Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hannah arendt the human condition short summary
Hannah arendt the human condition short summary
Hannah Arendt’s critique of ideology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Hannah arendt the human condition short summary
Hannah Arendt (1906-1975) was a German born political theorist. She was often described as a philosopher. She rejected that labeled on the grounds that philosophy is concerned with “man in the singular”. Instead she described herself as a political theorist because her work centers on the fact that ‘men, not Man, live on the earth and inhabit the world.” As an assimilated Jew, she escaped Europe during the Holocaust and became an American citizen. Her works deal with nature of power, and the subjects of politics, direct democracy, authority, and totalitarianism. (en.wikipedia.com) In The Origins of Totalitarianism, Hannah Arendt wrote about the rise of anti-Semitism, in the Central and Western Europe in the 1800s. Hannah Arendt was a Jewish …show more content…
She examines European colonial imperialism from 1884 to the outbreak of World War I. The institutions and operations of totalitarianism movements are explored. Nazi Germany and Stalinist Russia were the two forms totalitarianism government she focused on in the book. Written during the Cold War period and just after the Second World War, this book takes an important look into the minds of totalitarian leaders such as Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin. The Origins of Totalitarianism is broken down in to three sections; anti-Semitism, imperialism, and totalitarianism.
The first part of The Origins of Totalitarianism is about the historical origin of anti-Semitism. Hannah Arendt explores the rise of anti-Semitism in the birth of the nation-state, the emancipation of the Jews, the rise of the Jewish bankers, the roles of Jews within society, and the Dreyfus Affair. It happened in France at the end of the year 1894. Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish officer of the French General Staff, was accused and convicted of espionage for Germany. (Arendt p.89) Although it was known to be that Alfred Dreyfus was innocent, his trial and imprisonment, and attempted suppression of evidence that would have freed him, revealed the anti-Semitic climate of both the army and
…show more content…
Each class that came into open conflict with the state turned anti-Semitic. According to Hannah Arendt, Schoenerer’s agitation with the disadvantages for the nationalization of Austrian railroads, the major part of which had been in the hands of the Rothschild’s since 1836 due to a state license which expired in 1886, became the actual beginning of articulate anti-Semitic movement is Austria. Schoenerer’s movement was defeated by the Christian Socials under the leadership of Lueger. The decades when Lueger ruled Vienna were actually a kind of golden age for the Jews. Christian Socials never attacked the monarchy because the Hapsburg were a German house and had granted their German subject a certain predominance. Bagetelle pour un Massacre (1938) by Louis Ferdinand Celine went straight to the core and demanded the massacre of all Jews. In the Golden Age of Security, a section in the first part of The Origins of Totalitarianism, Arendt discusses how the more the government lost in power and prestige, the less attention was paid to the Jews. The declining need for Jewish services threatened Jewish bankers with extinction and forced certain shifts in Jewish occupations. She talks about how more and more Jews left state finance for independent
It was during the 1920’s to the 1940’s that totalitarian control over the state escalated into full dictatorships, with the wills of the people being manipulated into a set of beliefs that would promote the fascist state and “doctrines”.
Tucker, Robert C. "Stalinism as Revolution from Above". Stalinism. Edited by Robert C. Tucker. New York: American Council of Learned Societies, 1999.
Anti-Semitism is the hatred and discrimination of those with a Jewish heritage. It is generally connected to the Holocaust, but the book by Helmut Walser Smith, The Butcher’s Tale shows the rise of anti-Semitism from a grassroots effect. Smith uses newspapers, court orders, and written accounts to write the history and growth of anti-Semitism in a small German town. The book focuses on how anti-Semitism was spread by fear mongering, the conflict between classes, and also the role of the government.
Beginning with the economic level of analysis, Smith points out how accusations regarding the Jews concerning the murder of Ernst Winter generally had a common trait in that several of the accusers had either “worked for the Jews they accused or had been in close business relationships with them” (Smith 2002, 139). Smith goes on to note that these accusers often came from low-class or low-middle class citizens and consisted of “unskilled workers, day laborers, masons and a civil servant, a prison guard and a night watchman, a poor farmer and his family, a handful of apprentices, and a large number of servant girls” (Smith 2002, 139). Unsurprisingly, Smith explains that the result of such noticeable differences in the possession of wealth between Konitz citizens led to poorer Christians seeking to place blame on Jews of middle-class status; thereby creating a “rudimentary form of economic or class protest” (Smith 2002, 140). However, Helmut Walser Smith is quick to indicate that this form of analysis cannot solely provide an answer to the rise of anti-Semitic sentiment in Imperial Germany. This explanation, Smith says, is rather simple; although it is true that Christians were perhaps motivated to falsely accuse their Jewish neighbors due to their social and economic trials, not all Konitz-residing Christians were disadvantaged and not all Konitz Jews
Under a backdrop of systematic fear and terror, the Stalinist juggernaut flourished. Stalin’s purges, otherwise known as the “Great Terror”, grew from his obsession and desire for sole dictatorship, marking a period of extreme persecution and oppression in the Soviet Union during the late 1930s. “The purges did not merely remove potential enemies. They also raised up a new ruling elite which Stalin had reason to think he would find more dependable.” (Historian David Christian, 1994). While Stalin purged virtually all his potential enemies, he not only profited from removing his long-term opponents, but in doing so, also caused fear in future ones. This created a party that had virtually no opposition, a new ruling elite that would be unstoppable, and in turn negatively impacted a range of sections such as the Communist Party, the people of Russia and the progress in the Soviet community, as well as the military in late 1930 Soviet society.
One of the worst nations to suffer from Stalin’s great purges in the Soviet Union was not the Russians. Fascist sought to rejuvenate their nation based on commitment to the national community as an organic entity which individuals are bound together by ancestry, culture, and blood which are all super personal connections. However, even though Stalin did enforce Russia of the Soviet Union the main enemies of his were the political opponents and their followers. His most ferocious acts of terror “The Great Purges” took place between 1934 and 1939.
Gesink, Indira. "Fascism, Nazism and Road to WWII." World Civilizations II. Baldwin Wallace University. Marting Hall, Berea. 3 April 2014. Class lecture.
Totalitarianism in Pre-War Europe Totalitarianism refers to a system of government and parliamentary ideology that was in many of the countries of Europe between the years 1918-1939. This period saw many ideologies being developed and put into practice, and many even blame the rise of totalitarian states and aggressive, autocratic leaders for the Second World War. Totalitarianism is often associated with regimes in which there is one leader and party unquestionably in power with no significant rivals. In a totalitarian state, the ideology of the party is often firmly indoctrinated.
According to Hannah Arendt, “The Declaration of the Rights of Man at the end of the eighteenth century was a turning point in history”. (Arendt, 290). She begins her thesis by making this affirmation. However, throughout her essay, she further develops the idea that this “Declaration of the Rights of Man” has been questioned ever since then, because of the fact that these human rights don’t really appear to be implemented over a numerous amount of human beings. This “turning point” which Arendt refers to, indicates that when human rights were first conceived, they stated that only the nation worked as the law, and neither the divine law nor anything else had power over them. This was the moment when control over these rights was lost, since there is a deficiency in the precision of who really has the rule of law over them, if not even the human authorities have been able to manage the “universality” they are supposed to express. Hannah Arendt’s explanation on the human rights article called “The
In order to conclude the extent to which the Great Terror strengthened or weakened the USSR, the question is essentially whether totalitarianism strengthened or weakened the Soviet Union? Perhaps under the circumstances of the 1930s in the approach to war a dictatorship may have benefited the country in some way through strong leadership, the unifying effect of reintroducing Russian nationalism and increased party obedience. The effects of the purges on the political structure and community of the USSR can be described (as Peter Kenez asserts) as an overall change from a party led dictatorship to the dictatorship of a single individual; Stalin. Overall power was centred on Stalin, under whom an increasingly bureaucratic hierarchy of party officials worked. During the purges Stalin's personal power can be seen to increase at the cost of the party.
The Great Terror, an outbreak of organised bloodshed that infected the Communist Party and Soviet society in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), took place in the years 1934 to 1940. The Terror was created by the hegemonic figure, Joseph Stalin, one of the most powerful and lethal dictators in history. His paranoia and yearning to be a complete autocrat was enforced by the People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs (NKVD), the communist police. Stalin’s ambition saw his determination to eliminate rivals such as followers of Leon Trotsky, a political enemy. The overall concept and practices of the Terror impacted on the communist party, government officials and the peasants. The NKVD, Stalin’s instrument for carrying out the Terror, the show trials and the purges, particularly affected the intelligentsia.
While she was studying profusely she interrupted her studies to “work and study Jewish culture at Yivo, the legendary research institute in Vilna, Poland.” (Lucy Dawidowicz, The War Against The Jews 1933-1945 (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1986), Front Cover.) She studied here for a rewarding year and then returned to New York to study more with the Yivo. After the debilitating WWII ended, she went over to Europe where she helped the Jewish people “recreate schools and libraries, and she recovered vast collections of books. 2 seized by the Nazis”.
The Nazi government achieved there power through fear from the terror of the SS and Gestapo, and the feared Police State is a characteristic of totalitarian States.
In Hannah Arendt’s work, The Human Condition, Arendt addresses the active life or Vita Activa and how the three major human activities are incorporated into the public and private realms. The private realm, in which finances and basic needs are met, exists within the household. The Public Realm involves politics and interaction between individuals. All interaction within the public realm requires the individual to have attained freedom. As society continues to develop, however, and the Modern Age takes over the rise of the Social Realm disrupts the hierarchy of these three human activities. Arendt writes about how this disruption damages the natural order. Each of the three human activities has it’s own place in society and by disrupting the natural order this shift towards the Social Realm causes issues for mankind.
Firmly defining politics can be just as difficult as it seems at times of forming any sort of political consensus. This is in part due to rhetorical nature of politics and also due to the competing visions of what politics are and its end aims. While some intellectuals such as Carl Schmitt might define politics and political motives purely in terms of conflict, reducing political distinctions simply to that of friend and enemy (Schmitt, 26), these definitions do not adequately explore the complex relationships or struggles that politics are often employed to address. As the writer Hannah Arendt agues in her book The Promises of Politics, “the meaning of politics, in the distinction to its end, is that men in their freedom can interact with