Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros cons of genetic testing ethically
The pros and cons of genetic testing
The pros and cons of genetic testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As medical fields become larger, the morals every family stands for become weaker. Though most medicines and tests are needed every day, such as antibiotics, pain killers, and MRI’s the line needs to be drawn between the medical field and family morals. Prenatal genetic testing is pushing the moral line farther than ever before. The testing destroys every dream a parent has to be a father or mother. The prenatal genetic test rapidly changes the mindset of being a future parent into being an abortion supporter. As the medical field expands, it is nearly destroying every moral thing we stand for. We need to find the moral line and stand our ground. Prenatal genetic testing is a complicated topic for several families. This procedure is arranged in order to predict the health of …show more content…
I believe that these test mess with parent’s minds, by giving them probable false information. Yet, these test a supposed to be up to 99% accurate. If a test does not give 100% accuracy it is completely useless. Why even have a test that could and will fail as evidence shows, resulting in a probable abortion. I highly doubt you would want an archeologist to say that this bridge is only 99% stable. Mark Bradford’s article about abortion after prenatal diagnosis states, “Down syndrome live births as a percentage of total diagnosed pregnancies was 44%. Fifty-three percent of all pregnancies were aborted following prenatal diagnosis and a small percentage were lost to natural causes.” (Bradford, 2015). Why would you want to take a risky test that has a 53% abortion rate after receiving a result? If 53% of the children die before birth then why does the procedure say it is 99% accurate? A statistic cannot be completed if it is missing a variable, in this case it is missing 53% of the variables. Prenatal genetic testing indicates a parent’s unwillingness to have a child with
This test determines whether the unborn baby has genetic or chromosomal abnormalities. It identifies several hundred genetic disorders, including some of the most common, such as Down syndrome and Edward’s syndrome. It can also identify other genetic disorders such as Tay-Sachs disease, Huntington’s disease, Sickle cell disease, and cystic fibrosis. Other testing techniques such as ultrasounds can help with these problems. Only amniocentesis is able to provide the information needed to diagnose these problems in the womb.
“Today some patients have their genomes sequenced to shed light on genetic diseases or illnesses like cancer, but one day people will not wait until they are sick, for they will already know the data at birth, says Arthur Beaudet. In this day in time scientist are testing out procedures in which parents will be able to alter their child’s genes. This means parents will have the will to create their child in a way they see fit. Although, this is a technological breakthrough for scientist, many obstacles stand in the way of widespread use of prenatal DNA sequencing. To understand prenatal DNA sequencing scientist must look into the genetic inheritance and DNA of the child, for the procedure itself it creates many positive and negative effects; for the uncertain parents they must look into the procedure and learn from genetic counselors which could be the best choice, not only does providing a genetic counselor endure genetic counselors prenatal DNA sequencing also requires tons of money alone.
The Human Genome Project is the largest scientific endeavor undertaken since the Manhattan Project, and, as with the Manhattan Project, the completion of the Human Genome Project has brought to surface many moral and ethical issues concerning the use of the knowledge gained from the project. Although genetic tests for certain diseases have been available for 15 years (Ridley, 1999), the completion of the Human Genome Project will certainly lead to an exponential increase in the number of genetic tests available. Therefore, before genetic testing becomes a routine part of a visit to a doctor's office, the two main questions at the heart of the controversy surrounding genetic testing must be addressed: When should genetic testing be used? And who should have access to the results of genetic tests? As I intend to show, genetic tests should only be used for treatable diseases, and individuals should have the freedom to decide who has access to their test results.
I believe Deb should get genetic testing done for a few reasons. First of all the test would allow Deb to prepare and start to limit a potential disease. In the story it states that "at some point Deb would like to know her Cancer risk." That statement leads me to believe she would like the test conducted at some point as that's one of the few ways she can find out her risk. I feel the bioethical principal that represents this situation is the respect for patients principle. It is entirely up to Deb if she wants to have the test completed and no one should try to influence her decision. I also like to think if a cancer gene is found in Deb she will start preparing be starting a possible treatment plan and also start financial planning for the disease as she will have to pay some money to have the
Prenatal genetic testing has become one of the largest and most influencial advances in clinical genetics today. "Of the over 4000 genetic traits which have been distinguished to date, more than 300 are identifiable via prenatal genetic testing" (Morris, 1993). Every year, thousands of couples are subjecting their lives to the results of prenatal tests. For some, the information may be a sigh of relief, for others a tear of terror. The psychological effects following a prenatal test can be devastating, leaving the woman with a decision which will affect the rest of her life.
In today’s world, people are learning a great deal in the rapidly growing and developing fields of science and technology. Almost each day, an individual can see or hear about new discoveries and advances in these fields of study. One science that is rapidly progressing is genetic testing; a valuable science that promotes prevention efforts for genetically susceptible people and provides new strategies for disease management. Unnaturally, and morally wrong, genetic testing is a controversial science that manipulates human ethics. Although genetic testing has enormous advantages, the uncertainties of genetic testing will depreciate our quality of life, and thereby result in psychological burden, discrimination, and abortion.
(2) Even people that don 't have any disease could be more prepare, and prevent it from developing in the future by being more aware thanks to the genetic test provided. Genetic screening is another valuable technology that could help a parent keep track of their baby 's health by examining their chromosomes. Genetic testing and screening could impact the life all patients in a positive way, therefore the opposing side should be grateful, and take advantage of this opportunities provided. For example, a person goes to genetically test themselves in a clinic, and they come to find out that they could potentially develop heart problems in the future. Now they can be more aware, and prepared. They could in many different ways like changing their diet or exercising more so they could better protect their heart, and decrease the chances of having the heart problems, like they where presented in the genetic test. What if the person didn 't know they had a chance to have problems? and start eating unhealthy foods that could likely speed up their changes of developing a heart disease. My point is that the same thing goes to those parent who want to get a update of their unborn child 's health. Many healthy mother don 't really expect that their pregnancy will bring some implications, but in
Would you want to know the health of your child before it is born? That is what Prenatal Testing is for. If you don’t know what it is exactly, you’ll learn as you read through this paper. The two types of prenatal testing are prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis. Both types of testing allow for pregnant women to have a clearer understanding of their child. (Prenatal Diagnosis 2015) New ways of learning about the fetus will most likely become available in the near future because of technology advancing everyday. Even though some people believe miscarriages are a problem with some of the testing that’s done, it’s okay for pregnant women to do prenatal testing to make sure their baby is healthy because there could be possible disorders in the baby, results from the testing can help, and the tests can find cancer in pregnant women.
The results can occur ambiguous and not knowing whether or not the child could have abnormalities that can make the results inconclusive.
These tests help people who are living and pregnant. If a fertilized egg is given personhood, then they can no longer do these test because they don’t have the consent of the egg that isn’t even able to make choices. At Stanford they did a test on fertilized eggs allowing them to be able to with a 93% certainty be able to tell if the fertilized egg will make it to key milestones. This allow would arise problems with embryotic stem cell research. This is when they take a fertilized egg, which is 3-5 days old and takes it to the stem cells.
What is Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD)? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a test used prior to in vetro fertilization (IVF) to determine if an embryo carries a genetic disease or disorder. There are advantages and disadvantages to PGD, and is not required before IVF. It’s recommended for couples who carry a genetic disease or condition, and are at risk for passing it on to a child.
However, this has been avoided in recent years due to humanity's deeper understanding in this innovative science, and organs have become artificially engineered to suit every patient's demand [3]. Pregnant woman now accept screening their fetuses for genetic defectiveness in the intent of amending any faults [4]. Some parents also desire to coax the fetus into what they desire to be their offspring; however, this is regarded as unethical and immoral by many
Genetic testing negatively affects MILLIONS of lives. Those test results may trigger awful emotions. Testing may cost too much for the average person. Also, these screenings are not full body reviews. Considering these genetic testing should be prohibited by agencies offering the tests for everyone’s life.
Genetic Testing is a very helpful and useful tool for the world today. There and many pros and many cons to each test. In this paper the discussion is the pros and cons of preimplantation testing, newborn screening, and breast cancer genetic testing. Many different tests are used today ranging from before conception of a fetus all the way to adulthood and that is how much medicine had developed over the last few hundred years. Most people think these test are miracles and gifts however there are some people that disagree entirely with the whole concept of messing with the fate of each person. Preimplantation, newborn screening, and breast cancer testing all have pros consist of the helpful ways to stop things from happening in the future. However
There are two types of testing that can be done well you are pregnant. The most common test is amniocentisis which is done between fifteen to twenty weeks, this is where they use a hollow needle to get amnio fluid to test for genetic problems or even the sex of the baby (Hirsch, 2014). The other test is called Chronic Villus Testing (CVT) this is between ten and twelve weeks and the doctor removes a piece of the placenta to test for genetic problems (Hirsch, 2014). Some parents may have a child already and they may have a genetic disorder, and their doctor recommends them to have the test just to make sure their child is okay on the new pregnancy. I know if I had a one child with a genetic defect I would like to know if my other children would as well. “In a 1993 survey in United Kingdom out of 49 geneticists and 209 Pediatricians revealed that most pediatricians would test healthy children for 11 genetic conditions” (Arbour, and Belik, 2003). When genetic testing is done it seems that most parents want to test for cancer and less then 20% for Huntington’s disease (Arbour, and Belik,