Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Two theories for effective collaboration
Two theories for effective collaboration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Two theories for effective collaboration
There is a popular saying that states: “Two heads are better than one.” Many believe that human beings work more efficiently and make more reasonable decisions when working in a group. Collaboration is an action that is present in every social group, in every workplace, and in every field. However, human beings are also highly competitive. Like collaboration, competition is present in every aspect of life. Undoubtedly, collaboration and competition have provided a path to innumerable achievements in many fields, and science is not an exception. It sounds like a contradiction, but collaboration and competition go hand-in-hand in the field of science. Watson and Creek’s article, “A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid”, is an example of this …show more content…
For this reason, scientists “compete” to make groundbreaking discoveries. The discovery of the structure of DNA is not the only instance when this is evident. It was also noticeable in the race between the United States and the Soviet Union to put the first man in space, as well as when scientists were trying to decipher the sequence of the human genome. Several years ago the competition was not as evident due to the fact that the possibilities of research were “endless”. There was a vast amount of discoveries to be made. The problem is that as the years have gone by, the field of study has become narrower and more specific as new discoveries require more in-depth study. Also, the governments’ interest in scientific research has grown over the years. There is greater interest in the discoveries of new applicable knowledge and the development of new …show more content…
Collaboration and competition exist together. They are both present in every aspect of life. Competition requires a certain degree of collaboration in order to be considered a competition. Competition leads to collaboration since people unite to try to come up with a better product than someone else. These are the building blocks of science. They are what keep the discipline moving forward. They are what motivate scientists every day to push to develop new theories and technologies. They stimulated Watson and Crick into discovering the structure of deoxyribose nucleic acid which, in turn, led to many important discoveries that are applicable to every human being. As Simon Sinek said: “Competition pushes you to better yourself.” And as Alexander Graham Bell said: “Great discoveries and improvements invariably involve the cooperation of many minds. I may be given credit for having blazed the trail, but when I look at the subsequent developments I feel the credit is due to others rather than to
At times, regardless of the setbacks, rivalry can be advantageous by giving people the inspiration to continue. Debating on whether to give up the race, Watson realizes the full implications this scientific competition has: “But if I went back to pure biology, the advantage of our small head start over Linus (Pauling) might suddenly vanish,” (Watson 144). The grand quest for finding the structure of DNA is too great for Watson to pass up. Not only does this head start inspire Watson to continue studying DNA, but it convinces him to work even harder. While the desire to quickly find a solution can be too daunting to appease, even the notion of being in the lead can be enough incentive to strive for the goal which is a definite positive effect for Watson. But for every positive advantage, there is a negative setback that other competitors may impose.
Furthermore, to think that science is immune to the power establishment, one must assume that it is in no way affected by government or companies with money to spend. This, like the assumption that science is neutral, is also incorrect. In order for a scientist to be funded in his research, he must submit proposals to those power establishments that have money. These powerful companies and governments will only fund those projects they deem important to their interests and goals. In this way, science is extremely political in its effort to obtain money and support because it must please those power establishments who are, by nature, political.
While these norms all played a role in leading Watson to his discovery, the competitive nature of scientific worse was arguably
Most scientists want to be able to share their data. Scientists are autonomous by nature. Begelman (1968) refutes an argument made by I. L. Horowitz, a scientist who believes that the government is in “gross violations of the autonomous nature of science”. Begelman believes, however, that there is a system of checks and balances in the government regulation system, and that this system is in place to protect citizens.... ...
Competition has been around since the beginning of time and will continue to be around forever. It is what keeps the world turning and separates the boys from the men. Competition is what made Steve Jobs the icon and legend he is and made Michael Jordan the legend he is as well. The best thing about competition is failure because it paves the road to success and makes achieving the goals you set that much more satisfying. Setting goals and competition go hand in hand because without one, you can’t have the other.
In “The Nature and Necessity of Scientific Research” it says, “they are the source of the methods, problem-field, and standards of solution accepted by any mature scientific community at any given time.” These new discoveries can lead then to advancements and as a result can lead them to build a better society. Human beings will be able to reconstruct a better institutional framework which will bring them a prosperous and happy
After scoping out the DNA-research picture, Watson got a job at the Cambridge lab where Francis Crick, Max Perutz, and Sir Lawrence Bragg were working. Francis was rumored to be immodest and exceedingly talkative, ...
"We often think of science as something inescapably linked to progress, and of progress as continually marching forward. We assume that there is something inevitable about the increase of knowledge and the benefits this knowledge brings" (Irvine & Russell). Provide humanity with wisdom and speculative enjoyment. This enjoyment of the public is through reading, learning and thinking. But scientists are met with the real research work.
Realizing that a group can become a high performance team is important. Accomplishing this goal is invaluable, advantageous and profitable. Once able to operate from a group to the high performing team is a great step into preparation into the big business world. Leaders and members must also realize not only how to accomplish this but that some problems will and can arise from different demographic characteristics and cultural diversity. That is if one is in such a group, which the probability would be quite high.
...t it is beneficial, healthy and provides a little competition. No one knows how much competition can drive a person, but a healthy competition between you and your peers can benefit you by creating innovative ideas and work ethic that are much required in this world.
Ancient China has a number of sayings about competition, such as, “seeking great honor results in no honor at all”. Theodore Isaac Rubin, a writer of both fiction and nonfiction, explains in his essay, “Competition and Happiness” competition seldom brings out the best and often brings out the worst in people. He argues that competition is a form of projection in which the development of self is abandoned to beat the next fellow. Rubin believes that, “competition is a residual of a primitive past, and it is not a genetic residual” (312). In the past, competition was necessary for people had to compete in order to survive. Even though, people were conditioned to compete in the past, it is not pertinent anymore as it became another aspect in the modern day. Rubin further states, “people brought up this way feel lost…because they exist to compete and they’ve lost their raison d’être in the new situation” (312) Learning to compete with others is taught by an individual’s family and the individual forgets why he/she is competing as they only focus on beating their fellow mates. Competition produces anxiety which can interfere with learning and disassociates with one’s own body. It is not instinctual because it is taught and it damages people and creates stress in their life. Competition teaches people to give their worst while as they only focus on what their fellow mate is doing. I agree with Rubin that “competition limit people’s ability to lead happy and satisfying lives”, for I am assured that competition is destructive to children's self-esteem, it interferes with learning, sabotages relationships, and isn't necessary to have a good time.
Yes, it is to a certain extent. Competition is good for us as it challenges each individual. Without competition, there would be no standards and we would not know how to improve on areas we lack. In addition, we may not know where we stand, be it mentally, physically and academically. Different kinds of competition challenge us in different aspects and helps us to progress and move with times.
In today’s workplace teamwork is an essential part of success. We have more and more business that are incorporating teamwork in some type of way. They are effectively implementing ways on how to create effective teams, teamwork and team building. They are also creating a work culture that values collaboration. Teamwork, is about people working together and working towards reaching their common goal.
Our basic objective is to examine the scientific developments through history and how they affect human life and society. To meet that objective we will first develop tools to analyze the relationship between science and the increasingly complex decisions we have to make regarding the way we apply science for human welfare.
“Survival of the fittest” is a notion that I firmly advocate. Competition brings out the best in people, and I am a very competitive person. Competitiveness whether with one's self, or with others arouses the desire to succeed. My mother has taught me that competing with yourself is even better than competing with others because you struggle to become the best person you can be, without settling for exceeding the limitations of others.