Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical dilemmas of genetic testing
Arguments against genetic testing
Arguments against genetic testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical dilemmas of genetic testing
Genetic testing on children is a very controversial discussion with parents. Some parents do not think that it is appropriate to test children because their kids are not the ones making the decisions for them the parent is. Well others like me feel that genetic testing should be done for our children. I think is should be done because if there is cancer or some other kind of hereditary disease or disorder on either side of the family you can try to prevent it from happening before it become severe or even happens. A couple of examples are, one of my friends grandchild went to the hospital and was not feeling very well turns out that he had cancer and it was out of the blue because no one had cancer of that type. Maybe if they had tested …show more content…
There are two types of testing that can be done well you are pregnant. The most common test is amniocentisis which is done between fifteen to twenty weeks, this is where they use a hollow needle to get amnio fluid to test for genetic problems or even the sex of the baby (Hirsch, 2014). The other test is called Chronic Villus Testing (CVT) this is between ten and twelve weeks and the doctor removes a piece of the placenta to test for genetic problems (Hirsch, 2014). Some parents may have a child already and they may have a genetic disorder, and their doctor recommends them to have the test just to make sure their child is okay on the new pregnancy. I know if I had a one child with a genetic defect I would like to know if my other children would as well. “In a 1993 survey in United Kingdom out of 49 geneticists and 209 Pediatricians revealed that most pediatricians would test healthy children for 11 genetic conditions” (Arbour, and Belik, 2003). When genetic testing is done it seems that most parents want to test for cancer and less then 20% for Huntington’s disease (Arbour, and Belik,
This test determines whether the unborn baby has genetic or chromosomal abnormalities. It identifies several hundred genetic disorders, including some of the most common, such as Down syndrome and Edward’s syndrome. It can also identify other genetic disorders such as Tay-Sachs disease, Huntington’s disease, Sickle cell disease, and cystic fibrosis. Other testing techniques such as ultrasounds can help with these problems. Only amniocentesis is able to provide the information needed to diagnose these problems in the womb.
John F. Kennedy, President of the United States, in his speech on April 11, 1962 argues that the increase in steel prices is harmful to the United States economy. Kennedy affirms this with a strong use of logos, given diction he also applies ethos to his speech giving him credibility and status, and he also appeals to the emotions of his audience so that they may respond. Kennedy is confronting the steel production companies due to the increase in steel prices in order to force them to change. Kennedy addresses the steel companies and he appeals to them in a strict tone, but he is also appealing to the reader's emotions so that they may see that what the steel companies are doing is wrong. Kennedy does an immaculate job of expressing logos,
Genetic testing has been a very controversial topic. While some people believe that genetic testing is completely right in any situation, others believe that it is completely wrong in any situation. However, both sides prove valid points of why genetic testing is both right and wrong. Genetic testing can be very good when it is being used for helpful reasons. However, genetic testing can also be very bad when it is used for the wrong reasons. Genetic testing is okay to do as long as it is being done for the right reasons and following good moral guidelines.
The Human Genome Project is the largest scientific endeavor undertaken since the Manhattan Project, and, as with the Manhattan Project, the completion of the Human Genome Project has brought to surface many moral and ethical issues concerning the use of the knowledge gained from the project. Although genetic tests for certain diseases have been available for 15 years (Ridley, 1999), the completion of the Human Genome Project will certainly lead to an exponential increase in the number of genetic tests available. Therefore, before genetic testing becomes a routine part of a visit to a doctor's office, the two main questions at the heart of the controversy surrounding genetic testing must be addressed: When should genetic testing be used? And who should have access to the results of genetic tests? As I intend to show, genetic tests should only be used for treatable diseases, and individuals should have the freedom to decide who has access to their test results.
Knowing that the victims have these diseases written in their DNA from the moment they were born leads to an interesting argument. Several communities argue about whether parents or guardians should have the right to test their children for these diseases. There are many arguments, however, that stem from the social and ethical aspect of the effects it could have on the kids. The arguments that are presented are understandable because every parent wants to do what is best for their child. However, the true question is whether or not it is actually their choice to make.
Genetic Engineering has recently become a contentious topic within medical and social circles. Controversial topics such as Sex Selection and Designer Babies are linked to Genetic engineering. They are destructive in every circumstance. Genetic Engineering is detrimental towards the individual and all posterity.
Is DNA testing worth all the money and effort we put into it? Sometimes it is not and this is why. Analyst Kathryn Troyer did some tests on Arizona's DNA database. She stumbled across two different felons with incredibly similar DNA profiles. Both men DNA surprisingly matched at nine of the thirteen loci. The FBI approximated that the odds of unrelated people sharing those genetic markers are about 1 in 113 billion. The two men were in no way related, they were not even of the same race. The FBI desperately tried to hide this.
For couples with previous knowledge of genetic disorders in their family and concerned parents, prenatal genetic testing is part of the regular pregnancy checkup. Making an appointment with a genetic counselor may seem strange or even frightening for some, still others view it a very common step being taken by many Americans today.
In today’s world, people are learning a great deal in the rapidly growing and developing fields of science and technology. Almost each day, an individual can see or hear about new discoveries and advances in these fields of study. One science that is rapidly progressing is genetic testing; a valuable science that promotes prevention efforts for genetically susceptible people and provides new strategies for disease management. Unnaturally, and morally wrong, genetic testing is a controversial science that manipulates human ethics. Although genetic testing has enormous advantages, the uncertainties of genetic testing will depreciate our quality of life, and thereby result in psychological burden, discrimination, and abortion.
First of all, I want to start by saying that I 'm not discriminating the disabled community, but this is a very large number that could possibly be diminished with the help of genetic testing. (1) I believe that there is nothing wrong with testing the genes of an unborn child to possibly determine if it could develop a genetic disorder in the future. One of the advantages that genetic testing provides is that the parents could now be informed of the situation, and keep track of their unborn child 's health. I 'm sure those parents are pleased with this technology, and the chances to be able to keep track of their baby. This a baby, and is something very precious, and valuable, and I believe that parents want to keep track of anything that may happen with the unborn child. I 'm sure that a large amount of people would agree would agree that they don 't want to suddenly take the hard hit. When the news is presented in the delivery room. This serves more as an advantage than a disadvantage, due to the fact parents. Pull be more prepared, or possibly have the option to abort it. This is a right that the parents should have regardless of the opposing side arguments towards it. Im a hundred percent sure that the opposing side has very strong arguments towards genetics testing, and one of the main ones is "playing God." The opposing side believed that some things in
Every now and then, there emerges a great idea that changes they way we view and interact with the world for the better. Many times however, it takes an idea with catastrophic consequences to stimulate society to make a positive change. Eugenics is one of these ideas. It was an idea based on faulty ideas of human heredity, the assumption that man himself can change his evolutionary destiny, and was fueled by prejudice and hate. In the end however, its pseudo-scientific and deceptive nature was revealed to the people, and a path to true understanding of heredity was paved.
The study of eugenics has been around for many years. China runs the largest and most successful eugenics program in the world. This is becoming more common and accepted by many people. However, simply because it is accepted does not make it right. Eugenics comes from the Greek word meaning “good” or “well born”. It is the belief that some people are genetically superior to others; and that one inherits their relatives’ mental and psychological traits. Eugenics started off as a positive theory, encouraging educated people (positive eugenics) to bear more children and raise them in a constructive manner, but has become a negative theory threatening the sterilization of people with unwanted traits (negative eugenics).
As our food, diet, and lifestyle changes, many of us do not know the long term effects of what is happening internally in our bodies. Over time, if we do not treat our bodies with nutrients, our bodies can turn on cancerous genes, or genetically modify what we currently have. Mutating our own genes with bad habits, can cause a negative chain effect on our bodies. Prenatal genetic testing is a great tool to use while pregnant. It will allow expecting mothers to see if the fetus as well as themselves are healthy. While many expecting mothers do not know all the tests offered, genetic counselors will increase their knowledge on potential problems that may occur.
Most of the opinions in the genetic testing seminar were on the positive side, choosing that it should be used more often. The generic testing can help better prepare people for what they can pass down if they choose to have children. For example, if someone has the high risk of diabetes running in their family their most likely to have it passed down to their children and even getting it themselves. I think the majority of people want to know what their genes carry, because it can have a huge impact on their life. Technological advances in genetic testing lend parents new insight about their children's risk factors for developing diseases later in life. The issue has been the subject of heated debate as parents grapple with the pros and cons of testing themselves and their children.
Genetic engineering seems decades away, but through modern technology, it has recently entered the human realm. Some believe genetic engineering will bring forth great advancements in the human brain and body, but instead some believe one mistake creates a world where every child will be genetically engineered just to keep up with the rest of society. Many times, the media plays a very strong role in the image of this issue, and masks the true identity of this social injustice. However, what forms of genetic engineering can be done in humans today? What is in store for the future? What are the risks and what could be the possible benefits? Currently gene therapy is one of the only ways to change the genetic makeup of an animal or human. Also,