Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on irony in short stories
The physicians tale essay
Content analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on irony in short stories
The Physician's tale in Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales is fascinating not because of its content, but rather because of the role that it plays both for the Physician and for Chaucer the author. Initially seeming to be little more than a brief, depressing tale of beauty and loss, the story is later revealed to be both an ineffective veil for the Physician's flawed character and a window into the vanity of the pilgrims as a collection. Any poignancy that would otherwise exist regarding the knight Virginius and his pious daughter Virginia is completely torn asunder by the glaring contradictions, ironies, and duplicities of the Physician. This tale has little merit in terms of its message, but instead it is merely a ploy by the Physician …show more content…
He mourns the death of Virginia, wailing that it thoroughly upset him, yet he claims that "yiftes of Fortune and of Nature / been cause of deeth to many a creature. / Hire beautee was hire deth, I dar wel sayn." He completely misses the irony of the Physician's condemnation of agency used for evil and his victimization of the sole character that truly had the ability to do so. It is astonishing that this is lost on him, especially with the presence of such egregious 'lamentations' from Virginius such as "o deere doghter, endere of my lyf," which is a complete inversion of the true situation. Yet what the Host misses in terms of the irony of the letter he perceives in the irony of the spirit of the tale. He claims, "This is a pitous tale for to heere. / But nathelees, passe over; is no fors. / I pray to God so save thy gentil cors, / and eek thyne urynals and thy jurdones, thyn ypocras, and eek thy galiones, / and every boyste ful of thy letuarie; / God blesse hem, and our lady Seinte Marie!" He bemoans the death of Virginia for a number of lines, and then quickly dismisses this pity and says let us instead pray for the prosperity of this man's profession; the death of this innocent girl does not matter, but apparently praying for instruments such as urine analysis kits does. He is saying let us pray for life and prosperity, but let it be for those which are physical and tangible forms of them (the letters of them) rather than for what is truly intended by Christianity: spiritual life and prosperity in terms of love and peace (the spirit of them). This is an absurd statement to make, to so thoroughly sully the conventions of religion by mixing them with the corporeal; and if the host is not explicitly jabbing at the Physician here then Chaucer the author certainly
The difference between the tale of the Three Brothers and the Pardoners Tale is that in the Pardoners Tale the pardoner told a story of three rioters while the Tale of the three brothers was about three brothers. Unlike the tale of the three brothers, the rioters went searching for death because they wanted revenge. When they found the old man, he said he knew where death was after the three men threatened him and said he was in an old grove and pointed in the direction. When they came upon death they forgot it was death they were searching for because they found 8 barrels full of gold. They wanted everything for themselves and they were willing to kill the other rioters to get it. So they sent the youngest one to go get supplies in the town
Chaucer presents characters in the Physician's and Pardoner's Tales who are very similar to each other in one important way. Although the characters seem on the surface to be mirror images of each other, they have an important underlying similarity: both the physician and the pardoner are not what they appear to be to most people. Both are hypocritical, although they show this hypocrisy in different ways.
Honesty, it is a word that many use to describe someone who is truthful and someone you can trust. Money is also a very strong word and a very powerful one, it causes wars, lies, and can make a lot of people happy. Honesty and money are two words to describe the Pardoner honesty is the opposite of the Pardoner’s character and money is an important word to the Pardoner. Honesty has attributes such as integrity, truthfulness, straight forwardness, along with the absence of lying, cheating, theft (Dictionary). Honesty also involves being trustworthy, loyal, fair, and sincere. The characteristics of honesty are the complete opposite of the Pardoner. The Pardoner is not honest at all, he is the complete opposite of honest. The Pardoner is a man
middle of paper ... ... to extract money from his audience, the tale is morally beneficial to Chaucer’s contemporary audience; it shows the extent to which values had become mutated. The Tale also has a lasting resonance today; as we laugh at the humiliation of the pardoner by the Host we overlook the fact that what we think of as inversion of values in the Pardoner is in fact present in us, a modern-day audience. Although it may have a moral effect on his usual “lewd” congregation, the Pardoner’s sermon does not seem to have a moral effect on the pilgrims as we see them simple continue on their way. They do not seem to consider to the moral questions raised by the Pardoner; he touches on issues such as the vices of gluttony, drunkenness and gambling which several of the pilgrims are undoubtedly guilty of, and contemporary issues such as death and the fallen nature of mankind.
Chaucer identifies a pardoner as his main character for the story and utilizes the situational and verbal irony found in the pardoner’s interactions and deplorable personality to demonstrate his belief in the corruption of the Roman Catholic Church during this time. Chaucer first begins his sly jab at the Church’s motives through the description of the Pardoner’s physical appearance and attitude in his “Canterbury Tales.” Chaucer uses the Pardoner as a representation of the Church as a whole, and by describing the Pardoner and his defects, is able to show what he thinks of the Roman Catholic Church. All people present in the “Canterbury Tales” must tell a tale as a part of a story-telling contest, and the pilgrim Chaucer, the character in the story Chaucer uses to portray himself, writes down the tales as they are told, as well as the story teller. The description of the Pardoner hints at the relationship and similarity between the Pardoner and the Church as a whole, as well as marks the beginning of the irony to be observed throughout the “Pardoner’s Prologue and Tale.”
The Canterbury Tales is a very popular and well known set of stories, written by Geoffrey Chaucer. This collection of stories is great entertainment and some even provide very good moral lessons; most of these stories show the contempt Chaucer had for the Church of England which had control at the time over most of England. Chaucer’s bias towards the corruption of the Church is best demonstrated in the Pardoner’s Prologue, in contradiction with the Parson’s Tale, and the level of power within the Church structure. These are two of the stories of the many that are in The Canterbury Tales. Chaucer uses the Pardoner as a high level leader who is corrupt and yet enables him to convert the sinners even if he does it for personal gain. While the Parson is of lower standing in the Church, he is not corrupt, and gives the message to the pilgrims so that they might be forgiven.
The structure Geoffrey Chaucer chose for his masterpiece, The Canterbury Tales, of utilizing a melange of narrative voices to tell separate tales allows him to explore and comment on subjects in a multitude of ways. Because of this structure of separate tales, the reader must regard as extremely significant when tales structurally overlap, for while the reader may find it difficult to render an accurate interpretation through one tale, comparing tales enables him to lessen the ambiguity of Chaucer’s meaning. The Clerk’s Tale and The Merchant’s Tale both take on the institution of marriage, but comment on it in entirely different manner, but both contain an indictment of patriarchal narcissism and conceit.
“The Canterbury Tales” was written in the 14th century by Geoffrey Chaucer. These tales constitutes a frame story which each pilgrim has to tell their own story to the Chaucer, the pilgrim; not the poet. As we know, the tale itself is a satire, but the stylistic structure in the tales creates a sense that can be a parody as well. To support this idea of parody, it is need to know the definition of parody and how Chaucer use this style to make his own ideas clear through the general prologue and the tales such as “The Miller’s Tale” and “The Knight’s Tale”.
The Physicians tale is one of Geoffrey Chaucer’s most powerful tales. It is about sin and lust. There are many characters in this tale whom are, Virginia the beautiful daughter of Virginius. Virginius who is a wealthy knight who has a daughter names Virginia. Appius who is in love with Virginius’ beauty and cannot stop thinking about her; and Claudius whom helps Appius with his sinister plan. Each of these characters are important in describing a physician.
The Canterbury Tales examines many important qualities of human nature. Chaucer purposely mocks the faults in his characters, and shows the hypocrisy and deceitfulness ...
...eveals insecurities of him in the process while that itself tells us more about the popular culture in this time. Chaucer, along with many of the other pilgrims attempts to place themselves in a socially desirable or even superior position. With the Narrator having the responsibility of articulating the tales to us in a coherent fashion, he might feel pressure to present himself as all-knowing or superior to his companions rather than show us an honest and unbiased point of view. After all, he is telling the story; the Narrator can ultimately choose to tell us whatever he pleases. The Narrator plays the role of telling tales and providing the groundwork for this pilgrimage story, but since his ideas and opinions are designed in such a particular way; he indirectly tells us so much more about not only about the pilgrimage but of this time period’s culture as a whole.
In the Pardoners Tale by Geoffrey Chaucer, the narrator, the Pardoner, is very greedy an deceitful. His tale is about three rioters who go on a mission to seek death and kill him. Instead of finding death, an old man guided them to a tree which had gold beneath it. The gold symbolizes death because it led the rioters to sin and they became very greedy. The three rioters and the pardoner have a lot in common.
The prologues that link the various Canterbury Tales shift effortlessly from ponderous drama to light comedy. The lamentable tale of Griselde gives way to the Host's complaint about his shrewish wife. This prologue further illustrates how each of the characters informs the tale he tells. The travelers largely tell tales that conform to their personal experiences or attitudes, such as the Merchant, whose awful marriage is the occasion for his tale about a difficult wife. In most cases the influence of the narrator on his tale is apparent, but the authorial touch lightly felt. The Merchant's Tale, for example, gains little from the prologue's information that the Merchant is disenchanted with his own marriage. Only a few of these tales exist largely as extensions of the characters who tell them; the Wife of Bath's Tale is the most prominent of these stories.
Chaucer’s "General Prologue" is remarkable in that it allows us to see not only what characters may claim to represent, but also how they really are inside. Chaucer’s depiction of the Friar, who should be a man of upstanding piety and virtue, makes it readily apparent that he is quite the opposite. The Friar’s elitist background and behavior, his begging-supported greed, and the vices that oppose true Christianity prove that he is a man of low moral standards. Certainly, Chaucer paints a masterful contrast of image vs. reality.
While in reflection of the readings this semester, I could not deny that Chaucer’s collection should be preserved as the author succeeded in what his stories were meant to accomplish: to “delight and instruct”. With the alluring variety of characters and entertaining situations which are described in well-chosen detail, each story is provided by the pilgrims. Additionally, as each of the chosen tales (as stated in the course reading syllabus) provides a lesson that is still relevant after five centuries, the “instruction” comes from these universal morals. Therefore, in the course of this essay, I wish to provide reason as to why The Canterbury Tales should be preserved by looking further into the selected tales (“The Miller’s Tale”, “The Nun’s Priest’s Tale”, and “The Wife of Bath’s Tale) in reference to the following: the literary variety expressed in the stories, the morals given in the selected tales, and its references to English society at Chaucer’s time. 1).