The Norman Conquest and
Dynasty of William the Conqueror
The Norman Conquest of Anglo-Saxon England (1066)
Duke William of Normandy’s claim on England’s crown was based, in part, on the fact that he was distantly related to Edward the Confessor, the Saxon King of England. However, his more legitimate claim also was based on an event that occurred in 1054 when Harold of Wessex was shipwrecked on the shore of Normandy. Harold was rescued, and then imprisoned by his host, Duke William of Normandy. To secure his release, Harold was required to swear an oath that, after sickly King Edward the Confessor died, Harold would support William’s claim for the crown of England. Harold did not intend to honor this pledge, but, to his consternation,
…show more content…
She identified his body among the fallen, and testified that Harold was, indeed, dead. A stone memorial near Battle Abbey, Hastings, marks the place Harold is believed to have fallen. After the battle, Harold’s body was moved to Waltham Abbey, Essex, for burial. Harold of Wessex was the last Anglo-Saxon King of England. His line ran out, and made no contribution to later monarchies of England. His Queen Aldgyth (Edith) of Mercia had previously been married to Gruffydd ap Llyellyn, Prince of Wales. Aldgyth married Harold only a few months before the Battle of Hastings. Their only son, Harold, Jr. (there may have been twins), was born three months after his father’s death at Hastings. Queen Aldgyth and her infant son escaped to exile in France. The last record of their survival is dated 1075; what finally became of them is …show more content…
Although he was, in name, King of all England, it took two decades for William I to subdue all Saxon England. His conquest was a relentless exercise of will and purpose. At each step in William’s advance across England, strongholds were built to secure his rule. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle reports that ‘hundreds of castles were constructed’ throughout the land. One must downscale first impressions of what that frenzy of castle building actually entailed. The Norman fortifications were stockade constructions, similar to those hastily built to protect settlers during Indian Wars of the 18th Century in frontier Colonial
Kapelle, W.E. ‘The Norman conquest of the North:The region and its transformation 1000-1135’ (Croom Helm 1979)
When we look at Henry as a king we have to look in the context of
The Agreement between Lord and Vassal is an account of a relationship between Hugh of Lusignan and William V of Aquitaine (who was also Count of Poitiers ). This account is seen through the perspective of Hugh, and provides examples of different powers, actions, and decisions of lords and vassals. According to the introduction of the Agreement, this account was "wrote or dictated " between 1020 and 1025 . Through criticism and analysis of this source, I hope to determine what information historians can gather from a first-person document and how/if this document has a place in the milieu of history.
Every historian interprets the past differently and with distinctive perspectives, resulting in many sides to one story. Often the reader must decide which perspective is more logical, likely, or coherent. Recounting one war took a lot of time and effort because of the necessity to include all sides of the story. Becher, Barbero, Collins and Backman have approached the life of Charlemagne with different points of view; however, Barbero seems to have the strongest argument for the cause of the Saxon War. The other historians were less willing to see the Saxon war as a religious war. The life of Charlemagne was interesting to historians because it was filled with many vigorous wars that he fought including the infamous Saxon War. From the beginning of his life, Charlemagne was destined to rule a nation and lead his people into war, achieving both triumphant victories and devastating defeats. He died of sickness in old age, thus leaving the kingdom in the hands of his son. The Saxon war was the most persistent, yet hostile war he fought because of the determination and severity of the enemy. However, the questions remain: “What actually caused the Saxon war? What gave it life? What are all the different events that occurred during this war? What are some of the strategies used during this war?” The wars he fought resulted in his success as a ruler and as a historical figure to reflect on when considering the greatness of kings.
William was a better leader because although Harold had the upper hand in the battle and they were losing, William managed to outwit and defeat the English. In the Bayeux Tapestry there is a scene depicting that in the days preceding the Battle of Hastings, the wind direction changed and William and his army took this opportunity and managed to cross the Channel while Harold was still in the North. When they arrived, they made a fortified camp. William fed his troops, arranged them carefully and used them well in battle. Whilst in battle, William’s troops were getting killed because Harold’s troops had a strong position. Then he made a plan – he made his troops look like they were retreating and Harold and his army followed them, leaving their strong position on the hill, enabling William to defeat them as they walked into his trap.
honorble ruler. Henry IV was king of France between 1589 and 1610. He was supported
1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.
Even though William the Conqueror descended from a line of Vikings who had lived in France for over 200 years, William had more of an impact on the English language than the majority of influential English people of the time. The “French-speaking Normans brought a whole new vocabulary to England, whose language was closely related to German”(Barlow 8). Although he is most well known for the Norman invasion of 1066 that overthrew the Anglo Saxon reign, which had lasted for over six centuries, William was a very religious man. He was moral and righteous by the standards of the time, and devoted much of his time to the Norman church.
October 14th 1066 he and William fought at the famous battle of Hastings. William and his army of Normans came, saw, and conquered. True to his promise to his fellow warriors, William systematically replaced the English nobility with Norman barons and noblemen who took control of the land, the people, and the government.
King Henry IV was the great-grandson of Edward III who also thought that he was entitled to rule France and so the battles continued. In 1387, Henry IV had three sons one of which was named Prince Hal. Price Hal was groomed to be king and continued the fight with France for territory as his father and grandfather had done. He believe...
Although Charles V’s reign was not as successful as he would have liked, he is credited with carrying on the very powerful Hapsburg line. All of the children he fathered went on to continue it. His son, Phillip II, married Mary of England (7) who is also known as Bloody Mary (13). This marriage made him Queen Elizabeth I of England’s brother-in-law. Marriages of Charles V’s descendents to the royal elite of Europe assured the Hapsburg legacy for many generations to follow (7).
Henry VIII was born on June 28, 1491 at Greenwich Palace. His Parents, Henry VII and Elizabeth of York, were very loving and proud parents, even though they didn’t see much of their children. Henry was their second son. He was styled as the “Duke of York”. He had his own servants, Court Jesters, and to top it off he had is own whipping boy that would receive whippings whenever Henry did something bad.
King Henry VII was next in line to take over the throne, but could not, because of Richard the 3rd was king at that time. In August 22, 1485, Henry changed all of that, during the battle of Bosworthfield Henry killed Richard and became king of England (Meyer, G.J. pg114). During the time of King Henry’s reign there was a war going on between two families, The York and The Lancaster family. This war was known as the War of the Roses and had gone on for centuries, but Henry changed that on January 18, 1486, Henry of the Lancaster family and Elizabeth of the York family got married, because of their marriage the war had ended and it brought peace to England once again. King Henry and Elizabeth ended up having four kids, Arthur, Margaret, Henry, and Mary. Only two of them became rulers of England.
Alfred was not the average king. He encourages learning in young men and he loved to help protect people of all classes. In 870ce Alfred went to war against the Vikings, and the Battle of Ashdown was the first war the Vikings had lost. The Vikings had conquered all of the Anglo Saxon Kingdoms except Wessex (Alfred’s kingdom). Eight years later Alfre fought the Danish King and his army. With the surprise attack by the Danes, Alfred was lucky to escape with only a few of his men. Alfred the built his army and counter attacked the Danes. The battle was a fierce war. Alfred came out victorious and negotiated for the Vikings to turn to Christianity, they also had to remain on the Eastern side of Britain in Danelaw.
The Anglo Saxon period is the oldest known period of time that had a complex culture with stable government, art, and a fairly large amount of literature. Many people believe that the culture then was extremely unsophisticated, but it was actually extremely advanced for the time. Despite the many advancements, the period was almost always in a state of war. Despite this fact, the Anglo-Saxon period is a time filled with great advancements and discoveries in culture, society, government, religion, literature, and art.