Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the difference between negotiation mediation arbitration
The case about arbitration
The case about arbitration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Arbitration is appropriate when two parties know they will be unable to resolve a dispute by negotiation or mediation. Identify the steps that must be taken if one person would rather go to court.
The first step will be determining if litigation is a possibility based on the organization’s contract agreement with the parties involved. If the contract has a clause that arbitration must be used to resolve conflicts, then litigation is not an option. If the parties are not under this type of clause, then the individual (now known as the plaintiff) that wants to take the issue to court will hire a lawyer and a complaint and summons are usually filed. The summons is a description of the complaint that is given to the defendant. This also advises the defendant of the date that they must answer the lawsuit. The defendant will generally hire their own lawyer then and each party will gather the information needed for court. Motions are filed by both parties through the court, this may be to request evidence or a
…show more content…
F. & McConnell, C. R., (n.d.). Human Resource Management in Health Care. Retrieved from https://www.betheluniversityonline.net
Stone, K.V. & Colvin, A. J., (2015, December 7). The arbitration epidemic. Retrieved from Economic Policy Institution: http://www.epi.org/publication/the-arbitration-epidemic/
Describe the differences between arbitration and mediation.
According to Britannica academic “arbitration is nonjudicial legal technique for resolving disputes by referring them to a neutral party for a binding decision, or “award” (Britannica Academic, 2017). Arbitration will reach a decision in which one of the parties “wins” so to say. Arbitration is more formal than mediation is and often involves more than one arbitrator. An arbitrator can enforce a solution in binding arbitration. Arbitrators are normally derived from the National Academy of Arbitrators in which these are based on experience and education (Fallon & McConnell,
Sue contracts with Tom to deliver a quantity of computers to Sue’s Computer Store. They disagree over the amount, the delivery date, the price, and the quality. Sue files a suit against Tom in a state court. Their state requires that their dispute be submitted to mediation or nonbinding arbitration. If the dispute is not resolved, or if either party disagrees with the decision of the mediator or arbitrator, will a court hear the case? Explain. (See Alternative Dispute Resolution.)
Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2010). Human resource management (13th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomas/South-western
Bohlander, George, and Scott Snell. Managing Human Resources. 15th. Mason, OH: South-Western Pub, 2009. 98-147. Print.
Noe, Raymond A., et al. Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2010. Print.
Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2014). Fundamentals of human resource management (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Fisher, C., Schoefeldt, L., & Shaw, J. (1996). Human resource management. (3rd Edition). Princeton, NJ: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Alternative Dispute Resolution or ADR refers to a number of various processes that can be used to resolve legal disputes other than by litigation. Recently, methods of dispute resolution which focus on arbitration, mediation and negotiation as an alternative to adjudication have gained notoriety. This notoriety may have been caused by the public perception that ADR methods are less expensive, more efficient, and more satisfactory than the normal traditional course of litigation. The goals of establishing these processes to resolve disputes as an alternative to more formal legal processes include: 1) to make the regular court system more efficient, less costly and more responsive to the needs of the litigants; 2) to offer alternative methods of dispute resolution in addition to the regular court system; and 3) to provide public education about the available alternatives.
ADR holds an extensive, easily influenced and diverging choice of processes for finding solutions to disputes which are personified by structured negotiation and consensus. It is regarded that arbitration is a familiar ADR technique, however, it is more of an official adjudicative and adversary technique initially a confidential litigation process which has more commonality to litigation than the more original consensual processes which symbolise ADR. As simplified by Angyal (Alternative Dispute Resolution, 1987, p. 11). "The key difference between ADR and those traditional techniques of litigation and arbitration is that ADR techniques are used to produce a resolution to dispute through a negotiated agreement while litigation and arbitration are processes by which a result is imposed on the parties. " We can say that many issues arise with terms.
Management has sole discretion and flexibility in deployment and discipline issues and maintains the right to assign measures to people within the company, as it deems appropriate, as long as the language of the agreement does not explicitly limit the action.... ... middle of paper ... ... When management and the union cannot resolve a grievance submitted by a union, the union must decide whether to proceed to the final step of the grievance procedure: arbitration. Arbitration is an adversary proceeding, like a trial in court.
Human Resource Management is defined as the process of managing human talent to achieve an organization’s objectives (Bohlander & Snell, 2010). A more detailed definition is given by the Society for Human Resource Management which states that “human resource management is the function within an organization that focuses on recruiting, managing, and providing direction for the people who work in the organization” (Schmidt, 2011). The role that human resource management plays is the most vital in all business organizations. This importance is easily seen in running a health care facility. Human resource in health care is important in improving the overall patient health outcomes and the delivery of health care services.
In the world of commerce, employment, and other social relations, businesses and individuals strive to choose either arbitration or mediation (conciliation). There are situations when parties submit their cases to arbitration bodies for mediation and, vice versa, when mediators are requested to resolve the dispute through the arbitration award. The arbitration and mediation traditions vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but their general ideas still remain similar. However, while a mediator in a single process possesses no entitled authority to render an award, an arbitrator is vested with more procedural powers and can execute a mediator’s functions. Furthermore, despite the flexibility of arbitration and mediation procedures, as well
Gies, T. P., & Bagley, A. W. (2013). Mandatory arbitration of employment disputes: What's new and what's next?. Employee Relations Law Journal, 39(3), 22-33.
Torrington, D., Hall, L. and Taylor, S. (2008). Human Resource Management, 7th ed. Prentice Hall.
Noe, Raymond A., John R. Hollenbeck, Barry Gerhart, and Patrick M. Wright. Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2010. Print.
Massey, R. (1994). Taking a strategic approach to human resource management. Health manpower management, 20, 27-30.