Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The use of the atomic bomb in World War II
How was the creation of the atomic bomb helpful
Why was the atomic bomb important
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The use of the atomic bomb in World War II
On August 6, 1945 an American atomic bomb with the potential to incinerate anything in a one-mile radius was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan. Three days after the attack on Hiroshima, another atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, Japan with the same catastrophic effects. It was, indeed, a climactic point in history, but was it really necessary? The dropping of the bombs was not necessary, because it was predicted before that Japan would have lost the war anyways even if there were no atomic bombs dropped. While the war was in progress, Japan was losing large amounts of military and weapons. Japan was ready to surrender, but was trying to find a way to surrender at the time the bombs dropped. Dwight D. Eisenhower, who was the Supreme Commander …show more content…
of the Allied Forces in Europe, agreed with this statement saying that “Japan was already defeated”. The entire senior US officer corps, including Eisenhower, knew that by the middle of 1945, Japan would be forced to surrender with the extreme famine of Japanese military. After America took action against Japan, almost nothing was left of its overpowering navy or its mighty air force.
Due to this, American bombers dropped bombs at will all over Japan’s cities. The surviving facilities and workshops worked hard to build weapons, however, there were hardly any acceptable raw materials to use. Oil was cut off from Japan since April of 1945 while this devastation was happening. By July, 25% of Japan’s residential buildings were destroyed. Japan’s transportation system was inches away from collapse. Japanese citizens were starving from the lack of transportation of food to local grocers. The atomic bombs were too much for Japan to handle with the lack of food and …show more content…
military. In March of 1945, about 300 American bomber planes attacked Tokyo, Japan, resulting in 100,000 Japanese casualties. Nearly the entire city was destroyed, destroying about 250,000 buildings leaving 1,000,000 Japanese citizens homeless. Two months later, in May, a major air raid took place when 520 B-29 American bomber planes dropped nearly 4,500 tons of incendiary bombs on Japan a second time. A few days after that air strike, another one takes place, dropping 4,000 tons of bombs. It is clearly seen that Japan’s capital was completely destroyed. Japan was going to collapse with its capital destroyed. A Japanese prime minister mentioned that: “the thing that brought about the determination to make peace was the prolonged bombing from the B-29 planes.” In April and May of 1945, Japan attempted to make peace with Sweden and Portugal.
It was made aware of by Japanese prime minister to Japan’s Emperor that they should try to make peace by using the United States’s terms of surrender. However, the Emperor refused, because this meant unconditional surrender. When surrendering unconditionally, you have no control of how the opposing country being surrendered to choses your punishment. The Emperor was afraid that the United States would arrest the Emperor. The Emperor of Japan was part of a dynasty that started 2,600 years ago and didn’t want to end that dynasty. The Japanese were afraid America would execute or humiliate the
Emperor. In June of 1945, the Emperor and his advisors made the decision to seek peace and try to end the war. Their first task was to seek peace with the Soviet Union. Japan wanted to end the war by September. The Emperor told his war leaders to do whatever they could to conclude the war. In July of 1945, the United States intercepted messages between Japan and Russia discussing negotiations for ending the war. The United States knew that Japan did not want its Emperor to be harmed. Later on, that month, the Emperor told his prime minister to terminate war with Russia to end the war with the United States. Britain and the United States issued the Potsdam Declaration saying that: if Japan doesn’t give up its leader, the United States will destroy Japan. Japan couldn’t accept and the United States knew of Japan’s desire to keep the Emperor, but wanted to show no mercy. If the unconditional surrender terms were much lighter and letting Japan keep its leader, Japan would surely have accepted defeat and surrendered. On August 6, 1945, the United States dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. The United States wanted to rush and use the atomic bomb before Russia would have declared war on Japan two days later. If the United States didn’t use the atomic bomb and let Russia enter the war, Japan would most likely have surrendered 2 weeks after Russia declared war on Japan, because Japan had such a depleted military. This bomb caused around 80,000 deaths plus thousands more due to radiation poisoning. Three days later, the United States dropped another atomic bomb on Nagasaki. The Japanese government wouldn’t accept the Potsdam Declaration after the first atomic bomb. As a result, the United States felt obligated to drop a second one. This bomb killed about 40,000 people. Japan felt that the United States would keep dropping atomic bombs until Russia joined the war or Japan surrendered. Japan, finally, surrendered on August 14, 1945. In conclusion, the United States was very unmerciful in WWII with Japan. Japan refused to accept defeat because the United States wanted Japan’s Emperor. The dropping of the atomic bombs was unnecessary and could’ve been avoided in many ways, like: not wanting to take the Emperor of Japan, realizing how weak Japan was and how the atomic bomb would not be needed to defeat Japan, and continuing to bombard Japan with more explosive and incendiary bombs (since stopping the constant bombing was the main reason Japan wanted make peace with the United States). Japan was already on the verge of collapsing with no choice of what to do except surrendering; the atomic bomb was not imperative to ending the war with Japan.
Upon reading “Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan” by J. Samuel Walker, a reader will have a clear understanding of both sides of the controversy surrounding Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. The controversy remains of whether or not atomic bombs should have been used during the war. After studying this text, it is clear that the first atomic bomb, which was dropped on the city of Hiroshima, was a necessary military tactic on ending the war. The second bomb, which was dropped on Nagasaki, however, was an unnecessary measure in ensuring a surrender from the Japanese, and was only used to seek revenge.
Although WW II ended over 50 years ago there is still much discussion as to the events which ended the War in the Pacific. The primary event which historians attribute to this end are the use of atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although the bombing of these cities did force the Japanese to surrender, many people today ask “Was the use of the atomic bomb necessary to end the war?” and more importantly “Why was the decision to use the bomb made?” Ronald Takaki examines these questions in his book Hiroshima.
The war itself was filled with many battles, deaths, and decisions. Although the state of Japan in 1945 was a defeated nation, they refused to surrender, which was a key reason why Truman dropped the Atomic bombs. There are many important events and reasons as to why President Truman decided to drop the Atomic bombs on Japan. Japan's actions from 1852 to 1945 were stimulated by an extensive aspiration to elude the providence of 19th-century China and also to overtake it as a great power. When Japanese soldiers stormed into Manchuria in 1931, Japan commenced the first in the succession of annexations and conquest throughout the 1930’s that positioned the phase of the war.
This sharp decrease in morale amongst the Japanese people after the dropping of the atomic bomb coincided with an increase in Japanese fear of American and Allied power in future battles. For example, according to survivors of the bombing, whenever a lone American plane was seen over a Japanese city, people would “rush into their shelters,” and “They went in and out so much that they did not have time to eat. They were so nervous they could not work.” Prior to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki most Japanese were only scared of American aircraft if there was a large group, but after the dropping of the atomic bomb any individual plane could wreak havoc on Japanese cities, as Elona Gay did to Hiroshima on August 6th, 1945. The use of the atomic bomb was able to spread fear amongst the Japanese people so much that after the droppings of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki many people fled the cities to the countryside fearing more attacks of the same magnitude from the Allied powers.
The dropping of the atomic bomb may be one of the most controversial topics in American history. Could there have been another way to end the war without obliterating two Japanese cities? Several historians have taken a side and stated their interpretation of the situation. There are numerous factors that can sway the argument either way depending upon how influential you determine those factors to be. Some main historians that debated this topic are Robert Maddox, Tsuyoshi Hasegawa, and Gar Alperovitz. Each of these historians provides us with different insight, and a different answer to the question, was it necessary to drop the atomic bomb to end World War II?
World War II played host to some of the most gruesome and largest mass killings in history. From the start of the war in 1939 until the end of the war in 1945 there were three mass killings, by three big countries on those who they thought were lesser peoples. The rape of Nanking, which was carried out by the Japanese, resulted in the deaths of 150,000 to 200,000 Chinese civilians and POW. A more well-known event was of the Germans and the Holocaust. Hitler and the Nazi regime persecuted and killed over 500,000 Jews. This last country may come as a surprise, but there is no way that someone could leave them out of the conversation. With the dropping of the Atomic bombs the United States killed over 200,000, not including deaths by radiation, in the towns of Nagasaki and Hiroshima and ultimately placed the United States in the same group as the Japanese and the Germans. What are the alternatives other than dropping the two A-bombs and was it right? The United States and President Truman should have weighed their opting a little bit more before deciding to drop both atomic bombs on the Islands of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. In the case of dropping the atomic bombs the United States did not make the right decision. This essay will explain through logic reasoning and give detailed reasons as to why the United States did not make the right choice.
If they do not now accept our terms they may expect a rain of ruin from the air, the like of which has never been seen on this earth.” (Truman).The justification of the bombs was the fact that the bomb was only in retaliation to a hostile nation and there refusal to cooperate with the American government. Japan was attacking with no fear they were unwavering because there military mind set was to never surrender because it was a sign of weakness it was against their nature. And so was the United States we were not going to give up though we were not gaining anything from this war only loosing we had the same sort of national mindset that we could to surrender for the fear of being preserved as week. So with the rejection of surrender the United States dropped the bomb in order to stop a more brutal war and to protect the United States from having to drop out of the
The Atomic Age represents the most epic era and is composed of diverse controversial issues in the human history. In the late 1945, President Harry Truman informed to drop two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These two bombs quickly yielded the surrender of Japan and the end of the World War 2. However, the impact of it led us to debate whether this decision was actually right or not. First off, it would be hard to imagine how Japan would have been surrendered without the atomic bomb.
As World War 2, came to a close, The United States unleashed a secret atomic weapon upon the enemy nation of Japan that was quickly recognized as the most powerful wartime weapon in human history. They completely destroyed the entire Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and essentially vaporized countless innocent Japanese lives. Some historians believe that it was a foolish, brutal decision to use the atomic bomb on a weakened Japan, and that the civilians of the country did not deserve that kind of mass-annihilation. On the opposite side, other historians assert that dropping the bomb saved countless American and Japanese lives by ending the war faster than a regular invasion would have. What is undisputed is that this sad event dramatically changed the course of human history.
The effects of the atomic bomb might not have been the exact effects that the United States was looking for when they dropped Little Boy and Fat Man on Hiroshima and Nagasaki respectively (Grant, 1998). The original desire of the United States government when they dropped Little Boy and Fat Man on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not, in fact, the one more commonly known: that the two nuclear devices dropped upon Hiroshima and Nagasaki were detonated with the intention of bringing an end to the war with Japan, but instead to intimidate the Soviet Union. The fact of Japan's imminent defeat, the undeniable truth that relations with Russia were deteriorating, and competition for the division of Europe prove this without question. Admittedly, dropping the atomic bomb was a major factor in Japan's decision to accept the terms laid out in the Potsdam agreement, otherwise known as unconditional surrender. The fact must be pointed out, however, that Japan had already been virtually defeated.
In August of 1945, both of the only two nuclear bombs ever used in warfare were dropped on the Japanese cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. These two bombs shaped much of the world today.
In 1945, Germany had surrendered, but the war in the Pacific raged on. The allies were becoming desperate to end the war before it was necessary to carry out a full scale invasion. New developments in science had made it possible for the United States to weaponize the atom, and the consequent bomb created was dropped on Hiroshima and later Nagasaki at the approval of President Harry S. Truman and his advisors. In years to come, Truman would have to face questions over the merit of his actions. Although some may believe the atomic bomb was needed because it ended WWII, it was unnecessary to drop the nuclear bomb because of the alternatives that existed, the effect it had on the Japanese people, and because of the unethical reasons for dropping it.
...ecessary to end the war, because the Japanese were not going to surrender. In August of 1944 the war in Europe was over and the face off between the United States and Japan had finally arrived. The United States had to choose between sending hundreds of thousands of US soldiers, to invade Japan killing and being killed by the hundreds of thousands, OR dropping a newly developed weapon called the atomic bomb on two cities in Japan which would result in tens of thousands of civilian lives with little cost to US servicemen. The only hope of ending the war quickly and honorably was to drop the bombs. Calls for surrender were ignored and the Japanese hierarchy, Okinawa and Iwo Jima had shown clearly what an invasion of Japan would be like. The decision was made, the bombs were dropped, the war was ended and both military and civilian lives were saved by both countries.
Japan’s surrender may have been from the progress the scientist made during the Manhattan Project. The Manhattan Project was founded in 1942 by the United States government to create a fission (nuclear) bomb (Kroenig). The first idea of a fission bomb was during 1938 when two scientist named Enrico Fermi and Leo Szilard discovered the power of fission in uranium (Astore). In 1939, there was a possibility that Germany had the same idea and started researching on making a fission type bomb in an Arms race competition. An Arms race is when a country battles another country for status by having stronger and better weapons. In this race, it was for the creation of the fission bomb. Albert Einstein was also one of the scientists working on fission type reaction. Something different about Einstein is that he is from Germany, a country from the Axis power, and is helping the United States. He is helping the United States instead of Germany because he moved to the United States before Hitler became leader. In 1944, the United States knew Ger...
In 1945, when the Americans bombed Hiroshima, Japan, approximately 140,000 men and women were instantly killed by the effects of American nuclear defense. With such extreme brutality and force how many people must die for one to finally realize the strengths of nuclear bombs and what damage they can cause. Nuclear weapons should be outlawed because they kill thousands of innocent humans at a time, destroy the environment, and inviolate human’s right to moral and personal freedoms.