Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of free trade
The effects of free trade
Short essay on free trade
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of free trade
One of international relations theories, liberalism, supports free trade. Liberals believe that free trade benefits everyone, increases efficiency, and raises productivity. A famous liberal thinker, Adam Smith, believes that free trade enhances national economic capacity through the increase of connection between countries. He believes that free trade provides states not only to play an important role in international economic affairs, for example division of labour, property and justice, but also to promote self-interests and national defence. Smith provided an argument, with his concept of absolute advantage, that two countries could benefit from trade if they specialise in the goods they produced better than their rivals and traded with …show more content…
These thinkers are supporters of protectionism. They believe that the protection of local production increases national welfare and that the regulation of economic life enhances state power or protect a variety of national groups from competition (O’Brien and Williams, 2013). First, states can obtain benefits from free trade policy because of the elimination of tariffs and subsidies. Supporters of free trade advocate the elimination of tariffs and subsidies oppose regulation that force companies to pay extra for doing business in foreign markets. A main principle of free trade is non-intervention from the government. Under free trade policy, uncontrolled or unrestricted access to economy allows states to open up of all international markets, and this makes all states equal competitors on the same level (Balaam and Dillman, 2011b). Many people argue that free trade is beneficial to the development of states’ economy because domestic companies do not have to pay extra taxes and tariffs in order to trade their products internationally. Free trade also brings more money into the local economy. As entrepreneurs who sell their products to …show more content…
Free trade allows individuals to specialise in one thing they can do best, known as comparative advantage theory defined by the British political economist David Ricardo. Specialisation generates efficiencies. When they specialise in one task, people spend their time to do one thing and they learn how to do their task better. It allows people to learn how to produce more efficiently, and it creates even greater productivity. In terms of efficiency, free trade thus means that every state should play to maximise their specialisation of production and to minimise doing less efficient tasks (Kindleberger, 1995). Liberals believe that specialisation will improve the welfare of an individual country and that of the world as a whole if countries specialise in one task according to their comparative advantage (O’Brien and Williams, 2013). Moreover, nation states can expand their businesses with foreign direct investments, and this leads to more dynamic business style. Free trade opens up a door to the world for every single state, and domestic companies can export and import their commodities without paying extra tariffs or tax. Eliminating trade barriers creates a field which people can play a role internationally to compete one another in order to improve national as well as international economy (Balaam, and Dillman, 2011b). Liberal trade theorists argue that foreign investment accompanies increased trade and that
Trade is the most common form of transferring ownership of a product. The concepts are very simple, I give you something (a good or service) and you give me something (a good or service) in return, everyone is happy. However, trade is not limited to two individuals. There are trades that happen outside national borders and we refer to that as international trading. Before a country does international trading, they do research to understand the opportunity costs and marginal costs of their production versus another countries production. Doing this we can increase profit, decrease costs and improve overall trade efficiency. Currently, there are negotiations going on between 11 countries about making a trade agreement called the Trans-Pacific
...ystem primarily responsible for promoting global competition. Free trade also promotes shifts in production so as to fit the “comparative advantage” model. Though free trade is widely practiced concerns with how to regulate free trade, something supposedly unregulated, countries have to subject themselves to the controversial institutions of the IMF and WTO. Fair trade policies while potentially creating smaller markets support workers’ rights in both the U.S. and developing nations. Though the pros and cons of globalization continue to be debated the United States can no longer escape its role in the global economy nor can it impose policies that are detrimental to the United States founding ideals. However policies that play towards the advantages of both free and fair trade could stimulate a healthy domestic economy that is also competitive in the global market.
These three economists share the thought that free trade is the best answer to achieve economic growth because of a few things. Hume explains that free trade is good because “manufactures will continuously move production to the place with the least expensive labor”(Hume pgs. 281-285). He is saying there is always a developing country that has cheaper labor force so it is easier to move production there. Because this trade is cheaper in another place companies, to save money need to move their business production there and then send it back to the country of origin. “One reason that inexpensive labor is beneficial is that it allows poor nations to produce commodities more cheaply than wealthy nations where labor is expensive.”(David Harvey)This
Protectionism has both its pros and cons acquired to it, but in the end, it has its own pros and cons acquired to it. Protectionism is most often requested as a tool to provide more jobs in
Mayda, A. M. and Rodrik, D. (2005) Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others?. European Economic Review, 49 (6), pp. 1393--1430.
While free trade has certainly changed with advances in technology and the ability to create external economies, the concept seems to be the most benign way for countries to trade with one another. Factoring in that imperfect competition and increasing returns challenge the concept of comparative advantage in modern international trade markets, the resulting introduction of government policies to regulate trade seems to result in increased tensions between countries as individual nations seek to gain advantages at the cost of others. While classical trade optimism may be somewhat naïve, the alternatives are risky and potentially harmful.
Trade liberalisation involves the removal of barriers to trade between different countries and encouraging the free exchange of goods between nations. This includes the removal or reduction of tariff obstacles, such as duties and surcharges, and non-tariff obstacles, such as licensing rules, quotas and other requirements. Most of the economic literature considers that trade liberalisation leads to an increase in welfare derived from an improved allocation of domestic resources.
...would also trigger an unintentional effect that would eventually benefited the society as a whole by maximizing the total profit if individuals all follow their self-interest to behave. Newbert explained “For, only capitalism allows individuals to automously choose their own course of action, provided that in so doing, they do not violate the rights of others by forcing them to buy or sell a given product or service” (Newbert 2003, 253). From here, we can realize Smith’s insight towards the early form of capitalism. Finally, Smith’s suggested that free trade is the only way that helps a nation to sustain stable economic growth. He thinks that mercantilism is a barrier of the growth of a nation. He claimed that a nation will be able to maximize the wealth only if they use their competitive advantage on production and trade the surplus under the free trade economy.
With so much focus on the positive elements of free trade, the negative aspects of an open system are often overlooked. However, they do exist, and protectionism is needed. Consequently, safeguards are built into the system. States look out for their own good, whether that is through the use of escape clauses or the choice of the optimal forum for dispute settlement based on the precedent they do or do not want set. This paper argues that protectionism is valuable and inherent in the current system; however, not enough. Powerful states exploit weaker states, and “free trade” exacerbates the problem. I will first discuss why free trade does not work. Then, I will explain how the current system enables the inherent protectionist attitude of states. Finally, I will analyze the fairness of the system.
All nations can get the benefits of free trade by being specialized in producing goods they have a comparative advantage and then trade them with goods produced by other nations in the world. This is evidenced by comparative advantage theory. Trade depends on many factors, country's history, institution, size and. geographical position and many more. Also, the countries put trade barriers for the exchange of their goods and services with other nations in order to protect their own company from foreign competition, or to protect consumers from undesirable products, or sometimes it may be inadvertent.
The Law of Comparative Advantage was introduced by David Ricardo in 1817 in his book ‘Principles of Political Economy and Taxation’. According to this classical theory, a comparative advantage exists for a country when it has a margin of superiority in the production of a certain commodity over others. Comparative advantage results from differing endowments in the factors of production like technology, natural endowments, climate, etc. among different countries. Therefore, each country exports the commodities which it can produce at a lower opportunity cost or, in other words, lower marginal cost of production and imports the rest. This would ultimately be beneficial for all countries engaging in free trade as each would gain through its specialization
David Ricardo was a leading economist in the 1800s. Ricardo was a leading advocate of free trade. Adam Smith was also an advocate of free trade. Smith was more confident than Ricardo that the ability of a market economy's potential could benefit society. (Carbaugh, 2009). Ricardo felt that a countries government should not meddle in free trade and could hinder free trade instead of help it. Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage has been used by economists for years. The law of comparative advantage states that the citizens of each nation can gain by spending more of their time and resources doing those things in which they have a relative advantage (Carbaugh, 2009, p12). What this means is that one needs to determine whether the production of a goods or service is done more economically either domestically or abroad. Even if one country has the advantage in all situations, both countries can still benefit. The theory states that the less efficient nation should specialize in and e...
In order for international trade to work well, governments must allow the world market to determine how goods are sold, manufactured and traded for all to economically prosper. While all nations may have the capability to produce any goods or services needed by their population, it is not possible for all nations to have a comparative advantage for producing a good due to natural resources of the country or other available resources needed to produce a good or service. The example of trading among states comprising the United States is an example of how free trade works best without the interve...
Free trade was first observed by Adam smith in 1776. “These artificial constraints to free trade are detrimental to a society” (Adam Smith). Until his book was published so many people had different skeptic about free trade. As a result of Adam Smith's book titled Wealth of Nations, free trade achieved an intellectual and rational status supreme to any other principle in the field of economics.
International trade is trade between different nations, exchanging their products and resources with each other. As with other theories, there are opposing views. International trade has two contrasting views regarding the level of control placed on trade: free trade and protectionism. Free trade is international trade left to its natural course without tariffs, quotas, or other restrictions. Free trade is the simpler of the two theories: a laissez-faire approach, with no restrictions on trade. In contrast, protectionism holds that regulation of international trade is important to ensure that markets function properly. Backers of this theory believe that market inefficiencies may hamper the benefits of international trade and they aim to guide the market accordingly. Protectionism can be tariffs, subsidies and quotas.