Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lawful and unfair dismissal
Case study of unfair dismissal
Wrongful termination case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lawful and unfair dismissal
Wrongful Termination
A wrongful termination is what happens when the employer breaks a law when firing an employee. Workers wrongfully terminated from jobs may experience financial problems or emotional distress from discriminatory practices in their place of work. In case an employee is wrongfully terminated, they can seek compensation for lost salaries and sue for damages through the legal system.
Terminated workers may wonder, “What is a wrongful termination lawsuit?” Workers wrongfully dismissed from jobs may be able to file lawsuits against their previous employers by following the proper procedure. After suspicion of illegal termination, a worker should revise the employment laws of the state and government. Wrongfully fired employees
…show more content…
• One of the exceptions to at will employment is the covenant of good faith and fair dealing exception, encouraging all employers to act in good faith and with fairness when interacting with the workers.
File a Discrimination Charge With the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
The process of how to file a charge of employment discrimination can change, depending on the size of the business. When filing a charge of discrimination, if the business is comprised of 14 workers or less, claimants should submit to the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI). To file a wrongful termination discrimination charge for a company with 15 or more workers, a claim goes directly to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
The process for how to file an EEOC employment discrimination charge should happen within 180 days (federal violations) or 300 days (state-enforced violations) of the suspected unlawful occurrence. Once you file a wrongful termination discrimination charge, the EEOC will get back to you within 10 days after establishing whether to move forward with an investigation or close your claim. A successful investigation requires cooperation from both you and your former employer because the EEOC will schedule interviews and ask for evidence for your
Constructive discharge, or constructive dismissal, means that the employee resigned from their position as a result of the employer creating an intolerable and difficult environment. Constructive discharge is viewed as the employee being pressured to quit due to the employer making changes to the working conditions or responsibilities, but from a legal position, the employee quit due to forced termination, or fired without good cause. ("TimsLaw.com » Constructive Discharge - Being forced to quit - Tim 's Missouri Employment Law Info Site," n.d.)
There was evidence shown that the unfair dismissal requirements were the furthermost conflicting and inconsistent from the manager’s perspective. The Fair Work Act applied unfair dismissal requirements for entirely workers, regardless of the population of workers in the business (Chapman, 2015). The Fair Work Act presents two cases that dismissal could be reasonable, including other dismissal and summary dismissal. In the first case, the law offers a sequence of stages such as concluded checklist, copies of notice, declaration of dismissal and a witness announcement with signature that managers must follow with the intention to reduce the problem (Chapman, 2015). In the second case, managers may dismiss a worker without notice due to theft or fraud. As the consequence, the amount of cases in relation to unfair dismissal has risen significantly since the Fair Work Act implemented as law. In addition to the growing records of cases in relation to unfair dismissal, the judgements from Fair Work Australia showed some contradicting clarifications of the Fair Work Act (Chapman, 2015). According to an example, a business in Albury- Wodonga had dismissed an employee due to the breach of occupational and safety laws after an employee continually denied to wear safety glasses at work (Sloan, 2011). However, after checking the worker’s reinstatement, the Fair Work Australia stated that the worker had a family and he has found it challenging to
Bennett-Alexander, Dawn D. & Hartman, Laura P. (2001). Employment Law for Business (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Primis Custom Publishing. Downloaded February 4, 2008 from the data base of http://www.eeoc.gov
In the EEOC’s Charge Process, John must go to his EEOC’s representative within this company and file a complaint. This is considered the administrative process. Pertinent information must be given about the plaintiff and defendant such as name, address and phone number, the date and a brief description of the charge. Once the charge has been filed the employer is notified that charges have been filed. The charge would be thoroughly investigated. A written description and date of alleged violation is requested again; interviews with people, documents are reviewed; and sometimes the facility is visited which the alleged discrimination occurred. As an alternative the charge may be assigned to the EEOC Mediation Program instead of an investigation, which both parties must consent to. If the mediation is unsuccessful, the charge returns back to investigation. There is a possibility that the charge be dismissed. If this is the case, John will be able to file a lawsuit on his behalf within 90 days.
The Equal Employment Opportunity filed 142 lawsuits alleging discrimination during the fiscal year of 2015. The lawsuits included 100 individuals and 42 suits involving multiple victims or discriminatory
A precedent case changed the way several businesses handle EEOC grievances. In the case of Arbaugh v. Y&H Corp, a female employee brought a lawsuit against her former employer claiming she had been sexually harassed and a lower court jury found in favor of the employee and award her punitive and compensatory damages. The employer did not realize an exclusion from the Civil Rights Act of 1964 applied to the business due to the small number of employees on the payroll. The Supreme Court found that even though Y&H Corp. did not employ fifteen or more employee it did not preclude a federal district court from hearing the complaint. This case directly influences the relaxed rules related to the Civil Rights Act for smaller businesses. A component of the thought behind a different level of enforcement for small businesses is they cannot handle the monetary implications of higher standards. Since this case in 2006, employers routinely make the applicable enforcement agency aware they fall below the employee threshold and this has provided an enhanced level of protection (Gentry, Robinson, Dibrell, & Franklin, 2013). This has not mitigated the risk that the EEOC will find a small business has violated Title VII and the business owner must appear in court to provide evidence they are a covered employer. The Arbaugh case created
The process of carefully looking at every decision and the repercussions of that decision is simply good business practice. Every company audits its decisions to make sure its what is right for the company. Firing practices should be no different. To draw some arbitrary line at this point to allow for firing an employee without cause is unethical and egregious business conduct. Due process is simply a sound way of carrying out the practice of removing an employee from the services of a c...
to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s...
Discrimination occurs when an employee suffers from unfavorable or unfair treatment due to their race, religion, national origin, disabled or veteran status, or other legally protected characteristics. Employees who have suffered reprisals for opposing workplace discrimination or for reporting violations to the authorities are also considered to be discriminated against. Federal law prohibits discrimination in work-related areas, such as recruiting, hiring, job evaluations, promotion policies, training, compensation and disciplinary action. (employeeissues.com, 2006)
An employer may dismiss an employee for a fair reason - this means the dismissal is substantively fair and if the employer has followed a fair procedure - the dismissal is procedurally fair.
Sexual harassment cases can be very unfair when being put under a microscope by judges, managers and supervisors. It can be a potential serious consequence to bo...
Sisak, J. R., & Laird, M. J. (2001). Sexual harassment claims: A process in reducing corporate liability. Equal Opportunities International, 20(3), 19-27. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/199612169?accountid=15070
Workplace harassment is unwelcome actions that are based on a person’s race, religion, color, and sex, and gender, country of origin, age, ethnicity or disability. The targets of the harassment are people who are usually perceived as “weaker” or “inferior” by the person who is harassing them. Companies and employers can also be guilty of workplace harassment if they utilize discriminatory practices against persons based on ethnicity, country of origin, religion, race, color, age, disability, or sex. These discriminatory practices have been illegal since the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Civil Rights Act of 1964), and have been amended to be more inclusive of other people who experience discrimination by the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (The Civil Rights Act of 1991), and most recently, President Obama’s signing of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 (Stolberg, 2009).
Harassment and discrimination can affect a business in many ways. Having a history of harassment and discrimination claims can damage a business’ reputation and affect its bottom line. It can cost the business current and future clients as well as investors and employees. Depending on the gravity of the claim(s), the process of settling the claim(s) can take anywhere from months to years. Meanwhile, the cost of the settlement and other fees continue to add up. A business might have to compensate the affected parties besides paying court fees and lawyers. The EEOC has seen a rise in monetary rewards from 7.5 million to 24.3 million (Glazer, 1996) However, all of these can be avoided by properly educating employers and employees about their rights and what harassment and discrimination entails.