Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Movies don’t always portait characters correctly. For the most part, the characters will have important details in their life taken out for the sake of entertainment. The Patriot, while an amazing movie, did have a few major inaccuracies. Benjamin Martin, William Tavington, and Jean Villeneuve were all based off of real people from the war. While they were portrait pretty accurately, there were some major differences between the movie and real life.
Obviously, there were a few slight differences between hollywood, Ben Martin and actual person, Francis Marion. For one, Francis Marion did not have kids. In fact, he didn’t even marry til after the war. So the whole piece about his son's dying and him wanting to avenge their death did not actually happen. Marion was cautious and prudent in
…show more content…
his military tactics unlike Ben Martin who was bold. He was eccentric and unable to get along with his fellow military officers. Marion was known as the “Swamp Fox”. His base of operations was Snow’s Island, which is in the middle of the South Carolina Swamps. Another difference was that, in the movie, Martins militia was made up of mostly white people and one black slave. In reality, Marion's militia was made up of whites, blacks, both free and enslaved, and a few Native Americans. Undoubtedly, Marion was a courageous and deadly soldier, whose guerilla warfare techniques severely crippled British campaigns in the South, and helped to ensure victory for America. Colonel William Tavington was suppose to represent Colonel Banastre Tarleton in the movie.
Unfortunately, the movie did not portrait Tarleton very accurately. Of course there were a few similarities. For example, like the movie, General Cornwallis did send Colonel Banastre Tarleton after Marion and, like the movie, Tarleton was unable to capture him. For the most part, Travington was used as an antagonist and helped develop the plot. One major difference between the movie and the real person is that Tarleton is not killed in the war. And he is certainly not killed by Marion at the end of a huge battle. Tarleton was, without a doubt, a strong officer and was feared by many much like the movie.
“The Patriot”, while is a very good and entertaining movie, is still a movie and might not always portait a character correctly. Jean Villeneuve was loosely based off of a combination between Marquis de Lafayette and Baron von Steuben. Lafayette never fought in the South but did have few run ins with General Cornwallis. In fact, he helped keep Cornwallis army pinned at Yorktown. Baron von Steuben was at Valley Forge in the winter of 1778 and trained General George Washington's Continental
forces. Benjamin Martin, William Tavington, and Jean Villeneuve were all based off of real people from the war. While they were portrait pretty accurately, there were some major differences between the movie and real life.
Still No one could touch him, Major Patrick Ferguson's force was defeated at the Battle of Kings Mountain on October 7. Cornwallis became increasingly concerned about Marion, so as a result he dispatched the feared Lieutenant Colonel Banastre Tarleton to destroy Marion's command. With nicknames like “Bloody Man” or “Butcher” Lieutenant Colonel Banastre was not the best choice to mess with, even after the “Waxhaw’s Massacre” slaughtering hundreds. Tarleton was told intelligence spilling Marion’s location. Closing on Marion's camp, Tarleton hunted for the patriot for seven hours and across 26 miles before stopping in swampy territory and stating, "As for this damned old fox, the Devil himself could not catch him."
David McCullough author of 1776 puts faces and feelings to the events of the Revolutionary war making this an exciting novel even when the ending is known. Acting as a companion to an earlier work of McCullough’s, John Adams, 1776 is a strictly military view of the era versus political. Although the reader may have to get accustomed to the vast amount of characters introduced McCullough makes sure that those you are supposed to remember you will. Every character introduced is described incredibly well and throughout the novel you begin to feel as if you know the character and are going through the battle with them, specifically General George Washington with whom the reader emphasizes constantly with throughout the war. With the great description of the characters and events we feel as if we are there and in doing this the author creates understanding, the reader by knowing all sides and characters’ personalities the feels they know why the Revolution happened the way it did.
Benjamin Franklin, one of the Founding Fathers to the United States, was not a patriot but a mere loyalist to England before the dissolution between England and the colonies occurred. Sheila L. Skemp's The Making of a Patriot explores how Benjamin Franklin tried to stay loyal to the crown while taking interest in the colonies perception and their own representation in Parliament. While Ms. Skemp alludes to Franklin's loyalty, her main illustration is how the attack by Alexander Wedderburn during the Privy Council led to Franklin's disillusionment with the British crown and the greater interest in making the Thirteen Colonies their own nation. Her analysis of Franklin's history in Parliament and what occurred on the night that the council convened proves the change behind Franklin's beliefs and what lead to his involvement in the Declaration of Independence and the American Revolution. Benjamin Franklin was the colonial agent representing Massachusetts in Parliament in Britain.
The Patriot was a Hollywood version for the story of Francis Marion and the Swamp fox. The swamp fox was a group of men who fought the British Army using Guerrilla warfare. “Marion and his irregulars often defeated larger bodies of British troops by the surprise and rapidity of their movement over swampy terrain”. 2 The Hollywood version of the Swamp fox was quite close; the main Character Benjamin Martin w...
...is very historically accurate because the film incorporates, characters private lives, real film and speech, and great filming technuques that highlight the previous two examples.
Using these two articles (Ray and Cohen) as guides, discuss the character of Sgt Al Powell. Is he an outlaw hero? An official hero? Or some combination of both. To answer this question, use the character details the film provides through dialogue, clothing, mannerisms, gestures, and actions as evidence.
Later in the book, he again reflects on the war. He catalogs the proofs that he has been given — injured and half-starved countrymen — but persists in his existential doubt. He notes, “So we knew a war existed; we had to believe that, just as we had to believe that the name for the sort of life we had led for the last three years was hardship and suffering. Yet we had no proof of it. In fact, we had even less than no proof; we had had thrust into our faces the very shabby and unavoidable obverse of proof…” (94). Because he has not seen the battles, he has difficulty acknowledging the reality of war.
The Marquis de Lafayette is best remembered for the part he played in the American War of Independence. He contributed in helping the Americans gain free control over the colonies by breaking away from British home rule. For sixty years he fought with consistency and insight for political ideals and social reforms that have dominated the history of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Hence, Lafayette can be attributed to the spreading of liberty and freedom throughout America and France. Therefore, he is viewed as a symbol of liberalism in a once absolutist world.
his own worst enemy. The real Patton had a high pitched voice, unlike George C. Scott's
His impact on the Battle of Saratoga and efforts in controlling the sea for American were not recognized as much until after his death. He might not have won “the glory he sought,” but he definitely “helped win a nation’s freedom” (Thomas 311). This biography has provided me with information that has widened by understanding of the American Revolution and a new perspective on the intricacies of the battles at
Physically, he resembled the real life Malcom; tall, thin, and wears glasses. This physical resemblance helped the audience remember that the characters in the show were based on real people from the past. Appearance aside, the way the actor played his character was extremely authentic. What I found most enduring was how you could see the characters transformation throughout the play through the actors’ delivery of the lines. At the beginning of the play when he was talking with Dr. King, the actor gave his lines bitterly; we could hear his anger towards Dr. King in his voice when he spoke. However, as the play progressed and Malcom began to find respect for Dr. King, the way the actor spoke changed. Although you could still hear the passion in his voice, it was rooted in understanding rather than resentment. Also throughout the play, the actors’ facial expressions revealed how he thought and felt about what he was speaking
... up with the French and his troops turned his tactical blunders during the Siege of Savannah into a consequence that cost them the lives of many and a needless waste of time, effort, and money. The French made a lasting imprint in history because of their participation in the Revolutionary War. For the Siege of Savannah, however, one of the most crucial times when it was needed in the South, the French did not meet up with their expectations due to a combination of bad luck and strategical mistakes. The result was that many extra battles were fought, many more lives were claimed, and much more time and money was wasted. The Siege of Savannah was not just important for people who lived in Georgia, but also for everyone else participating in the war, whether they produced cloth at mills in Great Britain, or they wrote letters to their husband hoping to be written back.
Through many different points and facts, it’s shown that Louis Riel genuinely was a rebel who threatened the dominion of Canada. Leading two rebellions, executing Thomas Scott, and going against the government, were just a couple of the many things Riel did, to show that he truly was a rebel. All the things Riel did, have something in common, they all stopped progress. The government can’t trust Riel after the things he did, which slowed down the development of the newly formed dominion of Canada. Although many would disagree, the information shows, that Louis Riel was nothing more than a rebel to Canada, who went against the dominion of Canada.
According to Movie Fone the clothes and the guns that both the French, the British, and the Natives wore were correct for the time period. Also the majority of the locations were accurate in this film (Rappe). Many of the people in this film were historically real, one of these many people was Col. Edward Munro (Rappe). Another person that was portrayed in the film that was historically accurate was General Daniel Webb (Rappe). Fort William Henry was the fort that Munro and his army were fighting behind (Rappe). While Munro and the British army were fighting against Marquis there were children and w...
The movie I decided to analyze for this course was American History X (1998), which stars Edward Norton. Though this movie isn’t widely known, it is one of the more interesting movies I have seen. It’s probably one of the best films that depict the Neo Nazi plague on American culture. The film takes place from the mid to late 1990’s during the Internet boom, and touches on subjects from affirmative action to Rodney King. One of the highlights of this movie that really relates to one of the key aspects of this course is the deterrence of capital punishment. Edward Norton’s portrayal as the grief stricken older brother who turns to racist ideologies and violence to cope with his fathers death, completely disregards the consequences of his actions as he brutally murders someone in front of his family for trying to steal his car. The unstable mentality that he developed after his father’s death really goes hand-to-hand specifically with Isaac Ehrlich’s study of capital punishment and deterrence. Although this movie is entirely fictional, a lot of the central themes (racism, crime punishment, gang pervasiveness, and one’s own vulnerability) are accurate representations of the very problems that essentially afflict us as a society.