Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Creationism vs theory of evolution argumentative essay
Essays on the Origin of Life
Creation vs evolution debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Origin of Life
When considering the many theories involving “How life began” You must
not consider a few main theories but a few main theory groups. Because
there are literally hundreds of theories on this subject which can be
grouped in to three main categories and then in to various sub
categories.
1) Creation science
This consists of about twelve theories that are based on the book
Genesis all slightly varying in their interpretation. These can be
split into two main groups, New and Old earth creationists.
à New earth creationists believe that god created the earth its life
forms and the universe less than a thousand years ago. They also
believe the world was created within six days
à Old earth creationists believe that the world is billions of years
old they disagree with the new earth creationists because scientific
evidence shows that the earth is considerably older than ten thousand
years. Although they follow science on the earths age they believe
that the earth was created as described in genesis. However they
believe that the six days creation described in the bible in fact was
stretched over a large period of time.
Creation science is of course all based around Christianity there are
of course many other religions which in turn all have their own
creation beliefs.
2) Scientific views
This as the name suggests is the belief that life originated by a
number of scientific processes and there was no input from a god of
any kind at all. These theories agree on a few simple things the
universe is 15 billion years old and the earth is 4.5 billion years
old. Then...
... middle of paper ...
...d within a
couple of days of each other, amoebas and mammals were only created
two days apart. They also believe that this all happened in about 4000
bc.
Therefore the main arguments against creation science are firstly that
life began billions of years ago not around 6000 years ago. Secondly
that it then took billions of years more for mammals to evolve not the
few days that were described in the bible.
Therefore the story of creation according to genesis is widely
discredited by scientists.
Personally as a scientist I believe that life was created by chemical
means as proven by Miller. However I do not believe that this was a
totally scientific process I think that it was someway controlled or
perfectly arranged by a divine influence.
So overall I would place myself in the theistic evolution category.
Many discoveries have been made that give more and more clues to the history of life on earth. Paleontologists find artifacts throughout the world that not only answer many questions but also raise many new ones. A topic that is still a mystery today is the origin of man. Scientists often debate over where man originated from and who some of his prehistoric relatives were. Some people think that all men are related, and that there has been inter breeding between different groups of men. (I.e. the Neanderthals from Eurasia at some point bred with the homo sapiens of Africa.) Others believe that certain groups of men evolved in a completely different time period in a completely different place.
The Origin of Life has long been debated about. In result to that there are many hypotheses that each claim that’s how life started. Some of them claim life came from space, others from clay and even hydrothermal vents. However, they’re only theories which is why many experiments and research going into proving them. Many great minds such as Alexander Oparin, Gunter Wachtershauser, Robert Vrijenhoek and Louis Pasteur are the brains behind the hypotheses which is what makes them even more interesting to test out. The hypotheses that I researched were the Primordial Soup Hypothesis, the Iron-Sulfur World Hypothesis, the Deep Sea Vent Hypothesis, the RNA World Hypothesis, the Community Clay Hypothesis and the Panspermia Hypothesis.
The Evolutionist worldview believes that everything in the universe: “a process in which something passes by degrees to a different stage (especially a more advanced or mature stage)”; including life, came forth of a naturalistic cause. From a simplistic form of some sort and gradually develops over billions and billions of years into a more complex complicated system as we see today, such as life. In essence, “In the beginning” nothing created everything. Everything we see, hear, touch, taste, and smell in this universe exist because of an undirected cause. However, with the advancement of technology, when one re-examining the previous physical evidence, evidences that are believed to be undeniable proof, as well as examining new evidence; reveals an obvious contradiction to the theory of Evolution and a flat out theory based on lies. Evidences such as the supposed “missing links” or transitional form between the early ancestors of hominid, an ape like creature “a primate belonging to a family of which the modern human being is the only species still in existence” and human is of most controversial and debated issue (Dictionary).
explosion; nothing turns into something, and the world as we know it is formed. Or, there is a one true God who formed this world through supernatural means and created man out of the dust. Both seem pretty far-fetched for the ultimate answer to the preeminent question of the age: Why we are here and where we came from. Evolution is assumed to be true due to the fact that it seems to be proven by natural scientific organic processes, and Christianity is assumed to be false because it is based off some book that a bunch of random people wrote form 5,000 years ago. All of this would be postulated if this paper was written by the general populous, but this is not the case. In this paper, evolutionism, also called Darwinism, and creationism will be compared and contrasted, and in the end, give substantial information as to why creationism is the only conceivable answer.
After Sir Charles Darwin had introduced his original theory about the origins of species and evolution, humanity’s faith in God that remained undisputed for hundreds of years had reeled. The former unity fractured into the evolutionists, who believed that life as we see it today had developed from smaller and more primitive organisms, and creationists, who kept believing that life in all its diversity was created by a higher entity. Each side introduced substantial arguments to support their claims, but at the same time the counter-arguments of each opponent are also credible. Therefore, the debates between the evolutionists and the creationists seem to be far from ending. And though their arguments are completely opposite, they can co-exist or even complement each other.
Frankenstein was written by a woman named Mary Shelley. This story is considered to be one of the earliest examples of science fiction. Mary Shelley did not have a good life. There were always bad events occurring in Shelley’s life. Before the age of 30, Mary Shelley had lost her mother, sister, father, husband, and three of her four children. She battled depression all of her life and finally died in London at the age of fifty-four. After all of these terrible things that happened to her, people can probably understand how she came up with such a horror story like Frankenstein. In this novel, the main character is Victor Frankenstein. After Victor mother dies, he leaves and goes to England. In England is where he created this monster that he soon regrets. Victor abandons the creature, and the creature makes it his duty to find his creator and wreak havoc along the way. This horrifying sci-fi story could only be written and told by Mary Shelley, an individual that had such a horrible life.
telling her, “You will not die; for God knows that when you eat of it
If you were told to believe a side of an argument that did not have majority of evidence points on its side, would you? The theories of evolution, creation and intelligent design have been a debated controversy for years and years. These three theories have three different ideas. The theory that creationists have is to believe that concept and design require a Creator. Creationists usually tend to believe that each organism is created as a single and distinct organism. Evolutionists tend to believe that all life started from single celled organisms. They believe that these single celled organisms are part of a continuing evolution over a very long period of time and that this evolution results in the development of new varieties and different species. People who believe in intelligent design believe in the theory that the universe cannot have arisen by chance and was designed and created by some intelligent entity. Evolution is the theory that is most probable because of the fossil record, similarities in all organisms and genetic changes in a population over time.
Creation and Science We have all heard about the evolution vs. creation debate. Two sides opposing each other in fits of heated passion. One group believes that humans developed from monkeys, and the other group is a bunch of religious fanatics. Does this sound somewhat familiar?
In the history of science vs. religion there have been no issues more intensely debated than evolution vs. creationism. The issue is passionately debated since the majority of evidence is in favor of evolution, but the creation point of view can never be proved wrong because of religious belief. Human creation breaks down into three simple beliefs; creation theory, naturalistic evolution theory, and theistic evolution theory. The complexities of all three sides create a dilemma for what theory to support among all people, religious and non-religious.
There is a long line of history surrounding evolution. Theories really stated with creationism. According to Donald R. Prothero, leading paleontologist, creationism is the belief that living organisms in the unive...
Evolution views life to be a process by which organisms diversified from earlier forms, whereas creation illustrates that life was created by a supernatural being. Creation and evolution both agree on the existence of microevolution and the resemblance of apes and humans but vary in terms of interpreting the origins of the life from a historical standpoint. A concept known as Faith Vs Fact comprehensively summarizes the tone of this debate, which leads to the question of how life began. While creation represents a religious understanding of life, evolution acknowledges a scientific interpretation of the origins of life. The theory is illustrated as the process by which organisms change species over time.
Should we as humans expect to find intelligent life elsewhere in the Universe? There are many reasons for and against this concept, but first we should trace just how our terrestrial life started.
Mankind’s origin is from God through creation. The Bible tells us in Genesis chapter 1 verse 27; So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him: male and female created He them. The Bible also says in Genesis chapter 2 verse 7, And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
Presently, the Big Bang theory is the most logical scientific explanation of how the universe began. The majority of cosmologists favor the Big Bang theory and the idea that the expanding universe had an initial, incredibly hot and dense start (Peterson 232). According to the Big Bang theory, at one point in time, more than 12 billion years ago, matter was condensed in a single place, and a huge explosion scattered matter out is all directions (“Big Bang Theory” 403). At the moment of its origin, the universe was infinitely dense and hot, but as the expansion occurred, the universe cooled and became less dense (Narlikar 12). The debris the spewed from the initial explosion became the building blocks of matter, forming the planets, stars, and galaxies (Narlikar 12). Officially, the Big Bang model is called the standard cosmological model (SCH), and it has been the most widely accepted theory of the origin of the universe since the 1960s (Rich and Stingl 1). Most astronomers are in agreement that the universe’s beginning can be traced back to 10 to 15 billion years ago following some type of explosive start (Narlikar 12). Big Bang theorists have estimated the actual bang occurred 13.7 billion years ago and was followed by an inflationary period that created time, matter, and space (Rich and Stingl 1).