Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Interpretation essay of the most dangerous game
Interpretation essay of the most dangerous game
Interpretation essay of the most dangerous game
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Interpretation essay of the most dangerous game
It is not wise for a predator to underestimate its prey. In “The Most Dangerous Game,” written by Richard Connel, General Zaroff has become disinterested in hunting simple animals; he needs the challenge of hunting an animal that can reason. Mr. Rainsford is the next item on General Zaroff’s menu. The only way to get out is by beating Zaroff at his own game. A game of hunting that means life and death. Zaroff is the hunter and Rainsford is the hunted. In, “The Smuggler,” written by Victor Canning, Tasso, like Rainsford, is being contested by a predator. He is known as the Great Man. The Great Man is interrogating Tasso for smuggling. Tasso must be clever at how he responds and how he displays himself, for his life is in danger. The antagonists …show more content…
In “The Most Dangerous Game,” Rainsford finds Zaroff’s domicile after he gets stranded. Zaroff deludes Rainsford by playing the act of a hospitable character who offers food, clothing, and comfort. This role was one he played extremely well using his advanced intellect, obviously making Rainsford fall further into his trap. Zaroff opens his door to Rainsford and says,”It is a great pleasure and honor to welcome Mr. Sanger Rainsford, the celebrated hunter, to my home,”(14). It is later that Zaroff eases into telling Rainsford about his game. In, “The Smuggler,” Tasso shares just enough information to The Great Man so that he can make a case against the smuggler. He explained, “And yet you knew that our national football team had drawn with the English team? The game was played in London yesterday afternoon, after you left here… If you had been at sea twenty-four hours without a radio you could not have known the …show more content…
The Great Man seems to be disliked by his people and is very probably why he asks for the smuggler’s help to escape his kingdom, if he ever decides he needs it. The Great Man says to Tasso at the end of the meeting,”’You have made a mistake, one mistake that could have meant death. It might happen to me one day. If it does, I shall have a friend on this island with a boat,”(7) His power is beneficial at the moment but is ultimately leading to his downfall. Tasso is an amiable man who knows many people. It would be unwise to harm him. The Great Man knows his place and where he must stand to get his victim where he wants. Zaroff has been clever in using his power, until Rainsford got the best of him. He sometimes uses it for his own enjoyment, such as letting Rainsford live, when he could have easily terminated him, just to continue watching him struggle. He has also used it all these years to uphold his position. He has never been stopped for his outrageous actions when he very likely was caught. He must know how to play it correctly or his fun would’ve ended years ago.
The Great Man and General Zaroff have many common traits. It has helped both handle their prey with great cleverness, yet the protagonists, Rainsford and Tasso have showed cleverness of a greater level. The similarities between the two antagonists of the two stories have similar traits that make them interesting characters and ultimately a
In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the protagonist, Rainsford, is a smart, clever, resilient man who keeps a cool head in stressful and dangerous situations. Rainsford is not allowed to leave the island he washes up on after he falls off the yacht he was traveling on, because the mentally disturbed general wants to hunt people with Rainsford. Rainsford makes a deal with the general to win his freedom. If Rainsford can evade Zaroff for three nights, then Rainsford is free to leave the island. During the hunt, Rainsford must think quickly and be resourceful in order to stay alive. Rainsford is an extremely experienced hunter who writes books about his hunting experiences. When Rainsford is running from the
Survival skills can take over when in a life or death situation. The protagonist, Rainsford, in the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is a clear example of this. While on the way to hunting expedition Rainsford is thrown overboard his ship and swims to the nearby shore of Ship Trap Island. He explores the island and finds a chateau. He is invited in by the owner, General Zarroff, and they begin to converse. Here Rainsford learns something dark about this man that will lead to him being on the run for his life. He is forced to let his survival skills, resourcefulness, thinking on his feet, and his good eye, take center stage in the fight for his life.
Predators and Prey in Upton Sinclair's The Jungle. & nbsp; & nbsp; Throughout Upton Sinclair's The Jungle, the author demonstrates the greed of Capitalism and how it gives politicians and businessmen the ability to exploit the immigrant population. Sinclair's main purpose in naming the book, The Jungle, is to put the reader's focus on the heartless politics of capitalism. If he had named the book Stockyards or Packingtown, a person's concentration may be solely on these places. It is evident that capitalism does not equally distribute the industries ruling, but rather allows certain groups to dominate the workers.
Five years ago you could have found me hiding under my covers, praying to a god that I no longer believe in with my eyes shut tightly—but not anymore. These nights I offer up a two minute thanksgiving for the sake of karma; I look out into the darkness and I recognize the shadows as objects in my house rather than the faces of my dead grandfathers. It feels good to open my eyes, but I’ve traded in that old ignorant twinkle for a steady calmness. I still duck and cover when an insect the size of my pupil is within five feet of me, but from a distance I know that I am not so different from the tiny creature. If I am a predator, I am not the kind of predator who hunts but rather the one who kills out of fear. I prefer the role of the prey— it suits me well. I avoid conflict: I prefer spending time at home with my wife, I weigh less than 100lbs, and I have been notorious for becoming paralyzed with laughter upon being attacked by testosterone-laden family members. If a human or other animal my size or larger were to want me for dinner, I would be an easy target though my meat wouldn’t feed a family of four.
Hunting big game animals for sport was a popular pastime with the wealthy classes following World War I. The morality of killing for sport was not questioned in reality, but in this short story the author does question it by taking it a step further and having the protagonist, Sangor Rainsford, hunted by the antagonist, General Zaroff.In a short story full of irony, one of the greatest ironies of Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” is that General Zaroff repeatedly tells Rainsford that he maintains a sense of civilization on his island.
The Omnivore’s Dilemma In the book The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan challenges his readers to examine their food and question themselves about the things they consume. Have we ever considered where our food comes from or stopped to think about the process that goes into the food that we purchase to eat every day? Do we know whether our meat and vegetables picked out were raised in our local farms or transported from another country? Michael pollen addresses the reality of what really goes beyond the food we intake and how our lives are affected.
An author’s main goal is to entice readers with their stories. In order to do so, they use various literary elements. The literary elements create mood, plot, and much excitement. Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game” tells the story of Rainsford, who becomes trapped on an island and must fight. Suzanne Collins's trilogy The Hunger Games is the story of how Katniss must defeat the odds pitted against her. Connell and Collins use the elements of foreshadowing, allusion, and irony to create a sense of fear in their writings. An allusion is a reference to a statement, a person, a place or an event. In "The Most Dangerous Game," Richard Connell makes use of allusions frequently. In the very beginning of the story, Whitney says, "I hope the jaguar guns have come from Purdey's" (Connell 19). Purdey’s is a famous manufacturer of shotguns and rifles, and Connell includes it in the story so readers will come to understand that Whitney and Rainsford are fervent hunters. Furthermore, General Zaroff labels Ivan as a "Cossack”; Cossacks were known for their remarkable battle-skills. Thus, Zaroff shows Ivan as a fierce hunter whom Rainsford should fear. Also, as Rainsford hurries through the forest trying to comprise a plan to baffle General Zaroff, Zaroff sits in his home humming a tune from Madame Butterfly-a famous opera by Puccini. Then, right before he is about to go to bed, he reads "from the works of Marcus Aurelius”, a Roman emperor. Connell makes these references to help readers to benefit from some foreknowledge concerning his story and the characters/situations in it. Suzanne Collin’s has a way with words when it comes to using allusions. The Hunger Games is basically one over-arching allusion to Ancient Rome. The G...
General Zaroff used hunting tactics when they were eating “the last supper” at Zaroff’s house. Every time Rainsford looked up, he said, “he found him studying him, appraising him narrowly” (Connell 66). By this, the reader can tell that Zaroff is trying to notice Rainsford’s tendencies. Knowing these can make hunting him easier. Also at dinner, Zaroff explains to Rainsford that “God made him a hunter” and how his father believed that “his hand was made for the trigger” since he was ten (Connell 85). Zaroff sharing this with Rainsford is proof that this man is a talented hunter and has been for a long time. Rainsford is quite the hunter himself. So much so, that Zaroff knew who he was when he arrived. The General stated, “It is a very great pleasure and honor to welcome Mr. Sanger Rainsford, the celebrated hunter, to my home” (Connell 52). Also during the hunt when Rainsford set up the Burmese tiger pit and claiming one of Zaroff’s dogs, Zaroff tells him, “You’ve done well, Rainsford” (Connell 194). If his enemy believes that he is a great hunter, then he must be. Especially because Zaroff thinks so highly of himself. Going back to when Rainsford was
In the story The Most Dangerous Game a character named General Zaroff has a passion for hunting. He has been hunting since he was born. He has hunted every animal known to man, but, then he gets tried of hunting the same animal over and over. So he discovers a new animal human flesh. General Zaroff is person of bad character because he is cruel, cowardly, and untrustworthy.
Realism is a style of literature in which familiar aspects of life are represented in a straightforward or plain manner. In “The Most Dangerous Game,” Richard Connell uses realistic ways of writing to criticize realistic ideas of people at the time. Connell uses dominant mood, setting and naturalism to help create suspense and expand the story. Connell uses historic events such as Darwinism, big game hunting, and Russian Civil War to criticize the ideas of people in that time period. This time period helped Connell write a story where he could criticize a lot of what people thought.
The conflict of good and evil presents itself in “The Most Dangerous Game” and “The Child by Tiger” in two completely different ways. One story being commercial fiction and the other being literary fiction, there are many ways of viewing variables such as good versus evil, realistic versus unrealistic stories and moral significance. The stories have different voices and are meant for different audiences, but in viewing the overall moral importance of both fictional works, the story with a greater moral significance is “The Child by Tiger”.
Interview face towards camera: This is an interview conducted for students of English Literature class one, I will be asking Mr F. Scott Fitzgerald and William Shakespeare some questions, regarding their work on The Great Gatsby and ‘Othello’. The interview will include all of the questions that students from English literature class one have raised. As we all know Mr F. Scott Fitzgerald and William Shakespeare are from very different times, we will be looking deeper in to some of the characters and themes. We will be talking about ‘honest Iago’ and ‘the moor’ from the play ‘Othello, and we will be talking about the ‘great Gatsby’ and ‘Daisy Buchanan’.
K. Eric Drexler is known to be “the founding father of nanotechnology,” and theorized the creation of mechanical nanoscale systems that would revolutionize the world of manufacturing and technology. However, many opponents of his theory feared the implications and applications of such nanotechnology, and therefore began to spread panic through the concept of the menacing “grey goo.” “Prey” by Michael Crichton delves into the concepts Drexler proposed concerning nanorobotics computation and artificial intelligence through an interesting and insightful science fiction novel. Crichton delves in to the ethical implications of the unpredictability of evolutionary and machine learning programs, inability of technologists to learn from past mistakes,
The Role of the Character Bamforth and How he Changes in the Play The Long and the Short and the Tall by Willis Hall
..., for it is hard to believe someonewho indulges in dishonesty. His point of view is not objective at all. Likewise, the point of the narrator is not believable because it is naive. Scoresby does not say anything to defend himself. Nevertheless, the objective evidence of his many successful accomplishments as a soldier and as a student entices the reader to think that he has a minimum of common sense and intelligence. No one knows what he is thinking when falling forward to his left istead of falling back to his right as ordered. It might have been out of perspicacity and ingenuity that he acted so. This enthralling story teaches the reader not to believe everything people say about a person, but to get to know this person well before voicing any opinion about him or her. It is also a good example that supports the popular saying, "Don't judge a book by its cover."