Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparative essay of the other wes moore
Comparative essay of the other wes moore
Essay on the other wes moore
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparative essay of the other wes moore
Malcolm Gladwell once said, “...people who are outliers—in men and women who, for one reason or another, are so accomplished and so extraordinary and so outside of ordinary experience that they are as puzzling to the rest of us as a cold day in August.” The author, Wes Moore, of the book, The Other Wes Moore, is considered an outlier through the “Gladwellian” lens based off of Gladwell’s book, Outliers. Wes’s story demonstrates objectives that define him as an outlier with the contributions of where he’s from, his advantages, and also his attitude over his ability. These contributions therefore define him as an outlier through the “Gladwellian” lens. The contribution of Wes’s background played a role in him being an outlier. In Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell states that, “It is only by asking where they are from that we can unravel the logic behind who succeeds and who doesn’t” (19). …show more content…
Many parts of Wes’s life through the “Gladwellian” lens have played a contribution towards him being an outlier. The lessons he was raised with has played a large part. He will not disrespect women and he will think before he acts. These lessons have helped keep him on the right path. Even though at times, he may want to ignore them, his background tells him otherwise. The advantages he had also played a significant role. His mother’s sacrifices and good intentions have given him an advantage that has allowed him to obtain greater opportunities. Military school has not only given him more opportunities, it has also changed his attitude and perspective. His attitude has allowed him higher ranks amongst his fellow cadets and also jobs and new experiences. Even though Wes has achieved great things, every outlier has one thing in common. They were not alone along the way. As Gladwell once said, “The culture we belong to and the legacies passed down by our forebears shape the patterns of our achievement in ways we cannot begin to imagine”
Throughout the book, Outliers: The Story of Success, Malcolm Gladwell focuses on using the rhetorical technique of pathos to aid his readers in understanding the formula for success. In one particular part of the book, Gladwell uses experiences and human problems as examples to support his idea that plane crashes and ethnicty are related and the greater idea that success is based on opportunity.
Ivan Glasenberg, the CEO of Glencore, once said “I stopped focusing on people being different, and started treating everyone the same way.” An authority figure refuses to acknowledge the differences in people, and treats different individuals the same way. Authoritarian figures have shut down people, mostly kids, who are different for years. Striving to reach a conformity in society, they refuse to recognize the uniqueness of every individual. Similarly, in the short story “Antaeus”, the main character, T.J., is evidently different from the rest of urban society, much to authority’s disliking. In Borden Deal’s short story “Antaeus”, the author uses the main character ,T.J., to demonstrate that when man is different from the rest of society,
Malcolm Gladwell, in the nonfiction book Outliers, claims that success stems from where you come from, and to find that you must look beyond the individual. Malcolm Gladwell develops and supports his claim by defining an outlier, then providing an example of how Stewart Wolf looked beyond the individual, and finally by giving the purpose of the book Outliers as a whole. Gladwell’s purpose is to explain the extenuating circumstances that allowed one group of people to become outliers in order to inform readers on how to be successful. The author writes in a serious and factual tone for the average person in society of both genders and all ethnicities who wants to become successful in life.
Christopher Paul Curtis wrote The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 throughout the course of 1995. The novel follows the Watsons, a black family living in Flint, Michigan during the Civil Rights Era. In a historical context, 1963 and the early 1990s have far more in common than one would expect. The Civil Rights Act was passed in 1964 following the church bombing in Birmingham, and yet race-based discrimination remains a problem even in our modern society via passive racism. This paper will analyze the ways in which Curtis’ The Watsons Go to Birmingham—1963 draws parallels between the time in which his is writing during and the time in which he is writing about. This analysis will also shed light on what can be called the “white standard,” wherein all things white are “good” or “better” and anything not-white is “bad.”
Therefore, one of the two Wes Moores became a prisoner, convicted for robbery and murder. And the other one is Rhodes scholar and become a famous author. Even though they grew up in the same environment, but there is a big difference: the author Wes’s parents graduated from college and well educated, while the other Wes’s parents even didn’t finish school. So, according to the book, the most significant effect in the two Wes Moores lives is the education level of their parents.
According to Milton Berle, “If opportunity doesn’t knock, build a door,” (Berle). As a college student, I agree with Berle, we can help create opportunity for ourselves and others. Recently, I finished the book “The Other Wes Moore” based on the lives of two individuals with the same name, Wes Moore, from Baltimore, Maryland. One Wes is sentenced in jail for the rest of his life, and the other Wes is a college graduate, an author, a husband, and a public speaker. The author Wes Moore claims “The chilling truth is that his story could have been mine. The tragedy is that my story could have been his,” (Moore). Once I read this I wanted to seek out an organization that is “building a door” for opportunity for high school students.
In “Outliers” Malcolm Gladwell organizes his argument for their being a rule for overall success by showing statistics of people who are defined as being successful such as Bill Gates, Billy Joy, and The Beatles. He also uses a Berlin music academy to help prove his rule. He presents an argument that Bill Gates and The Beatles and the violinist attending the music academy may have been born with innate talent but that is not the sole ...
Beyond buzzing courtrooms of segregated townspeople and skies raining ashes reeking of kerosene, Harper Lee’s Atticus Finch (To Kill A Mockingbird), and Ray Bradbury’s Guy Montag (Fahrenheit 451) are both sui generis characters in their own stories because of their shared similarities deeper than eyes, ears, and noses. From their burning passions for knowledge and literature to their patient, unbiased hearts, the two men shake their communities to new realizations. Their idiosyncrasies made the relentless lawyer and runaway fireman standout in a society where laws are governed by people blinded in the bliss of oblivion.
Ellison?s story is not about just one man. It is actually about an entire culture that even today is prejudged on skin color alone. Injustice and inequality are made to be ironic because they could so easily be switched around and used against the people who are prejudiced. Ellison seeks to show that they only way to advance is to take a chance and try, but that even with determination goals are often unattainable.
In Outliers: The Story of Success, Malcolm Gladwell analyzes numerous success stories in an attempt to understand the circumstances that make certain individuals particularly exceptional. Through his analysis, Gladwell strives to find an explanation for why some people succeed, while others, despite their persistent efforts, do not. He questions the validity of conventional attitudes towards accomplished figures—that these figures simply rise to fame as a result of sheer talent and ambition—and points out that the superficial summaries leave out crucial details. As Gladwell studies the lives of these “outliers,” from piano virtuosos to software moguls, he indicates that their success stemmed from a variety of components, including fortunate
To those of you that are willing to open your minds and consider the possibilities of new and different concepts in regard to the way our society views successful people and the reasons behind their success. Malcolm Gladwell’s book Outliers includes a variety of different interpretations in regard to who becomes successful and how they became successful. By reviewing and analyzing the logical, ethical, and emotional appeals that Gladwell uses in “Chapter Two” to convince the audience of his philosophies, you too will surely be enlighten and convinced.. This will also clearly show that Gladwell relies more on a logical approach for his argument, then he does on his subtle ethical and emotional appeal
The ideas presented in Outliers are surprisingly aligned with my own. It makes sense to me that a person’s success isn’t all about ability and his or her individual merit. In the past I have reflected upon my successes to find that I was not alone while achieving them. I have been given tremendous opportunities in life. I have always challenged my own definitions, and I like the spin Malcolm Gladwell puts on his.
In the film, ‘Hacksaw Ridge’, there are many displays of concepts that we recently learned in sociology this year. The film is about a Christian, named Desmond, who decides to join the army during World War II. However, he has a very specific and socially unaccepted request of his time in the army. Usually when fighting in the army, the soldier carries a gun. In this film, Demond refuses to carry a gun during war due to his Christian faith and declaration against killing others. He decides to join as a combat medic, and is highly challenged and discouraged by other military members and officers during his training. This is a true story.
Another aspect of Gladwell’s article that I found interesting was his in-depth investigation of the specific cases of racism. With each example, Gladwell uses his criteria to break down the situation and determine the degree of racism that was conveyed by Michael Richards, Mel Gibson, and Michael Irvin.
Gladwell was able to earn as much as $40,000 per lecture because of his book.The book served as its own tipping point for Gladwell’s career. Sales increased again in 2006 after the release of Gladwell's next book, Blink. As cliffnotes.com says, Blink is about "thin slicing" which using information to form opinions. Gladwell explains that thin slicing is used to able us to make decisions quickly. Gladwell uses an example of buying jam in Blink. Let’s say a customer goes to a supermarket- because of “thin slicing” consumers are more likely to purchase jam if there are less to choose from. Although, snap decisions can go wrong. Gladwell also examines how racial biases can be subconscious and affect how we think about other groups of people. He uses bias to tell the story of Amadou Diallo. Amadou was shown by the police because of racial bias. The police officer thought he was armed with a gun. They used his race, being African American, to make a quick judgment. This incident demonstrates how relying on snap judgments can have negative consequences, like