Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Summary of article "Workplace Bullying: Costly and Preventable
Summary of article "Workplace Bullying: Costly and Preventable
Summary of article "Workplace Bullying: Costly and Preventable
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Is there any way you can tell that the clothes on your back, the coffee you sip on
happily, or the bricks that hold up your house were made by adults, teenagers, or
children? The answer is no. While these things make you happy, blood, sweat and tears
are put forth in order for others to survive.
To start off, if you don’t already know what a sweatshop is, its a term often used
to describe a manufacturing facility that is physically or mentally abusive, or that crowds,
confines, or compels workers, or forces them to work long and unreasonable hours,
commonly placed in comparison with slave labor. There exists a fierce debate over the
use of factories that have come to be known as sweatshops, especially in relation to
globalization. Proponents of free trade claim
…show more content…
such factories benefit the citizens of developing nations who would otherwise have no legal employment opportunities. Opponents claim inhumane treatment of workers and abhorrent working conditions (https://goo.gl/iVRJqq.) Most of these sweatshops involve child labor, and pay little to no wages at all. According to the The Fair Labor Association, "2006 Annual Public Report" inspected factories for FLA compliance in 18 countries including Bangladesh, El Salvador, Colombia, Guatemala, Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, China, Ruiz 2 India,Vietnam, Honduras, Indonesia, Brazil, Taiwan, Mexico, and the U.S (https://goo.gl/jLwN2R.) Until this very day, companies of many famous brands sti Ruiz 3 because women make up 85 to 90% of sweatshop workers, some employers force them to take birth control and routine pregnancy tests to avoid supporting maternity leave or providing appropriate health benefits. Can you imagine being a women and wanting nothing more than to start a family, but you can’t because your job won’t allow it? A woman wants nothing more than to be her own person, but sweatshops can’t afford for women to take a leave of absence. Now that we’ve talked about the sweatshop employment let’s talk about the gist of the financials throughout the sweatshops. According to aier.org, many sweatshops can’t offer that much to workers because of little money they have to work with. Activists who are trying to upgrade the workers pay may put the companies in danger of losing the whole sweatshop operations in general, perhaps even making the companies leave the country in general. Is this a good thing or bad thing though? Do workers really deserve to be put through these hard conditions just to keep the companies afloat? The price of using sweatshops isn’t what is important, the sweatshop salaries are. According to theworldcounts.com, sweatshop wages can be so low that they barely cover essential needs. Some people work for as little as 1 US cent per hour, often more than 100 hours per week in conditions of poor air quality and extreme heat. If workers’ rights are respected sweatshops can actually help poor countries. Since most of the sweatshops Ruiz 4 involve apparel, here are the average pay for the workers according to aier.org: Bangladesh $0.13, China $0.44, Costa Rica $2.38, Dominican Republic $1.62, El Salvador $1.38, Haiti $0.49, Indonesia $0.34, Nicaragua $0.76, and Vietnam $0.26. It’s not all bad, for example, in Honduras, the average clothing sweatshop workers earn 13 US dollars per day, yet 44 percent of the country’s population lives on less than 2 dollars per day, says theworldcounts.com. A study showed that doubling the salary of sweatshop workers would only increase the consumer cost of an item by 1.8%, while consumers would be willing to pay 15% more to know a product did not come from a sweatshop (https://goo.gl/7N48GJ.) Although it may seem that working in a sweatshop is better than nothing, nothing may be better than a sweatshop.
With this being said, this leads to my final discussion over the anti-sweatshop
movement. If you don’t know what the anti-sweatshop movement is, let me explain. The
anti-sweatshop movement refers to campaigns to improve the conditions of workers in
sweatshops, which is manufacturing places characterized by low wages, poor working
conditions and often child labor (https://goo.gl/fWnuyU.) It was established in the mid
1990’s and it obtained tons of attention from many people, and it escalated rather quite
quickly. The best well known incident happened in 1996 when TV star Kathie Lee
Gifford was ambushed by Charles Kernaghan, the director of the National Labor
Ruiz 5
Committee, with a young girl who worked for low wages in a Honduran factory making
Gifford’s line of Wal-Mart clothing (https://goo.gl/eSQZJU.) According to nytimes.com,
as of the early 2000s, apparel and footwear factories overseas have slowly
improved working conditions in response to a highly vocal anti-sweatshop movement, labor rights advocates say. Pressure from college students and other opponents of sweatshops has led some factories that make goods for industry giants like Nike and the Gap to cut back on child labor, to use less dangerous chemicals and to require fewer employees to work 80-hour weeks, according to groups that monitor such factories (https://goo.gl/Xf26Uj.) In conclusion, sweatshops do not alleviate poverty. The people who are forced to work must spend the majority of their paycheck on food for their families to survive (https://goo.gl/7N48GJ.) So next time you want new clothes, some starbucks, or a new house to live in, think about who puts their time and effort into providing that for you
It is often said that products made in sweatshops are cheap and that is why people buy those products, but why is it behind the clothes or shoes that we wear that make sweatshops bad? In the article Sweat, Fire and Ethics by Bob Jeffcott is trying to persuade the people and tell them how sweatshops are bad. Bob Jeffcott supports the effort of workers of the global supply chains in order to win improved wages and good working conditions and a better quality of life of those who work on sweatshops. He mentions and describes in detail how the conditions of the sweatshops are and how the people working in them are forced to long working hours for little money. He makes the question, “we think we can end sweatshops abuses by just changing our individual buying habits?” referring to we can’t end the abuses that those women have by just stopping of buying their products because those women still have to work those long hours because other people are buying their product for less pay or less money.
The controversial issue of sweatshops is one often over looked by The United States. In the Social Issues Encyclopedia, entry # 167, Matt Zwolinski tackles the issues of sweatshops. In this article Matt raises a question I have not been able to get out of my head since I have begun researching this topic, “ are companies who contract with sweatshops doing anything wrong?” this article goes on to argue that the people who work in the sweatshops willingly choose to work there, despite the poor environment. Many people in third world countries depend on the sweatshops to earn what they can to have any hopes of surviving. If the sweatshops were to shut down many people would lose their jobs, and therefore have no source of income. This may lead people to steal and prostitution as well. this article is suggesting that sweatshops will better the economy by giving people a better job than what they may have had. Due to this the companies contracting with sweatshops are not acting wrong in any way. This was a deductive article it had a lot of good examples to show how sweatshops are beneficial to third world countries. Radly Balko seemed to have the same view point as Matt Zwolinski. Many people believe the richer countries should not support the sweatshops Balko believes if people stopped buying products made in sweatshops the companies will have to shut down and relocate, firing all of the present workers. Rasing the fact that again the worker will have no source of income, the workers need the sweatshop to survive. Balko also uses the argument that the workers willingly work in the current environments.
Sweatshops started around the 1830’s when industrialization started growing in urban areas. Most people who worked in them at the time were immigrants who didn't have their papers. They took jobs where they thought they'd have the most economic stability. It’s changed a bit since then, companies just want the cheapest labor they can get and to be able to sell the product in order to make a big profit. It’s hard to find these types of workers in developed areas so they look toward 3rd world countries. “sweatshops exist wherever there is an opportunity to exploit workers who lack the knowledge and resources to stand up for themselves.” (Morey) In third world countries many people are very poor and are unable to afford food and water so the kids are pulled out of school and forced to work so they can try to better their lives. This results in n immense amount of uneducated people unaware they can have better jobs and that the sweatshops are basically slavery. With a large amounts uneducated they continue the cycle of economic instability. There becomes no hope for a brighter future so people just carry on not fighting for their basic rights. Times have changed. 5 Years ago companies would pay a much larger amount for a product to be made but now if they’re lucky they’ll pay half, if a manufacturer doesn't like that another company will happily take it (Barnes). Companies have gotten greedier and greedier in what they’ll pay to have a product manufactured. Companies have taken advantage of the fact that people in developing countries will do just about anything to feed their families, they know that if the sweatshop in Cambodia don't like getting paid 2 dollars per garment the one in Indonesia will. This means that there is less money being paid to the workers which mean more will starve and live in very unsafe environments. Life is
With the continued rise of consumer "needs" in "industrial" countries such as the United States, and the consistently high price that corporations must pay to produce goods in these countries, companies are looking to "increase (their) profits by driving down costs any way possible... To minimize costs, companies look for places with the lowest wages and human rights protections" (Dosomething). Countries with lax or unenforced labor laws grant multinational corporations the leeway to use cheap foreign labor to mass-produce their commodities so that they can be sold in countries like America. These inexpensive, sometimes borderline illegal, establishments are known as sweatshops. In his book Timmerman discusses the topic of sweatshops in great detail. Originally in search of "where (his) T-shirt was made(;) (Timmerman) (went) to visit the factory where it was made and (met) the people who made (it)" (Timmerman5).
...e their product. Sweatshops are found usually all over the world and need to make a better decision as in more labor laws, fair wages, and safety standards to better the workers' conditions. It should benefit the mutually experiences by both the employers and the employees. Most important is the need to be educated about their rights and including local labor laws.
What are sweatshops? The Miriam-Webster dictionary defines sweatshops as: A shop or factory in which employees work for long hours at low wages and under unhealthy conditions. These factories are mainly located in Third-World countries, although there are still a few in the United States. Many popular, name brand companies like Nike, use sweatshops around the world. Today there is much controversy about sweatshops and whether they should be banned and closed. In reality, the conditions of these factories are terrible. The employees are paid very little, even after working long, hard hours. The supervisors of these shops are often cruel, malicious, and brutal. Sadly, these factories are often the only source of income for Third-World workers. As bad as these sweatshops might be, they have pulled many countries and individuals out of poverty. So, are sweatshops beneficial?
In the eighteenth century slavery was all around. However, the mends were in store to make up for the unfounded actions of the past. By doing so, it punishes the people of today to make up for the wrongful doings of the people in the past. African Americans did suffer in the past from the injustice of slavery. Take in mind that it was the past, and the injustice of slavery does not affect African Americans in today’s day and time. White Americans in today’s day and time did not own or have anything to do with slavery. With this being said, I am presenting the pro-slavery side of slavery: the positive aspects of slavery and the justification of slavery, the stereotypes that promote the enslaved Africans/black Americans, proslavery socially and historically, how they describe the lives of men and women under slavery and how these men envision civilized society, attitudes these men had about slavery, and the reflective of racial prejudice.
Emerson, an abolitionist himself, succinctly defines the ongoing dilemma of the slave owning South. The Southern states had inextricably tied their economy, politics, lifestyle and future to the “peculiar institution” of slavery. Once indulging in the ownership of slaves, the south had lost its own freedom to move beyond slavery. Instead they were bound to defend its existence and application regardless of circumstance.
Child labor is work that interferes with the physical and mental development of children. This work also often interferes with children's opportunities to attend school fully or requires them to dropout of school entirely
Slavery, a very sensitive subject to many and the root of many problems still plaguing this country today. Before officially coming to an end, there was a great political controversy regarding whether or not it should remain or be abolished. During this time reforms took place and in turn different movements were created in order to eliminate slavery in the southern states. Abolitionist were stepping forward arguing against the immorality and inhumanity of it. On the other hand, supporters of proslavery argued to keep it, by making every effort to justify it legally by downplaying the slave’s mental capacity and inferiority in society
Any slave, or a person who feels they are slaving to survive, would desire to be free from chains of bondage. Through out history you find present a “class” of people, such as pharaohs, kings, queens, clergyman, then those who are not born into or of “royalty” working for the them. They work and are heavily taxed, forced into servitude, or slavery, and then their children are born into that life. Karl Marx speaks to and wants those that were in his present and even those who would read his material in the future to take notice that slavery is not just in the past, but also still in present. Marx tried desperately to promote and persuade others that, if the lower class never revolts they will remain laboring earning little to nothing while making those above them prosper. While his argument about their being different classes in society and one reaping plentifully from the laboring of the lower class, is strong, there are some fallacies in his argument about the lower class revolting and how to live there after. In reality they will be going from one form of slavery to another.
Tumblr’s whole “cis” hate thing is really messed up. I think this because all the post I see are basically people just blasting out there opinion the same way most right wing republicans voice theirs. It’s irrational not easily backed up and is only different in that they are supporting opposite sides. You get my drift? The basis that they can keep this argument is basically that they’ve been oppressed by these people so it’s totally justified.
Globalization and industrialization contribute to the existence of sweatshops, which are where garments are made cheaply, because they are moving production and consumption of those cheap goods. Industrialization has enabled for global distribution, to exchange those goods around the world. They can also set apart the circumstances of consumption and production, which Western countries as mass consumers, are protected from of producers in less developed countries. These factories are usually located in less developed countries and face worker exploitation and changes in social structures. Technological innovation allows for machines to take the place of workers and do all the dirty work instead of workers doing hours of hard work by hand.
Sweatshops, when left to operate without government intervention, are the most efficient way out of poverty especially in developing countries. This argument may feel far fetched, but when examined in the context of those working at sweatshops and the locations sweatshops are most often constructed in, the reason why this is true is apparent. The benefits of sweatshops can be found by examining how they increase living conditions, examining the locations where sweatshops are constructed, and looking at how government regulations on factories don’t help anyone.
Sweatshop is a common term used to refer to factories that typically produce apparel; that have very low wages by modern U.S. standards, long working hours, and unsafe or unhealthy working conditions; that often don't obey labor laws; and that would generally be considered