Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of colonization on Africa
Effects on the colonisation of africa
EUROPEAN IMPERIALISM and Africa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of colonization on Africa
“I know no national boundary where the Negro is concerned. The whole world is my province until Africa is free” (Garvey). These words by Marcus Garvey perfectly illustrate the spirit of unification that characterized the attitude of many people of African Descent as a direct result of the callous treatment that Africa as a whole suffered at the hands of Europeans. Europe not only ravished Africa of a significant resource in the millions of lives that it stole and enslaved. Europe also pillaged the continent with the brutal institution of colonization. The manacles of colonization inspired great suffering in the lands and lives of Africans examples include Land exploitation, labor exploitation and most significantly exploiting the minds and spirits of Africans through inhumane treatment. The disabling affliction imposed upon Africa by the White race was the driving force behind the idea of a Pan-African awareness. The narration at the beginning of the documentary King Leopold’s Ghost best articulates the driving force behind European Colonialism. “Natural resources inspire the most unnatural greed”. Natural resources account for the primary reason that Europe deemed it necessary to lay claim to Africa. As Cesaire points out in his essay Discourse on Colonialism there were many surface excuses given by Europeans for traveling to Africa, like missionary work, extending the rule of law, and curing diseases. Cesaire argues, “no one colonizes innocently” (Cesaire 39). This statement holds especially true for the Belgian colonizers of The Congo. Belgium nearly destroyed the land of The Congo with the implementation of cash crops. The colonizers forced Africans to specialize and grow cash crops. These crops were not... ... middle of paper ... ...upon the consciousness of Black people. Both Africans stolen from their homeland and Africans who had their homeland stolen from them share a sense of common grief with a common perpetrator in the White man. These shared sentiments are what gave rise to the Pan-African movement. The whole idea behind Pan African movement is that “Africa must be redeemed and all of us must pledge our manhood, our wealth, and our blood to this sacred cause” (Lynch). Africa needed to be redeemed from the ramifications of the exploitation that it suffered at the hands of Europeans. Examples of these ramifications are poverty, food shortages, corrupt political systems and the displacement and separation of Africa’s children. This reasoning leads to the conclusion that a Pan African consciousness developed as a direct result of the inhumane exploitation of people of African descent.
Since the 1880?s, when European nations colonized Africa, Europe had almost complete control over the continent, but this changed during the 1950?s and 60?s. By 1958, ten African countries had gained their independence, and sixteen more joined the list in 1960 alone. Although these nations? gain of independence demonstrates the ability of blacks to overpower their white oppressors, Baldwin argues ?The word ?independence? in Africa and the word ?integration? here are almost equally meaningless; that is, Europe has not yet left Africa, and black men here are not yet free? (336). While black people had been legally free in the United States since 1863, two decades before the European colonization of Africa, they were still not truly free, almost a century later.
Adam Hochschild's "King Leopold's Ghost" is a lost historical account starting in the late 19th century continuing into the 20th century of the enslavement of an entire country. The book tells the story of King Leopold and his selfish attempt to essentially make Belgium bigger starting with the Congo. This was all done under an elaborate "philanthropic" public relations curtain deceiving many countries along with the United States (the first to sign on in Leopold's claim of the Congo). There were many characters in the book ones that aided in the enslavement of the Congo and others that help bring light to the situation but the most important ones I thought were: King Leopold, a cold calculating, selfish leader, as a child he was crazy about geography and as an adult wasn't satisfied with his small kingdom of Belgium setting his sites on the Congo to expand. Hochschild compares Leopold to a director in a play he even says how brilliant he is in orchestrating the capture of the Congo. Another important character is King Leopold's, as Hochschild puts it, "Stagehand" Henry Morton Stanley. He was a surprisingly cruel person killing many natives of the Congo in his sophomore voyage through the interior of Africa (The first was to find Livingston). Leopold used Stanley to discuss treaties with African leaders granting Leopold control over the Congo. Some of the natives he talked to weren't even in the position to sign the treaties or they didn't know what they were signing.
King Leopold’s Ghost is a popular history telling the story how Europeans systematically exploited Africa. Special fork of King Leopold upholds colony of Congo which ran from the late 19th century to early 20th century. The Book actually starts story back during the age of exploration were European explore where would land on west coast Africa and try to engage trade and when they figure out when they could trade guns and other things white slaves undermine the stability of a lot of the states that were set up along the Congo river and also on the west coast of the Africa. What you see is a study political
Pan-Africanism by definition is a movement for the political union of all African nations (Merriam-Webster Dictionary). However, to me Pan Africanism has two meanings. The first meaning is all Africans and African Americans whether in Africa or in the diaspora coming together as brothers and sisters unifying as one. The second meaning is all the African nations coming together as one. The Pan African movement was brought about because the Africans and African Americans in the diaspora were tired of colonialism and slavery that was so reliant on their people. The movement began in the mid nineteenth century and it was led by people from the diaspora and leaders in Africa. Many people and events that played pivotal roles in this movement. Some
Pan Africanism, the possibility that people group of African plummet have regular interests and ought to be brought together. Generally, Pan-Africanism has frequently taken the state of a political or social movement. There are numerous assortments of Pan-Africanism. In its tightest political indication, Pan-Africanists imagine a bound together African country where all individuals of the African diaspora can live (“Pan Africanism” http://global.brintannica.com, 2016).
As a political figure, King Leopold of Belgium had minimal power, yet he acknowledged the political and financial advantages of colonization, and acquired the Congo as a private colony whereas Britain snatched up colonies globally, including the “crown jewel” of all colonies, India. Belgium and Britain demonstrated a stark contradiction of two opposing methods of colonization. These two countries methods’ of domination ultimately decide the fates of each party, conqueror and conquered, in the precarious gamble that is imperialism.... ... middle of paper ...
The strength of Pan-Africanism, at its height, came from its numbers — the support from the black community was extremely high. What drew this overwhelming support was the message of self-worth and a chance of self-identity throughout the African diaspora. Dubois and Garvey both held and promoted the belief that, as an alienated citizen in Ameri...
While Leopold II, the King of Belgium, desperately wanted an overseas colony, The Belgian people did not share his enthusiasm; which created the feelings of neglect and apathy Belgium had towards Congo. The Congo Free State, established “in the margins of the Berlin Conference” in 1885, allowed Leopold to “gain international recognition of his possession” which he had begun to take control of since the 1870s. However, while Leopold was securing control of the Congo, the Belgian people were not interested in controlling colonies, as they believed that colonies “would merely soak up resources that would be better used for social purposes at home.” Thus, the Belgian people decided to solve the problem of having an unwanted colony by separating the Belgian government from...
For the majority of the nineteenth century, European nations did not care enough to explore the unsafe Congo. Being new and unexplored, they did not want to take the risk of encountering deadly unknown diseases, which is why it was not considered a worthwhile area to take control of. But, unlike many others, King Leopold II seen profits when it came to the uncharted African land and stated “I do not want to miss us getting a slice of this magnificent African cake” in 1876. So, despite all the negative possibilities, in 1877 King Leopold II of Belgium assembled a team with Henry Morton Stanley to take a look at the unseen region and make treaties with native people. Not only did he believe that colonies could only bring positive feedback, such as economic progress and respect from other nations. He considered that it was his right to help the Con...
This class was filled with riveting topics that all had positive and negative impacts on Africa. As in most of the world, slavery, or involuntary human servitude, was practiced across Africa from prehistoric times to the modern era (Wright, 2000). The transatlantic slave trade was beneficial for the Elite Africans that sold the slaves to the Western Europeans because their economy predominantly depended on it. However, this trade left a mark on Africans that no one will ever be able to erase. For many Africans, just remembering that their ancestors were once slaves to another human, is something humiliating and shameful.
As we know, the majority of our past has challenges and the discontent, fighting to win independence from the Europeans. With the various readings we have discussed in the past couple of weeks about fighting for independence due to colonization. Also the troublesome view of race, human identity, and frustration. We will discuss a very important reading and viewing that is believed to best represent the main challenges that Africans’ went through during their difficult journey to independence, and identify conflicts. Blackass by Ignoi Barrett, will give us two very different examples but, very similar concepts on the role of independence and the war that colonization has been carried on in this new world in a political sense.
Africa’s struggle to maintain their sovereignty amidst the encroaching Europeans is as much a psychological battle as it is an economic and political one. The spillover effects the system of racial superiority had on the African continent fractured ...
An overwhelming majority of African nations has reclaimed their independence from their European mother countries. This did not stop the Europeans from leaving a permanent mark on the continent however. European colonialism has shaped modern-day Africa, a considerable amount for the worse, but also some for the better. Including these positive and negative effects, colonialism has also touched much of Africa’s history and culture especially in recent years.
In conclusion, the arrival of the Europeans to Africa impacted negatively on the continent. It led cruelty, hatred, division, mistreatment and color discrimination towards the Africans. This led to wide suffering, murder, torture, poverty, under development and exploitation of the African resources. The consequences of European colonization can be felt in Africa to date in the extreme activities such as the genocide in Rwanda. Africa is also characterized by ethnic violence, slums, landlessness and underdevelopment which can all be traced to the European invasion of the continent.
In the histories of many different nations there has was a beginning to each that is just as diverse as the nations and countries that make up this world. Some have maintained and identity that holds still today, some have risen out of the ashes of warfare, and some have been forced into making a decision to fight or assimilate in and against other countries. When it comes to the latter no other regions understand this better than Asia and Africa, now Asia and Africa are vast regions that contain a large majority of population and land area. So much so that all will not be covered, not because they cannot be but because some do not belong in the conversation of this paper. Some cannot hold claim to be instrumental in what is Afro-Asia Solidarity, although the goal of Afro-Asia was to ensure the opposite. Many countries if not almost all located in Asia and Africa were colonized by the pillars of western civilization which led to these regions having a common enemy, the term Afro-Asia derived from the need to support one another as countries began to come into their own or were trying to. At the conception of this idea thing were promising for both Asian and African sides, but along the way something went wrong because in the discussion of Pan Africanism and Anti Imperialism the topic is lesser known and easily disregarded. To provide insight into as why this happened this happened one must set the stage by providing the past circumstances the developed into Afro-Asian Solidarity.The beginning of this struggle has to begin during the age of imperialism, now there where a culmination of events that lead to this age and many countries were to blame. Although before this age of which countries like Great Britain, France, Portugal, and...