Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How is google affecting us
The internets effect on our minds
Impact of the internet on the human mind
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How is google affecting us
The internet: a place for individuals to search millions of topics and then add those topics to others’ understanding. Google, one of the most used internet websites, is where many Americans spend their time researching. The internet, and Google itself, are filled with an abundancy of information for humans to learn, research, and share their own thoughts and theories. One can say that Google is making Americans stupid, but how do we know that for sure? Carr’s theory states, “the Net is becoming a universal medium, the conduit for most of the information that flows through my eyes and ears and into my mind” (Carr 315). Carr believes that Google is where he receives and takes in most of his information. Other Americans believe this, also. But, …show more content…
Americans could spend hours sitting down reading a novel, taking in every detail and thoroughly understanding what they read. Now Americans get onto Google, type in a topic, skim over the topic and log off the computer. According to Carr, “immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy. My mind would get caught up in the narrative or the turns of the argument, and I’d spend hours strolling through long stretches of prose. That’s rarely the case anymore. Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle” (Carr 314). Not only is this statement true to Nicholas Carr, but it is true for many Americans. Carr spends much of his time on the Web instead of in a book for the convenience of the time it takes to learn about a topic. I understand where Carr and most Americans are coming from. Google has everything I need to know. In just a matter of minutes you can read and learn about a topic that would otherwise take hours to learn from reading a book. Conveniently, you can find an abundant number of books on the Web. Instead of reading a book and having one’s mind wonder in different places, Americans can read that same book on the internet and stay more focused. …show more content…
However, you do not see that happening much anymore. Sitting down and reading from a book has turned into sitting down and reading from an electronic device. Nicholas Carr admits, “for more than a decade now, I’ve been spending a lot of time online, searching and surfing and sometimes adding to the great databases of the Internet” (Carr 314). Carr wishes he could focus and read more from a book rather than the Web. I personally do not find a problem with reading from the Web, rather than a book. On the internet you have the option of seeking opinions while adding your own opinions to the list. Along with reading from the Web, you have the option to read summaries along with the book; to reach a better understanding of the reading. Most Americans view the Internet as information that is put into words, only. But along with the information, put in words, comes the information from
In my opinion, Google does not make us stupid like Carr suggests in his article. Google may make us seem lazy because we do less reading and physical activity. Information found on websites helps people become smarter and able to learn subjects easier in school. In the end, Carr never really provides scientific evidence that shows the brain’s circuitry having actually changed. I generally agree with Gladstone’s views and think the mirror metaphor is a useful way of talking about the media’s role in a free society. I also think that the computer and the Internet have enhanced our abilities and increased our processing speeds for acquiring knowledge: making the human brain more efficient in multitasking. The young people who are growing up with this new technology will expand it’s future. Gladstone makes the case that media distributors, even ones that seem indestructible, are ultimately subject to the preferences of their audience: us. Citizens should take up the responsibility of learning about and interacting with valuable media sources and reject those that pander to the lowest common
In composing “Is Google Making Us More Stupid” Nicholas Carr wants his audience to be feared by the internet while at the same time he wants his work to seem more creditable. Nicholas Carr uses many different types of evidence to show us that we should be scared and feared as well as his credibility. Carr’s audience is people who think like him, who find themselves getting lost on the internet while reading something, someone who is educated and uses the internet to look up the answers to questions or to read an article or book.
He states how he used to spend hours reading, but his concentration started to drift after two or three pages. He backed up his theory with stories from others who say they’re experiencing the same thing. But they still await the long-term neurological and psychological experiments that will provide a definitive picture of how the internet affects cognition. After a brief history lesson, Carr starts to incorporate Google into the article. He tells us about Google’s history and their mission.
In “Reading and Thought” editor Dwight MacDonald emphasizes that everything we read on a daily basis is worthless. MacDonald defines functional curiosity as a habit of reading rather than giving valuable information. MacDonald also alternates that people read too much material in a limited time frame; which results in hollow reading and thinking. Although, MacDonald encourages us to read more to become brilliant, I partially disagree with MacDonald’s argument because we waste time reading unimportant material, do not have time to reread and understand the material and we can now read our books electronically.
Nicholas Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and Sherry Turkle’s “How Computers Change the Way We Think” both discuss the influence of technology to their own understanding and perspective. The first work by Nicholas Carr is about the impact technology has on his mind. He is skeptical about the effect it could cause in the long term of it. He gives credible facts and studies done to prove his point. While Sherry Turkle’s work gives a broad idea of the impact of technology has caused through the years. She talks about the advances in technology and how it is changing how people communicate, learn and think. In both works “Is Google Making Us Stupid” and “How Computers Change the Way We Think” the authors present
In Is Google Making Us Stupid, Carr concerns about spending too much time on web, making people lose the patient and ability to read and think and changing people’s thinking behaviors. He gives so many points: he can not read lengthy article used to be easy; many author begin to feel that too much reading online let them hard to read and absorb a longish article; we put efficiency and immediacy above understanding when we read; The circuits in brain has been altered by reading habit.
The following essay will discuss how the ideas in “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr, is expressed in the futuristic novel Feed, by M.T Anderson.
With the rise of technology and the staggering availability of information, the digital age has come about in full force, and will only grow from here. Any individual with an internet connection has a vast amount of knowledge at his fingertips. As long as one is online, he is mere clicks away from Wikipedia or Google, which allows him to find what he needs to know. Despite this, Nicholas Carr questions whether Google has a positive impact on the way people take in information. In his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Carr explores the internet’s impact on the way people read. He argues that the availability of so much information has diminished the ability to concentrate on reading, referencing stories of literary types who no longer have the capacity to sit down and read a book, as well as his own personal experiences with this issue. The internet presents tons of data at once, and it is Carr’s assumption that our brains will slowly become wired to better receive this information.
In the articles, “How Facts Backfire” and “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Keohane and Carr explain the cognitive blocks we are faced with in society. Keohane explains how we can be misinformed because of our beliefs. These beliefs can cloud our judgement of what is true and what isn’t true. Carr focuses on how the internet has changed the way we think. Carr includes how the internet can distract us, making tasks harder to complete. Both Keohane and Carr show us the negatives side effects of cognition.
Humans are becoming more technologically-efficient every day. New inventions and innovations are constantly being made. The Internet is becoming more “reliable” every day. However, how much do we really get from the constant advancement of Internet use and smarter technology? Should we look at their contributions to the world as a benefactor or a curse? The common effect of “artificial intelligence” in the technology we use every day is examined by two brilliant authors, Nicholas Carr and Jamias Cascio. In Carr’s article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid”, he explains the effects of the Internet and technology in our society and claims that the overuse of technology is dangerous and can affect how our mind operates. Jamias Cascio, on the other hand, uses his article “Get Smarter” to show the positive effects of technology in our constantly adaptive society claims that technology may just be making our society smarter and more efficient. While Carr and Cascio both use the claim of cause in their articles to provide valid points on how technology affects our society, Carr’s article proves to be more effective because it focuses on skeptical-based evidence and uses a variety of appeals and proofs.
“Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr and “How Computers Change the Way We Think” by Sherry Turkle are two articles that explore how technology influences our daily lives. “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” discusses the effects of the internet in our society, how it is robbing us of our deep thoughts, memories and our ability to read books. Carr also talks about how the internet has become our primary source of getting information. The writer also discusses about how he’s having difficulty focusing on reading. “How Computers Change the Way We Think” is talking about how people don’t use their brains full potential capacity to solve problems. Instead, we depend on technology to do that for us.
Google is great. Isn’t it? You forget the name of that actress in that new movie you just saw and BAM! All you have to do is Google it. You don’t even have to think hard about it, because the answer is so close within your reach, just pull out your smart phone or laptop and give it a few seconds to load and there it is. What would have taken you 30 minutes, maybe even an hour to remember was easily found on the Internet with just the touch of a button. I saw Google differently before I read Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making us Stupid”. I went from seeing Google as a tool, to seeing it is a weapon. The beginning of Carr’s essay, jumped out at me immediately and made me think. Carr explains “Over the past
In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid” by Nicolas Carr published in The Atlantic in July, 2008, he debates a change that has happened since people began to use internet for information. Carr’s main reason is show to the people what the Internet has done to our brains; he showed how his life was before his use the Internet. The purpose of this article is to explain about how the Internet has affected our brains “Carr’s said the more time a person spent on the Internet, have greater difficulty in concentrating in a wider and deeper reading, like a book. He also said that his way of thinking had change and he did not have a lot of problem memorizing things. Before he used to be more focused when his read a book, but with Internet his became lazier, he could read a whole book, but with internet, he lost his concentration on reading. And reading was same thing that he used to do naturally, but it became obstacle for him”.
Our ability to interpret text, to make the rich mental connections that form when we read deeply and without distraction, remains largely disengaged” (Carr 744-735). After comparing my experience and that of my classmates with some of the criticism that I’ve read, I’m not convinced that Google is making me stupid, as Nicolas
I never knew that reading online, your brain receives less information than when reading a book. "Even if you’ve shunned all distractions, you still won’t absorb information you read online as well as you would if you’d read it in a book. And you can blame hypertext for that. Those colorful little links scattered throughout online articles (including this one) make your brain work harder than it would otherwise, leaving less brain power to process what you’re