Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
John grisham pelican brief summary
John grisham pelican brief summary
John grisham pelican brief summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: John grisham pelican brief summary
In John Grisham’s The Pelican Brief, He brings up oil and gas companies drilling in the wetlands, which is destroying them, and I decided to investigate further about how these companies have been hurting the environment. The main way that the wetlands are being killed is by the salt water that is getting into the marshes and the canals, that gas and oil companies use, are the way that most salt water gets so deep inside the wetlands (Barnowski). Oil and gas companies are always trying to build more canals to get into different areas of the wetlands when they find different reserves of oil and gas just like Victor Mattiece was in the Pelican Brief. When they build more canals, The wetlands soil starts to get broken up and that destroys the …show more content…
Ocean waves are also a cause of wetland destruction, but it’s a lot smaller contributing factor then canals. “There are 10 major navigation canals and countless smaller ones winding intricately through the wetlands of Southeast Louisiana” (Barnowski). Those canals are used for a lot of things, including for the oil and gas companies to find oil reserves and drill to get to them. The canals take up 10,000 miles of land and all the canals are basically just paths for salt water to get in and destroy some of the deepest freshwater marshes in Louisiana (“Louisiana’s Oil”). The canals have already caused a lot of damage because building them requires destroying land in the wetlands and then they kill more of the living things and destroy more of the wetlands as they bring salt water into the different parts of the wetlands that normally wouldn’t be exposed to the salt water. Then you have to add the amount of traffic that comes through these canals every day. All of the traffic that is passing through the canals makes the land erosion even worse because the soil is already loose and unstable and the more salt water splashed against it every day causes it to get worse and makes more land erode (Barnowski). The salt water that gets out of the canals goes deeper into the wetlands than it would ever naturally go and that kills off …show more content…
When oil and gas companies, such as the one Victor Mattiece owned, find new gas or oil reserves in the wetland they buy the area it’s in and most times need to build a new canal to get to it so they can get all of their equipment into the area of the reserve. Once they have a way to get in the area and work there, they will begin drilling into the wetlands to get to the oil or gas. “Then dredge yet another channel through the hapless and beleaguered marshlands so that the men and their equipment could get to the rigs and the oil could be brought out with haste. The canal would be thirty-five miles long and twice as wide as the others. There would be a lot of traffic.” (Grisham 230). This quote from the book points out all the different things I have mentioned about how the wetlands are being destroyed by canals. Victor Mattiece had found a new oil reserve and was going to drill into it and sell it so he could make even more money. He was going to create an even larger canal than most that already existed so he could transport his men and equipment to the site of the oil reserve he found, but that would hurt the environment even more and that’s why someone caught him and was going to bring him to court. The traffic that would travel through his canal would cause even more severe damage like I mentioned
Bayou Farewell is an eye-opening book that spells out the trouble of the eroding wetlands of South Louisiana. Many Americans have no idea what is happening to the wetlands of Louisiana so this book teaches everything about it. I felt like this was a very educational and emotional book but it showed just how people are being affected by this horrific problem. Mike Tidwell did an amazing job writing this book; I learned so much from it.
In the video “Fracking Hell: The Untold Story” by Link TV explains how natural gas has been a huge problem not only for the earth in general but for everyone and everything living in it. The video explains how North East of Pennsylvania is having difficulties to conserve a healthy environment and people. North East of Pennsylvania is the main sources to extract gas and send it throughout the United States for gasoline and so on. However, this action is wonderful for the cost of gas, but has a huge impact on the environment and the people living in Pennsylvania. A lot of people in this state are worried having health issues because everything is not usable is being thrown out to the rivers where they get their fresh water.
The first mitigation banking guidance was released in 1995 by the EPA and Corps of Engineers. The most recent wetland mitigation banking guidance was released in 2008. The idea behind both wetland mitigation banking and conservation banking is to provide compensation for unavoidable impacts to resources prior to the environmental impact taking place (FWS, 2003). Based on the rules set forth in section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and section 404 of the Clean Water Act, wetland impacts are reduced by using the following sequence of steps: avoiding impacts, minimizing impacts, and as a last resort, mitigating for impacts. Although the Corps has enforced a mitigation policy to reg...
Over the past 100 years the Louisiana coastline has suffered greatly from biotic, abiotic, and anthropogenic factors. The abiotic factors include things such as hurricanes or overnutrition that influence the surrounding biota. The biotic factors that contribute to coastal erosion are things like the immigration invasive species and the emigration or extinction of local flora and fauna that help preserve the wetlands. Additionally, there are anthropogenic factors such as pollution that can have strong negative influences on the abiotic and biotic factors of the wetlands. Each one of these factors cause ecological disturbances to the wetlands at a frequency and intensity that is unmanageable for the local flora and fauna. There are currently certain measures that are being taken into consideration to slow or stop the erosion of the Louisiana coastline.
I swear it’s a sickness. It’s either that or gravity has a bit of a crush on me, since I can never seem to stay upright and on my feet. Last summer during softball alone I had many semi-catastrophic occurrences involving loss of balance or coordination such as getting a cleat stuck in home plate and almost kneeing myself in the face and tripping in the indent in the batter's box while going after a bunt. These events, however, were by for not the worst that happened. The worst took place during the Presque Isle tournament, facing none other than the Presque Isle panthers.
This is a result from the new levee system. This system prevents the natural ways of sediment re-depositing along the riverbank and wetlands. The levees lead the sediment to deposit off the continental shelf in the Gulf of Mexico. (15) This adds to the loss of wetlands along the coast. Wetlands are important to the economy in more than one way. They serve as homes for fish which fishermen catch then sell and they protect the mainland from getting the full effect of storm surge during a hurricane. “Every 2.7 miles of wetlands absorbs one foot of storm surge” (1.2). Without wetlands and barrier islands working as a barrier, the mainland could experience even more damage during
“Nicaragua canal poses significant environmental risks.” Global Risk Insights Know Your World, July 26, 2015. Web. 15 August 2015). In Walden Thoreau complained of how technology and “civilization” were surrounding him in the woodland from which he was trying to escape or at least get away from. This canal too many people of the region represent something fowl that has arrived to destroy the very foundations of their livelihood. The illusion of progress shows this very clearly as in Thoreau’s viewpoint people always want technology to make their lives better and easier. As such they want to build more railroads to travel easier, more factories to make more goods to sell, and electricity to fuel their homes at night (the novel takes place in the 19th
the winding canals would give, for the fertilizers farmers use to grow crops. Which has caused
Ducks Unlimited claims that, “In some carefully targeted instances, DU will employ the extension process to work with private landowners to provide both economic and ecological sustainability.” The people that have private wetlands, and don’t have the money to fix them, DU will go to their land and make their land duck-livable and suitable for hunting. *Not only is state land good for duck also private owner will have good and safe land for the ducks. “For over six decades, Ducks Unlimited (DU) has maintained a singleness of purpose that has guided the organization to become the leading waterfowl and wetlands conservation entity in North America. Dynamic and responsive leadership by staff and volunteers, working together, has assured that DU’s work evolved in response to the ever-changing pressures on waterfowl and the habitats upon which they depend throughout their annual cycle”(DU). This is what the people want to see and the people that helps reach DU’s goal even more. They’re not out in the private land just yet, but once they hit their goal they’re not just going to stop at state land. “Canada, a non-profit wetland conservation organization, will announce today that after 20 years of repeated attempts, it has purchased the Chemainus Estuary, located 12 kilometres north of Duncan”(Chemainus Estuary). This is a piece of land that DU was trying to
People in the northern United States during the early nineteenth century wanted to rapidly industrialize and increase the amount of money they were making. The Erie Canal they believed was a great way to reduce the distance and time of shipping goods to the west. They also realized that the canal would probably increase their markets, which would mean a larger profit. The problem with all of this was how people had to destroy parts of nature in order for this to happen. Nathaniel Hawthorne, a prominent writer during the time, described the canal as “too rapid, unthinking advance of progress.” (57) Hawthorne and his supporters were very upset to see how forests and swamps were being destroyed and ruined in order t...
The environmental danger taken by offshore drilling is very straight forward, made clear by oil spills such as the recent BP oil spill and the Exxon Valdez oil spill in 1989 off the shore of Alaska. In the circumstances of the Exxon Valdez spill up to 250,000 sea birds died, over 2,800 sea otters and thousands of other animals], (figures from the BP oil spill are not yet concluded), having had a heavy strike on the regional wildlife and directing to a ban on all offshore drilling in America, until George Bush overturned it in 2008 to this repeal was a misjudgment because two years later there was the Deepwater Horizon spill. In this way, offshore drilling ruins ecosystems and fish supplies which creates a wasteland of a shoreline among southern USA.
According to Source #1, "Past and Present: The Florida Everglades" by Toby Haskell, "[W]hen settlers from outside of Florida came to the Everglades, they considered it useless swampland. They had the idea of draining the Everglades. From 1905-1910, the settlers began to convert the land to be used for agricultural purposes...The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and government officials authorized the digging of canals, the creation of water storage facilities, and the regulation of the flow of water. The streams were dredged, and the Everglades was nearly drained entirely...As a result, the quantity and diversity of the wetlands' wildlife decreased and 50% of the original wetlands of South Florida no longer exist today." Due to this draining of the wetlands and redirecting of the Everglades fresh water, these beautiful wetlands are being erased from existence. This is also negatively affecting animal populations in the Everglades and destroying biodiversity. Additionally, Source #2, "Can We Fix the Water Supply?" by Caleb Hughes states, "The Everglades, which provides water to nearly 7 million people living in Florida, has fallen victim to three extended droughts over the last 10 years. When a fragile ecosystem like the Everglades undergoes even a small change like a particularly rainy storm or a short-term lapse in rainfall, the repercussions can
Human activity is one of the leading causes of the disappearance of coastal wetlands. As the human population increases in coastal cities so does the demand for more land. Urbanization is causing enormous amounts of devastation to the existing wetlands. Unrestricted development is causing the erosion of soil, which is dumping foreign sediments into the wetlands polluting the water and disturbing the ecosystem. According to Lee et al. (2006) “Urbanization is a major cause of loss of coastal wetlands. Urbanization also exerts significant influences on the structure and function of coastal wetlands, mainly through modifying the hydrological and sedimentation regimes, and the dynamics of nutrients and chemical pollutants”. Restrictions on the development...
Between 300 and 400 million people worldwide live in areas near wetlands and depend on them. Wetlands are mechanisms for treatment of wastewater are extremely efficient because they absorb chemicals and filter pollutants and sediments. Half the world's wetlands have disappeared due to urbanization and industrial development. The only way to achieve sustainable development and poverty reduction will be through better management of rivers and wetlands, and the land they drain and drain as well as through increased investment in them.
Analysis of sites in five coastal states indicate that many marshes and mangrove ecosystems receive adequate mineral sediments to produce enough organic sediment and root material to remain above sea level at the present rate of sea-level rise (1-2 mm per year globally). However, three of the twelve wetlands studied were not keeping pace with the current rate of sea-level rise. If sea-level rise accelerates, some additional sites would also begin to slowly deteriorate and submerge.