‘Oh, la-la!’” (lines 73-74). This solidifies his arrogances and the role of Pemberton as a teacher that would make the child more bearable and thus Mrs. Moreen’s need for Pemberton. The overall diction, detail, and point of view in this excerpt greatly contribute to the development of this relationship built on fear and affluent apathy.
Class politics are introduced to the story when the Phonies arrive in Stella Street. The Phonies are disliked as soon as they arrive in Stella Street because of the renovations they make on Old Aunt Lillie’s house and the children of Stella Street make fun of the fact that the Phonies refurnish the house (p.13). Henni encourages the reader to make fun of the high class Phonies about the way they speak, because the Phonies use words such as ‘dinnah’ and ‘daaaarling’ (p.18). This shows the Phonies in a negative way enticing the audience to take Henni’s side or a middle class approach to the story. When the Phonies send a note from their lawyer to Frank’s family for a proposal of a new fence (p.22) they are once again looked at poorly.
However as Jeanette and her siblings quickly lose their innocence and are pulled into the reality of life, her idolization of her parents, (especially her father) gradually lessens and she comes to terms with their flawed lifestyle. As she begins to lose hope in her parents, she begins describing them in a more negative light. For example, she exposes the intensification of her father's drinking problem. “He staggered off to the bathroom, came back, ordered one for the road, slammed the shot glass down on the bar, and walked to the door. He lost his footing trying to open it and sprawled on the floor. I tried to help him up, but he kept falling over”(page?) This repugnant and embarrassing description of Rex, contrasts how Jeanette tried to showcase his admirable qualities earlier in the story. In the sentence she also no longe...
Jolley uses characterization to individualize each character in a poverty stricken family. The son is referred to as a prince by his mother several times throughout the story even though he is a high school dropout. “Mother always called him Prince; she worried about him all the time. I couldn’t think why. He was only my brother and a drop out at that” (117). The author portrays the son to be someone with low self-esteem because he is poor and a drop out he lives a miserable life. His mother tries to provide him with as much, but is unable to do this because of her social status is society. “‘Sleeps the best thing he can have. I wish he’d eat!’ She watched me as I took bread and spread the butter thick, she was never mean about butter, when we didn’t have other things we always had plenty of butter” (117). Through this passage the author convincingly demonstrates that they are poor and cannot afford an assortment of thing...
The verse novel, ‘The Simple Gift’ explores how relationships and place can impact detrimentally on one’s identity and sense of belonging. Herrick uses Billy to highlight how social issues such as dysfunctional families can lead to isolation and loneliness. Using first person narrative, “I”, Herrick in the poem 'Sport' establishes the barriers to belonging. Herrick uses flashback and hyperbole “he came thundering out” to highlight detachment from home prompted by Billy’s abusive alcoholic father. Detailed repetition of “I was ten years old” intensifies the poignant loss of Billy’s innocence and his displacement from a childhood sanctuary. Consequently the poem ‘Longlands Road’, uses personified enjambment, “rocks that bounce and clatter and roll and protest”, to capture the image of an angry boy who is searching for a sense of belonging. Imagery created through vivid descriptive language, “rundown and beat / the grass unmown around the doors”, depicts the impoverishment and disrepair of “Nowheresville”. While Billy’s description of “Mrs Johnston’s mailbox on the ground...” expresses his contempt and frustration. Subsequently, the ramifications of Billy’s discontent, portrayed by the sarcastic statement “It’s the only time my school has come in ...
...parents were much more successful in the working world encouraged him to complete many daily activities such as choir and piano lessons. His parents engaged him in conversations that promoted reasoning and negotiation and they showed interest in his daily life. Harold’s mother joked around with the children, simply asking them questions about television, but never engaged them in conversations that drew them out. She wasn’t aware of Harold’s education habits and was oblivious to his dropping grades because of his missing assignments. Instead of telling one of the children to seek help for a bullying problem she told them to simply beat up the child that was bothering them until they stopped. Alex’s parents on the other hand were very involved in his schooling and in turn he scored very well in his classes. Like Lareau suspected, growing up
When the poem is read aloud, the explicit rhyme and rhythm of the lines becomes extremely obvious. In fact, the bouncy rhythm is so uplifting, it occasionally makes the audiences feel like it is too predictable and straight-forward. An example would be “bright with chrysolite”, the word “chrysolite” feels like it is forcefully implemented for the sake of the rhyme. This is somewhat similar to a children’s tale. Most children’s tale as we know it, conveys messages straightforwardly and are easily understood by children, it also has an amiable tone and a merry mood that engages the children 's attention. Similarly, the rhyme and rhythm of this poem is very obvious and explicit, creating a delightful, casual mood that appeals to a young audience. Even though the legend dealt with deep insights about parenting that are intricate and puzzling, the father delivered it in such a gratifying, simple manner that made even the most dark and dreadful matters: like the description of precarious beasts and vicious monsters to sound like a blissful adventure of friendly animals. The sole purpose of this contradiction between the tone and message is to make this seemingly strong and serious topic more tolerable and captivating to the son of the father. Unsensible, impulsive youth is very similar to restless children, a long insipid lecture about deep insights is very difficult for them to buy into. In the same time, a harsh, threatening warning will only make them obey unwillingly, and creating a doubtful relationship will make them uncomfortable to communicate or appeal to their parents. Clearly, the percipient father recognized the ineffectiveness of these unsuitable parenting methods. Instead, he conveyed the message in a uncomplicated, friendly way that made his son to accept his teachings more comfortably. A
In the novella, Apt Pupil by Stephen King, the author illustrates and explains to us what his concept of evil is by showing us the ways society only see's and accepts the superficial aspects of people, like Todd the "All-American kid" (111) who is acceptable in every way and although Todd seems like the American ideal that most people view as what America should be like, society and people ignore or pretend that a person perfect like Todd or a man like Dussander who "exuded a certain courtly charm that all the young ladies responded to" (247) could get the nurses to blush, was actually able to think that killing "winos were fun" (210) and that "they made him feel alive" (210). Todd's grandfather was the type of man who had a "Left Hand Book" (185) where he helps out the people who go to his store. Todd's father soon grows to hate those people for causing him to wear Good will pants and the values that Dicks father has is twisted by Todd's father and the hate Todd's father has transferred to Todd, but in a more extreme manner.
In this passage she goes over the recent unfavorable events of divorcing her sickly husband and then, compromising her respectability, goes about with Peter Van Degen. She describes this play with only regret that she had been foiled in her plans. The language of this reflection is all business, a disturbing theme of the novel. She does not feel even compassion for the hard-working husband who forfeited his health to give her what he could, and thinks of her relationship with Van Degen as a game of cat and mouse.
Passage one also indicates the necessity of marrying well. Mrs. Dashwood illustrates a shallow reaction to the situation ...
Indeed, the satirical tone of this poem suggests that the speaker is somewhat critical of his father. The whiskey smell, the roughness, the inconsiderate and reckless actions are under scrutiny. The mother's frowning countenance suggests she too is rather unhappy with the scene. However, the winning tone of the poem is the light and comical one.
In the third sentence of the extract, the narrator states that the father “nonchalantly stands . . . like a horse at rest”, connecting him with the image on a strong and powerful horse. The father is viewed by the narrator as being in control and mighty. The diction used by the narrator develops an atmosphere than is tense, like walking a tightrope. The use of “if” and contrasting sentences displays the anxiety present in the scene. Should the father accept the offer, the mood will become “exuberant”, but if the father tears the ticket, refusing, the atmosphere will become “quiet” and in the future, cause “anger”. As of the moment of the scene however, the atmosphere is taut and nerve-wracking. Synecdoche is also used to distinguish to the reader which parent the narrator is focused on, such as when the father is being addressed. The narrator takes note of watching “Dad’s hands as he walks the line”. This prompts the reader to focus their attention to the father’s hands and how they are linked to his line of work, the trading mainly. This gives off the essence of a working class as usually one would watch someone’s back as
Charlotte Brontë’s novel, Jane Eyre, is set in a Victorian England, where social class is a huge factor in life. Brontë is very critical of Victorian England’s strict hierarchy. the main character, Jane, is a governess. Her social position is very complicated in which she has to be sophisticated, educated, intelligent, and soft spoken but she is then talked down to as she is of a lower class. The job of a governess is to teach children, whether it be art, writing or reading english literature. Victorian society is very corrupt and in the novel Brontë truly captures and illustrates the challenges that Jane has to face as a governess. The novel also emphasizes the social gap between individuals and how big it really is. In Victorian society, the rich get the most out of life and life for the poor gets harder. No individual should judge or belittle another due to the very minor factor of social status, but it seems to be very important in Jane’s society. The message that Brontë expresses in the novel is that social class is a meaningless catalyst in the progression of relationships, creating giant gaps between individuals.
The speaker reflects on the teenage girl’s childhood as she recalls the girl played with “dolls that did pee-pee” (2). This childish description allows the speaker to explain the innocence of the little girl. As a result, the reader immediately feels connected to this cute and innocent young girl. However, the speaker’s diction evolves as the girl grew into a teenager as she proclaims: “She was healthy, tested intelligent, / possessed strong arms and back, / abundant sexual drive and manual dexterity” (7-9). The speaker applies polished language to illustrate the teen. This causes the reader not only to see the girl as an adult, but also to begin to grasp the importance of her situation. The speaker expresses what the bullies told this girl as she explains: “She was advised to play coy, / exhorted to come on hearty” (12-13). The sophisticated diction shifts towards the girl’s oppressors and their cruel demands of her. Because of this, the reader is aware of the extent of the girl’s abuse. The speaker utilizes an intriguing simile as she announces: “Her good nature wore out / like a fan belt” (15-16). The maturity of the speaker’s word choice becomes evident as she uses a simile a young reader would not understand. This keeps the mature reader focused and allows him to fully understand the somberness of this poem. The speaker concludes the poem as she depicts the teenage girl’s appearance at her funeral: “In the casket displayed on satin she lay / with the undertaker’s cosmetics painted on” (19-20). The speaker elects not to describe the dead girl in an unclear and ingenuous manner. Rather, she is very clear and
The choice of words of the author also contributes to the development of the theme. For example, the use of words like "drafty," "half-heartedly," and "half-imagined" give the reader the idea of how faintly the dilemma was perceived and understood by the children, thus adding to the idea that the children cannot understand the burden the speaker has upon herself. In addition, referring to a Rembrandt as just a "picture" and to the woman as "old age," we can see that these two symbols, which are very important to the speaker and to the poem, are considered trivial by the children, thus contributing to the concept that the children cannot feel what the speaker is feeling.
Primarily, Mansfield uses the foil characters Laura and Mrs. Sheridan to accentuate Laura’s beliefs in social equality while bringing out Mrs. Sheridan’s opposite actions. After the news of the death of their neighbor, Mr. Scott, Laura feels she “...can’t possible have a garden-party with a man dead just outside [her] front gate”(5) she feels sympathetic towards the family as she knows they will be able to hear their band as they are mourning. On the contrary, Mrs. Sheridan does quite the opposite when alerted of the news, and even more so when Laura tells Mrs. Sheridan of her plans to cancel the party. Mrs. Sheridan strongly believes that “People like that don't expect sacrifices from us.”(6) Mansfield shows the reader how these two characters are quite different from each other. Laura doesn’t want a garden party to be disrespectful of the Scotts, but Mrs. Sheridan believes quite the opposite as she is rude and doesn’t believe the Scotts are on the same level as the Sheridans, being quite lower...